From 985760be7cd9215e9ca15e57980f9ab2b21d7f60 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: eulaly Date: Thu, 7 May 2026 18:07:45 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] tesging images --- docs/vatownhall.md | 157 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 157 insertions(+) create mode 100644 docs/vatownhall.md diff --git a/docs/vatownhall.md b/docs/vatownhall.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..f777cae --- /dev/null +++ b/docs/vatownhall.md @@ -0,0 +1,157 @@ + +# Table of Contents + +1. [Project Goals](#org214014d) + 1. [Research questions](#org54bfaa9) + 2. [Architecture](#orgf2c1000) + 1. [Scraper](#org88a423d) + 2. [Analysis](#orga217037) + 3. [Storage](#org73d6f34) + 3. [Instructions](#org672fefe) +2. [Roadmap](#org084df10) + + + + +## Project Goals + +1. Document and analyze sentiment of public comments on Virginia law, to determine: + 1. the utility of this forum as a mechanism for public comment, and + 2. the impact of this forum on Virginia regulation. +2. Make data and insights broadly available. +3. Generalize to other public comment tools. + + + + +### Research questions + +1. What is the quality of the comments on the forum? + 1. Are there duplicate entries? + 2. Are there non-human-generated entries? + 3. Are there entries intended to abuse the forum or drown out comment? +2. How do commenters feel about the proposed change? + 1. What is the total number and percent supporting vs opposing, and how does this change over time? + 2. What is the type of support, such as strong/weak, positive/negative? +3. What impact do the comments have on the proposed change? + (I anticipate this will not be measurable from currently available data) + + + + +## Architecture + +1. Scrape/Parse: Scrapy +2. Sentiment analysis: gpt-5.4-mini +3. Display: streamlit +4. Storage: jsonl, csv, parquet + +![](./docs/pipeline-v1.2.3.svg) + + + + +### Scraper + +Scrapy provides a simple mechanism for retrieving, parsing, and saving content form the forums. + +1. Forums listing page: \`Forums.cfm\` - lists all open forums with agency, reg title, action type, brief description, closing date, comment count +2. Comment listing page: \`comments.cfm?GDocForumID=X\` or \`comments.cfm?stageid=X\` or \`comments.cfm?petitionid=X\` - lists comments with title, author, date +3. Individual comment page: \`viewcomments.cfm?commentid=X\` - shows regulation title + brief description at the top, plus the comment + + + + +### Analysis + +Google and Amazon both return generic sentiment (tone of writing: positive/negative), not stance (for/against the regulation): "I strongly believe the government should NOT interfere" is negative tone but "against" the regulation. We add the proposed change as context to the model. + +Before sending the comments for sentiment analysis, \`tokenizer.py\` receives the forum to be processed and prompt as inputs, then generates a \`report.json\` estimating tokens (tiktoken), cost, and time to run for multiple models. + +Then, the batch processing scripts uses the \`report.json\` to create multiple jobs, with subcommands to download and check their status. + +We selected gpt-5.4-mini for a good balance of quality, cost, and time. + +1. Prompt + + \`\`\` + You are an expert policy analyst classifying public comments submitted to the Virginia Town Hall + regulatory comment system. You will be given the text of a proposed regulation and a single + public comment. Return ONLY a JSON object — no other text. + + Definitions: + + - stance: the commenter's position on whether the regulation should be adopted. + "support" = wants it approved (as-is or with changes); + "oppose" = wants it rejected or substantially weakened; + "neutral" = takes no position, asks a question, or provides factual input only; + "unknown" = too vague, off-topic, or uninterpretable to classify. + - tone: the emotional register of the writing, independent of stance. + "positive" = affirming, hopeful, appreciative; + "negative" = angry, fearful, alarmed, or contemptuous; + "neutral" = matter-of-fact, procedural, or informational; + "mixed" = contains both positive and negative emotional content; + "unclear" = tone cannot be determined (e.g., a one-word comment). + - stanceconfidence: float 0.0-1.0, your confidence in the stance label. + - stancerationale: 1-3 sentences explaining the key evidence; quote specific phrases where possible. + - tags: up to 5 short topic labels relevant to the comment's specific concerns (e.g. + "parental rights", "student safety", "privacy", "religious freedom", "LGBTQ+ inclusion", + "bullying prevention", "school sports", "bathroom access"). Empty array if none apply. + + Return exactly these keys: stance, stanceconfidence, stancerationale, tone, tags. + \`\`\` + + + + +### Storage + +- Each scraped forum is saved to \`output/.jsonl\` +- Each report (forum + prompt) is saves to \`reports/.json\` +- Each job is saved to \`analysis/jobs//: + └─\`forum.jsonl\` is a copy of the scraped forum for convenience + └─\`prompt.txt\` is a copy of the prompt used + └─\`report.json\` is a copy of the report used + └─\`status.json\` contains metadata about the job + For each batch in the job, four files are created: + └─\`jobN-input.jsonl\` contains the exact queries sent to the API, for troubleshooting + └─\`jobN-output-raw.jsonl\` contains the exact response from the API + └─\`jobN-output.jsonl\` contains the exact response from the API + └─\`jobN-output-errors.jsonl\` when errors are returned (this file may not exist) +- Once complete, the cleanup script saves \`review.csv\`, \`review.pqt\`, and \`review.sqlite\` in this folder. + + + + +## Instructions + +1. Scrape the forum. + \`python +2. Run model report. + \`python analysis/tokenizer.py –prompt \` +3. To run a realtime subset: + \`python analysis/openairealtime.py –prompt –model –limit \` + \`python analysis/openairealtime.py output/f452.jsonl –prompt prompt-1.txt –model gpt-4o-mini –limit 10\` +4. To create and run the whole thing in batches, first create the batch jobs from the report: + \`python analysis/openaibatch.py create –model \` + \`python analysis/openaibatch.py create ./reports/f452-1.json –model gpt-5.4-mini\` +5. Then, run the jobs sequentially. Don't submit more than one at a time, if the model fills up the batch will fail and resubmission is not implemented. + \`python analysis/openaibatch.py submit\` + + \`python analysis/openaibatch.py status\` + + \`python analysis/openaibatch.py download\` + + \`python analysis/openaibatch.py submit\` + + + + +# Roadmap + +1. Scrape one forum +2. Compare sentiment models +3. Display +4. Scrape all data +5. Scale? +