{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly asks officials to \"reconsider your desire to encourage gender confusion among our youth\" and says to \"leave children\" out of it, indicating opposition to the proposed transgender student policies. Phrases like \"hideous, child destroying agenda\" show they want the regulation rejected or substantially weakened.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","parental rights","gender dysphoria","youth mental health","school policy"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The comment explicitly says \"Support trans youth!!,\" which clearly endorses the regulation’s purpose of protecting transgender students. There is no language opposing or questioning the policy.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","transgender students","student support"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I completely support!!!\" which directly endorses the proposed regulation. There is no qualifying language or criticism, so the stance is clearly supportive.","tone":"positive","tags":["support for regulation"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.84,"stance_rationale":"The commenter objects to transgender-related policy content being used to \"force\" agreement and says those who disagree should have the right to \"respectfully disagree,\" which signals opposition to the regulation as written. The mention that their children felt \"bullied by transgender student and support groups\" further indicates resistance to the policy framework rather than support for adoption.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender policies","parental rights","bullying","student rights","school climate"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter calls the policy \"madness\" and \"nothing short of child abuse,\" which is a clear rejection of the proposed regulation. The language indicates they believe it should not be imposed on students.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","child abuse","school policy","student safety"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.84,"stance_rationale":"The commenter objects to the policy’s implications for transgender students by invoking women’s restroom access: \"Does everybody forget how hard women fought to get public restrooms?\" The request to \"Please respect women’s rights too\" and to \"Find a middle solution\" suggests they want the regulation changed or weakened rather than adopted as written.","tone":"negative","tags":["women's rights","bathroom access","transgender students","privacy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.89,"stance_rationale":"The commenter opens with support for helping children with gender dysphoria, but then clearly questions the proposed guidance and its basis, saying they are \"not sure of the 'science'\" and objecting to \"letting boys use the girl's bathroom.\" They also challenge the First Amendment implications of the policy, indicating opposition to key parts of the regulation rather than support for adoption as written.","tone":"negative","tags":["bathroom access","First Amendment","student privacy","LGBTQ+ inclusion","school facilities"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"i support trans people,\" which clearly aligns with approving the transgender student policies. No opposing or qualifying language is present.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","transgender students"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I do not support this as a school function!!!\" and argues that it is \"the roll of Parents and only parents,\" indicating rejection of the policy. The phrase \"Public schools are more and more trying to replace the prenatal responsibilities with their social agenda\" further shows opposition to the regulation's role in schools.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","school authority","transgender students","public schools"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I fully support this guidance\" and expresses a desire that it \"was already in place.\" They also describe positive experiences with inclusive schools, indicating approval of the regulation as written.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","parental rights","school climate","student support"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I support this wholeheartedly!\" and calls it \"an excellent step forward for the VDOE.\" They also state they want \"a school that supports all children,\" which clearly endorses the proposed policies.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student support","public schools"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"FULLY SUPPORT!!\" and \"STRONGLY SUPPORT,\" which clearly indicates approval of the proposed regulation. There is no language suggesting opposition, conditions, or a neutral inquiry.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","transgender students","school policy"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"In full support\" and states the policy \"has been needed for a very long time.\" They also argue that \"School should be a safe place for ANY child,\" which clearly endorses the regulation's protective aims.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","bullying prevention","school climate"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly states, \"i support!!\" which directly indicates approval of the proposed regulation. No contrary language or qualifications are included.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","transgender students","nondiscrimination"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly states \"I fully support!!!\" and repeats \"support,\" which directly indicates approval of the proposed regulation. There is no language suggesting reservations or opposition.","tone":"positive","tags":[]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"i support!!!!!\" and adds \"i support lgbtqia rights,\" which clearly endorses the regulation’s transgender-student protections. There is no opposing language or request to weaken the policy.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","transgender students","civil rights"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"i support!\" and the title \"trans rights\" indicates approval of the transgender student policies. There is no language suggesting opposition or neutrality.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","transgender students"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I support Trans rights,\" which clearly endorses the regulation’s purpose of protecting transgender students. The emojis and punctuation do not change the straightforward supportive stance.","tone":"positive","tags":["transgender rights","LGBTQ+ inclusion"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The comment explicitly states \"I SUPPORT\" and provides no contrary language. It clearly endorses the proposed regulation without qualification.","tone":"positive","tags":[]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly states, \"I support,\" which directly indicates approval of the proposed regulation. The title \"Yes\" reinforces that positive position and provides no contrary language.","tone":"positive","tags":["transgender students","nondiscrimination","student privacy"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly states, \"I FULLY SUPPORT\" and repeats \"I support,\" which clearly indicates approval of the regulation. There is no language suggesting opposition, neutrality, or a request for changes.","tone":"positive","tags":[]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"100% SUPPORT!!!!\" and urges to \"HELP AND PROTECT LGBTQ+ KIDS!!!!!!!!\" This is a clear endorsement of the proposed policies, despite the hostile language toward مخالفs.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","anti-bullying","privacy"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly states, \"I fully support,\" which clearly endorses adoption of the proposed regulation. No reservations or alternative requests are included.","tone":"positive","tags":["transgender students","LGBTQ+ inclusion","school policy"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"Trans youth need respect and support\" and urges, \"Don’t waste your energy on tearing them down,\" which clearly endorses protections and affirming treatment for transgender students. The comment does not ask for changes or express reservations about the regulation.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student support","respect","transgender students"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"fully support!!!!\" and adds \"Trans rights are human rights,\" which clearly endorses the proposed transgender student policies. There is no indication of opposition or neutrality.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","transgender students","civil rights"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly titles the post \"Support 100%\" and repeatedly endorses the policy, saying schools \"must be a safe and welcoming place for all students\" and that accommodating trans and nonbinary students \"should not even be up for debate.\" They also call for specific implementation measures like respecting pronouns and names, restroom/locker room access, and staff training, indicating clear support for adoption.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","privacy","bathroom access","staff training"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly states \"strongly support,\" which clearly indicates approval of the proposed regulation. No contrary language or qualifications are included.","tone":"positive","tags":[]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"i support\" and \"i completely support,\" which clearly endorses the proposed regulation. There is no language indicating any reservations or opposition.","tone":"positive","tags":[]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I support this,\" which directly endorses the proposed regulation. The title, \"100% support trans kids,\" reinforces clear approval of the policy.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","transgender students","student support"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says they are \"so pleased to see Virginia working to ensure\" transgender, non-binary, and gender non-conforming students' rights and calls the guidelines \"a good standard.\" They also thank the state for \"the care and effort put into these guidelines,\" indicating clear approval of adoption.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student rights","pronouns","student safety","anti-discrimination"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly endorses protection for transgender people, saying \"trans people deserve protection, respect, kindness\" and that \"the easiest remedy for transphobia and ignorance is knowledge and education.\" This clearly supports the regulation’s purpose of protecting transgender students and promoting inclusion.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","anti-discrimination","education"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly titles the comment \"100% Support\" and says the model \"should be supported by everyone.