{"stance":"unknown","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The comment consists only of the word \"fart,\" which is off-topic and provides no discernible opinion about the proposed transgender student policies. It does not express support, opposition, or any substantive concern.","tone":"unclear","tags":[]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly Approve\" and states that \"All children... should be treated equally,\" which clearly endorses the regulation's inclusive treatment of transgender students. The phrase \"Individual differences should be acknowledged, honored and accepted\" further supports adoption.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","equal treatment","student rights"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly oppose this\" and urges, \"Stop trying to confuse our children!\" They also reject the policy as \"weird crap,\" indicating clear opposition to adoption of the regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","bullying prevention","student safety"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"I am absolutely OPPOSED\" and frames the policy as \"forcing this agenda on Virginia's Children,\" which clearly rejects adoption of the regulation. The title \"OPPOSE Transgender indoctrination\" reinforces that opposition.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender policies","parental rights","education policy","LGBTQ+ inclusion"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"Support the youth!\" and states that youth \"need this support.\" They also endorse the policy as a way to move \"away from prejudice and hate and towards communal care,\" which clearly favors adoption of the regulation.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student support","anti-discrimination","youth wellbeing"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I am vehemently opposed to the proposed new policies\" and repeatedly argues against adoption, calling the policies \"extreme and confusing\". They also claim the policies will \"effectively end girls’ sports\" and object to the \"disregard for parents’ views and wishes,\" indicating clear opposition rather than a request for modification.","tone":"negative","tags":["girls' sports","locker rooms","parental rights","religious freedom","transgender students"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"We must support this bill,\" which directly endorses adoption of the regulation. The additional language about \"prejudice\" and \"This is a health crisis\" reinforces a strong pro-adoption position.","tone":"negative","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","mental health","anti-discrimination"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says they \"strongly oppose\" key parts of the policy and argues schools are \"going way to far\" and should \"step back.\" Although they express support for individuals being themselves, the overall position is against the regulation because it gives schools too much authority and allows bathroom access based on student choice.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","bathroom access","student privacy","school authority","student safety"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly oppose the proposed accommodations for transgender students.\" They also argue the policy should not be adopted because it would expose children to \"this ideology\" and claims it puts \"cisgender students at risk.\"","tone":"negative","tags":["religious freedom","parental rights","student safety","LGBTQ+ inclusion"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"I oppose\" the policy and repeatedly urges officials to \"Leave it alone\" and \"Do not establish that.\" They describe the proposal as \"overreach,\" \"misguided,\" and \"irresponsible,\" and argue it is \"none of the VDOE's business.\"","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","parental rights","privacy","school facilities","mental health"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly labels the submission \"Support\" and says \"At least allow them to feel safe in school,\" which endorses the regulation’s goal of protecting transgender students. The rest of the comment attacks opponents rather than questioning the policy itself.","tone":"negative","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","school climate","bullying prevention"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly rejects the policy’s implications for athletics, writing \"NO Transgender in sports\" and arguing that those \"born a male\" should be kept in male sports. The comment also says \"Don’t make our children pay,\" indicating opposition to the regulation rather than support or neutrality.","tone":"negative","tags":["school sports","LGBTQ+ inclusion","transgender students","sex-specific activities"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"STRONGLY OPPOSE\" and argues against the policy on religious and ideological grounds, stating \"the bible says there are man and women\" and \"you are what your born as.\" They also claim the regulation \"creates more sexual assault on children,\" indicating rejection of the proposed transgender student policies.","tone":"negative","tags":["religious freedom","transgender students","student safety","sexual assault","media criticism"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly support the implementation of the proposed guidance document\" and praises it as \"well-researched.\" The comment also endorses the underlying principle of respecting transgender people: \"Treating people as people and how they want to be treated.\"","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","transgender students","human dignity","nondiscrimination"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"I STRONGLY SUPPORT these policy recommendations\" and repeats that they \"strongly support them.\" They argue the policies will create \"a safe and inclusive learning environment for ALL students, including and especially LGBTQ+ youth.\"","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","bullying prevention","school climate","staff training"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly Approve\" and states that \"these children must be treated as every other child,\" which clearly endorses the regulation's purpose. There is no language opposing or questioning the policy.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student equality","nondiscrimination"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"This cannot be allowed to be enacted in our school systems\" and calls the policies \"absurd.\" They argue the policies are harmful, claiming they will lead to \"bullying and suicides,\" which indicates clear opposition to adoption.","tone":"negative","tags":["student safety","bullying prevention","mental health","transgender students","school policy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly states \"Strongly oppose,\" which clearly indicates opposition to adopting the regulation. No additional details or qualifications are provided.","tone":"negative","tags":[]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter says, \"I strongly oppose the current VDOE proposal\" and argues the policies should not be adopted because they \"overstep the role of schools,\" threaten \"safety and privacy,\" and deny \"rights regarding issues of conscience.\" These statements clearly reject the regulation rather than support it with changes.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","student safety","privacy","religious freedom","transgender students"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly Support\" and describes the policy as creating \"the accommodation for any child that is uncomfortable, transgender or not,\" which endorses adoption of the regulation. There is no indication of opposition or neutrality.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student accommodations","transgender students"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"OPPOSE! STRONGLY OPPOSE!\" and repeatedly argues against the policy, claiming it \"go[es] against science\" and removes \"parental rights.\" They also object to privacy impacts in \"locker rooms and bathrooms\" and to the policy's treatment of transgender students generally.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","privacy","bathroom access","locker rooms","transgender students"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"FULLY SUPPORT\" and praises the policy for providing \"inclusion for ALL students.\" They also endorse the policy’s purpose by saying children should be \"accepted and supported for who they are.\"","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student support","nondiscrimination"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly labels the comment \"Opposed\" and argues against the policy by warning it will expand beyond students to \"adult staff\" and by objecting to separate bathrooms for transgender people. The statement that this would \"take us back to the days of segregation\" indicates rejection of the regulation's approach.","tone":"negative","tags":["bathroom access","segregation","transgender students","equal education"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly oppose,\" calls the guidance \"dangerous\" and \"appalling,\" and urges readers to \"protest against this\" policy. They argue it \"does not accomplish\" preventing bullying and instead harms children, parents, and religious freedom.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","parental rights","religious freedom","privacy","student safety"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly oppose\" and argues that \"Legally enabling such profound confusion will cause more harm than good.\" The language rejects the regulation and frames it as harmful and ideological.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","gender identity","opposition","school policy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly oppose!\" and \"Please No!\", which clearly indicates rejection of the proposed regulation. There is no qualifying language suggesting support or neutrality.","tone":"negative","tags":[]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"Strongly support protections for trans youth\" and calls the policies \"an excellent start.\" They are urging adoption of the regulation and asking policymakers not to be swayed by opponents.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","transgender students","student rights","nondiscrimination"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly oppose passage of H.B. 145\" and argues it is \"wrong and unwise for the state to interfere\" with these policies. They also criticize the proposed approach as a \"cookie-cutter\" solution and say state involvement \"only adds another level of complexity,\" indicating clear opposition to adoption.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","gender identity","student privacy","state interference","LGBTQ+ inclusion"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter rejects the policy outright, saying \"I cannot even begin to fathom where anyone would think it is okay to allow this to take place\" and \"not with my children!