{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly rejects the policy, saying \"THIS IS WRONG!!!\" and \"DO NOT PASS THIS IN ANY LIFETIME!!\" They object to transgender students using \"the opposite gender bathroom or sport\" and to access to \"bathrooms/locker rooms etc. without supervision.\"","tone":"negative","tags":["bathroom access","school sports","locker rooms","student privacy","transgender students"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The comment explicitly says \"Strongly oppose,\" which directly states opposition to the proposed transgender student policies. No supporting or neutral language is present.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender policies","public schools","opposition"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says the \"Model policies violate privacy rights\" and argues that transgender students should use \"private facilities\" to avoid affecting others' privacy. This indicates opposition to the proposed policies as written.","tone":"negative","tags":["privacy","bathroom access","transgender students","school facilities"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly opposed\" and argues that the policy causes \"great damage to our children\" and \"more confusion,\" indicating rejection of the regulation. The language is directed against the underlying transgender student guidance rather than offering neutral feedback or a request for changes.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","student identity","school policy","child welfare"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"Opposed to proposed transgender School policy,\" and calls the policy \"discriminatory\" and \"a form of Child abuse.\" They also urge the agency to \"Spend your time and money improving education,\" indicating rejection of the regulation rather than support for it.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","discrimination","child abuse","education priorities"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"This is not a workable policy\" and argues that it will negatively change schools, stating that sports teams and restrooms will be \"drastically changed\" and that the school experience will be changed \"not for the good.\" This is a clear rejection of the proposed transgender student policy.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender policy","school sports","bathroom access","student experience"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"STRONGLY SUPPORT KEEPING STUDENTS SAFE\" and argues that schools should protect trans students through respect, dialogue, and inclusion. They reject prioritizing objections from uncomfortable parents over \"vulnerable children,\" indicating clear support for the regulation's protective aims.","tone":"positive","tags":["student safety","transgender students","LGBTQ+ inclusion","bullying prevention","parental rights"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly support the VDOE model transgender student policy\" and closes with \"Please adopt this plan.\" They also praise it as \"fair, reasonable, and flexible\" and say it would \"greatly reduce bullying in schools,\" indicating clear support for adoption.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","bullying prevention","student safety","local control"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Support!\" and thanks the policy for \"caring for the marginalized,\" indicating clear approval of the regulation. The religious reference \"Like Jesus did\" further reinforces a positive endorsement rather than criticism.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","nondiscrimination","privacy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I do not agree with this\" and argues that passage \"would violate the rights and beliefs for those of religious faith.\" They also say it would make others \"feel uncomfortable,\" indicating opposition to adopting the policy.","tone":"negative","tags":["religious freedom","privacy","parental rights","LGBTQ+ inclusion"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly endorses equal treatment for LGBTQ+ youth, stating that \"All people should be treated with respect\" and \"All should be treated equally and equitably.\" The comment rejects discrimination and \"Othering people,\" which aligns with support for policies protecting transgender students.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","equal treatment","non-discrimination","student dignity"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly opens with \"STRONGLY OPPOSE\" and repeatedly argues against the guidance, objecting to schools helping students with gender identity without parents and calling for only \"small changes\" rather than a \"no questions asked, no parents involved\" policy. They also reject pronoun use and oppose allowing transgender students access to facilities aligned with their gender identity.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","gender identity","privacy","bathroom access","school facilities"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I support the draft guidance provided by the VDOE.\" They also express approval of the policy goal, wanting children to grow up in an environment \"where there is equality for all.\"","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","equality","public schools"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says they are \"Strongly opposed to transgender policies proposed for K-12\" and argues that allowing children under 18 a \"choice\" about gender is \"a mistake.\" They also object to shared facilities, stating that sharing \"locker rooms, rest rooms and showers\" \"violates the privacy of both genders\" and \"should not be mandated.\"","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender policies","privacy","school facilities","K-12","gender identity"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"Strongly opposed to transgender guidelines presented,\" which directly rejects the regulation. They also object to shared facilities, asking why students should be in the \"same locker room, bathroom\" and proposing separate spaces instead, indicating opposition to the policy as written.","tone":"negative","tags":["bathroom access","locker rooms","transgender students","student rights","privacy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"STRONGLY DISAGREE\" and calls the proposals \"disgusting,\" indicating clear opposition to adoption. They argue the policies would \"indoctrinate other people’s children\" and create \"FAR TOO MUCH ROOM FOR ABUSE,\" which shows they want the regulation rejected or weakened.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","parental rights","student safety","indoctrination","privacy"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly support these model policies for the treatment of transgender students in public schools.\" They further endorse the guidance as helping schools provide a \"safe, respectful, and inclusive educational experience for all students.\"","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","school policy","nondiscrimination","inclusive education"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly SUPPORT this measure\" and repeatedly urges adoption with phrases like \"Do the right thing.\" They argue the policies protect transgender students from bullying and harassment and reject claims that they are a danger to others.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","bullying prevention","school climate","anti-discrimination"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly rejects the policy, calling it \"WAY overstepping the boundaries of government\" and saying the department should \"stick to the focus of education and safety\" and \"leave life altering decisions to the families.\" They also argue it \"jeopardizes the safety of my child\" and threaten to sue if harm occurs, indicating clear opposition to adoption.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","student safety","bathroom access","government overreach","privacy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter states plainly, \"I am opposed to these policies,\" which directly indicates rejection of the proposed regulation. No supporting reasons or qualifications are provided.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender policies"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly rejects the policy, saying officials should \"leave this social brainwashing alone\" and that their job is to \"educate, not indoctrinate.\" This is a clear objection to the transgender student policies rather than a request for modification.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","school policy","indoctrination","curriculum"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly urges adoption only sarcastically and argues the policy is \"radically counter to the design of the created order,\" indicating disapproval. They predict negative consequences if it is adopted, saying parents will \"flee to private schools and home education\" and mocking the policy as \"government education/indoctrination.\"","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","public schools","parental rights","school choice","religious freedom"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly rejects the policy, saying officials do not have a mandate \"to enforce gender promotion\" in public schools. This frames the regulation as something they want blocked rather than adopted.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","public schools","government mandate","LGBTQ+ inclusion"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.93,"stance_rationale":"The commenter rejects the LGBTQ+ framing of the policy area, saying \"Lets all take back the rainbow\" and criticizing \"the lbgtqqfag community\". The Bible verse is used to assert a competing religious claim over rainbow symbolism, indicating opposition rather than support for the transgender student policies.","tone":"negative","tags":["religious freedom","LGBTQ+ inclusion","transgender students","culture war"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says they \"OPPOSE the 'Model Policies for the Treatment of Transgender Students in Virginia’s Public Schools'\" and repeatedly argues it \"should not be adopted.\" The body lists multiple objections about pronouns, parental notification, bathrooms, privacy, and dress codes, showing clear rejection of the regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","parental rights","privacy","bathroom access","dress code"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly states, \"I strongly oppose this action,\" which directly indicates opposition to adopting the regulation. No supporting reasons or qualifications are provided.","tone":"negative","tags":[]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly opposed\" and states, \"You were not given a mandate to do anything about transgender children,\" which rejects the regulation’s purpose. This is a clear opposition to adopting the policy.