\" They argue it creates an environment where students feel \"accepted\" and \"without judgement or discrimination,\" and that supporting transgender students will help them \"flourish.\"","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student support","nondiscrimination","school climate"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly endorses the policies, saying \"Yes! Support trans kids!\" and thanking the authors for a document they believe will \"make a positive difference\" and create \"a safer environment.\" This is clear approval of adoption.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","supportive environment","transgender students"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The comment explicitly says \"full support\" and adds \"trans rights are human rights,\" which clearly endorses the proposed transgender student policies. There is no language indicating any objection or reservation.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","transgender rights","student rights"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I fully support the guidance\" and endorses \"fair and equal access to education\" for LGBTQ students. This is a clear affirmative position in favor of adopting the regulation.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","equal access","nondiscrimination"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly Oppose\" and \"I reject the lunacy of these guidelines,\" making their position clear. They argue the policies \"do a disservice to our children\" and that society should not \"enable unhealthy fixations and behavior,\" which indicates rejection of the regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","gender identity","school policy","parental rights"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"100% SUPPORT!\" and \"I fully support this,\" which clearly endorses adoption of the regulation. The phrase \"you should too\" reinforces approval rather than criticism or neutrality.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","nondiscrimination"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly states \"I SUPPORT 100%\" and repeats \"I SUPPORT,\" which clearly endorses the regulation. There is no language indicating any reservations or opposition.","tone":"positive","tags":[]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I am expressing my full support of Virginia's adoption of this policy.\" They also praise inclusion for a \"gender expansive child\" and urge compassion, indicating clear approval of the regulation.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","parental support","student inclusion","nondiscrimination"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I fully support the proposed policy\" and \"I applaud the state\" for the work. They argue the policies are \"ESSENTIAL\" and needed to protect transgender students and provide \"equal access, rights, and protections.\"","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student rights","nondiscrimination","school policy","privacy"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"support trans kids\" and affirms their identity, indicating approval of the policy’s protections for transgender students. The rest of the comment reinforces this supportive view by stating they \"are who they are\" and should be accepted.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","transgender students","student support","identity affirmation"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly opens with \"OPPOSE\" and repeatedly argues against the policy, saying schools should not \"hide[] situations from parents\" or \"intervene and encourage new age philosophies.\" They conclude, \"Oppose these drastic changes before it's too late,\" making their opposition clear and direct.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","transgender students","privacy","school policy","bathroom access"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I support these policies!\" and frames the issue as \"Trans rights are essential,\" which clearly endorses adoption of the regulation. The title, \"Support trans kids!!!!,\" reinforces the same pro-policy position.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","transgender students","student rights"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I support trans kids!\" and argues they \"need to be treated with respect,\" which clearly endorses the regulation’s purpose. The exclamation \"Support LGBTQ+ kids!!!\" further indicates approval rather than opposition or neutrality.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","transgender students","human rights","student respect"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly states \"100% support,\" which directly endorses adoption of the regulation. There is no qualifying language or criticism suggesting opposition or neutrality.","tone":"positive","tags":[]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says the bills \"need to be passed\" and calls their passage \"crucial\" for supporting transgender children and LGBTQIA+ members. The overall message is clearly in favor of adopting the regulation, even though the final sentence trails off.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","transgender students","student support","school policy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"Please do not adopt these new regulations,\" and repeatedly argues against the policy as \"ridiculous\" and a \"slippery slope.\" They also say schools should not add \"a litany of new laws\" and instead frame transgender-related issues as needing \"counselling and help, not acceptance and encouragement.\"","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","LGBTQ+ inclusion","bullying prevention","student privacy","parental rights"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I support the draft guidance provided by the VDOE,\" which directly endorses the proposed regulation. There is no qualifying language suggesting opposition or neutrality.","tone":"positive","tags":["transgender students","public schools","VDOE guidance"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly urges the policy to \"PROTECT AND SUPPORT LGBTQ+ KIDS,\" which clearly endorses the regulation’s purpose. The title \"Support LGBTQ+!!\" reinforces that they favor adoption of the transgender student policies.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","nondiscrimination"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I do not approve of these proposed guidelines\" and calls the policies \"totally unworkable.\" They argue the guidance is based on \"radical theories\" and would force compliance with a view of sex and gender they reject, indicating clear opposition to adoption.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","parental rights","sex and gender","school policy","religious freedom"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"i strongly support this,\" which directly endorses adoption of the regulation. No objections, qualifications, or alternative requests are included.","tone":"positive","tags":["support","transgender students","school policy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I DO NOT support this nonsense,\" and calls the policy \"a waste of tax dollars.\" The rest of the comment rejects the document's framing of gender, indicating opposition to the regulation itself.","tone":"negative","tags":["gender identity","transgender students","education policy","tax dollars"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I am in favor of efforts to make sure Virginia's schools are safe and welcoming\" and states that \"Protecting transgender and nonbinary students is key to their success.\" This clearly endorses the proposed policies and their goals.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","bullying prevention","anti-discrimination"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly labels the comment \"Support\" and urges policymakers to \"do right by our children\" by protecting transgender and nonbinary students. They argue the policies are needed so students feel \"protected and safe\" and to address bullying and discrimination.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","bullying prevention","anti-discrimination","mental health"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I am writing in support of the Model Policies\" and repeatedly argues that the rule will help transgender and nonbinary students feel \"safe and included.\" They also conclude that \"This proposed rule will make Virginia schools a better place to learn,\" which clearly endorses adoption.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","bullying prevention","privacy","bathroom access"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I am writing in support of the Model Policies on the Treatment of Transgender Students\" and repeatedly urges protection for transgender and nonbinary students. They also state, \"This proposed rule will make Virginia schools a better place to learn,\" which clearly endorses adoption.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","bullying prevention","privacy","bathroom access"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.78,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says they \"do not support\" the policy as drafted because it amounts to \"special treatment\" for transgender students. However, they also ask that it be \"amended\" to provide more single-use facilities, which indicates support for a modified version rather than outright rejection.","tone":"mixed","tags":["transgender students","bathroom access","privacy","fairness","school facilities"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly praises the policy and says they are \"excited to see Virginia public schools doing the same.\" They also thank the state for \"prioritizing this\" and describe it as protecting trans/nonbinary students' rights, which clearly indicates support for adoption.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student rights","student safety","gender identity","nondiscrimination"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I completely support this\" and adds \"protect trans rights,\" which clearly endorses adoption of the policy. There is no indication of opposition or neutrality.","tone":"positive","tags":["transgender rights","LGBTQ+ inclusion","nondiscrimination"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I am writing in support of the Model Policies\" and repeatedly argues that the proposed rule is \"necessary\" and will \"make Virginia schools a better place to learn.\" They also thank the agency for \"ensuring safe and welcoming schools for all Virginia students,\" indicating clear approval of adoption.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","bullying prevention","bathroom access","privacy"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says there is a \"need for policies to prohibit the mistreatment of trans youth\" and expresses excitement that the conversation is \"opening up in favor of trans people in the schooling systems of VA.\" This clearly աջակցs adoption of the proposed policies.