{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.93,"stance_rationale":"The commenter repeatedly questions the need for the policy and says, \"There was no need for action by the legislator,\" indicating opposition to adoption as written. They also argue it is \"more about scoring political points with identity politics\" and suggest it should be rewritten in \"more general terms,\" which signals they do not support the proposed regulation in its current form.","tone":"negative","tags":["identity politics","parental rights","transgender students","school sports","puberty blockers"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.96,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says they \"do not agree with proposed documents,\" indicating opposition to the regulation. The concern about \"parents not being informed of school's actions with child\" suggests they want the policy rejected or changed to require parental notification.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","student privacy","transparency"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly calls the policy \"Completely unnecessary and dangerous\" and asks, \"Why is this necessary?\" They argue it should not apply to minors and that such matters should wait until \"18+,\" indicating rejection of the regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","minors","school policy","gender identity"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I support this policy\" and describes it as \"a great foundation for support to all students.\" They also state it \"will help make school a safer place,\" which reinforces approval of adoption.","tone":"positive","tags":["student safety","LGBTQ+ inclusion","supportive schools"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly states, \"I support the draft guidance provided by the VDOE,\" which directly endorses adoption of the regulation. There is no qualifying language or criticism suggesting opposition or neutrality.","tone":"positive","tags":["transgender students","school policy","LGBTQ+ inclusion"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly rejects the policy as \"Completely wrong and completely confusing\" and asks to \"keep real biology and real science,\" indicating opposition to the transgender student guidance. The phrase \"Please leave fairy tales out of our schools\" further shows they want the regulation rejected.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","biology","science","school policy"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"Fully support this guidance\" and \"100% support this necessary guidance,\" which clearly endorses adoption of the regulation. There is no indication of opposition or neutrality.","tone":"positive","tags":["transgender students","LGBTQ+ inclusion","school policy"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly support the initiatives to protect trans and nonbinary youth in our schools\" and argues that these protections \"can and will save students' lives.\" The comment endorses the regulation’s goals of nondiscrimination, inclusion, and school-level protections for transgender students.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","anti-discrimination","bullying prevention","mental health"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly asks, \"Please leave this garbage out of our schools,\" indicating they want the policy rejected. They also argue that \"there are only 2 sexes\" and object to the guidance as \"completely wrong and completely confusing,\" which shows clear opposition to the regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","LGBTQ+ inclusion","biology","school policy"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I totally support this guidance\" and \"Please follow the guidance for transgender students as described above.\" This is a clear endorsement of adopting the regulation as written.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student privacy","nondiscrimination"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I completely support this!\" and adds that it is \"backed by science\" and beneficial \"for the health and well-being of all students.\" This is a clear endorsement of adopting the regulation.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student well-being","evidence-based policy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly argues against the policy, saying it would \"endanger all children\" and \"harm them all.\" They also urge, \"Don’t be the cause of fostering situations for rape and sexual abuse,\" which clearly rejects adoption of the regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":["student safety","religious freedom","privacy","LGBTQ+ inclusion","sexual abuse"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I am totally against this\" and calls the policy a \"transgender agenda\" and \"political agenda.\" They also urge reducing school funding and moving children to private school or homeschooling to avoid it, indicating clear opposition to adoption.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","LGBTQ+ inclusion","parental rights","school funding","political agenda"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.97,"stance_rationale":"The commenter clearly rejects the policy, calling it \"horrific and completely upside-down.\" The phrase \"Follow the science,\" except when it comes to DNA\" signals opposition to the transgender student guidance on biological grounds.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","science","biology","school policy"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I fully support this guidance document\" and repeats, \"I support this guidance\". They argue it will help LGBTQ+ students feel safe and reduce \"discrimination and harassment,\" which clearly indicates approval of the regulation.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","bullying prevention","anti-discrimination","school climate"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says they would \"vehemently oppose\" the school's involvement and describes the policies as \"overstepping\" and \"invasive.\" They conclude that the policies \"do not protect\" students, teachers, or parents and instead put rights at risk, indicating clear opposition to adoption.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","teacher authority","privacy","student identity","LGBTQ+ inclusion"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly rejects the policy’s inclusion of transgender students, saying it will \"confuse them even more\" and objecting to saying it is OK to be \"bisexual, gay or lesbian and now transgender.\" The final sentence urges that such matters be kept out of public education, indicating opposition to adoption of the regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","transgender students","public education","parental rights"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I do not approve of your proposed guidelines\" and argues they are based on \"radical theories\" that would \"eradicate all distinctions between male and female.\" This is a clear rejection of the regulation as proposed.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","gender identity","school policy","indoctrination"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I support the guidelines written to protect transgender students and keep them safe.\" This is a clear endorsement of adopting the regulation as proposed.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","nondiscrimination"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"DO NOT APPROVE THIS\" and asks, \"Please do not approve this sickening agenda,\" which clearly rejects the regulation. The phrase \"sickening agenda\" indicates opposition to the policy itself rather than a request for changes.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","LGBTQ+ inclusion","school policy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I do not support\" the policies and adds, \"These policies harm all children,\" which clearly rejects adoption of the regulation. The statement is broad and negative toward the proposed guidance rather than requesting changes.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","student safety","LGBTQ+ inclusion"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I fully support this guidance.\" They also endorse the policy goal by stating that \"Transgender youth need, want, and deserve to feel safe in their schools.\"","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","supportive schools","transgender students"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly rejects the policy, calling it \"Transgender BS\" and saying \"Forcing transgender anything on the 99% heterosexual population is wrong!!!\" This is a clear objection to adopting the regulation and frames it as coercive.","tone":"negative","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","transgender students","parental rights","school policy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Totally Disagree\" and calls the policy \"completely ridiculous\" and a \"Terrible use of our tax dollars,\" which clearly indicates rejection of the regulation. There is no language suggesting support or a request for modification; the comment is purely oppositional.","tone":"negative","tags":["budget concerns","transgender policies","public schools"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I absolutely DO NOT APPROVE\" of the \"new Virginia Department of Education Guidelines\" and urges, \"STOP with all this silliness.\" The rest of the comment argues against transgender identity as \"a psychological fantasy,\" reinforcing clear opposition to the regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","LGBTQ+ inclusion","privacy","nondiscrimination"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter says, \"I am totally opposed to any public school policy\" and objects to a policy that would affect their granddaughter's privacy. They specifically reject shared restroom/shower access with \"biological males,\" indicating opposition to the proposed transgender student policy.","tone":"negative","tags":["privacy","bathroom access","student safety","parental rights","transgender students"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I do not support any measures to remove/reduce traditional gender from our schools,\" which rejects the proposed transgender student policies. They also call the policies \"indoctrinating the children\" and argue schools should keep \"traditional gender roles\" and sex-segregated facilities, indicating opposition to the regulation as written.","tone":"negative","tags":["traditional gender roles","bathroom access","locker rooms","LGBTQ+ inclusion","student privacy"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Fully Support!\" and repeatedly endorses the guidance as \"needed, worthwhile, and valuable.\" They also state it \"will save lives\" and \"Only rightful good will come for this,\" indicating clear approval of adoption.