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","policy mandate","public schools"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly oppose this social experiment on our children\" and urges schools to \"stop this nonsense,\" which clearly rejects the proposed policies. The comment argues schools should focus on \"basic education\" instead of the regulation's subject matter.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","school policy","education priorities","student welfare"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly begins with \"Opposed!\" and says the policy is \"the wrong way to handle this situation,\" indicating rejection of the proposed transgender student policies. The statement that children \"dont get to choose\" their gender also shows disagreement with the regulation's underlying approach.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","parental rights","school policy","LGBTQ+ inclusion"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly support the guidance\" and endorses its \"codification of equal treatment of students.\" They also argue transgender students \"should not [be] harassed or denied equal access to education,\" which clearly supports adoption of the regulation.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","equal treatment","student safety","anti-discrimination"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly Support\" and asks to \"support requiring policies\" that protect transgender and other LGBTQ students. The comment endorses equal access, dignity, and respect for these students, which aligns with adopting the regulation.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","transgender students","equal access","student rights","mental health"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly states, \"I support the guidance,\" which directly endorses adoption of the regulation. There is no qualifying language or objection.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","transgender students","school policy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter says the policy is \"one-sided ideological driven\" and that it \"goes well beyond\" existing anti-bullying law, then explicitly calls for exceptions and opt-outs from the policy's mandates. They also argue it should not \"push involuntary promotion of gender confusion,\" indicating they want the regulation rejected or substantially weakened.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","religious freedom","privacy","LGBTQ+ inclusion","school facilities"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly states, \"I am in support of the guidance document,\" which directly endorses adoption of the proposed policies. No contrary concerns or qualifications are included.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","transgender students","school policy"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly support this guidance\" and explains that it will \"protect transgender and non-binary students from bullying, harassment, and discrimination.\" The closing \"Thank you\" reinforces approval of the regulation.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","bullying prevention","student safety","anti-discrimination"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"STRONGLY OPPOSE these irrational policies\" and ends with \"I STRONGLY OPPOSE the implementation of these policies.\" The body argues the policies are unenforceable, threaten privacy, and violate First Amendment rights, all of which indicate rejection rather than a request for modification.","tone":"negative","tags":["privacy","parental rights","religious freedom","bathroom access","student safety"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly support any guidelines that treat transgendered students fairly and with respect.\" They further affirm that \"everyone deserves to be treated equitably,\" indicating clear approval of the regulation.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","equity","student rights"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly support this guidance\" and explains that it will \"protect transgender and non-binary students from bullying, harassment, and discrimination.\" This is a clear endorsement of adopting the regulation as proposed.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","bullying prevention","anti-discrimination"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"We strongly support the rights of transgender people,\" which directly endorses the regulation’s purpose. The statement that \"Everyone deserves to feel valued\" further indicates approval of protections for transgender students.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student dignity","nondiscrimination"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly endorses the policy, saying that \"Policies that provide a safe space for trans students\" are beneficial. They frame the regulation as creating safety and support for \"all students,\" which is clear approval rather than a request for changes or a neutral observation.","tone":"positive","tags":["transgender student safety","LGBTQ+ inclusion","school climate","student support"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I support these protections,\" and describes the bills as codifying protections for transgender and non-binary students. They also endorse school boards adopting policies \"consistent with, or even more comprehensive than\" the VDOE model policy.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student protections","nondiscrimination","school policy"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"Support trans students\" and states that \"Virginia schools must do everything they can to ensure students can be who they are at school.\" This clearly endorses the proposed policies and their protective goals.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","school climate"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I completely support this bill\" and describes the policy as \"a long time coming.\" They also argue it would help trans and gender nonconforming students feel \"accepted, loved and safe,\" indicating clear approval of adoption.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","school climate","transgender students"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly Oppose\" and argues that schools should \"leave your political agendas out of our schools,\" indicating rejection of the proposed transgender student policies. The statement that the guidance is \"garbage\" and is \"harming our children\" further shows opposition to adoption.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","parental rights","school curriculum","LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"Strongly support the guidance\" and frames it as \"protection for trans students in va schools.\" This is a clear endorsement of adopting the regulation as written.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","transgender students","school protections"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly support House Bill 145 and Senate Bill 161.\" They also endorse the policy goals by praising a \"safe, welcoming, and inclusive environment\" and saying \"ALL students benefit\" from these measures.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","inclusive schools","bullying prevention"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly support\" and adds that \"there is no reason we should not support all people no matter their gender,\" which clearly endorses the regulation. No opposing or qualifying language is present.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","nondiscrimination","student support"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly support the draft guidance provided by the VDOE.\" This is a clear endorsement of the regulation's adoption for the \"safe and equal treatment of transgender students.\"","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","nondiscrimination"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly rejects the policy with \"NO! Stop the indoctrination\" and says \"Stop indoctrinating our young children in the new woke philosophy,\" which clearly opposes adoption of the transgender student model policies. The language targets the regulation itself rather than asking for changes or clarification.","tone":"negative","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","parental rights","education policy","indoctrination"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"This bill must be stopped\" and \"I oppose such insanity,\" which clearly rejects the regulation. They also argue it would infringe on children's rights and object to bathroom/shower access for transgender students, indicating opposition to the policy's core provisions.","tone":"negative","tags":["bathroom access","parental rights","religious freedom","transgender students","school facilities"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Stop this bill!\" and argues against the policy on the grounds that children should not be forced to share bathrooms or showers with transgender students. This is a clear rejection of the proposed regulation rather than a request for modification.","tone":"negative","tags":["bathroom access","privacy","student safety","transgender policy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly oppose transgender in schools!!\" and \"No transgender in our school system!!\" which clearly rejects the proposed policies. The religious framing (“what the Bible says,” “sexed by God”) reinforces opposition to adoption.","tone":"negative","tags":["religious freedom","LGBTQ+ inclusion","parental rights","school policy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I fully OPPOSE the Model Policies\" and argues they are \"wrong to impose these political views on our children.\" They also invoke \"freedom of speech and freedom of religion\" as reasons against the policies, indicating rejection of the regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":["religious freedom","parental rights","constitutional rights","transgender students"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says they are \"firmly vocal regarding their rights\" and frames the policy as protecting transgender students. They also criticize opponents and endorse the idea that treatment involves \"allowing the person to live the gender they identify with,\" which supports adoption of the regulation.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student rights","transgender students","healthcare"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly rejects the proposal: \"Absolutely not ...on the policy that you want to put n place.\" This is a clear statement against adopting the transgender student policy, even though the comment is brief and informal.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","policy opposition"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly states, \"I oppose transgender policy,\" which directly rejects the proposed regulation. No supporting or qualifying language is provided.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender policy","opposition"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says they \"strongly oppose transgender policy,\" which clearly indicates rejection of the proposed regulation. No supporting reasons or qualifications are provided, but the stance is unambiguous.