{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"Strongly support this!\" and urges the policy to \"Protect trans kids!\" This is a clear endorsement of adopting the regulation to improve treatment and protection for transgender students.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","transgender students","bullying prevention"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I am against these transgender policies being brought into our schools\" and asks, \"Why should our schools try to make decisions for them?\" They also state that if the bill is approved, their children will no longer attend public school, indicating clear opposition to adoption.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender policies","bathroom access","locker rooms","student safety","parental rights"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I fully support this proposal\" and opens with \"Wholeheartedly support.\" They also argue the policy will create a \"safe, supportive environment\" and be \"gender affirming,\" indicating clear approval of adoption.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","gender identity","bullying prevention","school climate"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"what is being proposed is WRONG\" and urges officials to \"Do your homework\" before more children are \"harmed and sterilized,\" which clearly rejects the regulation. The comment argues against affirming transgender treatment for youth and warns against a \"life-long medical path.\"","tone":"negative","tags":["gender dysphoria","youth counseling","medical treatment","student safety","parental concern"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I support this guidance\" and endorses the policy as creating a school environment where \"everyone feels safe.\" The closing statement, \"Trans rights are human rights!\" further confirms approval of the regulation's purpose and direction.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","safe learning environment","transgender rights"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"STRONGLY SUPPORT\" and adds that \"Everyone deserves the respect this guidance looks to provide,\" which clearly endorses adoption of the regulation. There is no indication of opposition or neutrality.","tone":"positive","tags":["transgender students","respect","nondiscrimination"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly Opposed!!!!\" and objects to the policy as \"nonsense.\" They also reject being told what to do and say they will remove their child from public school, indicating clear opposition to adoption of the regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","transgender students","public schools","home schooling"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Vote NO!\" and describes the policy as \"dangerous\" and \"over stepping so many boundaries,\" indicating clear rejection of the regulation. They also object to \"taking away parental guidance\" and claim it would \"put[] all other children at risk,\" which shows opposition rather than a request for changes.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","student safety","sexualization","transgender policies"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly support the guidance\" and asks to \"Protect our youth and their rights,\" which clearly endorses adoption of the regulation. There is no opposing language or substantive criticism.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student rights","student safety"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly Oppose\" and asks officials to \"withdraw and do NOT re-introduce these terrible bills.\" They also argue the policies violate \"the rights of Christian families\" and remove \"parental control and rights,\" indicating clear rejection of the regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":["religious freedom","parental rights","transgender students","school policy"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly labels the submission \"Strongly Support\" and urges officials to \"allow LGBT youth to thrive.\" They argue the policy could be \"lifesaving\" and say there is \"no reason to oppose this,\" which clearly endorses adoption.","tone":"negative","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","transgender students","bullying prevention"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"STRONGLY SUPPORT\" and argues the policies are \"long overdue.\" They also state that \"Legislation must be in place so that ALL children can be safe in schools,\" which clearly endorses adoption of the regulation.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","bullying prevention","nondiscrimination"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly urges action to \"support the most vulnerable\" and says \"All children deserve to feel safe and protected,\" which clearly endorses the regulation’s protective aims for transgender students. The title \"Support Trans Students!!\" reinforces approval rather than criticism or neutrality.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","anti-bullying","school climate"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly labels the submission \"Strong Opposition\" and argues that \"there is no science that supports affirming a trans identity,\" urging readers to reject the approach. The comment cites detransition and medical-harm concerns to oppose the policy's affirming framework.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender policy","medical concerns","science","school guidance"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The comment explicitly says, \"Trans rights are human rights!\" and repeats \"Trans rights are human rights,\" which clearly endorses protections for transgender students. It offers no criticism or conditions, indicating support for the proposed policies.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","transgender rights","nondiscrimination"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly oppose the transgender legislation in many many ways\" and argues against allowing the policy in public schools. They also say they would \"legally fight this all the way to the Supreme Court,\" which clearly indicates rejection of the regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":["religious objections","transgender students","public schools","parental rights","school policy"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I support trans students!\" which directly endorses the policy’s purpose of protecting transgender students. The remark about other comments being \"deeply disturbing\" reinforces approval of the regulation rather than opposition.","tone":"negative","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","anti-discrimination"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The comment explicitly says \"Support\" in both the title and body, indicating clear approval of the proposed regulation. No contrary language or qualifications are present.","tone":"positive","tags":[]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly rejects the policy, saying \"This messing with gender is NUTS!\" and urging that \"Schools and agencies must stay out of it!\" They frame it as \"solely a family issue,\" which indicates opposition to the regulation's involvement in transgender student treatment.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","transgender students","school policy","family autonomy"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I fully support the Model Policies\" and frames the policies as necessary for fairness and safety. They also endorse the goal of protecting transgender and non-binary students from discrimination, indicating clear approval of adoption.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","anti-discrimination","bullying prevention"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"Reject the Model Policies\" and states they are \"harmful to children.\" They also argue the policies \"undermine the rights of parents and families,\" indicating clear opposition to adoption.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","transgender students","school policy","child welfare"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly support the guidance,\" which directly endorses adoption of the regulation. The additional phrase \"hopeful of virginia becoming more supportive and inclusive\" reinforces approval of the policy's purpose.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","support for guidance","inclusive schools"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says the policy is \"VERY concerning and honestly frightening,\" calls it \"crossing the line,\" and concludes it is \"absolutely absurd\" and \"support of child harm.\" Although they say they support the transgender community, the overall message rejects the regulation as dangerous for children.","tone":"negative","tags":["student safety","transgender students","privacy","school policy"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly states \"STRONGLY SUPPORT\" and repeats it with emphasis, indicating clear approval of the proposed regulation. There is no contrary language or ambiguity.","tone":"positive","tags":[]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly labels the proposal as an \"Oppose\" and repeatedly argues it is \"dangerous,\" an \"unnecessary overstep,\" and something that would \"open the door to great harm.\" They ask that schools not adopt policies they believe would threaten parental rights, student safety, and free expression.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","student safety","privacy","bathroom access","LGBTQ+ inclusion"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly OPPOSE\" and calls the policies \"an outrageous, dangerous overstep on parental rights\". They also urge others to \"stand against this\" and \"pull their own children out,\" indicating clear rejection of the regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","transgender students","school policy","public schools"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says allowing students to choose facilities based on gender identity is \"a bad idea\" and concludes, \"we need to go back to the drawing board on this issue.\" They argue the guidance would make others uncomfortable or endangered and object that it would let students and administrators \"circumvent the parents.\"","tone":"negative","tags":["bathroom access","parental rights","student safety","privacy","transgender students"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"We do not approve\" and titles the comment \"Most Strongly Oppose VDE's Proposed Transgender Policy.\" The body repeatedly argues the policy should not be adopted, describing it as harmful to parents, privacy, safety, and religious freedom.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender policy","parental rights","privacy","student safety","religious freedom"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Oppose indoctrination of our children\" and argues the policy would \"take away the rights of parents\". They also call the policy \"wrong\" and describe teaching transgender acceptance as \"child abuse,\" indicating clear opposition to adoption.