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","mental health","anti-bullying","privacy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The comment calls the policy a \"Revolting perversion,\" which is a clear denunciation of the transgender student policies. It expresses strong rejection rather than support or neutral feedback.","tone":"negative","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","transgender students","school policy"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter clearly endorses the policy’s underlying goals, stating that \"our priority should always be our students first\" and that \"Inequity shall not be tolerated nor perpetuated.\" The emphasis on student well-being, safety, and health indicates support for protections for transgender students rather than opposition.","tone":"positive","tags":["education equity","student safety","LGBTQ+ inclusion","anti-discrimination"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I do not support this legislation,\" which directly indicates opposition to the proposed regulation. The follow-up statement, \"It will cause more harm than good,\" reinforces that they want it rejected rather than adopted.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender policy","school regulations","student safety"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I support this policy\" and calls it \"a great first step\". They also praise it for helping and respecting transgender students and creating \"a more inclusive environment,\" which clearly indicates approval of adoption.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","inclusivity","transgender students"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says they are \"strongly opposed\" to the guidelines and that \"this policy needs to be tossed.\" They argue the policy would be \"detrimental to the learning process\" and create disruption, indicating clear rejection of adoption.","tone":"negative","tags":["privacy","student safety","bathroom access","school disruption","transgender policies"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly urges officials to \"DROP THIS TOPIC\" and \"STOP WASTING OUR TAX DOLLARS,\" calling the policy \"illogical,\" \"inappropriate,\" and \"confusing.\" They argue schools should not address transgender issues and that this would cause \"irreparable damage\" to children.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","parental rights","school curriculum","student identity","taxpayer concerns"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says they \"wholeheartedly support passage of this bill\" and expresses gratitude for the policy. This is a clear endorsement of adopting the regulation.","tone":"positive","tags":["transgender students","LGBTQ+ inclusion","school policy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says they \"wholeheartedly disapprove\" of the policy and repeatedly argues it \"shouldn't\" move forward, including \"If this moves forward, and I hope it doesn't.\" They frame the proposal as threatening \"parental authority,\" \"religious rights,\" and student safety, and call for \"exceptions\" to the policy.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","religious freedom","bathroom access","student safety","privacy"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly praises the policy as \"a fantastic step forward\" and asks to \"continue to protect the rights of ALL people and all students.\" This is clear approval of the regulation and encouragement to keep it in place.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student rights","nondiscrimination","school policy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I wholeheartedly disagree\" and asks, \"Please vote against it\" and \"Do not enact these rules.\" This is a clear rejection of the proposed transgender policies, with the stated concern that they would \"break families apart\" and make parenting harder.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","family impact","transgender policies","school policy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I do not agree with the proposed bill\" and characterizes it as an attempt to \"penalize those who do not agree\" with the policy. The statement that \"The science of biology supports male or female sex for every individual\" and \"Children are not the property of the state\" further indicates rejection of the regulation's premise and goals.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","biology","free speech","parental rights","government overreach"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly rejects the policy as a \"dangerous usurpation of parents' right\" and says it is \"founded on identity politics, not science.\" The statement that it will \"endanger the lives of children\" indicates clear opposition to adoption.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","transgender students","student safety","science"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I do NOT approve of these proposed guidelines\" and urges \"DO NOT APPROVE.\" They object to the policies as \"radical theories\" and say they \"indoctrinate our school children,\" indicating clear opposition to adoption.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender policies","school children","indoctrination","sex distinctions"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.93,"stance_rationale":"The comment calls the policy \"Pure insanity\" and frames it as \"the wisdom of man, void of God,\" which clearly rejects the proposed transgender student policies. It offers no support or neutral inquiry, only condemnation of the regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":["religious freedom","LGBTQ+ inclusion","transgender students"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter rejects the premise of the policy, saying there is \"absolutely no evidence for the notion of transgender\" and calling it \"How foolish\" for legislators to spend time on it. The \"Check the plumbing!!!\" remark and references to sex differences indicate opposition to the regulation's treatment of transgender students.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","sex differences","school policy","LGBTQ+ inclusion"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly states, \"I support this policy,\" which directly indicates approval of the regulation. The added phrase \"as a parent in Fairfax county\" provides context but does not change the clear supportive stance.","tone":"positive","tags":["transgender students","public schools","parental support"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly states, \"I support this policy,\" which directly endorses adoption of the regulation. The additional line, \"As a Fairfax County parent, I support this policy,\" reinforces the same position without adding conditions or objections.","tone":"positive","tags":["transgender students","school policy","parental support"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly urges action in favor of the policy: \"All students deserve to be safe, protected, and to learn in a supportive environment\" and says Virginia should be \"leading the way\" on \"human rights\" and \"science.\" The criticism of those who would create \"unsafe places for trans students\" indicates support for the regulation’s protections for transgender students.","tone":"positive","tags":["transgender students","student safety","human rights","supportive environment","LGBTQ+ inclusion"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly rejects the policy, saying \"Stop!\" and \"THROW THIS FOOLISH POLICY IN THE TRASH.\" They argue it is \"inappropriate\" and should not be adopted because it allegedly confuses students and threatens privacy and safety.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","parental rights","student privacy","bathroom access","student safety"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I support the Model Policy\" and thanks the Department \"for working to create a safe and supportive environment for all students.\" This is a clear endorsement of adopting the regulation.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","supportive environment"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter says, \"I am totally opposed to this being proposed for Virginia schools,\" which is a direct rejection of the regulation. They also argue it should be left to \"the parents\" and that it takes away \"our parental rights,\" indicating they want the policy rejected rather than adopted.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","religious freedom","transgender students","school policy"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly endorses the guidance as a \"huge leap forward\" and says \"YES\" in the title. They praise the policies for protecting students' \"basic human rights\" and state they are \"proud\" of Virginia public schools for supporting \"ALL of our students.\"","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","human rights","school climate","anti-discrimination"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"Wonderful. In full support\" and thanks the drafters for \"supporting trans youth.\" They also express approval of the policy’s purpose, saying it \"only improves lives\" and wishing it had existed when they were in school.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","transgender students","student support","nondiscrimination"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I fully support the model transgender policy,\" which directly endorses adoption of the regulation. The rest of the comment criticizes opponents, reinforcing a pro-policy position.","tone":"negative","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","transgender students","school policy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I oppose this kind of rule\" and argues it is \"against Natural Law and Morals.\" They also urge that it not be approved, saying it would \"destroy our Virginia and the U.S.A.\" and that there is \"no chance it will be law ever.\"","tone":"negative","tags":["religious freedom","transgender students","moral opposition","public referendum"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter repeatedly argues against accommodating transgender students, asking why schools should \"change due to a few's perspective\" and framing such policies as \"confusing\" and potentially harmful. They also question whether children should be accommodated at all, implying the regulation should not be adopted.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","gender identity","student privacy","school accommodations","LGBTQ+ inclusion"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter argues that \"Sex and physiology related topics is not appropriate to be taught in schools\" and that \"Parents and guardians are the right folks\" to handle these issues, which rejects the regulation’s school-based guidance. They also say \"kids should not be taught/deciding on these topics outside the nuclear family,\" indicating opposition to the policy framework.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","gender identity","transgender students","school curriculum","student privacy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly calls the policies \"UNACCEPTABLE & Dangerous\" and says they \"completely unacceptable,\" indicating clear opposition. They argue the policies \"violates parental rights\" and \"jeopardize safety,\" and object to school involvement in decisions about children.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","student safety","privacy","bathroom access","school authority"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I support the dissemination of these tools to all schools in Virginia\" and thanks those who \"support transgender youth.\" The comment praises the guidelines as \"evidence-based\" and intended to reduce discrimination and harassment, indicating clear approval of the regulation.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","anti-discrimination","bullying prevention","transgender youth"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly states, \"Absolutely, 100% support for these students!\" This is a clear endorsement of the proposed transgender student policies.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student support","nondiscrimination"]}