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender policy","opposition"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The comment explicitly states \"Oppose\" in both the title and body, indicating clear rejection of the proposed regulation. No qualifying language or alternative suggestions are provided.","tone":"negative","tags":[]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I will never send my kids to public school if this agenda is adopted\" and repeats that it is \"dangerous\" and \"not safe.\" This is a clear rejection of the proposed policies and an attempt to deter adoption.","tone":"negative","tags":["student safety","transgender students","public schools","parental rights"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly oppose these guidelines\" and repeatedly argues against the policy's provisions. They object to the lack of parental notification, student self-identification, and restroom/locker room access, concluding that \"There has to be a better way forward than these Model Policies.\"","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","privacy","bathroom access","student safety","transgender students"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly labels the submission \"Strongly Oppose\" and says \"Stop this policy now and rethink it.\" They argue the policy violates rights and object to specific provisions such as \"allowing biological males into the female locker room\" and \"denying parents their rights,\" indicating rejection of the regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","bathroom access","privacy","civil rights","cost concerns"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.97,"stance_rationale":"The commenter asks to \"Provide separate facilities for transgender students,\" which rejects the policy’s inclusive approach and instead supports segregation. The opening plea to \"Protect our Precious children\" frames the regulation as a threat, indicating opposition to adoption as written.","tone":"negative","tags":["bathroom access","student privacy","transgender students","school facilities"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly rejects the proposal, saying they are \"disgusted with this proposal\" and \"We must not allow this to happen to our children or our families.\" They frame it as government overreach and a threat to parental rights, indicating opposition to adoption of the policy.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","government overreach","transgender students","family rights"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly oppose the proposed policy\" and repeatedly argues against it, calling it \"ludicrous,\" \"arrogant,\" and a \"dangerous precedent.\" They also object to pronoun requirements, gender identity guidance, restroom access, and say the policy should not be forced on schools and families.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","religious freedom","pronouns","bathroom access","transgender students"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly rejects the policy, saying \"Absolutely not\" and \"I whole-heartedly disagree with this policy.\" They also ask leaders to \"remove rights from parents,\" indicating opposition to adoption of the regulation as written.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","transgender students","school policy","privacy"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I support this set of guidelines\" and argues that schools should \"honor all children.\" The comment endorses the policies as helping students feel safe and supported, with no indication of opposition or neutrality.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","bullying prevention","school climate","nondiscrimination"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"STRONLY OPPOSE\" and calls the policy \"abominable\" and \"abhorrent.\" They also argue that \"Schools AND THE GOVERNMENT need to STAY OUT OF families,\" which clearly rejects the regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","government overreach","transgender students","school policy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Transgender policy--strongly oppose\" and asks that \"this gets denyed.\" They object to opposite-sex locker room sharing and argue for parental permission and notification, indicating rejection of the proposed policy.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","bathroom access","privacy","student safety","LGBTQ+ inclusion"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"Strongly opposed to this proposal,\" which directly states opposition to adoption. They also criticize it as having \"absolutely nothing to do with educating children\" and say it is \"Setting children up for nothing but trouble,\" reinforcing rejection of the policy.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","education policy","student welfare"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I support the Virginia Department of Education’s guidance\" and describes it as creating \"inclusive learning environments for transgender and non-binary youth.\" The final sentence, \"People should be free to express themselves and society should support them,\" reinforces approval of the regulation.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student support","inclusive schools","transgender youth"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"My family strongly OPPOSES the proposed policy changes\" and later urges VDOE to \"stop the nonsense.\" Although they support anti-bullying protections and suggest separate facilities if adopted, the overall message rejects the policy as overstepping school boundaries.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","parental rights","school facilities","privacy","bullying prevention"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Support for HB145/SB161\" and states that \"These policies will allow trans and non-binary youth to be safer\" and ensure \"an equal educational experience.\" The overall message advocates adoption of the policies to protect transgender students from harm, bullying, harassment, and discrimination.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","bullying prevention","anti-discrimination","equal access"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I am opposed to any policy\" and rejects policies that \"promote and encourage children to share restrooms and changing facilities.\" They also state they will not support lawmakers who back such policies and argue they \"take parental rights away from parents.\"","tone":"negative","tags":["bathroom access","changing facilities","parental rights","transgender students","privacy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I am not for this at all\" and that it \"needs to be voted against,\" which clearly opposes adoption. The threat to \"pull my children from public school and homeschool them if this gets passed\" reinforces strong rejection of the policy.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","public schools","parental rights","school choice"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I absolutely and vehemently oppose this!!\" and repeats that they \"absolutely oppose this model of policies.\" They argue the policies infringe on parental rights, are immoral, and violate \"the separation of church and state,\" all of which indicate clear opposition to adoption.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","religious freedom","LGBTQ+ inclusion","school policy","separation of church and state"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I disagree with with policy\" and argues that \"teaching transgender children without parent’s knowledge is not acceptable.\" They also reject transgender bathroom/locker room access and sex-specific sports participation, indicating opposition to the policy as written.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","bathroom access","school sports","privacy","transgender students"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I disagree with with policy\" and argues that \"teaching transgender children without parent’s knowledge is not acceptable.\" They also reject transgender-inclusive bathroom, locker room, and sports provisions, saying \"girls go to girls bathrooms/locker rooms and boys go to boys bathrooms/ locker rooms.\"","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","bathroom access","locker rooms","school sports","transgender students"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly Oppose\" and urges society to \"abandon this radical ideology.\" They also reject the guidance on multiple grounds, saying it undermines \"science,\" \"language,\" and \"privacy/safety,\" and call \"opening up bathrooms and locker rooms\" \"a terrible idea.\"","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","privacy","bathroom access","locker rooms","LGBTQ+ inclusion"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly oppose the proposed transgender policy\" and criticizes it as a \"progressive topic\" that wastes \"tax payer money.\" They also urge policymakers to \"do what is right,\" implying rejection of the proposal rather than support for it.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender policy","public spending","teacher concerns","moral opposition"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly rejects the policy: \"Absolutely not\" and says \"My child will not participate\" in it. They argue against transgender accommodations, stating children are \"by nature, a boy or girl\" and object to shared restroom access and related school practices.","tone":"negative","tags":["bathroom access","parental rights","LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","religious freedom"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly states \"Strongly oppose!\" and repeats \"Strongly oppose,\" which clearly indicates rejection of the proposed regulation. No supporting or neutral language is present.","tone":"negative","tags":[]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly support!\" and asks to \"Please support and pass.\" They also endorse the policy goal of ensuring \"all students are free from discrimination and harassment in schools.\"","tone":"positive","tags":["anti-discrimination","student safety","bullying prevention","LGBTQ+ inclusion"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"Please do not implement this policy,\" which is a direct rejection of the proposed regulation. They also describe the changes as \"unfair\" and likely to create \"unending problems for teachers and administrators,\" reinforcing opposition.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","school administration","policy opposition","teacher burden"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter says, \"I absolutely strongly oppose this measure,\" which directly states opposition to the regulation. They also argue it \"ruins Title 9 for girls\" and claim it will encourage harm in bathrooms, reinforcing that they want it rejected.","tone":"negative","tags":["Title IX","bathroom access","student safety","girls' rights","transgender policy"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Fully support\" and argues that \"Transgender students deserve equal rights\" and should not experience \"fear and bigotry while in school.