\" They argue schools should not help children \"identify with what gender they want to be\" and object to parents being accused of abuse, indicating clear opposition to the transgender student policies.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","parental rights","school role","gender identity","teacher bias"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.97,"stance_rationale":"The commenter questions why the policy is being considered at all, saying, \"Why are we wasting time and resources on this\" and implying the issue is too small to merit attention. The closing line, \"Don’t we have bigger issues to deal with?\" clearly signals opposition to adopting the regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":["resource allocation","transgender students","school policy"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly endorses affirming transgender students, saying children should \"exist in a way that affirms their gender identity\" and that \"Protecting trans kids\" helps them grow up healthy and happy. This clearly supports the proposed policies' purpose and implementation.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","gender identity","transgender students"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter says, \"I strongly oppose\" and argues the state is \"sexualize[ing] children\" through the policy, which indicates rejection of the regulation. The reference to \"undermine parent's rights\" further shows opposition to the proposed guidance.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","sexual education","child welfare"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"STRONGLY OPPOSE THIS APPROACH\" and repeatedly argues the policy is \"horrifically one-sided\" and should not be adopted. They cite concerns about \"parent's rights,\" \"constitutional rights,\" and \"freedom of religion,\" and predict it will be overturned in litigation.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","constitutional rights","religious freedom","transgender students","litigation"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter expresses clear hostility toward the policy and transgender people, opening with \"Strongly disagree\" and then using a derogatory slur: \"Trannies.\" This indicates opposition to the regulation rather than a neutral or supportive comment.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","LGBTQ+ inclusion","discrimination"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly argues that trans people “shouldn’t [be] exclude[d]” and concludes, “We should support everyone, no matter what.” This clearly endorses the regulation’s inclusive treatment of transgender students.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","non-discrimination","student support"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly Oppose!!\" and repeatedly condemns the policy as a \"radical indoctrinating agenda.\" They argue it is \"wrong\" and harmful to children, indicating clear rejection of the regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","transgender students","religious freedom","student welfare"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly labels the proposal \"Strongly Oppose\" and calls it \"over-reach\" and \"madness.\" They also question \"What happened to parental rights\" and argue the policies will cause \"psychological harm to our kids,\" indicating clear rejection of adoption.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","mental health","transgender students","school policy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.96,"stance_rationale":"The commenter says “portions of these proposed policies go too far and should be revised” and objects to specific provisions on parental notification and bathroom/locker room access. They argue the policies “potentially puts the children more at risk” and “would enable students to act on such impulses,” indicating opposition to the regulation as written.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","privacy","bathroom access","student safety","transgender students"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly oppose\" and rejects the policy’s core provisions, stating \"There are 2 genders - period\" and \"No separate toilets\" and no cross-sex athletics participation. They also characterize the policy as \"absurdity\" and say \"Common sense must be regained,\" indicating opposition to adoption.","tone":"negative","tags":["gender identity","bathroom access","school sports","parental rights","counseling"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I do NOT support Transgender being 'taught' in our school system!\" which clearly rejects the policy. The statement that gender should be discussed \"between the parent and children/s privately\" indicates opposition to school involvement in this area.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","LGBTQ+ inclusion","curriculum","school policy"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"FULLY SUPPORT!!\" and argues that \"It is vital to allow all students to exist safely and freely.\" They also endorse respecting students' identities and gender expression, which aligns with adopting the proposed transgender student policies.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","gender identity","respectful treatment"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly oppose transgenders in public school,\" and argues against \"altering of birth sex\" and transgender inclusion. They also propose removing transgender students to an \"alternate school,\" indicating rejection of the policy's protections for transgender students.","tone":"negative","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","transgender students","religious freedom","student placement"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says they are in \"strong support of this guidance\" and urges VDOE to \"adopt the guidance (with minor edits).\" They repeatedly frame the policies as \"a much needed intervention\" that would improve equity, belonging, and safety for transgender and non-binary students.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","bullying prevention","privacy","equity"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly titles the submission \"Strongly Support\" and argues that the policy \"helps trans kids and doesn't hurt anyone else.\" They also endorse the regulation's purpose by saying it provides \"immense mental health benefits\" and causes no harm.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student mental health","student safety","nondiscrimination"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly oppose!!!\" which clearly indicates rejection of the proposed regulation. The title \"No\" reinforces that they do not want the policy adopted.","tone":"negative","tags":[]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly endorses transgender youth and asks to \"give these young folks\" the understanding they need, which supports adopting the policies. Phrases like \"Trans rights are human rights\" and \"Please give these young folks... the understanding they need\" indicate clear approval of the regulation's purpose.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student support","transgender students","school climate"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly calls the policy a \"disturbing overreach\" and urges officials to \"stop trying to push your agenda.\" They also say \"If this passes\" there should be a \"mass exodus\" from public schools, indicating clear opposition to adoption.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender policy","parental rights","religious freedom","school choice","student support"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly states, \"VEHEMENTLY OPPOSED,\" which is a clear rejection of the proposed regulation. The brief body, \"My wife & I are VEHEMENTLY OPPOSED to this,\" reinforces that they want it rejected rather than adopted.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","opposition","school policy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly OPPOSE transgender kids sharing a restroom/locker room with my daughter\" and repeatedly rejects inclusion in bathrooms, locker rooms, and sports. They also urge, \"STOP pushing this liberal crap down our throats,\" showing clear opposition to the proposed policies.","tone":"negative","tags":["bathroom access","locker rooms","school sports","student privacy","parental rights"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"No to new transgender rules\" and asks why Virginia would \"adopt these new policies,\" calling them \"absolutely horrifically wrong.\" The comment argues the policies harm children, parents' rights, and girls' sports, indicating clear opposition to adoption.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender policies","parental rights","girls sports","student safety","school privacy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"STRONGLY OPPOSE\" and repeatedly rejects the policy, stating they are \"absolutely against\" schools teaching \"their views of sexuality\" and that public schools have no right to \"push their immoral transgenderism\" on children. The comment argues the regulation should not be adopted and should be kept out of schools.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","religious freedom","LGBTQ+ inclusion","curriculum","student privacy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"VEHEMENTLY OPPOSE\" and argues the policy would be harmful, claiming \"RAPE AND VIOLENCE WILL INCREASE IN SCHOOLS\" and that the state should expect \"multiple lawsuits.\" The comment rejects gender integration and transgender accommodations in schools rather than supporting the regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":["bathroom access","locker rooms","student safety","parental rights","transgender students"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"I strongly support all measures to better care for and support our transgender youth\" and calls it \"a necessary direction for our school district.\" The title also says \"STRONGLY SUPPORT,\" leaving little ambiguity about their position on adoption.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student support","nondiscrimination","bullying prevention"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter argues against the policy by warning that \"sharing bathrooms\" would lead to \"further issues\" and that \"integrating genders in sports would cause problems.\" They explicitly object to transgender participation in sports, saying males have an \"athletic advantage\" and asking how a female would feel competing against someone with \"male genetic makeup.\"","tone":"negative","tags":["bathroom access","school sports","sex-based policies","privacy","LGBTQ+ inclusion"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"Strongly support this policy\" and the title adds \"Strongly support this inclusive policy. Support Trans Youth!\" This is a clear endorsement of adoption.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","transgender students","school policy"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I fully support this legislation\" and frames it as improving \"the physical and mental well-being of transgender students.