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","transgender students","student safety","anti-discrimination"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The comment explicitly asks to \"Provide trans youth with a safe environment to learn in,\" which aligns with the regulation’s goal of protecting transgender students and creating a supportive school environment. It offers clear affirmative support rather than criticism or a request for changes.","tone":"positive","tags":["transgender students","student safety","safe learning environment","LGBTQ+ inclusion"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"strongly oppose\" and argues the policy \"encourages\" harmful outcomes, including children turning to \"drug- and surgery-based alterations\". The comment clearly rejects the regulation rather than supporting it with changes.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","student mental health","medical transition","school policy","LGBTQ+ inclusion"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly states \"I Support This\" and adds \"Protect trans youth,\" which clearly endorses the proposed transgender student policies. There is no language indicating opposition or neutrality.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","transgender students"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says they are \"outraged at the proposed Transgender policies\" and argues that \"our taxpayer monies do not need to interfere in these matters.\" They also urge to \"Allow caregivers to care for their children as they see fit,\" which rejects government adoption of the policy.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","parental rights","government overreach","biology","privacy"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I 100% support trans kids!!\" which clearly endorses the policy’s purpose of protecting transgender students. There is no language opposing or questioning the regulation.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","transgender students","student support"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says they are \"in support of the proposed Model Policies\" and urges officials to \"make the right decision.\" They frame the policies as \"a matter of safety and human rights,\" indicating clear approval of adoption.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","human rights","transgender students"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly advocates for the policy’s goals, saying \"Trans youth deserve to life a safe and happy life\" and \"They deserve to be protected by the law.\" This is a clear endorsement of protections for transgender students rather than a critique or request to weaken the regulation.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","anti-discrimination","transgender students"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly labels the submission \"Opposed!\" and says \"I do not believe\" the proposal should proceed, arguing it will \"open up the opportunity for unimaginable things\" in schools. They only support separate facilities for accommodations, which indicates opposition to the regulation as written rather than support for adoption.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","bathroom access","locker rooms","student safety","religious freedom"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I support this\" and states they are \"in support for protection for LGBTQ children.\" They further argue the policy is needed so students can \"feel safe and supported\" in public schools, indicating clear approval of the regulation.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","mental health","school climate"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly urges approval by saying \"Support Trans Children!\" and argues that trans children \"deserve the same rights\" and \"same treatment as any of their peers.\" The comment endorses the regulation’s protective purpose rather than opposing it.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student rights","anti-discrimination","student safety"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly endorses protecting transgender/LGBTQ+ students, criticizing adults who would allow a child to be treated with less respect. Phrases like \"all deserve to go to school and have a healthy and productive environment\" indicate support for the regulation's goal of creating a supportive school environment.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","school climate","anti-discrimination"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"i support this!\" and adds \"Protect trans rights,\" which clearly endorses adoption of the policy. There is no language indicating opposition or neutrality.","tone":"positive","tags":["transgender rights","LGBTQ+ inclusion","nondiscrimination"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly labels the comment \"Support\" and asks, \"Why would you oppose this?\" They further endorse the policy by saying, \"Let people live their lives how they want to,\" which clearly favors adoption.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","transgender students","civil rights"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly states \"support\" and adds that \"there is no reason not to support this,\" which clearly endorses adoption of the regulation. No objections or qualifications are expressed.","tone":"positive","tags":[]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"Please stick to education... not hotly debated social problems. Not your place,\" indicating they do not want the transgender student policy adopted. They also argue that \"These decisions and choices need to stay within the family\" and reject the premise of the policy throughout the comment.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","transgender students","mental health","school policy","family autonomy"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly titles the comment \"Support!\" and repeatedly praises the proposal as \"based on science\" and something that \"will help kids.\" They thank the authors and say it is \"good to have this guidance,\" indicating clear approval of adoption.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","teacher support","privacy","school facilities"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly states \"100% Support for LBGTQIA+\" and identifies themselves as a \"Teacher in 100% Support for LBGTQIA+ students.\" This clearly endorses the regulation’s purpose of supporting transgender/LGBTQIA+ students in schools.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","transgender students","student support"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly opens with \"Full Support!\" and repeatedly asks to \"help make the school atmosphere easier for today's non-binary children.\" They describe the policies as \"based on best practices\" and say they are \"relieved that these policies are finally being introduced,\" indicating clear approval of adoption.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student well-being","school climate","transgender students","family support"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says the document provides \"useful guidance\" and expresses being \"glad to see schools adopt pro-active policies\". They frame the regulation as protecting \"the legal rights and emotional well being of trans kids,\" which clearly supports adoption.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","bullying prevention","nondiscrimination","mental health"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly support the proposed Model Policies\" and urges officials to \"adopt it.\" They praise the guidance for protecting transgender and nonbinary students and describe it as making schools \"a haven\" for all students.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","bullying prevention","school climate","mental health"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"STRONGLY SUPPORT!\" and repeatedly endorses the policy, including support for transgender students' rights, updated records, non-segregation in facilities, and mandated training. The closing आग्रह to \"make that official and enforceable\" confirms approval of the regulation, not opposition or neutrality.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","bullying prevention","privacy","school facilities"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly labels the comment \"Support\" and says \"a change must happen\" and that \"adapting to the change will do... more good than fighting it.\" They also endorse an \"accepting, supporting environment\" and a \"smooth transition to these changes,\" indicating approval of the regulation with implementation caution.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","supportive environment","school climate"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"Please do not adopt this policy as it stands\" and titles the comment \"Strongly Oppose.\" They argue the policy is \"a complete attack on our values\" and ask to \"add some nuance\" because it is too forceful for families who do not accept gender identity as presented in the policy.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","parental rights","religious freedom","school policy","LGBTQ+ inclusion"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Would NEVER Support!!!\" and argues that the policy would \"make it easier for the evil to take hold\" and \"offer them more confusion.\" The comment clearly rejects the regulation and frames transgender affirmation as contrary to God's plan.","tone":"negative","tags":["religious freedom","LGBTQ+ inclusion","student mental health","parental concerns"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I 100% support the 'Model Policies for the Treatment of Transgender Students'\". They also describe it as \"an important step\" in reducing trauma and stress, which clearly endorses adoption.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student mental health","bullying prevention","student safety"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"fully support, a step in the right direction!\" and provides reasons favoring the policy. They argue that supportive environments reduce \"anxiety, depression, self harm and suicide,\" especially for transgender youth, which clearly endorses adoption of the regulation.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student mental health","student safety","supportive environment"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.93,"stance_rationale":"The commenter argues against affirming transgender identity, saying people \"want to silence\" those who \"tamper with their birth identity\" and warning that it leads to a \"growing sense of wrongness inside.\" This indicates opposition to the proposed transgender student policies rather than support for them.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","gender identity","student wellbeing","school policy"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly argues there is \"literally no reason to oppose this\" and says \"there's people who need this. badly. CHILDREN who need this.\" They repeatedly defend the policy as protecting students from \"gender and identity discrimination\" and frame opposition as against \"human rights.