\" This clearly endorses the proposed policies rather than opposing them.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","equal rights","religious freedom","school climate"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly Appose!\" and repeatedly urges officials to \"vote no.\" They argue the policy will cause \"headace and discrimination\" and call it \"nonsence,\" indicating clear rejection of the regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","school policy","discrimination","parental rights","LGBTQ+ inclusion"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Extremely opposed\" and repeatedly argues the policy is \"WRONG!!!\" They object to the burdens on \"students and faculty... and parents\" and claim it will create \"fear and intimidation\" and a \"hostile learning environment,\" indicating rejection of the regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","parental rights","school burden","student safety","hostile environment"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly oppose these policies by VDOE\" and repeatedly urges rejection, including \"Stop the insanity.\" They argue the policies \"strip parents and teachers of all rights\" and would create safety and legal problems, indicating clear opposition rather than a request for modification.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","student privacy","bathroom access","school safety","teacher rights"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I oppose this bill\" and argues it should be \"rewritten somehow\" because it allegedly endangers non-transgender children. They object to transgender students being allowed to \"change/dress/use restroom with other children of the opposite sex,\" which indicates opposition to the regulation as written.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","bathroom access","privacy","student safety","parental rights"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"Totally disagree\" and \"I stand against any policy that supports and promotes\" this guidance. They argue it has \"no place in the public school arena\" and call it \"dangerous and totally unscientific,\" indicating clear opposition to adoption.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","public schools","parental rights","ideology","student safety"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly states \"STRONGLY OPPOSE,\" which clearly indicates rejection of the proposed policies. No additional explanation or qualifying language is provided.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender policies","public schools","LGBTQ+ inclusion"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly oppose\" and repeatedly argues against the policies, calling them \"unacceptable.\" They object to school involvement, transgender recognition, and access to dress, restroom, and locker room choices, indicating clear opposition to adoption.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","religious freedom","bathroom access","gender identity","school facilities"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly states \"Fully support,\" which clearly endorses adoption of the proposed regulation. There is no qualifying language or criticism suggesting any opposition or neutrality.","tone":"positive","tags":[]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly labels the submission \"OPPOSE\" and says the policy is \"beyond concerning\" and that \"we are dropping the responsibility by doing this.\" They argue the regulation would undermine child safety and adult responsibility, indicating rejection of the proposed policies.","tone":"negative","tags":["student safety","sex-specific activities","parental rights","transgender students","school privacy"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I supported it\" and states that the bill \"addresses discrimination against a portion of the student body.\" They also endorse state guidance for \"All students' needs\" and do not express any opposition to the regulation.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","anti-discrimination","student support","best practices"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly affirms trans people and says \"we will support and protect you at all costs,\" which clearly endorses the policy’s protective aims. The message is directed at \"trans youth and ANY trans person\" and expresses support for their inclusion and safety in schools.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","anti-bullying","transgender students","supportive environment"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"Strongly oppose\" and \"I do not agree with this,\" indicating rejection of the regulation. The appeal to \"protecting all children not just the minority\" frames the policy as something they do not want adopted.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","student safety","LGBTQ+ inclusion","transgender students"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly states, \"I oppose this legislation in the strongest of terms,\" which is a clear rejection of the proposed regulation. There is no qualifying language suggesting support or neutrality.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender policies","opposition","school regulation"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I support the bill\" and adds, \"We must support all students, and that includes Trans students.\" This clearly endorses adoption of the proposed policies.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student support","nondiscrimination"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly rejects the Department's role in this policy, saying it is \"a Mental Health Issue\" and that the agency is \"neither qualified nor warranted\" to make such decisions. Phrases like \"Stay in your lane\" and \"STAY IN YOUR LANE\" indicate opposition to adopting the transgender student guidance as written.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","agency authority","mental health","transgender students"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly apposed\" and argues the policy \"will cause more harm\" and is \"not keeping any of the children safe.\" They warn against moving forward with the policy and say they believe it should not be adopted because it could enable abuse in bathrooms and harm children.","tone":"negative","tags":["student safety","bathroom access","privacy","transgender students","school facilities"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly Support\" and states that \"This is good for all children,\" which clearly endorses adoption of the policy. The mention of \"trans & non-binary students\" indicates support for the regulation’s protections for transgender students.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","nondiscrimination"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly oppose this\" and repeatedly argues that \"Transgender politics do not belong in the schools\". They also ask to \"Have a 'Transgender Restroom' available\" instead of the policy, indicating rejection of the regulation as written and a desire to weaken it substantially.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","bathroom access","transgender students","school policy","religious freedom"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter states, \"I strongly oppose,\" which directly expresses rejection of the proposed regulation. No supporting reasons or qualifications are provided, but the stance is unambiguous.","tone":"negative","tags":[]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly oppose this\" and calls the proposal \"appalling.\" They object to transgender-inclusive bathroom, locker room, and sports provisions, asking, \"Why should a boy be in the bathroom or Locker room with girls?\" and threatening to homeschool if adopted.","tone":"negative","tags":["bathroom access","locker rooms","school sports","parental rights","religious freedom"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly support this guidance\" and states that it \"furthers\" Virginia's progress toward inclusivity. They also argue the policies are \"vital\" for making students feel \"safe and supported,\" especially LGBTQ+ students.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","inclusivity","supportive schools"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I do not approve of the proposed guidelines,\" which directly rejects the regulation. The rationale given—\"radical theories\" that \"eradicate all distinctions between male and female\" and \"indoctrinate our school children\"—shows opposition to the transgender student policies themselves.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender policies","gender identity","school indoctrination","sex distinctions"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I fully support legislation needed to promote the health and well-being of trans youth\" and frames the policy as necessary anti-discrimination protection. They also urge action to \"protect our children,\" indicating clear approval of the regulation.","tone":"positive","tags":["anti-discrimination","transgender students","student safety","mental health","LGBTQ+ inclusion"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The comment explicitly says \"STRONGLY OPPOSE!!!,\" which clearly indicates rejection of the proposed transgender student policies. No supporting reasons or qualifications are provided, but the stance is unambiguous.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","opposition","school policy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I am totally opposed to this proposed legislation,\" which is a clear rejection of the regulation. They also argue against it on multiple grounds, including \"parental rights,\" \"spiritual convictions,\" and burden on schools, reinforcing opposition.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","religious freedom","school burden","transgender students","government authority"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly oppose this!!!\" and repeatedly rejects the policy, objecting to any implication that a parent telling children to \"embrace how God made them\" could be considered abuse. They also criticize the regulation as \"absolutely disgusting\" and say \"Don't go threatening parents,\" indicating clear opposition to adoption of the policy.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","religious freedom","transgender students","school policy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly oppose this being brought up as an option\" and repeatedly argues against the policy for elementary and high school students. They express concern about bathroom access, locker rooms, and sports, saying \"I'm not ok with this\" and that it would lead to \"all kinds of problems.\"","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","bathroom access","locker rooms","school sports","student privacy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The comment explicitly says \"STRONGLY OPPOSE!!!