\" The closing statement, \"Trans lives matter!\", reinforces clear approval of the proposed policies.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student well-being","nondiscrimination","mental health"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly states, \"I oppose this transgender bill\" and repeats, \"I oppose.\" This is a clear rejection of the proposed regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender policy","LGBTQ+ inclusion"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"STRONGLY DISAGREE!\" and objects to \"these innocent children\" being \"subjected to such things,\" indicating rejection of the transgender student policies. The reference to it being \"against all that we believe in as Christians\" further shows opposition on religious grounds.","tone":"negative","tags":["religious freedom","transgender students","parental rights","LGBTQ+ inclusion"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"STRONGLY SUPPORT\" and \"I 100% support policies which protect transgender students.\" They also explain that these policies help students \"feel safe in schools\" and succeed, indicating clear approval of the regulation.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","transgender students","school climate"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly states, \"I oppose this measure,\" which directly indicates rejection of the proposed regulation. No qualifying language suggests support or neutrality.","tone":"negative","tags":[]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly states, \"I vehemently oppose these policies,\" which is a direct rejection of the proposed regulation. There is no qualifying language suggesting support or neutrality.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","school policy","LGBTQ+ inclusion"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly Oppose This Evil\" and repeatedly rejects the policy, stating \"I WILL NOT tolerate this evil being pushed on our children.\" The comment argues against transgender recognition and related care, calling it \"child abuse\" and urging rejection of the agenda.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","parental rights","child abuse","religious freedom","mental health"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says they are \"encouraged to see this legislature finally taking steps to protect our trans kids\" and states that school should be protective for \"ALL students.\" This clearly աջակցs adoption of the proposed policies.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","nondiscrimination","supportive school environment"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly writes \"Support\" and titles the comment \"Support for this bill!\" indicating clear approval of the proposed regulation. There is no language suggesting any conditions or opposition.","tone":"positive","tags":["transgender students","LGBTQ+ inclusion","policy support"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I fully support any guidance that protects our students who are transgender\" and asks to \"help keep them safe while they are learning.\" This clearly endorses adoption of the regulation.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","transgender students"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly support\" and urges, \"Protect our children and allow them to learn in a safe environment!\" This clearly endorses adoption of the proposed transgender student policies.","tone":"positive","tags":["student safety","LGBTQ+ inclusion","bullying prevention","safe learning environment"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly support\" and praises the policy as a \"positive approach.\" They also state that \"All students deserve our support,\" indicating clear approval of the regulation.","tone":"positive","tags":["student support","LGBTQ+ inclusion","school policy"]}


{"stance":"unknown","stance_confidence":0.95,"stance_rationale":"The comment says only \"Support homeschooling\" and does not address the proposed transgender student policies or indicate whether they should be adopted, rejected, or changed. It is therefore too off-topic and vague to infer a position on the regulation.","tone":"neutral","tags":["homeschooling"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I am commenting to support these guiding principles\" and urges the commonwealth to \"continue to support evidence based policies in our schools.\" The final clause rejects opposition to trans students, indicating clear approval of the regulation.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","bullying prevention","evidence-based policy","student safety"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly endorses the policy goals by saying, \"Trans children deserve protection\" and that \"their identities should be affirmed.\" They also support anti-bullying protections, stating bullying \"should in no way be tolerated,\" which aligns with the regulation's purpose.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","bullying prevention","transgender students"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"STRONGLY SUPPORT\" and urges schools to \"protect their trans students\" through the policy. They frame the regulation as necessary for student safety and well-being, stating that \"Gender affirmation doesn't just feel good--it saves lives.\"","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","mental health","anti-discrimination","religious freedom"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says they are \"commenting in favor of supporting protecting Transgender students in Virginia\" and urges, \"Let’s keep our kids safe.\" They also endorse the policy’s anti-discrimination purpose, calling it \"common sense legislation.\"","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","anti-discrimination","student safety","transgender students"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly labels the submission \"Strongly Support\" and urges acceptance of transgender students: \"Who are we to tell others to hide themselves? Be kind.\" This clearly endorses the regulation's protective intent rather than opposing it.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student dignity","nondiscrimination"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"110% support\" and calls the proposal \"well-researched\" and \"evidence-based.\" They also argue it would \"protect previously vulnerable students\" and create \"safer, more inclusive learning environments,\" indicating clear approval of adoption.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","inclusive schools","mental health","transgender students"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I support this well-researched and evidence-based proposal\" and calls it a \"Great proposal.\" They also give reasons for approval, saying it supports students' \"health and autonomy\" and helps them feel safe and engaged in school.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","school climate","student autonomy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"against it\" and characterizes the policy as \"forced manipulation on captive defenseless children,\" which indicates rejection of the regulation. The remark about not trying it in adult workplaces first further signals opposition to the transgender student policies.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","student rights","child welfare","school policy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly rejects the transgender student policies, saying \"That's the biggest bunch of horse ive ever heard\" and arguing schools should not \"send boys in girls locker rooms r bathrooms\" or withhold information from parents. They also threaten to \"petition, seek legal counsel, and boycott/ protest\" if it passes, which clearly indicates opposition.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","bathroom access","parental rights","privacy","school facilities"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says they \"applaud\" the General Assembly and VDOE and praises the \"recently drafted Model Policies\" as \"necessary work\" to ensure equitable treatment. They clearly want the policies adopted and supported.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student support","nondiscrimination","equity"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I support the rights of the next generation of students\" and \"I support the rights of the next generation of students to be represented and protected.\" They also praise the guidance as a way to \"PREVENT DISCRIMINATION\" and say they are \"glad our state is making strides to stamp it out.\"","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","anti-discrimination","privacy","school policy"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.93,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"Support the treatment of ALL people,\" which endorses the regulation’s inclusive approach. The phrase \"not one specific group\" suggests support for policies that treat transgender students fairly rather than excluding them.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","nondiscrimination","student rights"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Vote No on transgender\" and argues the document \"will increase more issues than it solves,\" indicating opposition to adoption. They also criticize the policy’s treatment of gender identity and pronouns, suggesting they do not want the regulation approved.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","gender identity","pronouns","bullying","school policy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The comment explicitly says \"Oppose !\" and the title also states \"Oppose!\". It provides no additional reasoning, but the position against adopting the regulation is unambiguous.","tone":"negative","tags":[]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Vote yes\" and repeatedly endorses the policies as helping \"make the Trans community feel safer\" and \"supports children.\" The comment argues for adoption of the regulation and frames it as progress for transgender rights in schools.","tone":"positive","tags":["trans rights","student safety","privacy","LGBTQ+ inclusion","school policy"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly support,\" which directly endorses adoption of the regulation. They also add that \"This is good for all children,\" reinforcing approval of the policy's goals.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","nondiscrimination"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I support policy that recognizes the worth and dignity of all students, including transgender students.\" This is a clear endorsement of the proposed guidance and its inclusion of transgender students.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student dignity","nondiscrimination"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly support\" the guidance and argues it will \"ensure that our schools are more inclusive\" and provide \"safe learning environments.\" The comment frames the policies as necessary protection against discrimination and mistreatment of trans students.