\"","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","LGBTQ+ inclusion","student rights","nondiscrimination","human rights"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly titles the submission \"Fully Support\" and repeatedly says the policy should be passed, including \"I see no reason not to pass this bill.\" They argue transgender students should feel safe and that schools should be \"a judgment-free zone\" and \"harassment-free.\"","tone":"negative","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","bullying prevention","religious freedom","pronouns"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I support trans’ rights!\" and frames the policy as helping transgender students receive \"an excellent education as everyone else does.\" This is a clear endorsement of the regulation's purpose and likely adoption.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","transgender rights","education access"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly labels the comment \"Support\" and says \"Trans students should feel safe in school like everyone else,\" which endorses the policy's protective aims. The rest of the comment defends trans students' bathroom and changing-room access rather than opposing the regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","bathroom access","privacy","school sports"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"i support this!!\" and argues that the policy should protect \"trans kids from the discrimination and transphobia\" they face. This is a clear endorsement of adopting the regulation.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","anti-discrimination","transgender students"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I SUPPORT 10,00%\" and adds, \"I support this so much, everyone deserves respect.\" This is a clear endorsement of the proposed policies.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student respect","nondiscrimination"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"There is no reason not to support this\" and frames the policy as protecting \"the basic rights of children\" and equal treatment. This is a clear endorsement of the regulation.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student rights","nondiscrimination"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I support\" and adds that they \"support the LGBTQ+ Community\". They further state that the bill \"makes efforts\" to support that community, indicating approval of the regulation.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","support for regulation"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly defends the policy, saying there is \"absolutely no reason that transgender students should be treated any differently\" and that \"Being kind and respectful of someone’s identity is the bare minimum.\" The comment argues against taking rights away from transgender students, indicating clear support for adoption of the regulation.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student rights","nondiscrimination","respect and dignity"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly states, \"I support\" and reinforces it with \"I completely support,\" which clearly indicates approval of the regulation. No contrary language or qualifications are present.","tone":"positive","tags":[]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly labels the comment \"Support\" and argues that schools should be \"safe places\" free from \"bullying, harassment, and discrimination.\" They also say the Virginia Department of Education has a duty to provide the support needed to make schools safe for all students, which clearly endorses the regulation's purpose.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","bullying prevention","student safety","anti-discrimination"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The comment explicitly says \"Support!!!\", which clearly indicates approval of the proposed regulation. No contrary language or qualifications are present.","tone":"positive","tags":[]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I 100% support this\" and adds, \"I don't know why someone wouldn't support this,\" which clearly endorses the regulation. The remark \"Pam, you're wrong\" reinforces approval of the policy and disagreement with an opposing view.","tone":"positive","tags":["transgender students","LGBTQ+ inclusion","support for policy"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I support this guidance\" and explains that it will create a \"safe, supportive, and affirming school environment.\" They further state it will help schools be \"welcoming for all students, regardless of gender identity,\" which clearly endorses adoption of the policy.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","school climate","nondiscrimination"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"I Support!\" and repeatedly endorses the policy’s goals, stating they want schools to be \"a safe place for everyone, regardless of gender identity.\" The comment frames the regulation as consistent with their values of \"acceptance and love for all.\"","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","anti-discrimination","school climate"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I STRONGLY OPPOSE THIS PROPOSED MANDATE\" and adds \"THIS IS WRONG,\" which clearly indicates rejection of the regulation. There is no supporting language or request for modification, only opposition.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","opposition","school policy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I am completely opposed to this insane proposal\" and frames it as something they do not want adopted. They also argue it would take \"the rights and responsibilities of a parenting\" away and call it \"evil,\" indicating clear rejection of the regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","school authority","LGBTQ+ inclusion","political ideology","lawsuits"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"I strongly oppose\" and objects to the policy as \"remove God and parents in the upbringing of ANY child.\" This indicates rejection of the regulation and a belief that it improperly interferes with parental and religious authority.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","religious freedom","government overreach"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I fully support this guidance\" and endorses the policy as a way to \"protect our LGBTQI+ community.\" They also praise the guidance for helping educators ensure students are \"respected\" and have an \"inclusive educational experience.\"","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","nondiscrimination","inclusive education"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly oppose\" and refers to \"this new law\" being imposed, which clearly indicates rejection of the regulation. No supporting or neutral language is present.","tone":"negative","tags":["opposition","transgender students","school policy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly oppose to this\" and the title states, \"I oppose this legislation.\" This is a clear rejection of the proposed policies, though the explanation is brief and based on personal beliefs and values.","tone":"negative","tags":["opposition","religious freedom","parental rights"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says the policies are \"not your job,\" calls them \"dangerous,\" and ends with \"VOTE NO!\" They object to pronoun requirements, privacy provisions, restroom access, and complaint procedures, arguing schools should \"stick with teaching reading, writing, and math.\"","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","privacy","bathroom access","religious freedom","LGBTQ+ inclusion"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"STRONGLY OPPOSE\" and repeatedly argues the policies should not be adopted, ending with \"our children will be pulled out of Virginia Public Schools.\" The body lists multiple objections to pronouns, bathroom access, parental notification, dress codes, and religious accommodations as reasons for rejecting the regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","privacy","bathroom access","religious freedom","LGBTQ+ inclusion"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says the guidelines are \"misguided and overreaching\" and ends with \"Please do not enact them,\" which clearly rejects adoption. They also list specific objections about restroom access, pronoun discipline, and parental notification to argue against the proposal.","tone":"negative","tags":["privacy","parental rights","bathroom access","pronouns","transgender students"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly support\" the policy and frames it as \"lifesaving.\" They also endorse protections for trans students, citing safety concerns like \"homelessness, bullying, and even suicide\" as reasons for adoption.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","bullying prevention","mental health","nondiscrimination"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"Oppose transgender policy proposed by the Virginia Department of Education\" and adds, \"Do not disregard the role of parents in public education,\" indicating rejection of the regulation on parental-rights grounds. The comment does not suggest amendments; it argues against adoption.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","transgender policy","public education"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"STRONGLY OPPOSE\" and repeats \"WE STAND AGAINST THIS PERVERSITY,\" indicating clear rejection of the regulation. The stated reason is concern that it \"opens perverts to enter either bathrooms and endanger our children’s safety,\" which shows opposition tied to bathroom access and child safety fears.","tone":"negative","tags":["bathroom access","student safety","privacy","transgender students"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly oppose the proposed guidelines\" and argues they should not be adopted because they \"substitut[e] the state’s temporal prerogatives\" for parental rights. They also object to school administrators withholding information, potential liability for parents, and the lack of a minimum age, all indicating rejection of the regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","religious freedom","privacy","transgender students","school administration"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"STRONGLY OPPOSE\" and states \"I STRONGLY OPPOSE THE TRANSGENDER SCHOOL POLICY THAT VDOE PROPOSED.\" They argue it \"creates confusion and chaos\" and is against \"our families core principles,\" indicating rejection of the regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","school policy","parental rights","school environment","family values"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly oppose\" and objects to the policy because it \"took parents rights away\" and would not disclose a child's struggles to parents. They argue schools should not keep \"secrets\" from parents, indicating rejection of the regulation as written.