{"stance":"unknown","stance_confidence":0.86,"stance_rationale":"The comment does not clearly endorse or reject the transgender student policies; it only says, \"Let the people decide.\" This is a procedural request for a referendum rather than a substantive position on adoption of the regulation.","tone":"neutral","tags":["referendum","public input"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"VOTE YES!\" and repeatedly urges support for the guidance, stating it is important to \"support our trans kids\" and that \"This guidance will hopefully be the start to a better learning environment.\" The comment also argues against objections to the policy, indicating clear approval of adoption.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","anti-discrimination","bullying prevention","religious freedom"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly oppose!!!\" and repeatedly argues against the policy, calling it \"a complete loss of rights and trust\" and \"not the answer at all.\" They object to not notifying parents and say \"The school is not the place to enforce such a policy,\" indicating rejection of the regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","privacy","transgender students","school policy","bullying prevention"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly support adoption of the proposed transgender guidelines for schools.\" This is a clear endorsement of the regulation as proposed.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student rights","school policy"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I support these guidelines\" and describes them as \"reasonable.\" They also state the policies will \"lead to more equitable treatment of all students,\" indicating approval of adoption.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","equity","student support","public schools"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly rejects the policy’s premise, stating \"There are only 2 genders\" and calling anything else \"a myth\" and \"lies to our children.\" They also argue for replacing it with \"Christian values,\" which indicates opposition to adopting the transgender student policies.","tone":"negative","tags":["gender identity","religious freedom","LGBTQ+ inclusion","school values"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"SUPPORT AND PROTECT TRANS STUDENTS\" and repeatedly urges that \"School policy needs to protect them.\" They argue the regulation should ensure safety, dignity, rights, and privacy for trans students, which is clear support for adoption.","tone":"positive","tags":["transgender students","student privacy","student safety","nondiscrimination","LGBTQ+ inclusion"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly support this measure!\" and describes it as \"a huge step forward.\" They also endorse its goals of safety, mental health, and respectful self-expression for trans, cis, and questioning students.","tone":"positive","tags":["student safety","mental health","LGBTQ+ inclusion","bullying prevention","school climate"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly support\" and adds \"We must protect our trans students,\" which clearly endorses adoption of the regulation. There is no indication of opposition or neutrality.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","transgender students"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The comment explicitly says \"Support\" and repeats \"support!!!!!,\" which clearly indicates approval of the proposed regulation. There is no language suggesting opposition or neutrality.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","transgender students","school policy"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I support the guidance.\" They also endorse the policy goal by stating, \"All children deserve to be protected and feel safe in school,\" which aligns with adoption of the regulation.","tone":"positive","tags":["student safety","support for guidance","transgender students","school climate"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"This would be a great opportunity and progressive step\" and frames the policy as \"including LGBTQ communities n schools,\" which clearly endorses adoption. There is no opposing language or request to weaken the regulation.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","supportive schools","transgender students"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly states, \"I support the guidance,\" which directly endorses adoption of the proposed regulation. No qualifying language or objections are included.","tone":"positive","tags":["transgender students","LGBTQ+ inclusion","school policy"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly Support!\" and states that \"Trans students deserve to be able learn in a safe and nondiscrimanatory environment!\" This clearly endorses adoption of the proposed policies.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","nondiscrimination"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"protect trans rights\" and the title \"Protect TRANS STUDENTS\" clearly endorses the regulation’s purpose. The phrase \"they deserve the world\" is affirming and supportive rather than critical.","tone":"positive","tags":["transgender students","LGBTQ+ inclusion","student rights"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.93,"stance_rationale":"The commenter says, \"This is exactly why we need school choice,\" referring to the proposed transgender student policies as the reason to redirect funding away from public schools. By advocating to \"divide up the Education budget per kid and send that money to the school of the parents choice,\" the comment clearly signals opposition to the regulation and the public-school framework it would apply to.","tone":"negative","tags":["school choice","public schools","education funding","transgender students"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly urges officials to \"support them and keep them safe\" and says schools should \"accept trans and nonbinary students for who they are.\" The comment frames the policy as necessary to protect vulnerable youth and improve their well-being, which clearly supports adoption of the regulation.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","mental health","bullying prevention","privacy"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"STRONGLY SUPPORT!\" and argues that \"all people are accepted and treated as equal,\" calling for \"inclusivity.\" This clearly endorses the proposed transgender student policies.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student equality","inclusivity"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly states, \"I support the guidance,\" which directly endorses the proposed regulation. No qualifications or objections are included.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","transgender students","school policy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly Oppose\" and argues the policy \"opens the doors for predators to target our children,\" which is a clear rejection of the regulation. The comment does not request changes; it seeks to block adoption based on safety fears.","tone":"negative","tags":["student safety","predators","transgender students","school policy"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly support this proposal\" and frames it as protecting transgender and non-binary children from discrimination. They also endorse the policy basis, stating it should be based on \"research and science\" and that these students \"deserve to be treated fairly and with dignity.\"","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","anti-discrimination","student dignity","evidence-based policy"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"Please support this policy\" and repeatedly argues to \"get a policy in place\" to help transgender students. They frame the regulation as necessary to provide support, reduce bullying, and create consistent standards across jurisdictions.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","bullying prevention","student support","nondiscrimination","privacy"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"STRONGLY SUPPORT!!!!!\" and argues that \"Trans rights are human rights\" and transgender people \"DESERVES FAIR TREATMENT.\" The comment urges the policy to \"give them the support they need and deserve,\" indicating clear approval of the regulation.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","transgender rights","equal treatment","student support"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The comment explicitly states \"SUPPORT\" and repeats \"Support$$,\" indicating clear approval of the proposed regulation. No contrary language or qualifications are present.","tone":"positive","tags":[]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly Support!!!\" and urges to \"Protect trans students!\" This clearly endorses the proposed policies and their goal of making trans students feel safe in schools.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","transgender students","bullying prevention"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly states, \"I support the guidance!!\" which directly endorses the proposed regulation. The title also says \"SUPPORT,\" reinforcing the same position.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","transgender students","school policy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter rejects the policy outright, saying it is \"not a third option\" and that it is \"wrong\" to \"force these opinions on people.\" They also argue it will \"totally destroy female girl sports,\" indicating opposition to the regulation's treatment of transgender students.","tone":"negative","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","school sports","gender identity","student rights"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I am writing in support of the Model Policies on the Treatment of Transgender Students\" and repeatedly endorses equal treatment and acceptance. They also argue that students should not be \"bullied, harassed, or discriminated against\" and conclude that all students should be treated equally and allowed to thrive.