\" and repeats \"OPPOSE,\" which clearly indicates rejection of the proposed regulation. No supporting reasons or qualifications are provided.","tone":"negative","tags":[]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly oppose these policies\" and argues the school system should not be involved in transgender rights. They also reject transgender students' access to facilities and sports, stating that a biologically male student should \"shower, dress out, race or compete with the boys.\"","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","parental rights","school sports","bathroom access","privacy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says they \"completely oppose\" the policy and pleads, \"PLEASE DO NOT DO THIS!!\" They object to children being taught to \"go against their natural gender,\" indicating rejection of the proposed transgender student guidance.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender education","parental rights","LGBTQ+ inclusion","student identity"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly Oppose\" and argues the policy would \"violat[e] the civil rights of others\" and \"usurp[] parental authority.\" They also say schools should \"stick to teaching the basic subjects\" and leave matters like sexuality to parents, indicating rejection of the regulation as written.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","bathroom access","anti-bullying","LGBTQ+ inclusion","school authority"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly support\" and argues that \"No child should feel uncomfortable being who they are\" and that \"Education should be an inclusive place.\" This clearly endorses adopting the proposed transgender student policies.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","inclusivity"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"STRONGLY OPPOSE\" and argues against the policy, stating it is \"very disturbing\" and that allowing \"boys in girls restrooms will cause more harm than good.\" The comment also rejects the policy's approach to school involvement and parental role, indicating clear opposition to adoption.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","bathroom access","student safety","transgender policies"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I oppose this legislation in the strongest terms,\" which directly rejects the proposed policies. They also argue it will \"harm our kids emotionally and socially\" and that \"Government has no right to dictate these policies in our schools,\" reinforcing opposition to adoption.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","parental rights","school policy","student wellbeing"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly oppose this policy\" and repeatedly argues it should not pass, calling it \"a detriment to the mental health of all children\" and saying it would \"infringe on our rights as Americans.\" The comment frames the policy as harmful to faith, parents' rights, and young children, indicating clear opposition rather than a request for modification.","tone":"negative","tags":["religious freedom","parental rights","student mental health","transgender students","elementary schools"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly oppose for religious reasons,\" which directly rejects the proposed policies. They also object to restroom sharing and call it a \"liability issue for the school,\" reinforcing opposition to adoption.","tone":"negative","tags":["religious freedom","bathroom access","parental rights","student privacy"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I fully support legislation needed to promote the health and well-being of trans youth,\" which clearly endorses the regulation. The title \"Fully support!\" reinforces that they want the policy adopted.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student well-being","transgender students","support for policy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly states, \"I strongly oppose this!\" which directly indicates rejection of the proposed regulation. No supporting arguments or qualifications are provided.","tone":"negative","tags":[]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly oppose the Statewide Transgender School Policy,\" which is a direct rejection of the regulation. The follow-up, \"Please protect our children,\" reinforces opposition framed as concern about the policy's impact.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","parental rights","student safety"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly opposed\" and argues that \"These changes will put all children at risk,\" which clearly rejects the proposed policies. The rhetorical question about whether proponents \"care about the safety of our children\" further indicates opposition based on safety concerns.","tone":"negative","tags":["student safety","transgender students","school policy","bullying prevention"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly oppose\" and argues the proposed policies \"infringe upon the rights of parents\" and could be \"detrimental to non-transgender students.\" This is a clear rejection of the regulation rather than support for adoption with changes.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","non-discrimination","transgender students","student rights"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Opposed\" and calls the policy \"completely crazy and uncalled for.\" They object to schools addressing a child's gender without parental consultation and say their child will not remain in public school if it passes, indicating clear rejection of the regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","transgender students","public schools","government overreach"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly disagree\" and criticizes the policy as part of \"decisions like this.\" The body frames gender-related policy as misguided, contrasting it with abortion and stating people are \"either Male or Female,\" which indicates rejection of the transgender student policies.","tone":"negative","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","gender identity","religious freedom","student rights"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I am opposed to this,\" and argues the policy would reduce safety for daughters in locker rooms and restrooms. The concern that a \"male\" could enter without being questioned indicates rejection of the transgender student policy on safety grounds.","tone":"negative","tags":["student safety","bathroom access","locker rooms","privacy","transgender students"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I support policies and standards that promote safe and supportive learning environments for everyone, including transgender students.\" They also describe the policy as creating schools \"free from discrimination and harassment\" and express approval of the document and its guiding principles.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","anti-discrimination","student safety","bullying prevention","privacy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I oppose this policy being considered,\" and argues against school staff using a student's affirmed name and gender. They also reject the policy on ideological grounds, calling public schools \"radical liberal institutions\" and saying it should not be put into practice.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","gender identity","school administration","public schools","sex-segregation"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly titles the comment \"Support\" and says the policy \"would be a step in the right direction\" to protect transgender youth. Although they note it \"isn't perfect,\" the overall message clearly favors adoption with improvements rather than rejection.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","anti-discrimination","transgender students"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I fully support legislation needed to promote the well-being of trans individuals,\" which clearly endorses the regulation. The title \"Fully Support\" reinforces that the commenter wants the policy adopted.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","transgender students","student well-being"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly opens with \"Strongly oppose\" and repeatedly argues the policy \"goes well beyond what is practical and necessary.\" They object to pronoun requirements, bathroom-related provisions, and broader transgender-inclusive procedures, while preferring case-by-case accommodations instead of \"sweeping policies.\"","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","pronouns","bathroom access","student safety","privacy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly states, \"I oppose the new transgender guidelines,\" which directly rejects adoption of the regulation. The title, \"Oppose new transgender guidelines,\" reinforces the same position.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender policies","public schools","opposition"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says they \"Strongly,strongly disagree\" in response to the transgender student policies, indicating clear opposition to the regulation. No supportive or neutral language is present.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender policies","opposition"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"Absolutely oppose transgender policy,\" which directly rejects the proposed regulation. The explanation that it \"infringes on the rights of many more people than it protects\" further indicates opposition to adoption.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender policy","rights","opposition"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"strongly disagree,\" which clearly indicates opposition to the proposed transgender student policies. No supporting or neutral language is present.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender policies"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly oppose this legislation!\" which directly states opposition to the proposed policies. The follow-up, \"It is not good for our kids!\" reinforces that they want it rejected.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","school policy","student welfare"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly rejects the policy with \"Absolutely not\" and gives a reason for opposition: \"biblical.\" This indicates they do not want the regulation adopted.","tone":"negative","tags":["religious freedom","LGBTQ+ inclusion"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly oppose this new policy\" and calls it \"unacceptable.\" They also state it will affect their decision to send their children to public school, indicating rejection of the regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","transgender students","public schools","school choice"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly Oppose\" and argues that teachers discussing sexuality with minors without parental consent should be criminal. This directly rejects the proposed transgender student policies, which include guidance on student treatment and privacy in schools.