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","transgender students","indoctrination","child abuse","mental health"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Wholeheartedly Opposed!\" and argues the VDOE has \"gone far beyond\" what the General Assembly prescribed. They also state the policies \"infringe the First Amendment rights of parents\" and should not be adopted because they would encourage \"irreversible 'gender transitions'\" and compromise privacy.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","privacy","bathroom access","school facilities","gender identity"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.86,"stance_rationale":"The commenter questions the premise of the policy by asking, \"How can gender be reassigned?\" and states, \"We are who we are\" and that people are \"born with a physical gender.\" This indicates disagreement with the regulation’s transgender-inclusive approach and a preference for fixed sex/gender categories.","tone":"negative","tags":["gender identity","transgender students","LGBTQ+ inclusion","school policy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"The proposed Transgender Policy will not do that\" and concludes that it is \"riddled with problems\" and would \"create more problems\" if passed as is. They argue against the policy’s handling of restroom/locker room access, parental involvement, and reporting standards, indicating opposition to adoption in its current form.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","bathroom access","locker rooms","parental rights","privacy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter dismisses the policy as \"all nonsense\" and questions why the state is spending time and tax money on it, indicating clear opposition to adopting the regulation. The phrase \"wasting our time\" further shows they do not support the proposed guidance.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender policy","taxpayer spending","government overreach"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly rejects the proposal, calling it \"impractical and fraught with danger\" and saying it \"promotes an activist political agenda.\" They argue it harms \"a safe educational environment for all children,\" which indicates opposition to adoption.","tone":"negative","tags":["student safety","transgender policy","political agenda","school environment"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says the policies \"should be adopted as currently written\" and repeatedly endorses protections for trans and non-binary students. They frame the guidance as necessary to ensure students are \"protected within our school systems.\"","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","school climate","anti-discrimination","transgender students"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I do not agree with fluid gender policies\" and argues the policy is \"just too broad.\" They also say, \"Leave well enough alone!!,\" indicating opposition to adopting or expanding the proposed guidance.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender policies","LGBTQ+ inclusion","policy scope"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"Do NOT adopt a policy,\" which is a direct rejection of the regulation. The phrase \"mandates promotion of gender confusion to school kids\" shows opposition to the policy’s substance rather than a request for changes.","tone":"negative","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","parental rights","student identity"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly objects to the proposed policies, saying they \"pose a risk to the jobs of thousands of VA teachers of faith\" and that \"By moving forward with these proposed changes\" the department would violate rights and expose schools to lawsuits. They argue against requiring pronoun use and say educators should not be forced to \"affirm them in a lie,\" indicating rejection of the regulation as written.","tone":"negative","tags":["religious freedom","pronouns","parental rights","first amendment","teacher rights"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"Strongly opposed to this politicized policy\" and repeatedly argues that \"this policy goes too far\" and is \"forced upon\" families. Although they support anti-bullying measures, their overall position is that the regulation should not be adopted because it threatens privacy, parental rights, and religious freedom.","tone":"negative","tags":["privacy","parental rights","religious freedom","student safety","LGBTQ+ inclusion"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly oppose the statewide transgender school policy\" and calls it \"irresponsible and harmful.\" They also argue it will \"promot[e] and caus[e] gender confusion in children,\" which indicates clear rejection of adoption.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender policy","student welfare","gender identity","school policy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly oppose\" and describes the policy as \"one of the most harmful ideas\". They object to teachers and students being required to use transgender students' affirmed identities, calling it \"forcing\" and saying it \"defies logic.\"","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","LGBTQ+ inclusion","school policy","religious freedom"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I am 100% AGAINST this proposed Treatment of Transgender Students!\" and calls it \"PURE EVIL,\" indicating clear opposition to adoption. They also urge lawmakers to be \"ashamed\" for considering it, reinforcing that they want the policy rejected.","tone":"negative","tags":["religious freedom","LGBTQ+ inclusion","transgender students","school policy"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I wholeheartedly support this policy\" and asks, \"Please adopt this policy state wide.\" They also give a reason for support, stating their grandchild \"should not be discriminated\" against at school for their gender.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","nonbinary students","anti-discrimination","student rights"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says the policies would \"undercut parents’ involvement\" and \"endanger the bodily privacy and safety of all students,\" and concludes that the \"anything goes approach\" should not be adopted. They object to gender-inclusive bathroom access and self-identification provisions, arguing there is \"no attempt whatsoever\" to protect their daughter.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","student privacy","bathroom access","student safety","gender identity"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly oppose this legislation\" and \"I hope and pray that it does not pass.\" The rest of the comment argues that the policy is an \"extreme overreach\" and that schools should notify parents about a child's name/gender identity and locker room access, indicating rejection of the regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","transgender students","privacy","school notification","locker room access"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says they are \"Opposed to new transgender policies\" and argues that \"kids need guidance from their parents\" rather than the school system. They also object to students changing in front of the \"biological opposite\" and to teachers facing retaliation over pronouns or beliefs, indicating rejection of the proposed policies.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","privacy","bathroom access","religious freedom","LGBTQ+ inclusion"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says the policies are \"Strongly Opposed\" and calls them \"totally unworkable.\" They argue the rules would \"force all students, faculty and administrators to comply\" with a view they reject, indicating clear opposition to adoption.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","parental rights","religious freedom","school policy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says they are \"Opposed to transgender regulations proposed by VA Department of Education\" and warns that approval would \"undercut parents’ involvement\" and \"endanger the bodily privacy and safety of all students.\" This is a clear rejection of the proposed policies.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","privacy","student safety","transgender policies"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly states \"Strongly oppose,\" which clearly indicates rejection of the proposed regulation. No supporting reasons or qualifications are provided.","tone":"negative","tags":[]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly rejects the policy, saying it \"will only further promote gender confusion\" and calling it \"a disaster for girl's and women's sports.\" They also urge families to avoid public schools, which reinforces opposition to adoption of the regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":["gender identity","bathroom access","privacy","school sports","parental rights"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"we don’t need to force ideas\" and asks to \"Allow school to remain an academic institution and nothing more,\" which rejects the transgender student policies as beyond the school's role. They also object to bathroom, locker room, and sports provisions, saying they do not want children subjected to \"a child of the opposite sex\" in those settings.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender policies","bathroom access","locker rooms","school sports","parental rights"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I support this guidance\" and explains that they want \"all students to be in a school environment that is safe and welcoming for everyone.\" The comment also references personal experience with bullying and transgender students as reasons for approval.","tone":"positive","tags":["student safety","bullying prevention","LGBTQ+ inclusion","safe schools"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly oppose this bill,\" and the title also states \"Oppose House Bill 145 and Senate Bill 161.\" They argue against teaching children that the \"transgender lifestyle is 'normal' or acceptable,\" indicating rejection of the proposed policies.","tone":"negative","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","transgender students","public schools","student safety"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter says, \"I am adamantly opposed to the above proposed policy\" and objects specifically to allowing students to use \"the bath and dressing rooms of the opposite biological gender.\" They also argue that the policy should not be adopted because it would let a minority's wishes override the \"right of the vast majority for decency.\"","tone":"negative","tags":["bathroom access","privacy","student facilities","transgender students"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly oppose transgender bill\" and argues the model regulations \"infringe the First Amendment rights of parents to raise and care for their children.\" This is a clear rejection of the proposed policy on parental-rights grounds.