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","anti-bullying","student safety","non-discrimination","mental health"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly oppose!\" and repeatedly urges, \"Please don’t allow this to happen!!\" They argue against transgender recognition in schools, calling it a \"psychological problem\" and warning of harmful consequences if the policy is adopted.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","religious freedom","student privacy","LGBTQ+ inclusion","school policy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter clearly rejects the policy, opening with \"Ansolutely Not\" and criticizing it as coercive: \"threaten and cajole us to either conform or face threats of removal.\" They also argue it imposes broad burdens on others for a small group, saying the policy would \"severely impact\" everyone.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","parental rights","school policy","student rights"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I oppose this absolute insanity!!!!\" which clearly rejects the proposed regulation. The title \"OPPOSE!!!!!!!\" reinforces that they want it rejected.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","school policy","opposition"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly Support!\" and urges that trans people \"Must protect,\" which clearly endorses adoption of the policy. The body is affirming of transgender people and does not express any opposition or reservations.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","nondiscrimination"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Vehemently Oppose\" and \"I strongly object to this measure.\" They also argue it is \"morally and ethically wrong\" and an \"infringement upon our religious beliefs,\" indicating clear rejection of the regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":["religious freedom","parental rights","first amendment","transgender students","school policy"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly support\" and argues that schools should \"do everything possible to protect the rights of students who are transgender, gender nonconforming, nonbinary, etc.\" This clearly endorses adoption of the regulation's protections for transgender students.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","civil rights","nonbinary students"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Oppose!!\" and calls the policy \"extremely dangerous,\" indicating clear rejection of the regulation. The statement that \"This is Orwellian\" further shows disapproval of the proposed transgender student policies.","tone":"negative","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","nondiscrimination","privacy"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly support the policies to support trans students.\" They also reinforce approval by stating that the policies have \"significant positive impacts\" for trans students and all students.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","support for transgender students"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly support\" and urges action to \"protect our trans students,\" which clearly endorses adoption of the regulation. The brief exclamation \"C'mon now!\" reinforces approval rather than criticism.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","transgender students"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"STRONGLY SUPPORT\" and adds \"Trans rights = human rights,\" which clearly endorses the regulation’s purpose and protections for transgender students. There is no language indicating opposition or neutrality.","tone":"positive","tags":["transgender rights","LGBTQ+ inclusion","nondiscrimination"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly support!\" and asks to \"support the protection of trans lives.\" They also argue against barriers like \"Surgery requirements,\" indicating approval of the regulation with concern for transgender rights and access.","tone":"positive","tags":["transgender rights","health care","equal rights","access barriers","discrimination"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter rejects the policy’s treatment of transgender students, stating \"u are either woman or man\" and that \"no man claiming to be a woman should be allowed in a womans bathroom.\" The phrase \"this is sick\" shows clear opposition to the regulation’s protections and bathroom access provisions.","tone":"negative","tags":["bathroom access","transgender students","privacy","LGBTQ+ inclusion"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly Opposed\" and argues the policy \"opposes God\" and \"takes parenting out of the hands of the parents.\" They also say it \"creates more problems than it solves,\" indicating rejection of the regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","religious freedom","transgender policy","education priorities"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I stongly support the well-researched and evidence based proposal.\" They also endorse the policy’s purpose, saying it would \"protect this very vulnerable group of students\" and create a \"safe and inclusive learning environment.\"","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","inclusive schools","bullying prevention"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly titles the submission \"Strongly Support\" and criticizes people who would oppose the policy, saying \"Imagine being opposed to this, I can't.\" The final sentence, \"Don't have kids if wont accept who they are,\" clearly endorses acceptance of transgender students and the regulation's purpose.","tone":"negative","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","transgender students","parental rights","school policy"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly support\" and states they are \"strongly in support of supporting and protecting trans students’ rights.\" This clearly endorses adoption of the regulation.","tone":"positive","tags":["transgender students","student rights","LGBTQ+ inclusion","student protection"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly Support!\" and argues that students should be able to express their gender identity \"in a safe environment.\" They also state that \"Transgender children deserve to be protected,\" which clearly endorses the regulation's purpose.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","gender identity","anti-discrimination"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I am strongly opposed to this\" and argues against transgender students using bathrooms or dressing with others, indicating rejection of the policy. The language calling it \"tyrannical,\" \"child abuse,\" and saying it \"destroys families\" reinforces a clear oppositional stance.","tone":"negative","tags":["bathroom access","student privacy","parental rights","transgender students","school facilities"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly labels the submission \"OPPOSE\" and argues against the policy by rejecting \"changes without facts to support it.\" They also criticize \"affirming treatment\" and say \"There is no evidence this treatment is effective,\" indicating opposition to the regulation’s transgender-student guidance.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender youth","evidence-based policy","medical treatment","student rights"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"STRONGLY SUPPORT\" and asks to \"do everything in your power to protect and support transgender students and the entire LGBT+ student community.\" They also oppose any weaker approach, calling anything less \"a betrayal of our students' human rights.\"","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","transgender students","anti-discrimination","student rights"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I fully support this legislation\" and \"urge you to pass it.\" They also frame the policy as beneficial, stating it will \"save lives,\" which clearly indicates approval of adoption.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student support","nondiscrimination","mental health"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly Oppose!\" and objects to the policy with \"dont force LGBTQ on our Kids!!\" This indicates rejection of the proposed transgender student policies rather than support or neutrality.","tone":"negative","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","parental rights","student privacy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly oppose\" the draft policies and ends with \"Please DO NOT ratify these policies!\" They argue the policies threaten girls' privacy and safety, exclude parents, and involve schools in matters they believe schools should not handle.","tone":"negative","tags":["privacy","student safety","parental rights","religious freedom","LGBTQ+ inclusion"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly states, \"I support this,\" which directly indicates approval of the proposed regulation. The title also says \"Support,\" reinforcing the same position.","tone":"positive","tags":[]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly support the adoption of this Model Policy\" and frames it as the \"only moral choice.\" This is a clear endorsement of adopting the regulation as proposed.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","civil rights","student protection"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly states, \"I support the guidance,\" which directly endorses adoption of the proposed regulation. No qualifications or objections are included.","tone":"positive","tags":[]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly support the model policy for trans and non-binary students.\" They also endorse the policy’s purpose by stating that \"All students deserve a safe and supportive school environment.\"","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","supportive school environment"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly labels the submission \"STRONG SUPPORT\" and says the policy is \"an important step in creating a safe environment for all VA students\". The phrase \"help foster inclusiveness\" further indicates approval of the regulation.","tone":"positive","tags":["student safety","inclusiveness","LGBTQ+ inclusion"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly Support\" and \"very strongly support this policy recommendation.\" They also praise the policy as providing \"much needed guidance\" and helping schools create a \"safe and inclusive learning environment.\"","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","school climate","teacher training","bullying prevention"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly oppose\" the policy and threatens to withdraw their children if it passes, which clearly indicates rejection of the regulation. There is no supporting or neutral language in the comment.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","transgender students","school policy"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly titles the comment \"Strongly Support\" and repeatedly endorses the policy’s goals, saying they want kids to be \"supported and defended\" and to have access to education \"no matter what they look like or identify as.