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","privacy","transgender students","school communication"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly states, \"I support the guidance,\" which directly endorses the proposed regulation. There is no qualifying language suggesting opposition or neutrality.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","transgender students","school policy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"Strongly Oppose\" and states the policy \"will do more harm than good\" and is \"bad policy.\" Although they acknowledge that \"transgender children must be protected,\" they argue the regulation undermines parents and creates harm, especially regarding restroom and locker room access.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","bathroom access","locker rooms","student safety","transgender students"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly OPPOSE!\" which directly states opposition to the proposed policies. The title also frames the regulation as a harmful \"radical agenda\" that would \"destroy our youth,\" reinforcing rejection.","tone":"negative","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","transgender students","school policy","student safety"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly states, \"i support the guidance,\" which directly endorses adoption of the proposed regulation. No qualifications or objections are included.","tone":"positive","tags":["transgender students","LGBTQ+ inclusion","school policy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I oppose having gender confusion taught in schools,\" which directly rejects the regulation. The statement \"God didn’t make a mistake\" reinforces opposition to transgender-related policies rather than supporting them.","tone":"negative","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","religious freedom","curriculum","parental rights"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"Unequivocally, I support the guidance,\" which directly endorses adoption of the regulation. The rest of the comment provides a religious rationale for inclusion and dignity, reinforcing support for the policy.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student rights","religious support"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly oppose this being taught in the public schools,\" which clearly rejects the regulation. The reference to homeschooling as a response reinforces opposition to the policy's adoption in public schools.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","public schools","transgender students","homeschooling"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly oppose the LGBTQ and gender confusion agenda\" and argues against the policy as written. They also state, \"This LGBTQ push is counterintuitive to those objectives,\" indicating they want the regulation rejected rather than adopted.","tone":"negative","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","gender identity","parental rights","student well-being","school policy"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I support the guidance\" and argues that \"ALL STUDENTS deserve to be safe in school,\" which clearly endorses adoption. The rhetorical question about \"their human rights\" reinforces approval of the policy's protections.","tone":"positive","tags":["student safety","human rights","LGBTQ+ inclusion","anti-discrimination"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly oppose\" and states \"this is not the way to do it,\" indicating rejection of the regulation. They argue the issues should be handled by parents and claim the guidelines would violate \"1st Amendment guarantees,\" which further supports opposition.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","first amendment","religious freedom","freedom of expression"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"We stand against this evil plan\" and frames the policy as something being forced on children, indicating clear rejection of the regulation. The language condemns the proposal as \"horrible\" and \"demonic,\" leaving little ambiguity about opposition.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","parental rights","religious freedom","school policy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly oppose\" and objects to \"our children being taught this in our schools.\" They argue schools should focus on core academic subjects instead, indicating rejection of the proposed transgender student policies.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender policies","curriculum","parental rights","school instruction"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly states, \"I support the guidance,\" which directly endorses the proposed regulation. The title also says \"SUPPORT,\" reinforcing the same position.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","transgender students","school policy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly rejects the policy as “transgender mandates” and says Northam is trying to “impose his vision of the world upon the rest of us.” They frame the issue as “a fight between Good and Evil,” indicating strong opposition to adoption of the regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","parental rights","religious freedom","LGBTQ+ inclusion","school policy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly rejects the policy, saying \"these laws DO NOT do that\" and calling them \"VERY discriminitory\" and \"dangerous.\" They argue the rules harm \"parents and non-transgender students\" and restrict teachers' \"freedoms and personal convictions,\" indicating opposition to adoption as written.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","teacher rights","student safety","privacy","LGBTQ+ inclusion"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly oppose this being taught in the public schools,\" which clearly rejects the proposed policies. They also frame it as inappropriate for children, saying it is \"not fair to introduce innocent children to the uncertainties of grown adults.\"","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","LGBTQ+ inclusion","public schools","student age-appropriateness"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.93,"stance_rationale":"The commenter rejects the policy with the emphatic title \"No, No, No\" and argues that \"All children are better off staying at home\" rather than being subject to public-school guidance. This indicates opposition to the regulation’s adoption, even though the comment is broad and not specifically about transgender policies.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","home schooling","public education"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly rejects the policy’s premise that schools should create a safe environment for transgender students, saying “let's not encourage this!” and that it is “not the public worker's responsibility.” They argue parents should handle it at home and warn against “condon[ing] certain behaviors,” which indicates opposition to the regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","LGBTQ+ inclusion","school responsibility","student safety"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"100% support this\" and urges that it \"go through,\" which clearly endorses adoption of the regulation. The rest of the comment reinforces support for equal treatment and opposition to efforts to block the policy.","tone":"negative","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","transgender rights","religious freedom","nondiscrimination"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly rejects the policy with the title \"ABSOLUTELY NOT!\" and argues that it would force people to abandon their morals and accept a \"political progressive movement.\" The final sentence about schools trying to \"secretly\" become a \"hero\" for transgender students also indicates opposition to the regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":["religious freedom","transgender students","parental rights","school policy"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says they are \"writing in support of the proposed inclusive policy\" and repeatedly endorses it as \"evidence-based, ethical\" and aligned with \"diversity, inclusion, and affirmation of minority rights.\" They also argue that inclusive policies improve safety and academic outcomes for transgender and gender non-binary students.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","bullying prevention","mental health","nondiscrimination"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"Oppose transgender regulations proposed by VA Department of Education\" and argues schools should not be \"accommodating\" gender transitions. The comment cites concerns about puberty blockers and minors' ability to consent, indicating a clear rejection of the proposed policies.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","gender transition","puberty blockers","minors consent","school policy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter rejects the policy outright, calling the proposals \"completely out of line\" and objecting to schools allowing students to define their sex or gender identity. They argue this conflicts with parents' authority and faith, and explicitly state that \"Insisting that children remain their own sex is not abusive,\" indicating opposition to the regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","religious freedom","gender identity","transgender students","school authority"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly OPPOSE the proposed transgender guidelines\" and repeats \"I oppose\" the policy. The rationale focuses on parental authority and objects to schools \"going behind a parent's back,\" indicating rejection of the regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","transgender students","school policy","privacy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.97,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"Please oppose,\" and argues that the policy protects \"a small number of students at the expense of all.\" They also ask officials to \"let us do our job,\" indicating they do not want the regulation adopted as proposed.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly rejects the policy, saying \"This in no way is acceptable\" and \"I say no and will never support this.\" They also urge others to \"homeschool\" if such policies continue, indicating clear opposition to adoption.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","political agenda","parental rights","homeschooling","privacy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly rejects the policy: \"This in no way is acceptable\" and \"I say no and will never support this.\" They also urge others to homeschool if such policies continue, indicating clear opposition to adoption of the regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","LGBTQ+ inclusion","parental rights","school policy","homeschooling"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly Oppose\" and argues the policy would \"set a dangerous precedent\" and is \"absolutely absurd.\" They object to transgender student accommodations in locker rooms and sports, framing the guidance as unsafe and something that should not go into effect.