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","religious freedom","transgender policies","First Amendment"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter says the policy \"goes too far and is unnecessary\" and argues that \"This is not for teachers to be teaching,\" which clearly rejects the regulation. The title \"Promoting gender confusion in schools\" also signals opposition to the proposed transgender student policies.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","parental rights","curriculum","school role"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter says the Department of Education is \"usurping the rights of parents\" by \"mandating a K-12 transgender model policy,\" which clearly rejects the proposed regulation. The emphasis on parents as the \"authority of their family\" and the source of values and beliefs indicates opposition to state guidance on transgender students in schools.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","transgender policy","school governance","family values"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly frames the policy as an \"Oppose Confusion Policy\" and says the church must act against \"the state to plant seeds of confusion.\" They argue the regulation promotes an \"alternate identity lifestyle\" and a \"liberal sexual agenda,\" indicating clear opposition to adoption.","tone":"negative","tags":["religious freedom","parental rights","LGBTQ+ inclusion","student mental health","school policy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly oppose gender ideology in schools\" and argues the policy should not be adopted. Phrases like \"Children are only confused by this ideology\" and \"Let's protect them, not abuse them!\" clearly reject the regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":["gender ideology","parental rights","religious freedom","student safety"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.96,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I do NOT support this,\" which directly rejects the proposed policies. They also argue that protecting one group comes \"at the expense of another,\" indicating opposition to the regulation as written.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","student rights","fairness","school policy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly rejects the policy, calling it \"terrible\" and \"not in the best interests of anyone.\" They argue it \"push[es] an agenda\" and raise objections about bathroom/locker room access, religious beliefs, parental rights, and concerns about encouraging transgender identity.","tone":"negative","tags":["bathroom access","parental rights","religious freedom","LGBTQ+ inclusion","student privacy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"Strongly oppose\" and states they \"cannot back a policy change\". They reject pronoun use and argue that \"gender and sexuality have absolutely no place in a school or classroom,\" indicating opposition to the regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","pronouns","gender identity","LGBTQ+ inclusion","school curriculum"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I do not support the transgender guidelines\" and argues they are \"unjust, inappropriate, reckless, and irresponsible.\" They also object to \"bathroom sharing and individualized pronouns\" and call the policy a \"deeply troubling misunderstanding of biological facts,\" indicating clear opposition to adoption.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","bathroom access","pronouns","student privacy","parental rights"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly rejects the policy with hostile language such as \"Stop corrupting these kids with your filth,\" indicating opposition to the transgender student guidance. The remark also criticizes the schools for focusing on this issue instead of other subjects, implying the regulation should not be adopted.","tone":"negative","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student welfare","education priorities"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly urges approval of the policy, saying \"We MUST grant our students FAIR TREATMENT\" and criticizing opposition as \"transphobia.\" They also ask for additional education on transgender health and history, indicating support for the regulation and possibly stronger protections.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student equality","transgender rights","education curriculum"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I do not agree with this policy\" and asks to \"stop\" it, indicating clear opposition to adoption. They also argue it creates \"further distractions and avenues for deviant behavior and lawsuits,\" and say parents should not be \"disqualified\" from helping, which reinforces rejection of the policy as written.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","parental rights","religious freedom","school disruption","lawsuits"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I stand against these gender confusion proposals,\" which clearly rejects the regulation. The title \"Adamantly against\" reinforces a strong opposing position.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","LGBTQ+ inclusion","gender identity"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I am against this sickening attack on women\" and frames the policy as a \"WAR ON WOMEN,\" indicating clear opposition to the proposed transgender student policies. The comment argues the regulation would enable harm by \"men\" entering women's spaces, which is a rejection of the policy's adoption.","tone":"negative","tags":["women's safety","bathroom access","predators","transgender students","school facilities"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"Please oppose these transgender policies\" and asks to \"stop promoting dangerous transgender policies and instruction.\" They argue the policy is \"harmful for kids\" and should be replaced by existing anti-bullying rules rather than adopted.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender policies","student safety","bullying prevention","parental rights","mental health"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter argues the policy will \"open the door to biological males to compete directly against girls\" and says \"This puts an end to Title IX,\" which clearly rejects the regulation. The comment frames the policy as harmful to girls' athletics and scholarships, indicating opposition rather than support or neutrality.","tone":"negative","tags":["school sports","Title IX","girls athletics","transgender students","scholarships"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I oppose transgender education programs in schools\" and objects to \"any laws or policies\" that shift authority from parents to school employees. They also call the proposal \"unconscionable\" and argue that a \"programmatic approach to transgenderism is confusing,\" indicating clear rejection of the regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","transgender students","school authority","medical concerns","privacy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I oppose any laws or policies\" and concludes with \"Stop Transgender Indoctrination in VA Schools,\" indicating clear rejection of the proposed regulation. They argue it would \"create additional problems\" and threaten safety, parental authority, and religious freedom rather than protect students.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","bathroom access","privacy","religious freedom","LGBTQ+ inclusion"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I oppose transgender policies and teachings,\" which directly rejects the proposed regulation. The follow-up, \"Teach the basics: reading, writing, math, civics and American history,\" indicates they want these policies replaced or deprioritized rather than adopted.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender policies","education curriculum","school priorities"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly endorses the policy, saying \"All children deserve support, ESPECIALLY trans children\" and \"This is a step towards real progress.\" The final sentence, \"Don't sit on the wrong side of history,\" further signals approval and encouragement for adoption.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student support","nondiscrimination","transgender students"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"Do not support transgender indoctrination in public schools\" and calls the policy \"a terrible mistake.\" They argue that teaching these ideas in tax-funded schools is \"dangerous and ridiculous,\" which indicates opposition to adoption. The final sentence about supporting all students does not change the overall rejection of the regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","public schools","indoctrination","LGBTQ+ inclusion","education policy"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"STRONGLY SUPPORT\" and repeats \"SUPPORT\" in the title, indicating clear approval of the proposed regulation. There is no opposing language or substantive critique.","tone":"positive","tags":["transgender students","LGBTQ+ inclusion","school policy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Do not impose transgender beliefs upon our children\" and asks the DOE not to adopt the proposal. They argue it conflicts with \"families' foundational, religious beliefs\" and call the policy \"harmful,\" especially regarding bathroom and changing room access.","tone":"negative","tags":["religious freedom","parental rights","bathroom access","student privacy","LGBTQ+ inclusion"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly calls the policies \"mandatory 'transgender' policies\" and says the Commonwealth should not impose them, describing them as \"abhorrent\" and something \"many of its citizens vigorously oppose.\" The request for \"school choice, through vouchers\" is framed as an alternative if the policies persist, indicating opposition to adoption as written.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender policies","parental rights","school choice","vouchers","public schools"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"Please support!\" and describes the policy as \"a long overdue and great step forward.\" They clearly favor adoption because they believe it will create \"a healthy and supportive environment\" for trans and non binary children.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","bullying prevention","supportive environment"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I urge that you do not move forward with this\" and argues that the policies \"should not be adopted\" because they \"promote gender spectrum views.\" They also describe the policies as \"designed to harm society, families and children,\" indicating clear opposition to adoption.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","gender identity","student safety","parental rights","LGBTQ+ inclusion"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly oppose the DOE Transgender policy,\" which is a clear rejection of the regulation. They also state it would \"violate my religious freedoms and responsibilities as a parent,\" indicating substantive opposition rather than a request for changes.","tone":"negative","tags":["religious freedom","parental rights","transgender policy"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly support\" and explains that the changes help kids \"feel safe and secure.