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","mental health","anti-discrimination","school climate"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I support this legislation\" and repeatedly argues for its adoption, stating that trans youth \"deserve the same treatment as any other kid.\" The rest of the comment defends the policy and rebuts objections about safety and bathroom access, which reinforces support.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","bathroom access","student safety","privacy"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"yes support\" and asks not to let it \"fall through,\" which clearly endorses adoption of the regulation. The phrase \"a fair school environment for all students\" further indicates approval of the policy's goals.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","school climate","nondiscrimination"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I vote no\" and describes the draft as containing \"many disturbing policies.\" They object to school personnel withholding information from parents and argue this \"would not be in the best interest of the child or the family unit,\" indicating clear opposition to adoption.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","student privacy","school communication","transgender policies"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly titles the submission \"Support\" and says they have been \"advocating for years\" for the protections in the document. They also thank the agency and state that the guidance on \"student privacy, dress code, and access to facilities\" is needed by trans students.","tone":"positive","tags":["transgender students","student privacy","dress code","facility access","LGBTQ+ inclusion"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.97,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"not with this guidance\" and \"Find alternatives,\" which indicates opposition to adopting the proposed policy as written. The statement that \"Youth girls will be at an even higher risk\" shows a negative view of the regulation’s effects rather than support for it.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","student safety","girls' safety","school policy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly oppose\" the policy and rejects transgender restroom access, stating that people should use the restroom matching their sex assigned at birth. The repeated language like \"This nonsense has got to stop\" shows clear opposition to the regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":["bathroom access","transgender students","privacy","sex-segregated facilities"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"strongly support!\" and urges the policy to \"Protect and support trans students.\" The rest of the comment reinforces approval of the regulation’s purpose, asking to \"Respect them as human beings\" and \"Listen.\"","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","transgender students","anti-discrimination"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter repeatedly expresses \"serious concerns\" with the guidance and argues it is \"far more ideology-based than fact-based\" and \"dangerous.\" They ask for the department to \"slow down\" and imply the policy should not be implemented in its current form, especially regarding gender identity assumptions, student identification, and restroom access.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","bathroom access","student privacy","parental rights","special education"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly rejects the policies, stating \"These policies are fascist\" and calling them \"Compulsory Speech.\" This is a clear expression that the regulation should not be adopted.","tone":"negative","tags":["free speech","transgender policies","government overreach"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly oppose this,\" which directly indicates rejection of the regulation. They also state it \"violates our religious and educational freedom\" and parental rights, reinforcing opposition to adoption.","tone":"negative","tags":["religious freedom","parental rights","educational freedom"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly oppose\" and \"I vote no,\" which clearly rejects the proposed policies. The statement that their children will be pulled out of public school if this happens further indicates opposition to adoption.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","transgender students","public schools","school policy"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly support this proposal\" and argues that schools should \"support all students\" and \"protect previously vulnerable students.\" The comment endorses the regulation as a way to create \"safer, more inclusive learning environments.\"","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","school climate","bullying prevention","mental health"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says they \"support protections for transgender and non-binary students\" and asks the state to \"protect all LGBT students\" in Virginia schools. They also state that such protections will help create \"a positive learning environment,\" indicating clear approval of the regulation.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","school climate","non-discrimination","transgender students"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Fully supporti\" and adds that \"ALL children should feel comfortable while getting their education,\" which aligns with approving the transgender student policies. The comment expresses clear endorsement rather than criticism or neutrality.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","supportive schools"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"STRONGLY SUPPORT!\" and adds \"Trans Rights are Human rights!\", which clearly endorses the proposed transgender student policies. There is no indication of opposition or neutrality.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","transgender rights"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The comment explicitly states \"NOT SUPPORT\" and provides no qualifying language suggesting approval or modification. This is a clear rejection of the proposed regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":[]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly endorses equal treatment for transgender people, stating that they \"deserve the same basic human rights\" and that \"Everyone should have access to education, regardless of their gender identity.\" This clearly supports adopting the regulation’s protections for transgender students.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","equal rights","education access"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly Opposed\" and states the bill \"must be put away immediately.\" They argue it is a dangerous overreach that would \"undermine the foundations\" of family and society, which clearly rejects adoption of the regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","family values","government overreach","transgender policies"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter rejects the policy outright with \"Absolutely not!\" and argues it will be abused, specifically citing fears that \"a boy decides he identifies as a girl just to use the girls locker room/bathroom.\" The mention of parents considering private school indicates opposition to adopting the regulation as written.","tone":"negative","tags":["bathroom access","locker rooms","parental rights","privacy","LGBTQ+ inclusion"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Oppose!\" and states \"This change is not ok!\" They argue public schools should focus only on \"the childrens EDUCATION! That’s IT!\", indicating rejection of the transgender student policies.","tone":"negative","tags":["education priorities","transgender students","public schools"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly support this,\" which directly endorses the regulation. They also provide reasons in favor, arguing that trans students need access to facilities aligning with their identity and that support reduces depression, anxiety, and ostracism.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","bathroom access","student mental health","student privacy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The comment explicitly says \"ABSOLUTELY NOT SUPPORT,\" which clearly rejects the proposed regulation. There is no qualifying language or request for modification, only a direct opposition.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","LGBTQ+ inclusion","school policy"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"These people must be fully supported,\" which clearly endorses the proposed policies for transgender students. There is no language indicating opposition or neutrality.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student support","nondiscrimination"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly support this well-researched and evidence-based proposal\" and argues that the policy would \"protect previously vulnerable students\" and create \"safer, more inclusive learning environments.\" The comment endorses adoption as written and does not raise objections or request weakening.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","school climate","mental health","bullying prevention"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I oppose the government pushing an agenda\" and refers to the proposal as \"transgender policies that we unequivocally disagree with.\" They ask for an alternative policy supporting those who oppose transgenderism, indicating rejection of the regulation rather than support for it.","tone":"negative","tags":["religious freedom","First Amendment","transgender policy","parental rights"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly oppose\" and \"strongly disagree with this indoctrination of our children,\" which clearly rejects the proposed policies. They also object to schools addressing LGBTQ topics, saying these conversations should be initiated \"at home with parents.\"","tone":"negative","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","parental rights","indoctrination","school policy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly states \"Absolutely NOT SUPPORT,\" which clearly indicates opposition to the proposed regulation. No additional explanation or qualifying language is provided.","tone":"negative","tags":[]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"Strongly oppose!\" and \"Please vote NO!\" which clearly indicates they do not want the regulation adopted. There is no qualifying language suggesting support or neutrality.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender policies","public schools","opposition"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.93,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"VA would be ahead of other states in finally supporting a traditionally underserved population,\" which endorses the regulation. The closing line, \"We must protect our kids. All of our kids,\" further supports the policy’s protective intent rather than opposing it.","tone":"positive","tags":["transgender students","student safety","nondiscrimination","supportive schools"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I support this\" and adds \"Protect trans kids,\" which clearly endorses adoption of the proposed policies. The comment expresses approval without reservations or requests for changes.