\" They also argue against discrimination and for student safety and inclusion, which aligns with adopting the regulation.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","bullying prevention","bathroom access","privacy"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly Support\" and adds that \"Supporting children being themselves should be a no-brainer,\" which clearly endorses the regulation. There is no indication of opposition or neutrality.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student support","transgender students"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly support this proposal\" and argues it would \"protect this already vulnerable group of students\" and create a \"safe and inclusive learning environment.\" The final aside is also supportive of the policy's goals, despite being dismissive of opponents.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","inclusive schools","privacy","bathroom access"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I hope most of this policy will be struck down,\" and argues that it is \"dangerous to experiment on people.\" They also oppose key elements of the regulation, including bathroom access, sports participation, and limiting parental involvement.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","bathroom access","school sports","gender identity","privacy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly calls the policy \"the most ridiculous thing\" and says \"If this is passed, public schools will lose a ton of employees and students,\" indicating clear opposition. They also argue it will make children unsafe and propose an alternative, narrower bathroom arrangement instead of the policy as written.","tone":"negative","tags":["student safety","bathroom access","locker rooms","privacy","transgender students"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly endorses protecting transgender students and says they should be \"uplifted, not alienated\" by school administrators. The comment supports allowing students to \"express their gender\" authentically and argues against harassment, indicating approval of the proposed policies.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","bullying prevention","gender identity","school climate"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly rejects the policy with \"Absolutely NOT!!\" and argues that \"Males have absolutely no place in Female sports or any other female organisations,\" indicating opposition to transgender-inclusive school policies. The statement also says \"The same holds true for Females,\" reinforcing a rejection of the proposed guidance rather than support or neutrality.","tone":"negative","tags":["school sports","gender identity","sex-specific facilities","LGBTQ+ inclusion"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"STRONGLY SUPPORT!\" and adds \"Trans rights are a human right!\" indicating clear approval of the proposed transgender student policies. There is no language suggesting opposition or neutrality.","tone":"positive","tags":["transgender rights","LGBTQ+ inclusion","nondiscrimination"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly states, \"I support the guidance,\" which directly endorses adoption of the regulation. They also give a reason for approval, saying children \"deserve a safe and inclusive school community.\"","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","school climate","anti-discrimination"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Oppose these guidelines\" and argues that \"parents have authority\" rather than the government. They also reject mixed-sex access to bathrooms and locker rooms, calling it \"non-negotiable\" and describing the policy as \"irresponsible\" and \"dangerous.\"","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","bathroom access","privacy","student safety","gender identity"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I oppose the requirements being considered\" and calls the policies harmful because they \"provide no exceptions for faith based beliefs\" and \"block parents access\". They argue the policy \"take[s] away the rights of the majority,\" indicating rejection of the regulation as written.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","religious freedom","transgender students","school policy","student rights"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"Protect trans people\" and condemns the current situation as \"this awful oppression,\" which indicates support for the regulation’s protective intent. The phrase \"Shame on you for creating this hostile environment\" suggests they want stronger protections rather than rejection of the policy.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender rights","anti-discrimination","student safety","LGBTQ+ inclusion"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter clearly rejects the policy, calling it \"sick,\" \"disgusting,\" and saying that \"allowing it is disgusting.\" They also argue that \"Teaching this or allowing this to proceed borders on child abuse,\" which indicates strong opposition to adoption of the transgender student policies.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","child abuse","school policy","gender identity"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly support this\" and endorses the policy for \"our LGBTQ+ kids.\" The phrase \"It should be a no brainer\" reinforces clear approval of adoption.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student support","nondiscrimination"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The comment explicitly says \"Support trans rights!!\" and is clearly endorsing the regulation’s purpose of protecting transgender students. There is no language opposing or questioning the policy.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","transgender students","civil rights"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly support\" and adds that \"Trans kids need support and recognition,\" which clearly endorses the regulation. The final sentence, \"Do unto others as you would have them do unto you,\" reinforces approval of the policy's protective intent.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student support","transgender students","nondiscrimination"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"This proposed rule will make Virginia schools a better place to learn\" and argues that schools should be safe and inclusive for transgender and nonbinary students. The comment repeatedly endorses the policy’s goals of preventing bullying, discrimination, and improving access to bathrooms and locker rooms.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","bullying prevention","student safety","privacy","bathroom access"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"STRONGLY SUPPORT\" and adds \"Trans rights are human rights,\" which clearly endorses the proposed transgender student policies. There is no indication of opposition or neutrality.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","transgender students","civil rights"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly states, \"I strongly support,\" which directly indicates approval of the proposed regulation. No contrary language or qualifications are included.","tone":"positive","tags":[]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says the proposals are \"very detrimental\" and asks, \"Please do not enact these changes in the public schools.\" They also argue the policy would conflict with religious beliefs, harm family structure, and increase risk in restrooms/locker rooms, all indicating opposition to adoption.","tone":"negative","tags":["religious freedom","parental rights","bathroom access","student safety","gender identity"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly SUPPORT\" and adds \"Trans rights are human rights!\" indicating clear approval of the proposed policies. There is no qualifying language or criticism of the regulation.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","transgender rights","nondiscrimination"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly states \"Strongly support,\" which directly endorses adoption of the regulation. No contrary language or qualifications are included.","tone":"positive","tags":[]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.93,"stance_rationale":"The comment explicitly says \"Support amendment,\" which indicates approval of the regulation with changes. It does not raise objections or request rejection, so the stance is supportive rather than opposing or neutral.","tone":"neutral","tags":["regulatory amendment"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly urges officials to \"do everything and anything you can\" to ensure transgender and gender non-conforming students \"feel safe and cared for at school,\" which aligns with adopting the policy. The statement \"trans rights are human rights\" is a clear endorsement of protections for transgender students.","tone":"positive","tags":["transgender students","student safety","LGBTQ+ inclusion","bullying prevention","school climate"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly support this guidance\" and frames it as necessary \"to protect trans and non-binary youth.\" They also state that schools should be places where \"all children can be safe,\" indicating approval of the regulation's purpose and adoption.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","bullying prevention","school climate"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly support\" and argues that \"we should respect how others choose to live without inhibiting them,\" which clearly endorses the policy. The statement \"Trans people are people\" is also affirming of the regulation's purpose.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","transgender students","civil rights","respect"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"STRONGLY SUPPORT TRANS RIGHTS\" and urges that \"trans youth\" be \"accepted and be who they want to be,\" which clearly endorses the regulation's purpose. There is no language opposing or questioning the policy.","tone":"positive","tags":["trans rights","LGBTQ+ inclusion","student acceptance"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly states, \"We are strongly opposed to this proposed policy change,\" which directly rejects adoption of the regulation. No supporting reasons or qualifications are provided, but the opposition is unambiguous.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender policy","public schools","opposition"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter begins with \"Strongly disagree\" and argues against the policy allowing transgender students access to facilities aligned with their gender identity. They say they would \"never want my kids in the same bathroom or locker room\" and claim the policy is \"taking away our kids rights,\" indicating clear opposition to adoption.","tone":"negative","tags":["bathroom access","locker rooms","parental rights","student privacy","transgender policy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly oppose this,\" which directly rejects the proposed regulation. The opening phrase, \"These children need our love,\" does not change the overall position and appears to be a preface to opposition.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","school policy","parental rights","taxpayer concerns"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly states, \"I support the policy,\" which directly endorses adoption of the regulation. There is no qualifying language suggesting opposition or neutrality.","tone":"positive","tags":[]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The comment explicitly rejects the regulation with \"HELL No!!!!!!!\" and calls it \"the most ridiculous thing ever!!!\" This is a clear expression of opposition to the proposed policies.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","LGBTQ+ inclusion","school policy"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.96,"stance_rationale":"The comment explicitly says \"Support\" and adds \"I believe we must make systemic change,\" which indicates approval of the proposed policies. There is no language opposing or questioning the regulation.","tone":"positive","tags":["transgender students","systemic change","nondiscrimination"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I stand in full support of legislation to protect the health and well being of Transgender youth in Virginia schools.\" They also urge that \"policies must be implemented in schools\" so all students can \"grow and thrive,\" which clearly endorses adoption of the regulation.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","bullying prevention","transgender students"]}