\" This is a clear endorsement of adopting the regulation.","tone":"positive","tags":["student safety","supportive learning environment","transgender students"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly oppose\" and argues the VDOE has \"gone far beyond the path the General Assembly prescribed.\" They also reject the policy's treatment of gender identity and object to shared facilities, stating \"No child should be forced to share showers, locker rooms, hotel rooms\" with someone of the opposite biological sex.","tone":"negative","tags":["privacy","bathroom access","locker rooms","parental rights","student safety"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter clearly rejects the proposed transgender student policies, calling them \"an affront to common sense\" and \"Insane ideas period.\" They argue for separate facilities and ask, \"Why mess with the other 99%,\" which indicates opposition to adoption of the regulation as written.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","bathroom access","school facilities","parental rights","LGBTQ+ inclusion"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly support this change\" and praises policies that \"facilitate anti discrimination\" and create a \"supportive community.\" They also argue the change helps students be \"their true self\" and eliminates \"gender discrimination,\" indicating clear approval of the regulation.","tone":"positive","tags":["anti-discrimination","student support","LGBTQ+ inclusion","school climate"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"STRONGLY OPPOSE\" and repeatedly argues against the policies, calling them \"VERY IRRESPONSIBLE and VERY DAMAGING.\" They also object to school involvement over parents and criticize the policy as unsafe and confusing for children.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","student safety","gender identity","teacher rights","school policy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.97,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"opposed\" and asks officials to \"listen to the voices of so many parents who are opposed to these new policies,\" indicating rejection of the regulation. No supporting or neutral language is present.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","transgender students","school policy"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I'm proud to support this guidance\" and expresses approval of its purpose. They also state that \"Everyone deserves to be safe and welcomed at school,\" which aligns with adoption of the policy.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","school climate"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter says they are \"strongly opposed to the imposition\" of the regulations and argues the proposal would \"spread the confusion\" and \"deny parents their rights.\" They also object that schools could help students with gender identity \"without a parent even knowing,\" indicating clear rejection of the policy.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","gender identity","SOGI","privacy","school authority"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter says, \"I strongly oppose any regulations\" and asks, \"Please rethink this regulation,\" which clearly rejects adoption of the policy. The rationale centers on opposition to perceived \"abrogating of parental rights\" and concern about \"confusion\" regarding transgender issues.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","religious freedom","transgender students","family values"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"Please oppose this legislation,\" and repeatedly argues the policy is \"not healthy or safe\" and would cause harm. They object to pronoun requirements, bathroom access, and the promotion of transgender acceptance, indicating clear opposition to the regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","bathroom access","pronouns","student safety","privacy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly oppose\" the proposed initiatives and argues they would be \"very harmful\" and \"create more anxiety for everyone affected by it.\" Although they support anti-bullying measures, modest dress codes, and counseling, those are framed as alternatives rather than support for the regulation itself.","tone":"negative","tags":["bathroom access","school sports","pronouns","dress codes","bullying prevention"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I am writing to strongly oppose the Virginia DOE Proposed Transgender School Policies.\" They repeatedly argue the policies are harmful, unnecessary, and unconstitutional, calling them \"indoctrination\" and saying they \"make no allowances for religious exemptions.\"","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","parental rights","religious freedom","privacy","school funding"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The comment explicitly says, \"Strongly opposed to transgender policy!\" which clearly indicates rejection of the proposed regulation. No supporting or neutral language is present.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender policy","LGBTQ+ inclusion"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly rejects the policy, saying \"We will not allow you to devour our children's souls\" and \"We will not allow you to corrupt our children with evil.\" The repeated biblical warnings are used to condemn the regulation rather than support it.","tone":"negative","tags":["religious freedom","parental rights","LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says they \"strongly welcomed\" transgender peers and argues against objections to the policy, stating \"Transgender Women are indeed women\" and that the proposed concerns \"hold no water.\" They also offer assistance \"in helping transition to a more inclusive environment in our schools,\" which clearly supports adoption of the regulation.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","bathroom access","student privacy","school facilities","transgender rights"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly labels the policy \"Strongly Opposed!\" and argues it would harm children by allowing transgender students to use bathrooms and locker rooms aligned with their gender identity. They also object that it can be done \"without ever notifying parents\" and urge officials to \"Stop ignoring the science/DNA of biological differences,\" indicating rejection of the regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":["bathroom access","locker rooms","parental rights","privacy","student safety"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I do not approve of the proposed guidelines\" and asks, \"Please do not impose this on our children,\" which clearly rejects adoption of the regulation. The language about \"radical theories\" and \"indoctrinate our school children\" indicates opposition to the policy itself rather than a request for changes.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","LGBTQ+ inclusion","parental rights","school policy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.95,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly oppose\" and objects to \"forcing confusing content on small children,\" which indicates rejection of the proposed transgender student policies. The closing appeal to \"protect All children\" does not change the overall opposition to the regulation as written.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","parental concerns","student wellbeing","school curriculum"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly argues against the policies, saying they are \"collateral damage\" and asking officials to \"consider the parents' opinions\" and \"hear the parents' voices.\" They also criticize the underlying approach as an \"ideology\" with \"questionable backing by science,\" indicating opposition to adoption of the regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","gender identity","transgender students","student safety","medical transition"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I support the guidance,\" which directly endorses adoption of the regulation. The additional statement, \"Trans kids deserve respect,\" reinforces approval of the policy's purpose.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student respect","transgender students"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I am strongly opposed to this decision!\" and argues it could \"put them in a place of harm.\" This is a clear rejection of the proposed policies rather than a request for modification.","tone":"negative","tags":["student safety","parental rights","harm concerns"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly oppose the VDOE's proposed guidelines for transgenders,\" which clearly rejects the regulation. No supporting or neutral language is present.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","LGBTQ+ inclusion","school policy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"STRONGLY OPPOSE\" and \"I do not approve of these proposed VDOE guidelines,\" which clearly rejects adoption of the regulation. No supporting or conditional language is provided.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","school policy","opposition"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says the policy \"goes way beyond prevention\" and objects to \"mandatory promotion of politicized, sexualized ideology,\" indicating opposition to adoption. They argue it is \"irresponsible\" and potentially \"damaging,\" which shows they want the proposed policy rejected or substantially weakened.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","bullying prevention","student safety","LGBTQ+ inclusion","school policy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"oppose oppose oppose\" and repeats \"Oppose\" multiple times. They state that \"this should not be taught in school\" and \"This should be illegal,\" which clearly indicates rejection of the proposed policies.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","school curriculum","parental rights","LGBTQ+ inclusion"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I am opposed to this bill,\" which directly states rejection of the regulation. The phrase \"uses our children as political plunder for this cultural war\" shows they want it rejected on ideological grounds.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","culture war","school policy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"please reconsider\" and concludes, \"This is not a prudent way to help our students,\" indicating opposition to adopting the policy. They also argue it would force teachers to act against \"legitimate personal or religious beliefs\" and call the approach \"inherently discriminatory and unconstitutional.\"","tone":"negative","tags":["religious freedom","parental rights","teacher rights","LGBTQ+ inclusion","student privacy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly oppose this policy,\" and argues that the regulation is \"inappropriate\" because it \"removes the parents from gender discussions and decisions.