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","LGBTQ+ inclusion","privacy","student safety"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I do NOT support the proposed changes,\" which is a clear rejection of the regulation. They also cite concerns that it \"disregard[s] parental rights, students’ privacy rights, and the First Amendment rights of teachers and administrators,\" indicating opposition to adoption as written.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","privacy","First Amendment","transgender students"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I personally oppose this policy\" and \"I do not agree with it,\" which clearly indicates rejection of the proposed regulation. The suggestion about being \"on board with a 3rd facility\" is a conditional alternative, not support for the policy as written.","tone":"negative","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","bathroom access","school facilities","transgender students"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly oppose this policy\" and asks to \"reconsider forcing this policy on our schools.\" They argue it conflicts with \"anti-bullying policies,\" \"religious freedom rights,\" and \"parental rights,\" and call it \"aggressive policies,\" all indicating rejection of the regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","religious freedom","anti-bullying","transgender students","school policy"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Support\" and asks to \"Please protect our vulnerable trans students by enacting a K-12 policy.\" They also describe the proposal as \"a good start,\" indicating approval of adoption, possibly with further action later.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","transgender students","K-12 policy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly oppose this for our school children\" and urges, \"Do not vote for this!\" This is a clear rejection of the proposed policies rather than a request for changes or clarification.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","school policy","student safety"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly support this guidance\" and adds \"We need to support all of our children,\" which clearly endorses adoption of the regulation. There is no opposing language or request to weaken it.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student support","nondiscrimination"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I whole-heartedly support this policy\" and repeatedly urges approval of protections for transgender students. They also endorse specific provisions like \"safety nets, privacy, and gender-concordant bathrooms and locker rooms,\" indicating support for the regulation as written or strengthened.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","privacy","bathroom access","student safety","anti-discrimination"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly states, \"I am in support of protections for transgender children,\" which directly endorses the regulation’s purpose. No opposing or qualifying language is present.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student privacy","nondiscrimination"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"Please support the rights and inclusion of transgender and nonbinary students\" and asks the agency to support them. They also state, \"I support transgender people, including children and adolescents,\" which clearly endorses the regulation's purpose.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","transgender students","student rights","nonbinary inclusion"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly states, \"I oppose,\" which directly indicates opposition to the proposed regulation. No additional context or qualifications are provided.","tone":"negative","tags":[]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly urges readers to \"support our transgender children\" and defends the policy against criticism, saying opponents were misled by a \"right-wing site\" that \"distorts and omits a LOT of details.\" The comment clearly favors adoption of the regulation rather than rejection or weakening.","tone":"negative","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","transgender students","bullying prevention","student safety"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly states, \"I am in full support of this guidance,\" which directly endorses adoption of the proposed regulation. The title, \"Fully Support,\" reinforces the same position.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","transgender students","school policy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly Oppose\" and argues the guidance is \"overbroad\" and that it \"trample[s] the rights of others.\" Although they say they support accommodation to prevent harassment or bullying, the overall position is that the guidelines should not be adopted in their current form.","tone":"negative","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","constitutional rights","litigation costs","bullying prevention","parental rights"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly gives their \"full support of this legislation\" and says the policy's \"core aims\" are to promote the safety of trans students. They repeatedly argue that LGBTQ+ and trans students should be protected from discrimination and conclude by hoping trans students feel \"safer and more accepted\" in public schools.","tone":"positive","tags":["transgender students","LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","anti-discrimination","bathroom access"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I do not approve of the proposed guidelines,\" which directly rejects the regulation. They also argue it should be rejected because it ignores \"Parental rights\" and fails to honor \"Religious beliefs and conscience,\" indicating opposition rather than a request for modification.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","religious freedom","LGBTQ+ inclusion","student privacy"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I support the Virginia Department of Education’s guidance\" and praises \"creating inclusive learning environments for transgender students.\" They also endorse the policy’s purpose by emphasizing \"fair and equal treatment for all people.\"","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","equal rights","inclusive schools","transgender students"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly states, \"I strongly oppose the transgender policy as it is being proposed.\" This is a clear rejection of the regulation in its current form.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender policy","opposition"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly states, \"I strongly oppose this,\" which directly indicates rejection of the proposed regulation. No supporting reasons or qualifications are provided.","tone":"negative","tags":[]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"Reject the Model Policies\" and states they are \"harmful to children\" and \"undermine the rights of parents and families.\" This is a clear request to reject the regulation rather than adopt it.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","family rights","transgender students","school policy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"vehemently OPPOSE\" and \"I am fully against this.\" They argue the policy would let schools \"hide information from parents\" and act \"without parental knowledge or consent,\" indicating rejection of the regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","privacy","school authority","transgender students"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says the proposal is \"a step forward towards equal, inclusive treatment\" and that \"We need legislation like this to make school safer.\" They argue it protects trans youth from discrimination and harassment, indicating clear support for adoption.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","anti-discrimination","bullying prevention","transgender students"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"Strongly Oppose!\" and asks, \"Please ensure that this policy is not issued.\" They object that it would interfere with parental guidance and \"makes no allowance for religious considerations,\" indicating rejection of the regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","religious freedom","transgender students"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly rejects the policy, opening with \"Please stop this destructive nonsense\" and arguing that schools should not \"hide information from parents\" or act \"without parental knowledge or consent.\" The final sentence says it will \"destroy our children, schools, families, and society,\" indicating strong opposition to adoption.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","privacy","transgender students","school policy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly labels the submission \"Strongly Oppose\" and argues against allowing transgender students access to bathrooms and locker rooms consistent with their gender identity. They say this is \"traumatic,\" \"simply a chaotic and traumatic encounter,\" and ask to \"Please consider the grand scope of what is at stake here,\" indicating rejection of the regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":["bathroom access","locker rooms","student privacy","parental rights","student safety"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I do NOT support the proposed changes\" and opens with \"Strongly ***OPPOSE!***\". They argue the policy disregards \"parental rights,\" \"students’ privacy rights,\" and \"the First Amendment rights of teachers and administrators,\" indicating clear rejection of the regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","privacy","First Amendment","transgender students","school policy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.93,"stance_rationale":"The comment is explicitly titled \"Oppose\" and the body says \"Parents job is removed,\" indicating the commenter believes the policy undermines parental authority. This is a clear objection to the regulation rather than a request for clarification or neutral input.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","transgender students","school policy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"Please REJECT Model Policies for the Treatment of Transgender Students,\" which directly opposes adoption. They also object that the policies would be \"circumventing parents\" and providing validation and \"services,\" indicating they want the proposal rejected rather than modified.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","transgender students","school policy","family authority"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"STRONGLY OPPOSE!!\" in response to the transgender guidelines, which clearly indicates rejection of the proposed regulation. No supporting reasons or qualifications are provided.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","LGBTQ+ inclusion","school policy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I do not support this,\" and argues the policy \"goes way beyond prevention and crosses the line into mandatory promotion\" of an ideology. They also say it is \"damaging to kids\" and that it makes them want to remove their daughters from public schools, indicating clear opposition to adoption.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","bullying prevention","student safety","parental rights","LGBTQ+ inclusion"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly labels the submission \"Strongly Oppose\" and says \"New policies are not required for this,\" indicating rejection of the proposed regulation. They argue existing policies already protect students and warn the new policy could be misused, showing opposition to adoption.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","student safety","privacy","bullying prevention","government overreach"]}