{"stance":"unknown","stance_confidence":0.18,"stance_rationale":"The comment only says \"STRONGLY DISAGREE!!\" without stating what part of the regulation it objects to or whether it is opposing adoption of the policy itself. Because there is no substantive explanation, it is too vague to confidently classify as support or oppose.","tone":"negative","tags":[]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly oppose\" and argues the policy is \"taking away safe spaces for girls,\" which indicates rejection of the regulation. Although they mention protecting children's rights and compassion, the overall message is against adoption of the transgender student policies.","tone":"negative","tags":["student safety","girls' spaces","transgender students","school facilities"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly Support\" and states the regulations \"are wonderful and should already be in place.\" They also argue that school should be \"a safe zone\" and that the policy will \"lower bullying and suicidal rates,\" indicating clear approval of adoption.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","bullying prevention","mental health"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly support this,\" which clearly endorses the proposed regulation. The additional point about \"increasing accessibility to mental health resources\" is a related policy suggestion, not a rejection or weakening of the regulation.","tone":"positive","tags":["mental health","student support","LGBTQ+ inclusion"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Support!\" and \"Totally support!\", which clearly indicates approval of the proposed regulation. There is no qualifying language or criticism suggesting any opposition.","tone":"positive","tags":[]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter uses explicitly hostile language about the policy, saying it \"preps little children\" and accusing it of grooming and pedophilia. This is a clear rejection of the proposed transgender student policies rather than a request for changes.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","child safety","grooming","school policy","LGBTQ+ inclusion"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I support the identification of transgender students as their chosen gender\" and argues that people should be allowed to do so. The rest of the comment condemns opposition and frames the policy as preventing \"hate,\" indicating clear support for the regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","gender identity","human rights","LGBTQ+ inclusion"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Disagree\" and argues the policies \"go far beyond the path the General Assembly prescribed.\" They also state that schools should not accommodate these policies and that they \"infringe upon parents' rights and duties,\" indicating opposition to adoption.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","privacy","bathroom access","locker rooms","gender identity"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Vote NO!\" and repeatedly urges rejection: \"I do not want\" these guidelines and \"Stop this madness now!\" They argue the policies are \"unworkable\" and object to restroom/locker room access and student privacy provisions.","tone":"negative","tags":["bathroom access","locker rooms","parental rights","privacy","transgender students"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly oppose this!\" and repeats \"I oppose them!\" They argue the policies let schools and government replace parents and allow \"KIDS to make these adult like decisions,\" indicating rejection of the regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","student privacy","age appropriateness","government overreach","transgender students"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"i absolutely support this\" and adds support for \"any piece of legislation that will support transgender teens and people.\" The closing \"Don’t drop the ball\" reinforces approval of the regulation rather than opposition or neutrality.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","transgender students","student support"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly rejects the policy, calling it \"ABSOLUTELY SICKENING\" and asserting that \"This country was founded for men and women,\" which signals opposition to transgender-inclusive guidance. The title \"Trans people deserve death, not support\" is also a clear denunciation of the regulation's subject matter.","tone":"negative","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","transgender students","discrimination","school policy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I oppose the detailed proposal\" and \"I will never support policy\" that \"intentionally eliminates the parent.\" They also ask for alternatives and exemptions, stating parents should receive \"FULL disclosure\" and options for those who oppose it on religious grounds.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","religious freedom","privacy","school communication","transgender students"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I do not support this in any way shape or form,\" which clearly rejects the proposed policies. They also object to transgender inclusion in schools and specifically say, \"Trans don't need to be in women sports either,\" indicating opposition to the regulation's purpose and provisions.","tone":"negative","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","school sports","religious freedom","student privacy"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly urges approval of the policy, saying \"Support saves lives\" and that schools should \"putting the health and safety of our children first.\" They argue that \"validating a student's gender identity\" is beneficial, which aligns with endorsing the proposed transgender student policies.","tone":"positive","tags":["student safety","mental health","LGBTQ+ inclusion","transgender students"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.97,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly frames the proposal as harmful, saying it \"will be so confusing for children\" and \"basically creates chaos in our schools.\" They also argue it makes teaching harder by adding \"more pressure on the teacher,\" which indicates opposition to adoption.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","school climate","teacher burden","student confusion"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly titles the submission \"Oppose\" and says the policy is \"a major overstep of the role of public entity.\" They object to \"giving a public entity the right to usurp parental rights\" and argue these issues should be handled by families without school interference.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","school authority","transgender students","privacy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.97,"stance_rationale":"The commenter says, \"I strongly oppose any idea\" and \"THIS IS NOT THE WAY,\" indicating clear rejection of the proposed policies. They also object to \"government to force any type of rule,\" asking to \"come up with another solution\" instead of adopting this regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","government overreach","parental rights","nondiscrimination"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly rejects the policy, saying \"Absolutely Not,\" \"this is unacceptable,\" and \"in no way should be allowed.\" They repeatedly argue that it should be \"left to the parents,\" call the proposal \"unconstitutional,\" and say \"LEAVE IT TO THE PARENTS.\"","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","religious freedom","transgender students","privacy","school policy"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly support this\" and argues that \"Protecting these individuals hurts no one.\" The remainder of the comment reinforces approval by emphasizing the need to protect transgender students from harm.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","privacy","anti-discrimination"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I wholeheartedly vote NO on this proposal\" and repeatedly argues the policy would \"disregard women's rights\" and \"silence and discriminate against women.\" They also urge the state to \"Find a better solution\" rather than adopt this policy, indicating clear opposition.","tone":"negative","tags":["women's rights","bathroom access","locker rooms","school sports","religious freedom"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I do not support this bill,\" which directly indicates opposition to adoption. They also argue it \"takes the rights away from parents\" and object to punishment for pronoun mistakes, showing they want the policy rejected or substantially weakened.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","pronouns","religious freedom","LGBTQ+ inclusion"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"STRONGLY OPPOSE\" and identifies the regulation as \"undermining of parental authority,\" which clearly indicates rejection of the proposed policy. There is no request for modification or neutral input, only opposition.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","transgender students","school policy"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"STRONGLY SUPPORT!\" and \"Wholeheartedly support!\" They also endorse the policy goals by stating \"Trans rights are human rights\" and that every student deserves a \"compassionate and inclusive setting\" where they are safe.