\" This is a clear rejection of the proposed guidance rather than a request for modification.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","transgender students","school policy","gender identity"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I oppose this policy,\" which directly states opposition to adoption. The follow-up, \"Parents can teach their children concerning this subject,\" reinforces a preference against the policy by asserting parental control instead of school guidance.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","transgender students","education policy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly oppose\" the policy and describes it as \"indoctrination of the transgender agenda.\" They also argue it is \"extremely dangerous\" and undermines parental guidance, indicating rejection of the regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","LGBTQ+ inclusion","student welfare","indoctrination"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter rejects the policy’s premise, calling transgender identity \"not based on medical science\" and arguing that schools should not accommodate students \"claiming a subjective, dysphoric identity.\" The final sentence explicitly says it is \"overtly abusive\" to require shared sports teams and locker rooms, indicating opposition to the regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","gender identity","school sports","locker rooms","privacy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I oppose any policy that pushes or teaches our children about transgender issues,\" which is a direct rejection of the proposed guidance. The statement that these topics should be discussed \"at home not in school\" indicates opposition to adoption in the school setting.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender issues","parental rights","curriculum","school policy"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"We absolutely need protections for them,\" and frames the policy as necessary so trans kids \"feel safe and heard.\" The title, \"Support Trans Kids!,\" also clearly indicates approval of the regulation's purpose.","tone":"positive","tags":["transgender students","student safety","bullying prevention","LGBTQ+ inclusion"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly labels the submission \"oppose\" and says the policy is \"another distraction from the real job of teaching academics.\" They also argue \"This should be a private matter,\" indicating they do not want the regulation adopted in schools.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","school policy","privacy","academic focus"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"Strongly oppose this measure,\" which directly states opposition to adoption. They also argue it lacks \"scientific evidence\" and \"will harm many children and youth,\" reinforcing a rejection of the policy.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","student safety","evidence-based policy","harm to youth"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"Strongly oppose the proposed transgender policy\" and asks, \"Please reject this radical policy.\" They argue the policy is \"mandatory promotion of politicized, sexualized ideology\" and harmful to children, indicating clear opposition to adoption.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender policy","parental rights","student safety","curriculum","LGBTQ+ inclusion"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly oppose this policy\" and argues it should not be imposed on students and staff. They describe it as an \"assault on the freedoms of conscience, expression, privacy, and religion,\" and say it would undermine parents' authority and force families to withdraw from public schools.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","religious freedom","privacy","transgender students","school policy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly rejects the proposal as \"very concerning\" and a \"tremendous overreach,\" and says it \"smells more like indoctrination, not education.\" The closing demand to \"Teach, do not indoctrinate!\" indicates they want the policy rejected rather than adopted.","tone":"negative","tags":["indoctrination","parental rights","education scope","transgender students"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.84,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says they \"oppose all kinds of discrimination\" and agrees with parts of the policy, including that schools should not enforce sex-specific dress codes. Although they raise concerns and request changes on parental notification, bathrooms, and pronouns, the overall thrust is to refine the regulations rather than reject them.","tone":"mixed","tags":["anti-discrimination","parental rights","bathroom access","privacy","pronouns"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says they are \"beyond confident that affirming treatment is life-saving and ethically mandated\" and frames it as part of \"non-discrimination policies.\" They also offer to \"contribute to policy efforts,\" indicating clear support for adopting the regulation.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","non-discrimination","student wellbeing","transgender students"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.86,"stance_rationale":"The comment says, \"The role of parents in public education should not be removed or threatened,\" which signals concern that the proposed transgender student policies would diminish parental authority. It does not explicitly mention rejecting the regulation, but the wording clearly objects to the policy direction and implies opposition to adoption as written.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","transgender policies","public education"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly oppose\" and argues against \"forcing this on every child.\" They reject the policy’s approach to transgender students, saying \"Feelings aren't fact\" and that adults should not tell children \"that the truth is whatever they want it to be.\"","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","LGBTQ+ inclusion","parental rights","student guidance"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"STRONGLY OPPOSE THIS MADNESS\" and rejects the guidelines as \"NOT based on science\" and \"not sustainable.\" This is a clear call to reject the regulation rather than adopt it with changes.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","science","school policy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly opposed\" and repeatedly rejects the policy, calling the science \"crap\" and accusing the authors of having an agenda. The statement \"God created male and female\" and \"You people are out destroy this world\" indicate opposition to the transgender student policies themselves.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","science","religious beliefs","school policy"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly endorses the policy’s goals, saying that providing a \"safe, inclusive, affirming environment\" is \"an obligation\" and that \"we should all be doing our part\" to support LGBTQIA students. The comment argues the regulation is necessary to reduce discrimination and exclusion, indicating clear support for adoption.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","anti-discrimination","mental health"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"Please vote to support the rights of trans and non binary students in schools\" and repeats, \"I urge you to vote to support the rights of transgender and non binary students.\" They frame the policy as important for a \"supportive and understanding\" school environment and for students' \"mental well being.\"","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student mental health","school climate","transgender students"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.78,"stance_rationale":"The comment appears to reject the policy by warning that \"upskirting and sex will become a problem\" and asserting \"It’s gonna happen,\" which frames the regulation as dangerous or harmful. Although brief and vague, the language clearly signals opposition rather than support or neutral inquiry.","tone":"negative","tags":["student privacy","student safety","bathroom access","privacy"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"STRONGLY support\" and calls the proposal \"a vital stepping stone in achieving equal rights for all children.\" They also argue it will \"protect[] all family members\" and create \"a safe environment,\" which clearly endorses adoption of the regulation.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student privacy","student safety","equal rights","transgender students"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The comment explicitly says \"Support.\" and the title also indicates approval, despite the misspelling \"Suppprt.\" There is no qualifying language or objection to suggest otherwise.","tone":"positive","tags":[]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I support 100 %\" and endorses the policy’s underlying goals of respect and equality for transgender people. The rest of the comment reinforces approval by arguing for \"equal rights and support\" and criticizing opposition to the policy.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","equal rights","respect and dignity","anti-discrimination"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly oppose any legislation granting transgender rights while in school\" and asks, \"please do not grant transgender rights while in school.\" They object to school bathroom access and related accommodations, indicating rejection of the proposed policies.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender rights","bathroom access","student safety","school policy"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly support\" and \"I fully support this legislation.\" They also endorse the policy goal of protecting \"the well-being of trans and non-binary youth\" and preventing harassment and discrimination.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","anti-discrimination","bullying prevention"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"strongly oppose!!\" and argues that \"This will only harm our children.\" They also state that it \"will not help them in any way,\" indicating clear rejection of the regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":["student safety","transgender students","parental concerns"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly opposed\" and condemns the policy as \"foolish,\" framing it as a harmful social change. The statement that this is \"the end result when you have taken God out of are society\" indicates rejection of the regulation on religious/moral grounds.","tone":"negative","tags":["religious freedom","LGBTQ+ inclusion","gender identity"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I support these policies\" and \"Strongly support,\" indicating clear approval of the regulation. They also frame the policies as necessary to \"keep children safe\" and to protect \"transgender youth.