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","transgender students"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly support guidance\" and repeatedly argues that schools should \"support trans & nonbinary youth\". They frame the policy as necessary for student safety, acceptance, and mental health, which indicates clear approval of the regulation.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","mental health","school climate","nonbinary youth"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly Support!\" and repeatedly urges adoption, including \"Protect transgender students\" and \"Give them a school system that will treat them fairly.\" The comment endorses the regulation’s goals of safety, privacy, and rights for transgender students.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","privacy","nondiscrimination","transgender students"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly support this\" and frames the policy as \"a human rights issue.\" They also argue that transgender students should be \"accepted and respected,\" which clearly endorses adoption of the regulation.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student respect","human rights","school climate"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Absolutely oppose!\" and characterizes the policy as \"another attempt to promote an agenda\" rather than support for students. The language rejects the regulation on ideological grounds, saying it \"contradicts the natural law\" and \"exploit[s]\" children.","tone":"negative","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","parental rights","student welfare","religious freedom"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly states, \"Absolutely opposed\" and \"Please vote NO,\" which clearly indicates rejection of the proposed regulation. No supporting or neutral language is present.","tone":"negative","tags":[]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I am strongly opposed to this guidance!\" which directly states opposition to adoption. The concern about a young daughter being \"exposed to\" the policy reinforces that they want it rejected rather than modified.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","parental rights","student exposure","school policy"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says they are \"excited to see this policy be implemented\" and that they \"fully believe in supporting a policy\" that reduces discrimination. The comment repeatedly endorses the regulation as promoting \"safe and equitable\" conditions and \"equal opportunity\" for students.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","equal opportunity","anti-discrimination","mental health"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly states, \"I support the guidance,\" which directly endorses the proposed regulation. There is no qualifying language or criticism suggesting opposition or neutrality.","tone":"positive","tags":["transgender students","policy support"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly support this bill!\" This is a clear endorsement of adopting the regulation, with no qualifying objections or requested changes.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","transgender students","school policy"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly support this\" and argues the policies \"protect trans kids\" and \"create a better environment for all.\" The comment endorses adoption of the regulation as a protective measure for transgender students.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","mental health","anti-bullying"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"Strongly object\" and \"This does not belong in our schools,\" indicating clear opposition to the proposed transgender student policies. The remark \"Quite leaving the parents out of raising their children\" also shows resistance to the regulation's school-based guidance.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","LGBTQ+ inclusion","transgender students","education policy"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The comment explicitly says \"Support!\" and repeats \"Support,\" which clearly indicates approval of the proposed regulation. There is no qualifying language or criticism suggesting otherwise.","tone":"positive","tags":[]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says they are \"writing to support protections for transgender and non-binary students\" and asks to \"Please consider protections\" for this population. They also argue these protections will create \"a safe place to learn and succeed\" and a \"positive learning environment.\"","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","mental health","bullying prevention","school climate"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The comment explicitly says \"Strongly support,\" which clearly endorses adoption of the proposed regulation. No contrary language or qualifications are present.","tone":"positive","tags":[]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly states \"100% SUPPORT\" and says their family is in \"complete, unqualified support of legislation protecting the rights of ALL individuals.\" This clearly endorses the proposed policies rather than opposing or questioning them.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","civil rights","student rights"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"STRONGLY SUPPORT OUR TRANS STUDENTS\" and urges officials to \"pass this bill and improve their elementary and secondary school experiences.\" They describe harmful effects of prior policies and argue that trans students should receive \"the necessary care they deserve,\" indicating clear support for adoption.","tone":"positive","tags":["transgender students","bathroom access","student health","LGBTQ+ inclusion","school policy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Oppose\" and repeatedly argues against the policy, calling it \"a much more personal issue and agenda\" and stating \"This kind of education is not for public schools.\" They also urge the state to \"NOT\" push it in schools and frame it as harmful to students and parents' rights.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","bathroom access","locker rooms","student safety","LGBTQ+ inclusion"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I support all children, including LGBTQ youth,\" and states \"we need help in protecting children\" from discrimination. This clearly endorses the regulation’s protective purpose for transgender and LGBTQ students.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","anti-discrimination","bullying prevention"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly states \"STRONGLY OPPOSED\" and \"Absolutely do not support!!\" which clearly indicates rejection of the regulation. There is no qualifying language suggesting support or neutrality.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","school policy","opposition"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"In favor, strongly support\" and describes the policy as \"the bare minimum for protecting and including trans students.\" They also defend the proposal against a likely objection about sports, indicating approval of the regulation as written.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","school sports"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Support!!! Thank you!!\" and praises the Board for \"working to ensure that trans students are treated with basic human dignity and respect.\" This clearly endorses adoption of the proposed policies.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student dignity","nondiscrimination","supportive school environment"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly states, \"I strongly strongly oppose,\" which clearly indicates rejection of the proposed regulation. The title, \"Strongly Strongly Oppose,\" reinforces that position.","tone":"negative","tags":[]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly states \"STRONGLY SUPPORT\" and repeats \"strongly support,\" which clearly endorses adoption of the regulation. No contrary language or qualifications are present.","tone":"positive","tags":[]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"STRONGLY SUPPORT\" and repeats \"I strongly support!\" They also frame the policy as \"basic human rights,\" indicating clear approval of adoption.","tone":"positive","tags":["human rights","transgender students","support"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"STRONGLY OPPOSED!!!\" and \"COMPLETELY AGAINST this proposal.\" They object that it threatens \"parental rights\" and opposes the policy because it does not allow \"parental notification,\" calling it a \"Huge government overstep.\"","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","parental notification","government overreach","student well-being","bullying"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly support this well-researched and evidence-based proposal\" and repeatedly endorses the policy as creating \"safer, more inclusive learning environments.\" They also argue it would \"protect previously vulnerable students,\" indicating clear approval of adoption.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","school climate","mental health","bullying prevention"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Absolutely oppose\" and rejects the policy, arguing that transgender students should be sent to \"a specific school of their own\". The statement \"Our religious vows do not accept this!!\" further indicates opposition to adoption of the regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":["religious freedom","LGBTQ+ inclusion","parental rights","school placement"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly oppose this amendment\" and repeats, \"I strongly oppose this legislation.\" They also state they will \"drop my daughter out of school and fully homeschool her,\" indicating rejection of the policy.","tone":"negative","tags":["religious freedom","parental rights","LGBTQ+ inclusion","education policy"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly writes \"SUPPORT!\" and says \"It is so important to protect trans and nonbinary youth,\" which clearly endorses the regulation. The comment offers a reason for approval rather than criticism or a request to weaken it.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","transgender students"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly titles the comment \"strongly support\" and argues that \"Educating children about it in schools will help kids make an informed decision.\" The body endorses school guidance on transgender students as a way to counter misinformation and social pressure, which supports adoption of the regulation.