{"stance":"unknown","stance_confidence":0.12,"stance_rationale":"The comment only says \"STRONGLY DISAGREE!!\" without stating what part of the proposed regulation is being rejected or why. Although the wording suggests opposition, it is too vague and uninterpretable to confidently classify the commenter’s position on adoption of the regulation itself.","tone":"negative","tags":[]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I fully support this measure\" and \"I support any measure that moves us toward a world where gender is truly a non-issue.\" They also frame the policy as an \"over due adjustment of social values,\" indicating clear approval of adoption.","tone":"positive","tags":["transgender rights","LGBTQ+ inclusion","student mental health","nondiscrimination","school support"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"Strongly oppose this proposed legislation,\" which directly states opposition to adoption. No supporting arguments or qualifications are provided.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","public schools","opposition"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"We support this guidance for trans youth in Virginia\" and frames it as beneficial because \"an affirming environment can save lives and increase the quality of life.\" This is a clear endorsement of adopting the regulation.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","transgender students","supportive environment"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I oppose\" and repeatedly rejects the policy as \"unacceptable.\" They object to schools addressing students' gender expression without parental knowledge and specifically oppose bathroom and locker room access for transgender students.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","bathroom access","locker rooms","religious freedom","LGBTQ+ inclusion"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Completely Opposed!!!!!!!!!!!!!\" and repeatedly argues the government and school system are \"overstepping\" and should not have this influence on children. They frame the policy as \"clear discrimination\" and reject it on religious and parental-rights grounds.","tone":"negative","tags":["religious freedom","parental rights","government overreach","LGBTQ+ inclusion","discrimination"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I support 100%\" and argues in favor of allowing the child to use the bathroom, wear a dress to prom, and join the girls' field hockey team. The final plea, \"Please really think about this,\" is framed as support for the proposed transgender student policies rather than opposition.","tone":"mixed","tags":["transgender students","bathroom access","school sports","student privacy","LGBTQ+ inclusion"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly states, \"I oppose this policy - it is fundamentally evil,\" and repeatedly argues against adopting the regulation. They describe the policy as \"reckless,\" \"evil,\" and likely to cause \"division\" and \"violence,\" which clearly indicates opposition to the proposed policies.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","parental rights","student safety","civil unrest","religious beliefs"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"This is an awful idea!\" and \"Do not change it,\" indicating opposition to the proposed transgender student policies. They argue against restroom access based on sex assigned at birth and say the policy would \"take away the rights of everyone.\"","tone":"negative","tags":["bathroom access","parental rights","religious freedom","LGBTQ+ inclusion"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly states \"Strongly Oppose!!\" which clearly indicates rejection of the proposed regulation. No supporting reasons or qualifications are provided.","tone":"negative","tags":[]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"oppose\" in the title and repeatedly argues that \"Enacting these guidelines\" would violate teachers' speech and faith rights, empower students over parents, and amount to \"suppression, not engagement.\" They conclude the document reads like a \"left wing blog post\" rather than balanced legislation, indicating clear rejection of the proposal.","tone":"negative","tags":["First Amendment","parental rights","religious freedom","LGBTQ+ inclusion","bullying prevention"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"I strongly support the bill\" and repeatedly endorses the policy as creating a \"safe, respected, and supported\" environment. They also argue it improves mental health outcomes and want \"more communities and schools like ours,\" indicating clear approval of adoption.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","mental health","bullying prevention","school climate"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly titles the submission \"Strongly oppose transgender school policy\" and cites Genesis 1:27 as the basis for that opposition. The religious quotation about God creating \"male and female\" is used to reject the proposed transgender student policy.","tone":"negative","tags":["religious freedom","LGBTQ+ inclusion","transgender students","school policy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I do not support\" the proposed policies. The phrase \"Not biblical\" indicates opposition on religious grounds rather than a request for changes.","tone":"negative","tags":["religious freedom","LGBTQ+ inclusion"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly support the creation of standards\" and describes the policy as \"strong action\" that will create a \"safe and inclusive educational experience\" for transgender and non-binary students. They also express hope for related inclusive sex education, reinforcing clear approval of the regulation.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","inclusive education","sex education","non-binary students"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"STRONGLY OPPOSE\" and states that the policy \"completely goes against women’s rights for safety,\" indicating rejection of the regulation. The comment frames the policy as a threat to safety rather than supporting adoption with changes.","tone":"negative","tags":["women's rights","safety","transgender students","school policy"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly states, \"I support the guidance,\" which directly endorses the proposed regulation. No qualifying language or objections are included.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","transgender students","school policy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"100% Opposed\" and states that schools should focus on \"education quality instead of programs intent on sexually confusing a generation of children.\" They also reject the policy as inconsistent with \"biology\" and \"every organized religion in America,\" indicating clear opposition to the regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","religious freedom","parental rights","education quality","LGBTQ+ inclusion"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter clearly rejects the policy, saying they do not want anyone \"brainwashing\" children and that \"This whole thing makes no sense.\" They also argue for separate facilities and warn that if it passes, there will be \"a lot of homeschool and private school children,\" indicating opposition to adoption.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","bathroom access","locker rooms","religious freedom","parental rights"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly support\" and adds \"Trans rights are human rights,\" which clearly endorses the proposed transgender student policies. There is no indication of opposition or neutrality.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","transgender rights"]}


{"stance":"unknown","stance_confidence":0.12,"stance_rationale":"The comment contains only the title \"Gender\" and no body text, so it does not express support, opposition, or a clear question about the regulation. With no substantive content, the commenter’s position cannot be determined.","tone":"unclear","tags":[]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly states that GLSEN is in \"strong support\" of the proposed policies and says they \"supports the adoption of the proposed guidance.\" The rest of the comment offers suggested revisions and clarifying edits, which indicates support with modifications rather than opposition.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","transgender students","nondiscrimination","privacy","bathroom access"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I Object the approval of the proposed transgender policies,\" which clearly opposes adoption. They also argue the policies violate \"religious and personal beliefs\" and would place children in \"potential harmful situations,\" reinforcing rejection of the regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":["religious freedom","parental rights","student safety","transgender policies"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly states \"STRONGLY DISAGREE,\" which clearly indicates opposition to the proposed policies. No supporting reasons are provided, but the stance is unambiguous.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender policies","public schools","LGBTQ+ inclusion"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I am totally against this!!\" and the title is \"Oppose,\" indicating clear rejection of the proposed policies. The reference to \"try reading the Bible\" suggests a religious objection to the regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":["religious freedom","LGBTQ+ inclusion","transgender students"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly asks, \"Please don't confuse these precious children about their God-given identity,\" which rejects the transgender student policies. The statement that \"God created/designed male and female, and no one can change that\" indicates opposition to the regulation's premise and implementation.","tone":"negative","tags":["religious freedom","gender identity","student safety","parental concerns","LGBTQ+ inclusion"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly oppose the transgender policy,\" which directly states opposition to the proposed regulation. No supporting reasons or qualifications are provided, but the stance is unambiguous.