{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly begins with \"OPPOSE!!\" and repeatedly condemns the policy as \"this act of perverseness.\" The rest of the comment uses religious quotations to argue against the regulation and those who support it.","tone":"negative","tags":["religious freedom","LGBTQ+ inclusion","transgender students","school policy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"My family and I completely oppose any and all legislation\" and asks, \"Please oppose this policy.\" They argue it would be \"detrimental\" and should be rejected so teachers can focus on academics instead.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","privacy","student safety","parental rights","school policy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Oppose!\" and rejects the policy as part of \"this evil\" and \"promoting this.\" They also urge alternatives like \"home schooling and/or Christian schools,\" indicating they do not want the regulation adopted.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","religious freedom","parental rights","school choice","LGBTQ+ inclusion"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly states \"Adamant opposition\" and asks, \"Please do not adopt these or any similar guidelines.\" They also frame the policies as efforts to \"normalize LGBTQ behavior\" and argue for preserving parental control, indicating rejection of the regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","parental rights","student rights","school policy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly asks not to \"impos[e] opposite sex kids into their bathrooms and locker rooms\" and says this would be a \"violation of safety, well being and privacy.\" They do offer an alternative—accommodate transgender students \"in other ways\"—but the overall position is against the regulation’s bathroom/locker room provisions.","tone":"negative","tags":["bathroom access","locker rooms","privacy","student safety","transgender students"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly support all efforts to support transgender and non-binary youth,\" which clearly endorses the regulation's purpose. The title \"Strongly Support\" reinforces that the commenter wants the policy adopted.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","transgender students","student support"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly condemns the policy as \"wicked, disgusting, and morally wrong\" and says \"That is what you promote when you support transgender rights,\" indicating clear opposition to the regulation. The closing line, \"Let kids be kids,\" further signals rejection of transgender-related school policies.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender rights","LGBTQ+ inclusion","religious beliefs","student privacy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly oppose the proposed model policies\" and repeats that they are \"STRONGLY OPPOSED\" and urge representatives to \"OPPOSE adoption.\" The body argues the policy is harmful, promotes a \"one sided agenda,\" and threatens religious freedom and privacy, all indicating clear opposition to adoption.","tone":"negative","tags":["religious freedom","parental rights","privacy","LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says they \"OPPOSE\" the regulation and repeats that they \"want it to be publicly known.\" The rest of the comment uses religious condemnation and scripture to argue against the policy as an \"act of perverseness.\"","tone":"negative","tags":["religious freedom","LGBTQ+ inclusion","parental rights","school policy"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly support the guidance\" and explains that it would help \"all students can receive an education in a safe and inclusive environment.\" This is a clear endorsement of adopting the regulation.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","inclusive environment"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"OPPOSE Transgender Policy!!\" and argues \"This is NOT the answer!!\" indicating clear rejection of the regulation. The statement that it \"will harm ALL our precious children\" further shows opposition based on perceived harm.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender policy","student safety","gender identity","children"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says they \"strongly oppose transgender legislation for schools\" and argues Virginia needs legislation to protect students \"from transgender agenda,\" indicating rejection of the proposed policies. The language is clearly opposed to adoption rather than requesting changes.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender policies","public schools","student protection","LGBTQ+ inclusion"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly oppose these new mandates\" and repeats, \"I strongly oppose!\" They also object that teachers are \"not trained\" for this role and that they do not want parents \"pushed out of the parenting role,\" indicating rejection of the policy.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","teacher training","gender identity","school policy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly oppose transgender legislation for schools,\" which directly rejects the proposed policies. The phrase \"protect public school students from transgender agenda\" also indicates opposition to the regulation's purpose.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender policies","public schools","opposition","student protection"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly oppose,\" which clearly indicates rejection of the regulation. The follow-up question, \"where is this going?\" does not add support or nuance to the position.","tone":"negative","tags":["opposition","transgender students","school policy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I am opposed to this proposal\" and argues the changes will be harmful. They cite concerns about \"confusion,\" \"a distraction,\" and fear for \"the safety of my child\" if restroom access is based on identified gender.","tone":"negative","tags":["bathroom access","student safety","parental rights","gender identity","school policy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly oppose transgender legislation for schools,\" which clearly rejects the proposed policy. The earlier sentence about officials lacking a mandate and \"jeopardize the bodily privacy and safety of our children\" reinforces opposition to adoption.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","student privacy","student safety","transgender policy","school facilities"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"strongly oppose\" and adds \"No transgender legislation unless straight students are protected,\" indicating rejection of the proposed transgender student policies unless conditions are changed. The comment does not support adoption as written; it argues against the regulation in its current form.","tone":"negative","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student rights","nondiscrimination","parental rights"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly begins with \"Oppose\" and says the \"current VDOE proposal does not focus on the well-being of all children.\" They argue it would \"inject confusing policy\" and \"disenfranchise parents,\" indicating rejection of the regulation as written.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","student safety","school policy","transgender students","privacy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says they \"strongly oppose\" the Model Policies and repeatedly states that they \"should undergo major amendments\" and that they \"oppose these policies.\" Although they express support for protecting transgender students from bullying, the overall position is that the policies are \"misguided,\" \"discriminatory and unconstitutional,\" and should not be adopted as written.","tone":"negative","tags":["religious freedom","pronouns","bathroom access","parental rights","LGBTQ+ inclusion"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly opposed\" to the proposed transgender student policies. The stated reason, \"for the health and safety of our children,\" indicates they want the regulation rejected rather than adopted.","tone":"negative","tags":["student safety","transgender students","public schools"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly oppose the Model Policies\" and repeatedly argues against adoption, asking to \"Please slow down.\" Although they affirm respect for all students, their overall position is that the policies should not be ratified because they violate parental rights and would harm sports and privacy.