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","school sports","locker rooms","student safety","privacy"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly support\" and argues that \"Schools should be safe spaces, free from harmful harassment and bullying,\" which aligns with adopting the policy. The statement that \"Transphobia doesn't just harm, it ends lives\" further endorses protections for transgender students.","tone":"positive","tags":["student safety","bullying prevention","LGBTQ+ inclusion","anti-discrimination"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly labels the submission \"OPPOSE\" and calls the policy \"nothing short of child abuse,\" which clearly indicates rejection of the regulation. The remark also criticizes the policy’s effects, saying parents are \"fleeing to private/charter schools,\" reinforcing opposition.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","parental rights","child abuse","school choice"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly oppose this proposal\" twice, indicating clear rejection of the regulation. They object that it \"puts the government between the parent(s) and their child\" and \"forces speech compliance,\" which shows opposition to adoption.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","free speech","government overreach"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"We need to make our schools safe for Gender Nonconforming Students and for all students\" and concludes, \"These policies are a step forward.\" The title also states \"Support Policies for Treatment of Transgender Students in Va Schools,\" making the endorsement clear.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","bullying prevention","school climate"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter questions whether young children can \"give informed consent\" and asks whether they will be \"pressured to make these decisions,\" indicating opposition to the policy. They also state that \"The privacy of the child and the right of parents are being violated,\" which directly criticizes the regulation's approach.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","privacy","informed consent","transgender students"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I fully support this proposal\" and repeats that they \"full support this endeavor.\" They also frame the policy as important for \"the emotional and physical well-being of our students,\" indicating approval of adoption.","tone":"positive","tags":["student well-being","transgender students","school policy","supportive environment"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"We cannot let political and social ideology trump basic biology,\" which rejects the policy basis of the regulation. They also warn that \"By taking this action\" it will invite harm, indicating opposition to adoption of the model policies.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","student mental health","biology","school policy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly labels the submission \"OPPOSE\" and asks to \"let the school stay out of our homes\" and \"not fall prey to ideology or trends,\" indicating rejection of the transgender student policies. They argue schools should \"simply teach basics\" and that \"we the adults are the ones pushing this stuff on them,\" which is a clear objection to the regulation's subject matter.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","school curriculum","parental rights","ideology","student wellbeing"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I fully support this,\" which directly endorses adoption of the regulation. The follow-up, \"We should all be supporting our kids, no matter who they are,\" reinforces approval of the policy's purpose.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student support","nondiscrimination"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly oppose this!!\" and describes the document as \"a complete undermining of parental rights.\" They also claim it \"represents a great danger to our children,\" indicating rejection of the regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","student safety","transgender policies"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The comment explicitly says, \"Strongly Oppose This!\" which clearly indicates rejection of the proposed regulation. There is no qualifying language or request for modification, only a direct opposition statement.","tone":"negative","tags":[]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly asks, \"Please do not try to condition our children with this SJW crap,\" which clearly rejects the proposed transgender student policies. The phrase \"Please stop\" reinforces opposition rather than support or neutrality.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","LGBTQ+ inclusion","school policy","parental rights"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The comment explicitly says \"Strongly oppose!!!\", which clearly indicates rejection of the proposed guidance. No supporting reasons or qualifications are provided, but the stance is unambiguous.","tone":"negative","tags":[]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly oppose!!!\" which clearly indicates rejection of the proposed regulation. No supporting reasons or qualifications are provided.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","public schools","policy opposition"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly states \"strongly oppose,\" which clearly indicates rejection of the proposed regulation. No additional context or qualifications are provided.","tone":"negative","tags":[]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly disagree with this legislation\" and the title reads \"Absolutely Oppose!!\". They frame the policy as \"a violation of parental rights,\" indicating they want it rejected rather than adopted.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","transgender students","school policy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly oppose this requirement\" and urges, \"lets end this now,\" which clearly rejects the regulation. The language indicates opposition to adoption rather than a request for modification.","tone":"negative","tags":["opposition","transgender students","parental rights","culture war"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"Support for the Guidance Document\" and calls it \"vitally important.\" They also endorse the policy's purpose by stating it is \"about allowing them to be who they are,\" which clearly favors adoption.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student rights","transgender students","school policy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly begins with \"Oppose regulation\" and repeatedly argues against the policy, calling it a \"delusional mental state\" and saying schools should not \"interfere in the personal affairs\" of students. They also frame the policy as harmful to morality and parental authority, indicating clear rejection of the regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","parental rights","privacy","mental health","school authority"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly rejects the policy, saying \"Stop trying to outwit nature\" and \"Don't force ridiculous rules on normal human beings.\" They argue against transgender accommodations in bathrooms and locker rooms and frame the guidance as harmful and unnecessary.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","bathroom access","locker rooms","privacy","student safety"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly rejects the policy, titling the comment \"OPUESTA A ESTA LOCURA\" and saying the drafters \"no saben ni cual es lo correcto o moral.\" The statement \"Da mucho miedo saber que nuestros hijos estan a su cuidado\" expresses fear and disapproval of the regulation and those implementing it.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","parental rights","student safety","moral opposition"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says they \"absolutely and vehemently oppose this intervention\" and says the policy \"must be thrown out.\" They argue schools should not interfere in \"the personal affairs of an individual,\" indicating rejection of the transgender student guidelines.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender policies","parental rights","constitutional rights","school role"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says they \"Vehemently oppose\" the transgender guidelines and calls the bill \"ridiculous.\" They also argue it would \"squelch our freedoms\" and should \"never see the light of day,\" which clearly indicates rejection of the regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","religious freedom","LGBTQ+ inclusion","student privacy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"STRONGLY OPPOSE\" and calls the policy an \"anti-science agenda,\" indicating rejection of the regulation. They also argue parents should be able to \"refuse this\" and claim it will cause harm, which supports an oppositional stance.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","transgender students","school curriculum","student safety","privacy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I very much oppose the mandates\" and asks officials to \"please refrain from implementing these ridiculous policies.\" She repeatedly argues against transgender-inclusive language and bathroom/locker room access, indicating clear opposition to adoption of the regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","bathroom access","locker rooms","student safety","parental rights"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"we oppose the proposed guidelines for transgender students.\" They also object to \"requiring made-up pronouns\" and argue that parents should be notified before transgender bathroom and locker room use is allowed, indicating rejection of the policy as written.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","pronouns","bathroom access","locker room access","transparency"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.96,"stance_rationale":"The commenter argues that \"the parents, not the state\" should handle the issue, which directly rejects state-issued guidance for schools. The statement that \"one law cannot possibly cover all cases\" further suggests opposition to a uniform policy framework.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","state authority","transgender students","school policy"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I want to express support for these policies\" and praises them for helping transgender students. They also endorse specific provisions like \"chosen names, pronouns, and bathrooms that fit the gender they feel they truly are,\" indicating clear approval of adoption.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student privacy","bathroom access","bullying prevention","transgender students"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly rejects the policy, calling it an \"Absolute Travesty\" and saying it \"jeopardiz[es] all.