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","transgender rights","inclusive schools"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"SUPPORT TRANS KIDS\" and \"Trans rights are human rights,\" which clearly endorses the regulation’s protections for transgender students. The statement that \"No child should be discriminated against\" aligns with adopting the policy.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student rights","nondiscrimination","privacy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I do not support this bill\" and argues that transgender students should use the \"correct designated restroom,\" indicating rejection of the proposed policies. The comment also warns that adopting it would lead to \"more sexual assault in our schools\" and students being pulled from school, reinforcing opposition.","tone":"negative","tags":["bathroom access","religious freedom","student safety","transgender students"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly oppose the legislation/amendment regarding transgender policies.\" They also argue it is \"not the role of our government to mandate such requirements\" and call the policy \"detrimental to society in general,\" indicating clear rejection of the regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender policies","government overreach","public schools","taxpayer burden"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I support House Bill 145 and Senate Bill 16\" and calls the actions in the bill \"necessary.\" They also describe the proposal as \"a first step towards creating an equitable learning space\" and hope it becomes \"groundwork for further legislation,\" indicating clear support for adoption.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","equity","transgender students"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I support the guidance\" and clarifies the reason: \"to protect trans students.\" This is a clear endorsement of the proposed regulation as written.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","nondiscrimination"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I support the guidance\" and praises it for \"improving the lives of trans and non-binary kids in schools.\" This is a clear endorsement of adopting the regulation.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student support","school climate"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly support these policies,\" which directly endorses adoption. They also praise \"supportive measures and inclusive alterations\" and frame them as beneficial for transgender and LGBTQIA+ students.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","dress codes","transgender youth"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly states, \"I wholeheartedly support these guidelines,\" which directly endorses adoption of the regulation. There is no qualifying language or criticism suggesting opposition or neutrality.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","nondiscrimination"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"100% support\" and asks to \"support the guidance for protecting LGBTQ+ and trans youth.\" They also state that \"The safety and well being of these young people depends on steps like this happening,\" which clearly endorses adoption of the regulation.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","transgender students","student safety","bullying prevention"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.96,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I do not support all the parts of this legislation\" and \"cannot support it as a whole,\" which indicates rejection of the regulation in its current form. Although they do not specify which provisions they object to, the overall position is clearly opposed.","tone":"neutral","tags":["transgender students","school policy"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Support trans kids\" and argues that transgender students have an \"equal right to safe and harassment-free public education.\" They also say it is \"imperative\" that school boards receive this guidance, which clearly endorses adoption of the policy.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","bullying prevention","nondiscrimination"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly endorses the policy, saying \"We need to do everything we can to protect and support our transgender students\" and calling \"Transgender affirming policies\" \"a necessary part\" of school support. The comment argues for adoption based on safety and affirmation concerns rather than raising objections or questions.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","mental health","anti-bullying","school policy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I do not want the state to decide when my child learns about this\" and argues to \"Let parents be parents,\" which rejects the proposed policies. They also frame the guidance as harmful by saying treating transgender students as \"completely normal only hurts them\" and ask to \"oppose this.\"","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","mental health","gender dysphoria","transgender students","school policy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I am totally against the regulations you want to implement\" and objects to specific provisions such as bathroom/locker room access and transgender-related policies. They also argue the rules \"usurp parental authority\" and conflict with \"religious faith\" and \"basic biology,\" indicating clear opposition to adoption.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","bathroom access","religious freedom","transgender policies","school facilities"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly disagree with this proposal\" and repeats that \"this proposal is not ok.\" They argue it \"cuts the parents out,\" \"silences families,\" and raises concerns about bathrooms and changing rooms, indicating clear opposition to adoption of the policy.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","privacy","bathroom access","LGBTQ+ inclusion","school facilities"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly states, \"I support this policy,\" which directly indicates approval of the regulation. The title also says \"SUPPORT,\" reinforcing the same position.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","transgender students","school policy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly oppose!\" and repeats, \"I oppose the proposed VDOE transgender policies.\" They argue the policies will \"add to the confusion and stress\" and criticize them as \"another layer of correctness,\" indicating rejection of adoption.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender policies","student well-being","school policy","LGBTQ+ inclusion"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I fully support the proposed protections for trans and non-binary students\" and repeatedly urges, \"Please, please, please, pass these proposed protections.\" The body consistently endorses the regulation’s goals of nondiscrimination, privacy, bathroom access, and gender-affirming treatment for transgender students.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","privacy","bathroom access","religious freedom"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly endorses the policy’s purpose with the phrases \"trans rights are human rights\" and \"Protect trans kids,\" which clearly supports adoption of the transgender student protections. There is no language opposing or questioning the regulation.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","transgender rights"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly oppose!\" and argues against the policy on bathroom-access grounds. They frame the regulation as creating a safety risk, asking \"what if a random boy says he classifies as a girl and goes into the girls bathroom\" and concluding that children would have to worry about it.","tone":"negative","tags":["bathroom access","student safety","privacy","transgender students"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"Please vote against this,\" and argues the policies \"undermin[e]\" the family and \"discriminat[e] against the religious values\" they live by. The comment clearly rejects the proposed transgender policies rather than supporting them with changes.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","religious freedom","family autonomy","transgender policies"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Support Trans Youth\" and states that \"having everyone on the same page to support students is important,\" which clearly endorses the regulation’s purpose. The comment expresses approval of unified support for LGBTQUIA+ students rather than criticism or opposition.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student support","transgender students","school climate"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I fully support the proposed measures\" and describes them as having \"a tangible, positive impact on children's lives.\" The comment is clearly in favor of adoption, while criticizing opposing comments as harmful.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","bullying prevention","transgender students"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I oppose!!\" and argues the proposal is \"absurd\" and \"goes against all legal rights\" and \"freedom of speech.\" They also reject transgender students' restroom access, stating students and faculty should use their \"birth given gender restrooms,\" which indicates opposition to the regulation's protections and accommodations.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","bathroom access","freedom of speech","parental rights","privacy"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"100% support . Vote yes!\" and \"Protect Trans kids rights!\" which clearly endorses adoption of the regulation. The final line, \"And let them pee in peace!\" further supports transgender students' access and privacy protections.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student privacy","bathroom access","transgender rights"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly oppose even the thought of this,\" which clearly rejects the proposed transgender student policy. The follow-up question, \"How can this even be thought about being implemented,\" reinforces opposition rather than offering a neutral inquiry.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender policy","parental rights","education policy"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly support this!\" and frames the policy as \"protecting trans kids.\" They also argue it is \"being open to every child\" and not \"forcing legislation,\" which clearly endorses adoption of the regulation.","tone":"mixed","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","transgender students","parental rights"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly endorses the policy’s purpose, saying they are fighting for \"BASIC protection and rights for a child\" and that \"ALL CHILDREN deserve to feel safe and supported in their school.