\"","tone":"negative","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","transgender rights","bullying prevention"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly condemns the policy, saying, \"I couldn’t imagine a more destructive or reckless policy.\" This is a clear rejection of the proposed transgender student guidance rather than support or a neutral question.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","school policy","parental rights"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter states \"Completely Opposed,\" which is a direct rejection of the proposed transgender guidance document. No qualifying language suggests support or neutrality.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender policy","school guidance","opposition"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I fully endorse the promulgation of these regulations as written,\" which is a clear endorsement of adoption. They also argue the regulations \"must not bow\" to opposing views, reinforcing support for the policy.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","transgender students","nondiscrimination","student safety"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly oppose\" and states the policy \"does not belong in the schools of Virginia.\" They also characterize it as \"indoctrination,\" indicating rejection of the regulation rather than support or neutrality.","tone":"negative","tags":["indoctrination","public schools","transgender students","parental rights"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly support this\" and ties that support to \"the improved health and wellbeing of trans students.\" This is a clear endorsement of the proposed policies.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student wellbeing","transgender students"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter clearly rejects the regulation, calling it \"terrible\" and saying it is \"trampling women’s rights.\" The phrase \"Extremely disturbing\" and \"Virginia is lost\" indicate opposition to adopting the policy.","tone":"negative","tags":["women's rights","LGBTQ+ inclusion","transgender students","school policy"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"This is excellent, necessary, guidance for our schools,\" which clearly endorses the regulation. The closing \"Thank you!\" reinforces approval rather than criticism or neutrality.","tone":"positive","tags":["transgender students","school policy","LGBTQ+ inclusion","supportive guidance"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly endorses an inclusive approach, stating that \"all students deserve a thoughtful unbigoted learning environment\" and praising educators who \"champion inclusion and belonging for all.\" This aligns with support for the proposed transgender student policies.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student support","school climate","anti-bullying"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"fully support\" and repeats \"trans rights are human rights,\" which clearly endorses the regulation. There is no language indicating opposition or neutrality.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","transgender rights"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"In Strong Opposition\" and \"I stand in strong opposition to this.\" They also call the policy \"an unacceptable policy\" and argue it would make schools \"unsafe,\" indicating clear rejection of the regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","public education","religious freedom"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly labels the proposal \"STRONGLY OPPOSE\" and repeatedly asks to \"Reject these policies completely\" or remove them from consideration. The body argues the guidelines violate parental rights, free speech, religious freedom, and student privacy, and says they \"create far more problems than they solve.\"","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","free speech","religious freedom","privacy","bathroom access"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly opposed!\" and calls the policies \"Ridiculous,\" which clearly indicates rejection of the regulation. There is no request for modification or neutral information, only opposition.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","school policy","LGBTQ+ inclusion"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I fully support this measure\" and endorses \"the protection of all trans students.\" This is a clear affirmative position on adopting the regulation, with no opposing language.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","transgender students","student protection","nondiscrimination"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"Strongly support\" and \"I fully support this policy,\" which clearly indicates approval of the regulation. There is no qualifying language or criticism suggesting opposition or neutrality.","tone":"positive","tags":["transgender students","LGBTQ+ inclusion","school policy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Opposed STRONGLY!\" and argues against allowing children to \"question who God made them,\" which clearly rejects the proposed transgender student policies. The phrase \"Plain evil\" further indicates opposition rather than support or neutrality.","tone":"negative","tags":["religious freedom","LGBTQ+ inclusion","parental rights","student identity"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly support the Model Policies\" and repeatedly argues the Guidance is \"the right thing to do\" and \"a move in the right direction.\" The comment also defends the policy as constitutional and protective of transgender youth, indicating clear approval rather than a request for weakening or rejection.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","anti-bullying","privacy","nondiscrimination"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly opposed,\" which directly indicates rejection of the regulation. The reason given — \"Undermining parental authority is most concerning\" — shows opposition to the policy on parental rights grounds.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","transgender students","school policy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"Strongly oppose the transgender draft model\" and argues against the policy throughout. They object to restroom/locker room access, pronoun enforcement, and school discussion of gender without parental permission, indicating they want the regulation rejected.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","bathroom access","locker rooms","pronouns","student safety"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly support!!!!!!\" and adds \"Trans rights are human rights,\" which clearly endorses the proposed transgender student policies. There is no indication of opposition or neutrality.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","transgender students","civil rights"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I fully support the protection of the health and well-being of transgender students in Virginia public schools.\" They also endorse the policy goal of creating a \"safe space\" for students to be \"their authentic selves,\" indicating approval of the regulation.","tone":"positive","tags":["transgender students","student safety","LGBTQ+ inclusion","school climate"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"STRONGLY OPPOSE\" and argues the policy \"goes FAR beyond equality\" and should not be imposed. They call it \"another radical policy\" and say it is \"further indoctrinating our children,\" indicating clear rejection of adoption.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","transgender students","privacy","indoctrination","public schools"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Oppose,\" \"Back off, please,\" and \"My vote is no,\" indicating clear rejection of the regulation. They argue it conflicts with \"biological fact\" and parental authority, and object to school involvement in gender identity and restroom access.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","bathroom access","gender identity","privacy","LGBTQ+ inclusion"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly support\" and argues that \"ALL students, including transgender students, deserve to feel safe and welcome in schools.\" This clearly endorses adoption of the regulation and its protections for transgender students.","tone":"positive","tags":["transgender students","student safety","LGBTQ+ inclusion","school climate","rights"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"Strongly support,\" which directly endorses adoption of the regulation. The added phrase \"please protect trans youth\" reinforces support for the policy's purpose and protections for transgender students.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","transgender students"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly support\" the initiative and \"wholeheartedly support\" it. They frame it as helping \"ALL VA kids\" and \"stand with Trans youth and Trans lives everywhere,\" indicating clear approval of the regulation.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student support","transgender students","anti-discrimination","student safety"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"Oppose and here is why\" and repeatedly argues the policy \"needs to be reworked\" before adoption. They object to pronoun requirements, bathroom/discipline implications, loss of gendered school traditions, and possible religious-rights conflicts, concluding that the policy \"allows for the rights of other students to be infringed upon.\"","tone":"negative","tags":["pronouns","parental rights","religious freedom","student discipline","LGBTQ+ inclusion"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"this law is way overboard\" and frames the policy as harmful, indicating rejection of the regulation. They object to privacy provisions, stating they \"can never agree that any information... should be kept from the parents,\" and argue it would create a \"parents vs the school\" conflict.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","privacy","transgender students","school policy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly oppose\" and argues against the policy by rejecting transgender identity and pronoun guidance as a \"gender pronoun conflict.\" The language condemns the regulation as enabling a \"mental disorder\" and asks, \"Why are we letting the patients run the asylum,\" indicating clear opposition to adoption.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","pronouns","LGBTQ+ inclusion","school policy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I am absolutely opposed to this,\" which clearly rejects the regulation. They object specifically to \"biological males or females\" using opposite-sex bathrooms, calling it a \"huge liability\" and \"inviting a myriad of issues.\"","tone":"negative","tags":["bathroom access","privacy","student safety","transgender students"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly titles the submission \"Oppose!\" and states, \"This is wrong and unacceptable,\" which clearly rejects the proposed regulation. There is no request for modification or neutral information, only opposition.