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student education","transgender students","parental influence"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly urges others to \"Stop making this about you\" and says \"Don't take away kids' HUMAN RIGHTS,\" which clearly supports protecting transgender students. The title \"PROTECT TRANS LIVES\" and references to respecting others' identities indicate approval of the proposed policies, likely with strong enthusiasm.","tone":"negative","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student rights","nondiscrimination","privacy","respect"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly oppose these guidelines\" and repeatedly argues they should not be approved, calling them \"totally unworkable\" and saying they \"need to be totally reworked.\" The comment objects to parental exclusion, bathroom/changing facility access, and religious conscience concerns as reasons to reject the proposal.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","privacy","bathroom access","religious freedom","LGBTQ+ inclusion"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly support trans and non-binary youth\" and states that schools \"should be a safe and accepting environment\" and \"should encourage acceptance.\" This is a clear endorsement of the proposed policies' goals and adoption.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","school climate","acceptance"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The comment explicitly says \"strongly support an equitable learning environment for persons of all gender identities\" and then answers \"YES,\" indicating approval of the proposed policies. There is no language opposing or questioning the regulation.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","equity","student safety"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly oppose\" and argues that \"The teaching of personal sexual PREFERENCE has no place being taught in school,\" which rejects the regulation’s transgender-student guidance. Although they add that children with questions should have access to counselors and social workers, that is a limited caveat and does not change the overall opposition.","tone":"negative","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","sex education","parental rights","school counseling"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The comment explicitly endorses transgender rights with the title \"Trans rights are human rights!\" and the body states \"Human rights apply to all people.\" This clearly supports adopting the regulation’s protections for transgender students.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","human rights","student rights"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.97,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"This needs to be revisited and revised,\" and argues the policy contains \"concerning language\" that could override \"the rights of parents\" and \"the free speech rights of the teachers and other students.\" They frame the guidance as \"silencing of differences\" and call for substantial revision rather than adoption as written.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","free speech","teacher rights","student rights","transgender policies"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.97,"stance_rationale":"The comment clearly rejects the regulation with the title \"Absolutely Not\" and the rhetorical question \"Have the people agreeing even read this?\" indicating disapproval. It does not offer support or neutral inquiry; it is a brief negative reaction to the proposed transgender student policies.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","school policy","LGBTQ+ inclusion"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Fully support trans student rights\" and \"highly recommend\" making students feel supported and equal. They also endorse the policies as \"one step towards civility and wellbeing within the school setting,\" indicating clear approval of adoption.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","anti-discrimination","school climate","transgender students"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I oppose such preposterous legislation\" and asks to \"Stop pushing against God's natural order,\" which clearly rejects the proposed policies. The reference to infringement on \"the rights of students, parents, and teachers\" further indicates opposition to adoption.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","religious freedom","LGBTQ+ inclusion","student rights"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly Support\" and argues that \"Trans & non-binary youth deserve safety, acceptance and acknowledgment.\" They further state that school \"needs to be a safe place for children physically and mentally,\" which clearly endorses the proposed policies.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","school climate","transgender students"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"It is time to support the human rights of all Americans\" and emphasizes that \"All children should have a safe place in school,\" including \"transgender children.\" This clearly endorses the regulation’s protective goals for transgender students.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","human rights","safe schools"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly rejects the policy, saying \"This is NOT OKAY!\" and arguing that allowing transgender students access to bathrooms/locker rooms would be \"BAD.\" They frame the regulation as a threat to \"safety of all students\" and say it would \"take away everyone else’s rights/safety.\"","tone":"negative","tags":["student safety","bathroom access","locker rooms","transgender students","privacy"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I support my students being their true selves\" and \"I support without judgement or malice,\" which clearly endorses the guidance. They also state they \"stand against prejudice and discrimination\" toward transgender, non-binary, and LGBTQ+ students, indicating approval of the regulation's protective aims.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","anti-discrimination","student support","transgender students"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly states, \"I am in Support of trans rights in Virginia,\" which clearly endorses the regulation’s purpose. There is no language indicating opposition or neutrality.","tone":"positive","tags":["transgender rights","LGBTQ+ inclusion"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"Strongly support this guidance document\" and frames transgender rights as \"human rights.\" They also argue the policies are \"necessary and life-saving,\" indicating clear approval of the regulation.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","sex education","student rights","gender identity"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly oppose\" and argues the policy \"does not respect the freedom of speech or the freedom of religion\" of those who believe \"sex is determined by our biology.\" Although the final sentence mentions schools should respect all people, the overall thrust is rejection of the regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":["religious freedom","free speech","parental rights","sex definition","public schools"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I support the guidance\" and explains that schools should provide \"a safe and inclusive environment\" where \"LGBTQ students feel supported and respected.\" This clearly endorses adoption of the proposed policies.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","inclusive schools"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"STRONGLY OPPOSE\" and argues the policy \"goes far beyond\" protecting rights, calling it an \"egregious violation\" and saying it is \"trampling on the rights of parents and children.\" They conclude that the policy uses \"intimidation and bullying tactics\" and should not be embraced in public schools.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","religious freedom","LGBTQ+ inclusion","student discipline","school policy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Oppose, Oppose, Oppose\" and argues the policy is \"very dangerous\" and should not be forced on children and families. They reject the premise of the regulation, stating \"There are only two genders\" and that suggesting otherwise \"damages children and families.\"","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","gender identity","parental rights","student safety","LGBTQ+ inclusion"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I support this bill\" and urges the VaDOE to \"adopt[] an inclusive policy.\" They also express approval of the policy’s purpose by emphasizing support for trans and LGBTQIA+ youth and accountability for staff.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student mental health","supportive policy","accountability"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I oppose the draft transgender policies put forward by the VDOE\" and argues the policies \"go far beyond the path the General Assembly prescribed.\" They also say the policies \"infringe the First Amendment rights of parents\" and should not accommodate \"irreversible 'gender transitions,'\" showing clear rejection of the regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","First Amendment","gender identity","transgender policies","student wellbeing"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly states, \"I do not approve/strongly disagree,\" which directly indicates opposition to the proposed regulation. No supporting reasons or qualifications are provided.","tone":"negative","tags":[]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"forcing transgender ideology on our kids... is wrong\" and calls for \"some room\" for people who believe sex is biological reality, indicating opposition to the policy. Although they acknowledge compassion for gender dysphoria, the overall thrust is that the proposed guidance should not be adopted as written.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender policy","parental rights","LGBTQ+ inclusion","school guidance","sex-based definitions"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The comment explicitly states \"Oppose\" in both the title and body, indicating clear rejection of the proposed regulation. No additional reasoning or qualifications are provided.","tone":"negative","tags":[]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I oppose new VDOE guidance\" and calls it \"a dangerous draft policy.\" They argue it would \"force\" affirmation, \"undermine parents' authority,\" and constitute an \"assault\" on freedoms of conscience, expression, privacy, and religion, all of which indicate rejection of the regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","religious freedom","privacy","LGBTQ+ inclusion","student rights"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly Oppose\" and objects to \"lgbt teaching\" and \"letting them decide which bathroom\" to use, indicating rejection of the proposed transgender student policies. The statement that it \"goes against the teaching of God\" and will have \"dire consequences\" further shows opposition rather than a request for changes.","tone":"negative","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","bathroom access","religious freedom","student privacy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.97,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly oppose transgender policy\" and argues that \"This policy is not thinking of all the children that will be harmed.