\" They argue that gender-neutral restrooms would make girls \"at risk and unsafe\" and frame the policy as harmful \"social engineering\" rather than education.","tone":"negative","tags":["bathroom access","student safety","gender identity","privacy","religious freedom"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I am opposed\" and directly instructs, \"Do not approve this measure.\" They also characterize it as \"beyond overreach,\" indicating rejection of the guidance rather than support for it with changes.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender policy","government overreach","parental rights","school policy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly states, \"100% OPPOSED\" and repeats, \"My wife and I are 100% OPPOSED to this!\" This is a clear rejection of the proposed policies with no qualifying support or request for modification.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","school policy","opposition"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says they \"look forward to policies like\" the Model Policies being in place and argues it is \"crucial that every person has safe and respectful treatment at school.\" They also endorse expanding protections, saying \"Maybe next year we can take it a step further,\" which clearly supports adoption of the regulation.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","nondiscrimination","religious freedom","bullying prevention"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly rejects the policy as \"government overreach\" and says it \"opposes biological science, common sense, and parental rights.\" They also ask rhetorical objections about affirmation, religion, and school employees, indicating they do not want the regulation adopted.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","religious freedom","LGBTQ+ inclusion","government overreach","student mental health"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly Opposed\" and asks, \"Please do not enact them!\" They argue the policies give the state \"too much power\" and call them \"evil,\" indicating clear rejection of the regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","state authority","transgender policy","privacy","school policy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I do not support these policies,\" and repeatedly argues the policies \"go far beyond\" basic rights and are \"over reaching.\" They object to parental notification, bathroom/locker room access, gender-neutral clothing requirements, and unclear harassment standards, all indicating opposition to adoption as written.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","privacy","bathroom access","dress codes","religious freedom"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly urges rejection of the policies, saying citizens should \"refuse these policies in court\" and \"All parents should stand up against these policies.\" The body repeatedly condemns the proposal as harmful and abusive, indicating clear opposition rather than a request for changes.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","free speech","privacy","LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly states, \"I strongly oppose this transgender policy,\" which directly rejects adoption of the regulation. No supporting or neutral qualifications are provided.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender policy","public schools"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"If the proposal passes\" and calls on parents to sue the VDOE, indicating they want the regulation rejected. The comment describes the policy as \"pedophilliac grooming policies\" and says it would \"endanger students,\" which is clearly oppositional.","tone":"negative","tags":["student safety","parental rights","LGBTQ+ inclusion","privacy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I am opposed to this policy,\" which directly states opposition to adoption. The emphatic \"STOP THE MADNESS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!\" reinforces a strongly negative rejection of the regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender policy","opposition","school policy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly condemns the policy proposals as \"criminally insane\" and says the people behind them \"have no business working in education,\" which clearly indicates rejection of the regulation. The language is directed at the policies themselves rather than asking for changes or clarification.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","education policy","opposition","school administration"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The comment rejects the premise of the policy by asserting, \"God created male and female sexes. No others have been created,\" which directly વિરોધs recognition of transgender students. The rhetorical question, \"Where did all these others come from recently,\" signals disbelief and opposition to the regulation's treatment of transgender identities.","tone":"negative","tags":["religious freedom","gender identity","LGBTQ+ inclusion"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly labels the proposal \"Opposed!\" and argues it should not be adopted, calling it an \"anti-science ideology\" and an \"ideologically motivated folly.\" They also predict it will be \"challenged in court and invalidated,\" indicating clear rejection rather than support or neutrality.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","privacy","school sports","LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly rejects the policy, titling the comment \"Opposed at all costs!\" and repeatedly urging \"DO NOT DO THIS TO OUR SCHOOL KIDS!\" They argue the regulation is harmful because it undermines parental involvement, \"intrud[es] into\" the family, and threatens privacy in bathrooms and locker rooms.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","bathroom access","privacy","LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I Strongly Disapprove\" and calls the policy a \"Radical Push\" that should be stopped, indicating clear opposition to adoption. Phrases like \"STOP CONFUSING CHILDREN\" and \"STOP PUSHING CRAP INTO THEIR BRAINS\" further show they want the regulation rejected.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","LGBTQ+ inclusion","parental concerns","religious freedom","student privacy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter clearly rejects the proposed policies, calling them \"Only Bigots Support these Policies\" and claiming they prevent families from transmitting \"ethnic, cultural, or religious values and beliefs\" to children. The statement frames the regulation as a threat from the state, indicating opposition rather than support or neutrality.","tone":"negative","tags":["religious freedom","parental rights","family values","LGBTQ+ inclusion"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.93,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly titles the submission \"Oppose\" and argues that girls \"need a safe place, apart from eyes of boys,\" indicating resistance to the policy’s treatment of transgender students in school spaces. The statement suggests concern about sex-separated facilities and student privacy/safety rather than support for the regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":["student safety","bathroom access","privacy","sex-specific facilities"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I oppose this policy\" and argues it \"does not\" keep children safe or treated equally. They object to privacy and parental notification provisions, as well as restroom/locker room access, saying the policy \"leaves children vulnerable\" and \"is only further opening the door\" to abuse.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","privacy","bathroom access","locker rooms","student safety"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I object to this notion,\" and frames the policy as contrary to \"Biblical principles\" and \"morals, values.\" The comment asks that it not pass, indicating clear opposition to the regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":["religious freedom","LGBTQ+ inclusion","parental rights","school policy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Vehemently Oppose Transgender Guuidelines for FCPS students,\" which clearly rejects the proposed transgender student policies. There is no qualifying language suggesting support or neutrality.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender policies","public schools","LGBTQ+ inclusion"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I Strongly Disapprove\" and urges, \"STOP CONFUSING CHILDREN,\" indicating clear opposition to the proposed transgender student policies. The language about a \"Radical Push\" and \"brainwashing\" shows they want the regulation rejected rather than adopted.","tone":"negative","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","parental rights","religious freedom","student privacy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly rejects the policy framework, saying \"All this transgender stuff in schools is wrong and harming our children!!\" This indicates opposition to adopting the transgender student policies. The statement \"God created male and female and nothing in-between or extra\" further signals disapproval of the regulation's premise.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","religious freedom","student safety","LGBTQ+ inclusion"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I am opposed to these model policies\" and repeatedly states they \"oppose most strongly\" and find them \"very problematic and potentially harmful.\" The comment argues against affirming students without parental involvement and against accepting gender identity assertions without evidence, indicating clear rejection of the regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","privacy","transgender students","school policy","student safety"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says they \"unequivocally OPPOSE\" the initiative and calls it \"NOT acceptable 'education' for our kids.\" They also argue it should be handled \"from the home\" and accuse the legislature of \"overstepping their boundaries,\" indicating clear rejection of the regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","parental rights","education policy","school curriculum"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says they are \"deeply concerned about the risk this puts\" their daughters at and warns they will \"look into other options if the outlines provided are enacted.\" Although they begin with a general statement about dignity, the overall message rejects the policy as written and implies it should not be adopted in their county.","tone":"negative","tags":["student safety","parental rights","bathroom access","LGBTQ+ inclusion"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly rejects the proposal with \"Absolutely NOT\" and says it is \"totally opposed to the constitution\" and \"Shame on you for even considering it.