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender policy","opposition"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly states, \"I do not agree with this policy,\" which directly indicates opposition to adoption. No supporting reasons or requests for modification are provided, but the stance is clear.","tone":"negative","tags":[]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly oppose the transgender policy,\" which is a clear rejection of the proposed regulation. The title \"Strongly OBJECT\" reinforces that they want it not adopted.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender policy","opposition"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly Support\" and states that \"Trans kids deserve to be respected in schools,\" which clearly endorses the proposed policies. The phrase \"Trans rights are human rights\" further indicates approval of the regulation's protections for transgender students.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student rights","school climate"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"I strongly oppose\" the policy and urges officials \"not to give into this perversion.\" They reject the premise of transgender inclusion, stating that \"there are only two genders\" and that \"accepting transgenderism as normal is not the answer.\"","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","LGBTQ+ inclusion","gender identity","school policy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter says, \"I strongly disagree with gender confusion in schools,\" which clearly rejects the proposed transgender student policies. The phrase \"strongly disagree\" indicates opposition rather than a neutral question or factual remark.","tone":"negative","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","transgender students","school policy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly(100+%) oppose any and all of this proposal!\" which is a clear rejection of the regulation. The title \"Open Restrooms!\" suggests a specific objection related to restroom access, but the overall position is unambiguously opposed.","tone":"negative","tags":["bathroom access","transgender students","privacy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly opposed !!\" and states that \"The confusion and harm caused by this policy is not acceptable,\" which clearly rejects the regulation. There is no indication of support or neutrality.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","school policy","student safety"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I very strongly oppose the Model Policies\" and argues the policy is a \"very very dangerous path to take.\" They also cite negative consequences such as \"safety issues and serious confusion,\" indicating rejection of the regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":["student safety","transgender students","school policy","confusion"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I wholeheartedly support\" and urges readers to \"Love that transgender child\" and treat transgender students \"with dignity and grace.\" The comment argues against \"fear mongering\" and for acceptance, indicating clear support for the proposed policies.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student dignity","bullying prevention","religious freedom"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly Support!\" and urges action: \"please take this action!\" They frame the regulation as \"positive change,\" indicating clear approval of adoption.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","transgender students","nondiscrimination","school policy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly states, \"i strongly oppose this,\" which directly indicates opposition to the proposed regulation. No supporting reasons or qualifications are provided, but the stance is unambiguous.","tone":"negative","tags":["opposition","transgender students","school policy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Oppose this policy\" and \"DO NOT SUPPORT!\" They argue the policy violates their Christian beliefs and claim it creates danger for girls by allowing boys or men into women's facilities.","tone":"negative","tags":["religious freedom","bathroom access","student safety","privacy","LGBTQ+ inclusion"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"Strongly oppose\" and \"This must be rejected!\" which clearly indicates opposition to adopting the regulation. There is no qualifying language suggesting support or neutrality.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","school policy","opposition"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly support trans rights in school!\" which clearly endorses the policy direction. The title, \"Strongly support trans rights in schools,\" reinforces that they want the regulation adopted.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","transgender students","school rights"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly oppose,\" which directly indicates rejection of the proposed policies. The reason given — \"I don’t believe the school should discuss sexual or personal issues with students\" — shows opposition to the regulation’s guidance on transgender student treatment.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","student privacy","LGBTQ+ inclusion"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I, therefore, support creating inclusive and safe environments for our transgender youths.\" The opening title, \"Support... anyone opposing this is close minded,\" also clearly endorses the regulation.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","anti-discrimination","bullying prevention"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I fully and wholeheartedly support legislation\" and frames the purpose as promoting \"the health and well-being of trans youth.\" This is a clear endorsement of the proposed policies.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student well-being","transgender students"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter clearly endorses the policy’s goals, arguing that transgender students \"deserve to live their life with just as many options\" and that people should \"allow each individual to grow with the same chances and the same opportunities.\" The comment defends transgender inclusion and rejects common objections, indicating support for the regulation.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student rights","school sports","nondiscrimination","student support"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly am opposed to creating transgender policies\" and argues the policy would \"negatively effects more than it positively effects.\" They also object to impacts on privacy, sports, and parental/religious rights, indicating rejection of the regulation rather than support with changes.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","religious freedom","privacy","school sports","student safety"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"Please Vote No\" and calls the policy \"a vast overstep\". They argue it \"undermines/threatens parental authority\" and should be rewritten, indicating opposition to adoption as proposed.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","teacher workload","student wellbeing","transgender policy","school climate"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly Support the proposed policies.\" They also argue in favor of transgender inclusion and privacy protections, referencing psychological harm from suppression and supporting sports participation for transitioning students.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student privacy","school sports","mental health","nondiscrimination"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly rejects the policy, calling it \"Completely WRONG!\" and \"This garbage\". They argue it \"violates all parental rights\" and \"encourages my children to do things without parental knowledge or consent,\" which clearly indicates opposition to adoption of the regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","privacy","transgender students","school policy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I oppose any policy/mandate promoting gender confusion to children,\" which clearly rejects the proposed regulation. The phrase \"oppose any policy/mandate\" leaves little ambiguity about their position.","tone":"negative","tags":["gender identity","transgender students","parental concerns","school policy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"VERY OPPOSED\" and argues the policy \"should be illegal to allow this,\" which clearly rejects adoption. The statement that it will \"confuse our children\" and that they lack the \"mental capacity\" further shows opposition to the regulation's substance.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","parental rights","student mental health","school policy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter says, \"I’m strongly against transgender rights in schools,\" which directly rejects the proposed policies. They also call the policies \"confusing to young kids\" and \"not mentally or morally right,\" indicating clear opposition rather than a request for modification.","tone":"negative","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","religious freedom","student rights","school policy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Very strongly oppose\" and describes the rules as \"folly\" and \"dangerous.\" They object to students being able to choose locker rooms and change gender identities \"without any proof beyond their own words,\" indicating rejection of the regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","bathroom access","locker rooms","student privacy","school policy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly rejects the policy as \"Absolutely disgusting\" and says it should not be \"pushed on not just my kids but ALL kids.\" They argue for separate facilities for transgender students and raise objections about bathroom/locker room access and possible assaults, indicating opposition to the regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":["bathroom access","locker rooms","student safety","parental rights","religious freedom"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Oppose\" and argues that \"Matters dealing with child sexuality should be handled by the parent, not a school employee,\" indicating rejection of the proposed transgender student policies. They also criticize the policy as \"pushing your agenda\" and say schools should focus on academics instead.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","transgender students","school priorities","bullying policy","LGBTQ+ inclusion"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Oppose\" and repeatedly rejects the policy as \"over reach\" and something to \"stay out of.\" They argue the state should \"stay the hell out of how I raise my kids\" and warn against pressing the issue further, indicating opposition to adoption of the regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","religious freedom","transgender students","government overreach","privacy"]}