\" They further state it will \"negatively affect mental health of all students,\" indicating rejection of the regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":["mental health","student safety","transgender policy","harm to students"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter argues that allowing transgender girls access to female locker rooms and bathrooms is a \"breach of privacy\" and says it should be limited to \"only females.\" This directly rejects a key part of the proposed policies regarding transgender student access to school facilities.","tone":"negative","tags":["privacy","bathroom access","locker rooms","student safety","transgender students"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly OPPOSE this legislation,\" which directly states opposition to the proposed regulation. The title also reinforces this with \"Strongly oppose.\"","tone":"negative","tags":["opposition","transgender students","school policy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.93,"stance_rationale":"The commenter argues that \"boys and girls should be kept in separate rooms during over night field trips\" and says co-ed overnight rooms are \"a breach of trust,\" indicating opposition to any policy allowing mixed or transgender-inclusive rooming arrangements. Although they mention mental health, the thrust is to restrict the regulation rather than support it.","tone":"negative","tags":["overnight field trips","student privacy","parental rights","sex-segregated housing"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"OPPOSE!\" and demands to \"STOP THE LIES! PROTECT OUR KIDS,\" indicating rejection of the proposed transgender student policies. The statement \"YOU CAN'T CHANGE YOUR DNA!\" is used as a reason to oppose the regulation rather than support it.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","parental concerns","student safety","LGBTQ+ inclusion"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"Strongly oppose DOE transgender policy,\" which directly rejects the regulation. They also argue it would \"spread the confusion concerning gender\" and \"den[y] parents their rights,\" indicating substantive opposition to adoption.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","gender identity","transgender students","school policy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly oppose this bill\" and repeats that it is \"completely inappropriate.\" They argue against hiding a student's identity from parents and against allowing access to locker rooms, indicating rejection of the regulation rather than support for it.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","privacy","bathroom access","school safety","transgender students"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"Support the guidelines\" and expresses approval that the state is \"helping trans and non-binary students feel safe at school.\" They also call for staff training to \"help make schools safer,\" which supports adoption of the policy.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","staff training","bullying prevention"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I support this guidance,\" which directly endorses adoption of the regulation. The additional statement that it is \"so important to the well-being of our youth\" reinforces a favorable position.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student well-being","school policy"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I very much support these guidelines,\" and the title states \"This parent Overwhelmingly supports.\" This is a clear endorsement of adopting the regulation.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","nondiscrimination"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I oppose these model policies\" and repeatedly argues against adoption, calling them \"reckless\" and saying they would have an \"overall negative effect on students.\" They also propose an alternative approach instead of adopting the policies, which confirms opposition rather than neutrality.","tone":"negative","tags":["bathroom access","parental rights","student privacy","LGBTQ+ inclusion","school facilities"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly oppose this legislation,\" and argues against transgender student access to locker rooms and against discipline for misgendering. The phrase \"This is a slippery slope\" reinforces that they want the policy rejected rather than amended.","tone":"negative","tags":["bathroom access","locker rooms","misgendering","teacher burden","transgender students"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The comment explicitly says \"strongly oppose,\" which clearly indicates the commenter wants the regulation rejected. No supporting or qualifying language is provided.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender policy","opposition"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly states, \"I strongly oppose the transgender policy,\" which directly indicates rejection of the proposed regulation. No supporting or neutral language is present.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender policy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The comment explicitly says \"strongly oppose,\" which directly indicates rejection of the proposed transgender student policy. No qualifying language suggests support or neutrality.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender policy","opposition"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly Oppose Policy!\" and argues against shared facilities with transgender students, stating schools should protect \"bodily privacy and dignity\" and that most children would be uncomfortable sharing bathrooms and locker rooms. This indicates opposition to the proposed transgender student policies.","tone":"negative","tags":["privacy","bathroom access","locker rooms","student safety","parental rights"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I support policies that protect transgender and non-binary youth in schools\" and closes with \"I support the VDOE model polices.\" They also endorse the regulation’s goals of a \"safe and supportive learning environment\" and protection from \"bullying, harassment, and discrimination.\"","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","bullying prevention","anti-discrimination","school climate"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I'm strongly opposed to these measures\" and frames the proposal as harmful. They argue it \"cuts against parental rights, student safety, and freedom of speech,\" indicating rejection of the regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","student safety","freedom of speech","transgender students"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I'm strongly opposed to these measures\" and frames the proposal as \"an injustice to children and parents.\" They also argue it \"cuts against parental rights, student safety, and freedom of speech,\" indicating rejection of the regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","student safety","freedom of speech","transgender students","LGBTQ+ inclusion"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"we strongly support this guidance!\" This is a clear endorsement of adopting the proposed policies.","tone":"positive","tags":["transgender students","public schools","support for guidance"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly endorses the policy in the title, \"Support Trans Student Protections,\" and argues that \"having clear protections for them is more important than ever.\" The body cites discrimination, bullying, and suicide risk as reasons to adopt the regulation.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","bullying prevention","mental health","bathroom access"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"we should all support this,\" which directly endorses the proposed policies. The rest of the comment reinforces approval by appealing to unconditional parental support and empathy for transgender children.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","parental rights","student support"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I support the guidance on transgender student protections\" and argues that schools should ensure transgender students \"are safe and welcomed.\" The comment clearly endorses adoption of the policy to protect students from bullying and unsupportive environments.","tone":"positive","tags":["transgender student protections","student safety","bullying prevention","LGBTQ+ inclusion"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly oppose the transgender guidance document\" and repeatedly argues against it, including claims that it would \"depriv[e] parents\" of knowledge and force students into bathrooms/locker rooms they are uncomfortable with. The comment asks that the measure not go through and warns it will cause harm and enrollment loss.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","privacy","bathroom access","student safety","psychological harm"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"SUPPORT this much needed legislation!\" and urges, \"Protect our kids and pass this legislation.\" They also describe it as \"Science based and comprehensive\" and say it \"provides exactly the kind of guidance schools need,\" indicating clear approval of adoption.","tone":"negative","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","bullying prevention","religious freedom","school policy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly Oppose\" and asks to \"please try a different approach,\" indicating rejection of the proposed policies. The statement that it is \"more about ideology\" and will \"cause polarization and negative results\" further shows opposition to adoption.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","ideology","polarization","school policy"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I support this guidance\" and explains that it would help schools provide \"a safe and inclusive educational experience for all students.\" The reference to \"especially our LGBT youth\" shows affirmative support for the regulation's purpose and implementation.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","inclusive education","school policy"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Fully Support Protections for Transgender Students\" and urges, \"Please implement additional guidance that protects transgender students rights.\" This clearly endorses adopting the regulation and even strengthening it.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","nondiscrimination","transgender students"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly signals opposition in the title, \"OPPOESE,\" and argues against affirming transgender identities for children, saying it is \"a crime\" to \"lock a child into an identity\" and that officials have \"NO Right to bend God's laws.\" These statements clearly reject the proposed transgender student policies.