\" This clearly supports adoption of the regulation as a means of protecting transgender students and other children.","tone":"positive","tags":["student safety","LGBTQ+ inclusion","nondiscrimination","bullying prevention"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"We are strongly opposed\" and frames the policies as harmful, calling them \"nonsense\" and saying their children will not attend public schools if enacted. They also object that the bills \"violate the rights of Christian families\" and \"take parental control,\" indicating rejection of the regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","religious freedom","transgender policies","public schools"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"Support trans youth at all costs\" three times and frames it as a duty to \"protect children.\" This is a clear endorsement of the proposed transgender student policies.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","transgender students","youth protection"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"we support all children\" and identifies transgender children as included, then urges \"moving forward\" with the policy. They argue that failing to adopt it would subject transgender kids to \"discrimination and stigma,\" which clearly supports approval of the regulation.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","nondiscrimination","student safety","bullying prevention"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I support this guidance\" and explains that schools should be a place where \"everyone feels safe\" and \"comfortable and welcoming.\" This is clear approval of the proposed policies.","tone":"positive","tags":["student safety","LGBTQ+ inclusion","supportive school environment"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"Please support this legislation\" and frames it as needed to \"provide resources to Trans Kids in our schools.\" This is a clear endorsement of adopting the regulation.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student support","transgender students"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"STRONGLY SUPPORT\" and repeatedly urges approval, stating that \"Trans and nonbinary youth deserve support\" and that it is \"imperative to support our children.\" The comment argues the policy would protect youth from ostracization and harm.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student support","mental health","bullying prevention"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Completely support\" and argues that \"this needs to pass.\" They also endorse the policy’s purpose of \"Educating our children to be accepting of all people, regardless of gender identity\" and conclude with \"Trans rights are human rights.\"","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","transgender students","anti-discrimination","school climate","bullying prevention"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"In strong support\" and argues that schools should \"support and affirm\" transgender students. The statement that this is \"important for their survival\" clearly endorses adopting the regulation's protections for transgender children.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","supportive school environment","gender identity"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"Very much in support!\" and describes the policy as \"wonderful progress.\" They also state it will be \"very beneficial\" to the \"health, safety, and general well being\" of transgender individuals, indicating clear approval of adoption.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","well-being","nondiscrimination"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly endorses the policy, saying \"We need to do everything we can to protect and support our transgender students\" and calling \"Transgender affirming policies\" a \"necessary part\" of school protection. The title, \"All students include trans students!\", also signals clear approval of the regulation's purpose.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","bullying prevention","mental health"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I feel this is a step in the right direction\" and expresses hope that the policy will \"help strengthen these students' self worth.\" The comment supports LGBTQ+ youth and endorses adult support in schools, indicating approval of the regulation.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student support","school climate","anti-bullying"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Support!\" and states that \"All students including trans and non-binary students should be supported and protected in Virginia schools,\" which clearly endorses the regulation's purpose. There is no indication of opposition or neutrality.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","nondiscrimination","supportive schools"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"we fully support him\" and adds that \"no kid should feel ashamed for how they identify,\" which clearly endorses the regulation’s protections for transgender students. The final sentence, \"we should be teaching kids compassion, not judgement,\" further supports adoption of the policy.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student support","anti-bullying","compassion","gender identity"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"Absolutely oppose all of this!!!\" and repeatedly rejects the policy as \"unacceptable\" and \"ridiculous.\" They argue it threatens their children's privacy and safety in bathrooms/changing rooms and propose separate individual-use restrooms instead.","tone":"negative","tags":["bathroom access","privacy","student safety","parental rights","gender identity"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"STRONGLY SUPPORT\" and argues that \"Trans individuals are still people\" who \"deserve to be treated with respect.\" They also state that \"Trans children deserve to be protected,\" which clearly endorses the regulation's purpose.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","anti-discrimination","transgender students"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly support this legislation\" and frames it as necessary for \"protections for trans people\" and \"civil rights.\" This is a clear endorsement of adopting the policy.","tone":"positive","tags":["transgender rights","civil rights","LGBTQ+ inclusion"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly states, \"I support transgender youth,\" which clearly endorses the policy’s purpose of protecting and accommodating transgender students. No opposing or qualifying language is present.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student support"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"STRONGLY oppose\" and \"Please do NOT pass this,\" which clearly rejects the regulation. They also describe it as \"incredibly harmful to our children,\" indicating opposition to adoption.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","student safety","parental rights","harm to children"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly urges adoption of protections for transgender students, saying \"Trans rights are human rights!\" and asking to \"Protect trans youth!\" They also state that withholding protections is \"basic discrimination,\" which clearly supports the regulation's purpose.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","nondiscrimination","transgender youth"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly rejects the proposal with \"Absolutely NOT\" and says \"I do not believe it is the right of the government to mandate\" these policies. They also argue it would \"discriminate against all other children\" and should not pass, indicating clear opposition to adoption.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","bathroom access","school sports","transgender students","privacy"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The comment is explicitly titled \"Support\" and the body quotes a well-known justice-oriented phrase, indicating approval of the proposed policies. There is no language opposing or questioning the regulation.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","civil rights","student rights"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly titles the post \"Oppose Transgender guidelines\" and says the policies \"totally goes against my religious beliefs.\" They also argue that schools are \"not the place\" for this issue and that the policies would make them \"not want to teach anymore,\" indicating rejection of the regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":["religious freedom","parental rights","LGBTQ+ inclusion","teacher concerns","student gender identity"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"Oppose\" and asks to \"Reject the Model Policies,\" which clearly indicates opposition to adoption. The stated reason is that they \"undermine rights of parents and families,\" showing a substantive objection to the regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","family rights","transgender policies"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly support the protection and safety of trans children,\" which clearly endorses the regulation's purpose. The title, \"Support! Protect Trans Kids!,\" reinforces approval rather than criticism or neutrality.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","transgender students"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says they are in \"proud support of trans and gender non-conforming, gender-exploring students\" and argues that schools should \"normalize[] the acceptance of trans youth.\" They also state that students have a right to feel safe and that the policy would help \"uplift the trans and queer community,\" indicating clear support for the regulation.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","transgender students","school climate"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The comment explicitly says \"Strongly oppose\" and provides no qualifying language suggesting support or neutrality. This is a clear rejection of the proposed regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":[]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I am 100% in support of the guidelines proposed to protect Trans students\" and argues they \"deserve safety just as much as cisgender students.\" The rest of the comment reinforces approval of the proposed policy as a step toward \"equitable education for ALL.\"","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","equity","nondiscrimination"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"i support the model policy protecting transgender students!\" This directly endorses adoption of the regulation and its purpose.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","transgender students","student rights"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly urges officials to \"pass this in support of our trans youth\" and argues that \"Trans youth deserve the same rights, protections\" as others. The comment is clearly advocating adoption of the proposed policies, not rejection or neutrality.","tone":"negative","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student rights","transgender students","privacy","bullying prevention"]}