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","school policy","opposition"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I support trans rights completely!\" This is a clear endorsement of the regulation’s purpose and direction.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","transgender rights"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"STRONGLY OPPOSE\" and states \"If this happens to be approved\" they will lose more families, indicating clear rejection of the regulation. The comment argues schools should not \"misguide our children\" and frames the policy as contrary to parental values.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","transgender students","school policy","student safety","family values"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly oppose this policy being recommended\" and repeatedly argues it \"violates parental rights\" and \"religious freedoms.\" The body also calls the policy \"totally unworkable\" and says it should not be adopted because it would create safety, privacy, and due process problems.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","religious freedom","privacy","student safety","bathroom access"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I support this guidance\" and urges the state to \"include and protect its Trans students.\" The rest of the comment reinforces approval by arguing the policy is needed to address harm and affirm transgender identities.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","privacy","anti-discrimination"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strpngly oppose\" and rejects the policy’s premise by asserting \"There are only 2 genders male or female.\" The biblical reference and \"God didnt create adam and steve\" indicate opposition to adopting the transgender student policies.","tone":"negative","tags":["religious freedom","gender identity","LGBTQ+ inclusion"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"Support as a Means to Prevent Suicide and Violence\" and repeatedly endorses the guidance as \"practical and beneficial overall.\" They argue it protects transgender youth, promotes equity and access, and asks, \"Shouldn’t school be a safe place?\"","tone":"negative","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","bullying prevention","mental health","equity"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly praises the guidance, saying the \"Guiding Principle\" section is \"a fine summary\" and that they \"look forward to the implementation of this guidance document.\" They also argue the school system should \"teach trans/nonbinary students that they are welcome,\" indicating clear support for adoption.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","anti-discrimination","bullying prevention","school climate"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I oppose the Statewide Transgender School Policy\" and repeatedly argues against specific provisions such as preferred pronouns, bathroom access, and gender-neutral dress codes. They also state the policy \"weakens/undermines my role as a parent\" and \"does not address the rights\" of those who disagree, indicating clear rejection of the regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","bathroom access","pronouns","dress code","student safety"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"100% support\" and adds \"Every single individual matters,\" which clearly endorses the regulation. There is no indication of opposition or neutrality.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student rights","nondiscrimination"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I Support this legislation\" and adds \"Equality for all,\" which clearly endorses adoption of the policy. There is no indication of opposition or neutrality.","tone":"positive","tags":["equality","LGBTQ+ inclusion","nondiscrimination"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"Strongly oppose the VDOE Transgender Draft\" and calls it \"Unacceptable.\" They argue it \"contradicts science,\" \"strips parental rights,\" and says public schools are \"overstepping,\" all of which indicate rejection of the regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","transgender students","public schools","medical transition","school policy"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly support protection for trans students\" and adds that students \"deserve full support and inclusion.\" This clearly endorses the proposed policies rather than opposing or questioning them.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student support","nondiscrimination"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.96,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly labels the policy as \"Strongly Opposed\" and says \"This has gone way to far,\" which clearly indicates rejection of the regulation. No supporting or neutral language is present.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","school policy","opposition"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly support protections for transgender and non-binary students,\" which directly endorses the regulation. They also add that \"this is good for all children,\" indicating approval of the policy's adoption.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","nondiscrimination"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly oppose this gender confusion policy,\" which clearly rejects the proposed regulation. The phrase \"strongly oppose\" leaves little ambiguity about their position.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","gender identity","opposition"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly Oppose\" and argues the issue \"doesn't need consultation/guidance from the state,\" indicating rejection of the proposed policy. They also frame school policy as something that should be based on \"the needs/concerns of the majority,\" which is inconsistent with adopting the transgender student guidance.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","state guidance","child protective services","transgender students"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"Strongly support this legislation,\" which directly indicates approval of the proposed regulation. No contrary concerns or qualifications are included.","tone":"positive","tags":[]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I support this policy\" and argues that the comment section itself demonstrates \"the need for transgender protection.\" The rest of the comment criticizes opposing views and reinforces support for adoption of the policy.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender protection","school policy","anti-discrimination","student safety","harassment"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I support the model policy protecting transgender students\" and expresses approval of the policy's purpose. The rest of the comment reinforces that position by stating that \"All people deserve to be who they are and exist in safety.\"","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","nondiscrimination","transgender students"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I am highly in support of the proposed guidelines\" and argues they should apply so that \"all Virginia students, and especially transgender students\" can learn in a compassionate environment. The comment praises the guidelines as promoting \"equal treatment\" and a \"diverse learning environment.\"","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","equal treatment","school climate"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly support!\" which directly endorses adoption of the proposed policies. There is no qualifying language or criticism.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","nondiscrimination"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly urges approval, saying \"This passing is a necessity\" and \"All children deserve the right to be protected and loved!\" They frame the policy as necessary for \"the safety of trans and non binary youth\" and criticize opponents as \"hateful,\" indicating clear support for adoption.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","student safety","LGBTQ+ inclusion","bullying prevention","religious freedom"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The comment explicitly states \"Strongly Oppose\" and provides no qualifying language suggesting support or neutrality. This is a clear rejection of the proposed regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":[]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Oppose\" and pairs it with \"respect parental rights,\" indicating they do not want the regulation adopted. The phrase \"Listen to Science\" is used as a supporting argument for rejection rather than a neutral observation.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","science","transgender students"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"These new policies should never be implemented in our public schools,\" which is a clear rejection of the regulation. Although they support protecting children from bullying, the overall message argues the policies are \"dangerous\" and harmful to parents' rights, safety, and privacy.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","student safety","privacy","bathroom access","LGBTQ+ inclusion"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly asks to \"SUPPORT\" the policy and argues that it should allow trans children \"the same basic comforts\" as other students. The statement \"allow trans kids the same basic comforts you allow your cis students\" clearly endorses adoption of the regulation.","tone":"positive","tags":["bathroom access","transgender students","student comfort","equal treatment"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The comment explicitly says \"Opposed\" and the body says \"Stop this nonsense,\" which clearly rejects the proposed regulation. There is no indication of support or a neutral question/comment.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","school policy","opposition"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly oppose\" and characterizes the policy as \"unbelievably dangerous,\" indicating clear rejection of the regulation. The phrase \"Common sense has died!\" reinforces a hostile opposition to the proposed transgender student policies.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","school policy","student safety"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly support the Virginia Department of Education’s guidance\" and endorses \"creating inclusive learning environments for transgender and non-binary youth.\" They also defend the privacy protections in the policy and argue against objections to them.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student privacy","student safety","mental health","parental rights"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly states, \"I support this 100%.\" This is a clear endorsement of the proposed regulation with no reservations or qualifications.