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","religious freedom","parental rights","child welfare","LGBTQ+ inclusion"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly labels the comment \"Support\" and describes wanting transgender students to feel safe using \"the bathroom\" and \"locker rooms\" and to be supported in class. The language endorses empathy and inclusion, indicating approval of the proposed policies rather than opposition.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","bathroom access","privacy","locker rooms"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The comment explicitly says \"Strongly oppose,\" which directly states the commenter wants the regulation rejected. No additional context suggests support or neutrality.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender policies","public schools","opposition"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly states, \"I strongly oppose,\" which directly indicates rejection of the proposed regulation. The title also says \"OPPOSE,\" reinforcing the same position.","tone":"negative","tags":[]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly labels the submission \"OPPOSE\" and argues that \"Facilities and activities should be based on gender someone was born as,\" which rejects the proposed transgender student policies. They also say \"Transgenderism is a mental illness\" and urge to \"Stop subjecting our children\" to these ideas, indicating clear opposition rather than a request for modification.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","school facilities","school activities","parental rights","mental health"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I support the model policies for Transgender students\" and repeatedly urges that the policies be implemented immediately: \"We should not delay implementing these policies\" and \"We need these policies now.\" The comment also endorses specific provisions such as affirming chosen names/pronouns, confidentiality, and access to facilities.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","transgender students","privacy","parental rights","school staff accountability"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I support equal rights for all genders\" and \"No discrimination in America!\" This clearly endorses the proposed transgender student policies and their nondiscrimination goals.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","equal rights","nondiscrimination"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly support this guidance\" and repeats that support multiple times. They also endorse the policy goals of creating a \"safe and inclusive environment\" and protecting \"LGBTQ youth\" from \"bullying, harassment and discrimination.\"","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","bullying prevention","anti-discrimination","school climate"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter clearly endorses protecting transgender and non-binary students, describing them as a \"vulnerable group\" facing discrimination and concluding, \"Thank you for representing all people!\" The offer to \"educate\" and share voices of transgender people indicates support for the regulation’s inclusive aims rather than opposition.","tone":"positive","tags":["transgender students","non-binary inclusion","mental health","anti-discrimination","student well-being"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says they are \"in support of the Trans Student Policy\" and repeatedly endorses the guidelines as protecting transgender students and all children. They also state there is \"NO ACCEPTABLE reason to be against these guidelines,\" which clearly indicates approval of adoption.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","bullying prevention","nondiscrimination","school climate"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly labels the policy \"Strongly Opposed\" and says it is a \"misguided policy\" that \"tears down\" protections. They also argue against allowing transgender students in sports and conclude with \"NO!\" to the policy makers' proposal.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","school sports","fair competition","student safety","privacy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"Strongly oppose this gender confusion agenda,\" which clearly rejects the proposed transgender student policy. The phrase indicates opposition to adoption rather than a request for modification.","tone":"negative","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","transgender students","school policy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly do not support this proposal\" and argues it would \"break down families\" and be \"detrimental to society.\" They object to teachers addressing gender identity and insist that \"Teachers are not parents,\" indicating rejection of the policy.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","family values","gender identity","teacher role","school policy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The comment explicitly states \"OPPOSE,\" which directly indicates the commenter wants the regulation rejected. No additional explanation or qualifications are provided.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender policies"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly praises the policies, saying they \"give me hope\" and that the government is \"solidly pointed in the right direction with these policies.\" They also say they are \"excited to encourage my administration to adapt and exceed them,\" which clearly supports adoption.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","transgender students","nondiscrimination","student privacy","school policy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly Oppose,\" \"Absolutely not,\" and urges the Department of Education to \"reject the proposed model regulations.\" The body repeatedly argues against the policies on bathroom access, sports, parental rights, and religious objections, all indicating clear opposition to adoption.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","bathroom access","school sports","privacy","religious freedom"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Oppose!!!!!\" and argues against the policy by calling it \"misguided compassion\" and claiming \"Transgender confusion is just that confusion.\" They further state that \"Transgenderism leads to confusion,\" indicating they do not want the regulation adopted.","tone":"negative","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student mental health","transgender students","school policy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"STRONGLY OPPOSE\" the proposed transgender policies and adds that \"this does more harm than good,\" which clearly rejects adoption of the regulation. There is no language suggesting support or neutrality.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender policies","school policy","student safety"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly support the protection of trans youth\" and repeats, \"Please support this bill.\" This is a clear endorsement of adopting the regulation.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","transgender youth","healthcare"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"NO to Transgender Policy\" and calls it \"bad policy,\" indicating clear opposition to adoption. They argue it promotes \"politicized, sexualized ideology,\" threatens religious parents, and \"encourages schools to deceive parents,\" all of which show rejection rather than support or neutrality.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","religious freedom","privacy","LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"No!\" and \"Strongly oppose on every level,\" which clearly indicates rejection of the proposed regulation. There is no qualifying language suggesting support or neutrality.","tone":"negative","tags":[]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly rejects the policy with phrases like \"Stop indoctrinating our kids!\" and \"This is child abuse,\" indicating they want the regulation blocked. They also say \"Stay out of sex related education\" and criticize \"this ungodly agenda,\" which shows clear opposition to adoption.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","transgender students","sex education","child welfare","religious freedom"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly oppose this\" and argues it \"will do more harm then good for all involved!!!\" This is a clear rejection of the proposed regulation rather than a request for changes.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","school policy","student safety"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly endorses the policy’s goals, stating that \"There is no space in education for institutionalized discrimination\" and criticizing those who oppose it. They argue for protecting transgender students from bullying and negligent school responses, which aligns with supporting adoption of the regulation.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","bullying prevention","student safety","equity","school climate"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I am writing to oppose the proposed VDOE policy\" and argues against pronoun requirements and restroom/locker room access provisions. Although they begin by supporting equal treatment, the overall thrust is to reject the policy because it allegedly violates speech, religion, and privacy rights.","tone":"negative","tags":["religious freedom","free speech","privacy","bathroom access","parental rights"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I want my objection to Transgender indoctrination in our schools to go on record\" and argues it is not the school's job to \"teach, promote or encourage\" children to question or reject their gender. Although they support bullying-free education, the overall message rejects the proposed transgender student policies as harmful.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","LGBTQ+ inclusion","parental rights","school curriculum","bullying prevention"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly support this guidance\" and argues that all students should be protected from \"stigma, bullying, or discrimination.\" They also endorse \"consistent standards across all school districts\" and a framework that lets students express themselves safely, which clearly supports adoption of the regulation.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","anti-bullying","student safety","nondiscrimination","gender identity"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I do not agree with this new upcoming law,\" indicating opposition to the regulation. The stated reason is fear that someone could \"enter the bathroom acting like a transsexual\" and harm children, which shows rejection of the policy on safety grounds.","tone":"negative","tags":["bathroom access","student safety","privacy","transgender students"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly support this bill\" and adds that it \"is based in science and current based evidence.\" This is a clear endorsement of adoption of the regulation.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","evidence-based policy","student rights"]}