{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly oppose to this\" and argues that schools should not \"be opening to help or guide\" gender discussions. They also say the policy will \"open major confusion and issues for children,\" indicating rejection of the regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","gender identity","student privacy","LGBTQ+ inclusion"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says they are in \"FULL SUPPORT\" and calls the policy \"essential\" for providing \"a safe and supportive place\" for transgender and nonbinary students. They also argue schools should \"support and protect these children\" and endorse bathroom/locker room access by gender identity.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","mental health","bathroom access","anti-bullying"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly titles the submission \"Oppose Model Transgender Policy\" and repeatedly argues against key provisions, including restroom/locker room access, school notification rules, and participation in female sports. They state the policy would allow \"a male to use this policy to gain access to a female locker room\" and that \"Allowing a male to participate in female sports is cheating and should not be allowed.\"","tone":"negative","tags":["bathroom access","locker rooms","parental rights","school sports","privacy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I am opposed to the proposed gender policy\" and objects that it \"allows for deception of parents.\" They also frame the policy as potentially harmful to parental communication and student expression, indicating rejection of the regulation rather than support for it.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","privacy","religious freedom","LGBTQ+ inclusion"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly labels the proposal \"Oppose\" and argues against allowing \"boys to share a shower n locker room with our 12 yr old daughter.\" They ask for separate sex-specific spaces and say \"Do not take away pur childrens innocence,\" indicating rejection of the policy as written.","tone":"negative","tags":["bathroom access","locker rooms","religious freedom","parental rights","student safety"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Absolutely support!!!!\" and argues that \"Trans people deserve the same rights as everyone else.\" This is a clear endorsement of the proposed policies.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","equal rights","transgender students"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter says, \"I strongly disagree with the bill\" and argues it should not be handled by schools: \"not the school system.\" This clearly rejects the proposed policies rather than supporting them with changes.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","parental rights","school policy","children"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly labels the submission \"Support\" and states that \"This policy would ensure that our trans students have the chance to excel.\" They argue the policy helps students feel \"safe and comfortable\" and protects them from \"harassment or violence,\" which clearly endorses adoption.","tone":"positive","tags":["transgender students","student safety","bullying prevention","LGBTQ+ inclusion"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter rejects the premise of the policy by framing transgender identity as a \"mental health issue\" and saying children should be taught \"the real truth\" about transgender struggles. The comment argues against affirming transgender students and instead promotes a corrective, pathologizing view, which indicates opposition to the regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","mental health","LGBTQ+ inclusion","student education"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly support\" and frames the policy as part of \"achieving equal rights for all people, including trans people.\" This is a clear endorsement of the regulation's purpose and adoption.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","equal rights","transgender students"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"Vote no! Do not support bill,\" which clearly rejects the proposed regulation. There is no qualifying language or request for changes, just direct opposition.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","school policy","opposition"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I support guidance for students and educators to accept and support trans youth in schools,\" which directly endorses the proposed policies. They also frame schools as needing to be \"a safe place\" and express hope that children can \"live their truth safely in school,\" reinforcing approval of the regulation's purpose.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","transgender students","school climate"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"support the guidance\" and repeats \"I support this guidance\". They frame it as necessary for a \"safe and welcoming\" school environment for all students, indicating approval of adoption.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","safe schools","nondiscrimination"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I do not support it,\" indicating opposition to the proposed policies. They argue that \"school legislation\" on gender is unnecessary and dismiss the bullying rationale as \"a distraction,\" while preferring general anti-bullying measures instead.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","bullying prevention","school policy","gender identity"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I am in support of programs promoting safe learning environments for all student\" and clarifies that this includes transgender, non-binary, and LGBTQ students. This is a clear endorsement of the regulation’s goals and protections.","tone":"positive","tags":["student safety","LGBTQ+ inclusion","transgender students","safe learning environment"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly support\" and adds that \"this support for our students is greatly needed.\" This is a clear endorsement of the proposed policies.","tone":"positive","tags":["student support","transgender students","public schools"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Vote NO!!!\" and \"strongly disagree!!!,\" which clearly indicates opposition to adopting the proposed regulation. No supporting reasons or qualifications are provided, but the stance is unambiguous.","tone":"negative","tags":[]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly argues against discrimination based on gender identity, stating, \"There is no logical reason why someone should be discriminated against because of their gender, or non gender.\" This aligns with supporting the proposed transgender student protections and nondiscrimination policies.","tone":"positive","tags":["human rights","nondiscrimination","LGBTQ+ inclusion"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter clearly rejects the policy, asking rhetorically, \"Who in their right minds thinks it's cool to allow confused boys into the girls locker rooms/bathrooms\" and urging, \"Don't make everyone else have to pretend.\" They also explicitly oppose recognizing transgender identities, saying there are \"only TWO\" genders and calling it a \"mental illness.\"","tone":"negative","tags":["bathroom access","locker rooms","gender identity","transgender students","privacy"]}