\" They argue it conflicts with \"freedom of religion\" and \"what the bible teaches,\" indicating clear opposition to adoption.","tone":"negative","tags":["religious freedom","constitutional objection","LGBTQ+ inclusion","parental rights"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly endorses the policy’s transgender accommodations, saying that allowing youth to use the bathroom matching their gender identity is \"deeply important.\" They also argue it \"does not harm anyone\" and that there are \"no negatives,\" which clearly supports adoption of the regulation.","tone":"positive","tags":["bathroom access","transgender students","student privacy","LGBTQ+ inclusion"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly labels the submission \"Strongly Support\" and urges action to \"prevent cruelty to children\" and protect \"trans children.\" The body endorses the regulation’s purpose of supporting transgender students and reducing bullying and discrimination.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","bullying prevention","student safety","anti-discrimination"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly argues that female athletic competitions should be reserved for “those with female bodies” and warns that allowing transgender girls to compete will “destroy the progress that girls have made.” Although they say transgender students should be treated with respect, the overall message opposes the regulation’s inclusion of transgender students in sex-specific sports.","tone":"negative","tags":["school sports","girls athletics","transgender students","sex-specific activities","fairness"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly calls the policy \"extremely dangerous\" and concludes it is an \"Unacceptable policy,\" indicating clear rejection. They also argue it would \"open[] them up to assaults\" and give students undue leverage over staff, which shows opposition to adoption.","tone":"negative","tags":["student safety","bathroom access","parental rights","staff authority","LGBTQ+ inclusion"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly rejects the policy’s subject matter, saying children are at school to learn \"reading, writing and math\" and \"Not to have a social issue be taught.\" The final statement, \"This is ridiculous!!,\" reinforces opposition to the regulation’s transgender-related guidance.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","curriculum","parental concerns","gender identity"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly oppose\" and states that \"These policies will cause more harm and confusion within our schools.\" They also reject the underlying policy framework as \"radical and political,\" indicating opposition to adoption.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","school policy","religious freedom","science","student wellbeing"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I support the guidance\" and endorses schools supporting \"trans and non-binary students.\" The final sentence, \"There are so many kids in our schools who dearly need this support,\" reinforces approval of the regulation.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student support","transgender students"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly states, \"I do not support this legislation,\" which directly indicates opposition to adopting the proposed policies. No qualifying language or request for changes is provided.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","school policy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly oppose this legislation,\" which directly states opposition to the proposed policies. The claim that it will \"damage children’s perception about themselves\" and create \"opportunities for abuse\" further indicates rejection rather than support or neutrality.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","student safety","child welfare","abuse concerns"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I oppose your proposed guidelines\" and calls for rejecting them as \"radical theories\" that \"eradicate distinctions between males and females.\" They argue the policies would \"create confusion, fear and emotional trauma\" and \"undermine[] a parent’s role and authority,\" which is clear opposition to adoption.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","gender identity","transgender students","family values","school policy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"Very strongly oppose\" and \"Do not pass this education legislation.\" They argue the policy would \"confuse a child concerning their gender\" and cause an \"identity crisis,\" indicating clear rejection of the regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":["gender identity","parental rights","student wellbeing","LGBTQ+ inclusion"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I STRONGLY OPPOSE\" and \"I oppose your proposed guidelines.\" They argue the policies would \"create confusion, fear and emotional trauma\" and \"undermine[] a parent’s role and authority,\" indicating clear rejection of the regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","gender identity","family values","student mental health"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.94,"stance_rationale":"The commenter rejects government/school involvement in transgender-related decisions, saying it is a \"private decision\" and should not be \"forced on by the Gv't. or school board.\" This indicates opposition to the proposed policies being adopted or imposed in schools.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","government overreach","transgender students","school policy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly oppose,\" which directly states their position on the regulation. The phrase \"it's indoctrinating all children\" indicates they believe the policy should not be adopted.","tone":"negative","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","parental rights","indoctrination"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly and enthusiastically support this guidance\" and argues it \"should absolutely be enacted state-wide.\" The comment also defends the policy as \"grounded in sound science,\" indicating clear approval rather than any request to weaken or reject it.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","transgender students","science","nondiscrimination"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"STRONGLY Support!\" and argues that the policies help create \"a safe and supportive school environment.\" They also endorse the underlying rationale by stating \"The science supports transgender identities.\"","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","school climate","nondiscrimination"]}


{"stance":"unknown","stance_confidence":0.95,"stance_rationale":"The comment does not provide a substantive opinion on the regulation itself. \"Lord come in the rapture!\" is a धार्मिक/expressive statement and does not clearly indicate support or opposition to the proposed policies.","tone":"unclear","tags":[]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says to \"oppose the Democrat's pathway to new legislation\" and urges, \"don't let these policies be adopted in any form.\" They repeatedly criticize the proposed \"Model Policies\" as \"disgusting\" and a \"disregard of science,\" indicating clear opposition to adoption.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","LGBTQ+ inclusion","school policy","student privacy","school choice"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says they are \"deeply disturbed by this proposal\" and argues it will \"harm young girls and women,\" undermine parents, and create safety risks. They ask policymakers to \"consider the damage these policies will do,\" which clearly indicates opposition to adoption.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","bathroom access","student privacy","student safety","women and girls"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"Strongly oppose these policy changes,\" which directly states opposition to the regulation. The rest of the comment argues that the policies \"pretend biology does not exist\" and calls them \"nonsense,\" reinforcing rejection of the proposed transgender student guidance.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","biology","feminism","school policy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly Object\" and argues the guidelines should not be adopted, calling them \"anti-science and anti-biology\" and \"tantamount to child abuse.\" They object to transgender students using girls' facilities and to schools not informing parents, indicating clear opposition to the regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","bathroom access","privacy","parental rights","school facilities"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly object\" and argues the policy would expose students to \"intimate parts of the opposite sex\" in locker rooms. They call the policy \"perverse\" and frame it as causing \"sexual trauma,\" indicating clear opposition to adoption.","tone":"negative","tags":["locker rooms","privacy","student safety","bathroom access","parental rights"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly rejects the policy, saying they \"do not and will not accept this type of education\" and that they will not allow their children to be in a school system that teaches it. The comment repeatedly characterizes the guidance as \"brainwash[ing]\" children and promoting \"false ideology,\" indicating clear opposition to adoption.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","gender identity","parental rights","education curriculum","school policy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly titles the submission \"Opposed to this confusion\" and argues that \"there are only two genders,\" rejecting the policy's premise. They also say \"Please do not exploit them,\" indicating they do not want the regulation adopted.","tone":"negative","tags":["gender identity","religious freedom","LGBTQ+ inclusion","student welfare"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly support these model policies for transgender students,\" which directly endorses adoption. The phrase \"Equal is equal\" reinforces approval of the policy's nondiscrimination intent.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","nondiscrimination","student rights"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"Please reconsider this policy\" and argues that it \"goes well beyond protection,\" indicating opposition to adoption. They object that it \"undermines the role of parents\" and forces people with \"faith-based disagreements\" to affirm something against conscience, while still supporting safety from harassment in general.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","religious freedom","transgender students","privacy","student safety"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly rejects the policy with \"There is no way the state of Virginia should trump parents' rights\". They also object to officials discussing \"private information with children without their parents knowledge or permission,\" indicating opposition to the regulation's approach to student privacy and parental notification.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","privacy","student confidentiality","transgender students"]}