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","transgender students","school policy"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly support protections for transgender and non-binary students!\" This is a clear endorsement of the proposed policies and their protections.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","nondiscrimination"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The comment explicitly states \"100% OPPOSE,\" which is a clear rejection of the proposed regulation. No supporting reasons or qualifications are provided, but the stance is unambiguous.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","school policy"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly support\" and endorses the policy because \"Everyone, especially children trying to find themselves, deserve to feel safe and supported.\" This clearly favors adoption of the regulation.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","supportive environment"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly labels the proposal \"Opposed\" and says \"This is totally out of line,\" indicating rejection of the regulation. The question \"Where are our straight children rights to feel safe\" frames the policy as harmful to non-transgender students and supports weakening or rejecting it.","tone":"negative","tags":["student safety","parental rights","LGBTQ+ inclusion","nondiscrimination"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I fully support this guidance\" and urges schools to \"do better in protecting transgender students.\" The rest of the comment reinforces approval of the policy’s goals, including treating transgender students with dignity and resisting bullying.","tone":"positive","tags":["transgender students","student safety","bullying prevention","LGBTQ+ inclusion"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly endorses equal treatment, saying \"Equal rights for all!!\" and that transgender people \"deserve to be treated as such.\" The final sentence, \"We need to change this,\" indicates support for the proposed policies' inclusive approach rather than opposition.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","equal rights","student inclusion","nondiscrimination"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I can not support this as it currently stands\" and argues the policy is \"foolish, irresponsible, and potentially dangerous.\" Although they call for \"balance\" and protections for all parties, the overall message rejects the regulation in its current form.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","parental rights","student rights","school policy","privacy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Oppose transgender policy\" and adds \"god made boys and girls!\", which rejects the proposed transgender student policies on religious/sex-binary grounds. This is a clear call against adoption rather than a neutral or informational remark.","tone":"negative","tags":["religious freedom","LGBTQ+ inclusion","gender identity"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly oppose this transgender policy,\" which directly indicates opposition to adoption. They also argue it is \"taking away parental rights\" and disregarding \"the safety and privacy rights of girls,\" reinforcing a negative position toward the regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","privacy","student safety","girls' rights"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I am strongly opposed to these new policies,\" which directly indicates opposition to adoption. The phrase \"set a dangerous precedent\" further reinforces a negative position toward the regulation, despite the likely typo in \"will not be harmful.\"","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","school policy","student safety","parental rights"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly urges action with the title \"Protect trans children\" and states that \"Protecting trans youth is a public health concern,\" which supports adopting the regulation. The comment frames the policy as necessary for safety and well-being, not as something to reject or weaken.","tone":"positive","tags":["transgender students","student safety","public health","LGBTQ+ inclusion","bullying prevention"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.96,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Oppose!\" and argues the policy would \"infring[e] on the rights of others,\" specifically citing \"freedom of religion\" and \"parents’ rights.\" This indicates they do not want the regulation adopted in its current form.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","religious freedom","transgender students","privacy"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says they are \"completely in support of these proposals!!\" and adds \"Trans rights are human rights,\" which clearly endorses adoption of the regulation. There is no opposing language or request to weaken it.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","transgender students","civil rights"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly rejects the policy, calling it \"WRONG\" and saying \"I WILL NOT tolerate this.\" They object to transgender students using shared facilities, warning that if a boy goes into the dressing room it will be \"a problem\" and saying \"over my dead body\" they would allow it.","tone":"negative","tags":["bathroom access","privacy","student safety","parental rights","LGBTQ+ inclusion"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I completely support this idea\" and adds that it \"should not be debatable whether this should happen or not,\" which clearly endorses adoption of the regulation. There is no indication of conditions or reservations.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","transgender students","school policy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Opposed to the Trans’ curriculum\" and asks to \"Leave alternative sex Ed for adult-parent conversations,\" indicating rejection of the proposed transgender student policies. The request to focus only on core academics is framed as a reason not to adopt this guidance.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","sex education","parental rights","curriculum"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I oppose this 100%!!\" and repeatedly objects to the policy being imposed on everyone. They also express concern about locker room/bathroom access and being \"turned in and face charges,\" indicating rejection of the regulation as written.","tone":"negative","tags":["bathroom access","locker rooms","parental rights","student privacy","LGBTQ+ inclusion"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly support these changes in support of trans students\" and repeatedly argues the guidance should be adopted to protect transgender youth. They also describe it as \"a progressive move for all students,\" indicating clear approval rather than a request to weaken or reject it.","tone":"positive","tags":["transgender students","LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","privacy","school facilities"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly endorses the policy’s underlying purpose by stating, \"trans kids deserve rights\" and that they \"should be given the opportunity to feel safe in schools.\" This is a clear affirmative position in favor of adopting protections for transgender students.","tone":"positive","tags":["transgender students","student safety","LGBTQ+ inclusion","school climate"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The comment explicitly says \"OPPOSE\" and rejects the premise of the policy by stating, \"A man is not a woman and a woman is not a man. A boy is not a girl and a girl is not a boy.\" This indicates opposition to transgender-inclusive treatment in the regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","gender identity","transgender students"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I completely disagree\" and urges, \"Stop trying to confuse these kids,\" indicating rejection of the transgender student policies. The statement that people are \"born male or female\" also signals opposition to the regulation's recognition of transgender students.","tone":"negative","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","transgender students","parental concerns","school policy"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly states \"full support\" and repeats \"support,\" indicating clear approval of the proposed regulation. There is no language suggesting opposition or neutrality.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","transgender students","school policy"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Support!\" and adds \"Protect trans students,\" which clearly endorses the regulation’s purpose. The comment offers no objections or qualifications.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","transgender students"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I do not support this policy,\" which directly indicates opposition. They further narrow the objection by saying \"especially in elementary schools\" and argue it will have \"unintended consequences negatively impacting far more kids than it will protect.\"","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","elementary schools","student safety","policy impact"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly support these guidance updates\" and argues that \"All students should have access to a safe and welcoming environment.\" They frame the regulation as \"a good step for Virginia schools,\" indicating clear approval of adoption.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","school climate","teacher training"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly urges the Department to \"continue with the Model Policy\" and says it is \"required by law\" and \"necessary and right.\" They repeatedly endorse trans-inclusive policies as \"best practices\" and say schools need the guidance to comply with existing regulation.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","nondiscrimination","privacy","parental rights"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I am absolutely opposed to this idea!\" and argues the policy would let boys access girls' locker rooms and restrooms. They frame the regulation as creating risk of \"sexual assault\" and \"possible abuse,\" indicating clear rejection of the proposal.","tone":"negative","tags":["bathroom access","locker rooms","student safety","parental rights","privacy"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly support transgender student rights\" and criticizes opposition to the policy. The statement \"I can't believe this is even debatable\" indicates clear approval of the regulation's purpose.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender student rights","LGBTQ+ inclusion","nondiscrimination"]}


{"stance":"unknown","stance_confidence":0.95,"stance_rationale":"The comment only says \"Strongly oppose\" and then trails off with \"Virginia Department of Education’s (VDOE)\" without specifying what is being opposed or why. Although the title suggests opposition, the body is too incomplete to confidently classify the stance toward the regulation itself.","tone":"negative","tags":["opposition"]}