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","bathroom access","school sports","privacy","transgender students"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I support this guidance\" and argues that policies are needed to protect LGBTQ students from discrimination and make schools \"inclusive to all.\" The comment endorses adoption of the guidance as a means of improving safety and support.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","anti-discrimination","bullying prevention","school climate"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly oppose these actions,\" which clearly indicates rejection of the proposed regulation. The title \"Oppose!\" reinforces that position.","tone":"negative","tags":["opposition","transgender students","school policy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says officials do not have a mandate to enforce the policy and claims it would \"jeopardize the bodily privacy and safety of our children,\" which indicates rejection of the regulation. The phrase \"gender promotion\" is used pejoratively to oppose the proposed transgender student guidance.","tone":"negative","tags":["privacy","student safety","transgender students","public schools","parental rights"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"i am AGAINST this!\" and \"Do not allow this to go forward,\" which clearly rejects the regulation. They also argue it is a \"terrible idea\" and warn it would invade children's privacy and modesty, indicating opposition to adoption.","tone":"negative","tags":["religious freedom","privacy","parental rights","transgender students","school policy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I am strongly opposed to this policy\" and argues it will \"victimize and irreparably harm many children.\" They also describe it as a \"crazy, whacky\" move and say private schooling is now a must, indicating rejection of the regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender policy","student harm","public schools","parental choice"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly oppose the model policy proposal for 'transgender' students!!!\" This is a direct rejection of the regulation with no qualifying support or suggested amendments.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","school policy","LGBTQ+ inclusion"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly argues against the draft policies, saying they \"seem instead more like the repressive policies of a totalitarian government\" and urging Virginia to protect \"freedom of speech and conviction and freedom of religion\" instead. They object to bathroom access, changing areas, sports participation, and the policies' treatment of biological sex, indicating they want the regulation rejected or substantially weakened.","tone":"negative","tags":["bathroom access","school sports","privacy","religious freedom","parental rights"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly oppose Transgender promotion in publicly funded schools\" and \"adamantly oppose the use of bathrooms and locker rooms by the opposite gender.\" They reject the policy’s approach to transgender students, though they suggest a separate gender-neutral facility as an alternative.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","bathroom access","locker rooms","parental rights","school facilities"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly urges rejection: \"Please do not do this to our children!!!!!!\" They argue the policy would expose children in bathrooms and make them feel \"unsecure and unsafe,\" indicating opposition to the regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":["bathroom access","student safety","privacy","parental concerns","transgender students"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"strongly oppose transgender legislation for schools\" and repeatedly argues against the policy on religious grounds, asking how parents could \"change what GOD has created.\" The language clearly rejects the regulation and calls for \"TRUTH and RIGHTEOUSNESS\" instead of the proposed approach.","tone":"negative","tags":["religious freedom","transgender students","LGBTQ+ inclusion","school policy"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I fully support these bills to strengthen VDOE guidance,\" which clearly endorses adoption of the regulation. The personal context about being a grandparent to a transgender person and friend to LGBTQ people reinforces that supportive position.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","transgender students","school policy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"Please do not pass this!\" and argues the policy \"goes way beyond prevention\" into \"mandatory promotion\" of an ideology. Although they support anti-bullying protections, their overall position is clearly against adopting the proposed regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","anti-bullying","student safety","gender identity","public schools"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"stronly oppose\" and argues that the \"Transgender policy can not solve their problems\" and would \"do them more harm than good.\" They also ask officials not to \"enforce gender promotion\" in schools, indicating rejection of the regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender policy","student privacy","student safety","parental rights","LGBTQ+ inclusion"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly support this policy\" and explains that it is \"incredibly important\" for students to feel welcome and protected. They also endorse specific provisions like using a student's \"correct pronouns and chosen name\" and say the policy would \"afford all students more protection.\"","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","bullying prevention","pronouns","school climate"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenters explicitly say, \"Please Do Not Implement This Policy\" and repeat \"Please do not put this policy into action.\" They argue it is \"pushing an agenda,\" \"confusing,\" and would create problems around bathrooms, sports, and parental convictions, indicating clear opposition to adoption.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","bathroom access","school sports","privacy","LGBTQ+ inclusion"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"strongly oppose,\" which clearly indicates rejection of the proposed policies. The title \"transgender mandates for public schools\" also frames the regulation negatively as unwanted mandates.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","public schools","mandates"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I'm proud to support this guidance\" and argues that it would help schools \"provide a safe and inclusive educational experience for all students.\" The comment endorses the policy as a way to better support trans and non-binary students and LGBT youth.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","inclusive education","transgender students","school policy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says the Department of Education should \"abandon these guidelines immediately\" and argues the policy would endanger girls, be unfair, and expose schools to lawsuits. The comment repeatedly objects to bathroom access, overnight trips, and sports participation for transgender students.","tone":"negative","tags":["bathroom access","school sports","student safety","overnight field trips","privacy"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"STRONGLY SUPPORT\" and argues that \"Supporting trans students is important\" and that leaders should \"protect and support minorities of all types.\" This clearly endorses adoption of the regulation.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student support","nondiscrimination","minority rights"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I am strongly opposed to implementing this dangerous policy\" and asks, \"Please do not endanger our children by implementing this policy.\" They argue the policy would be harmful and should not be adopted.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","student safety","gender identity","public schools"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"STRONGLY OPPOSE\" and asks to \"STOP!\" the policy. They argue it amounts to \"enforce[d] gender promotion in schools\" and say it \"confuses a child,\" indicating rejection of the regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","school policy","child welfare","gender identity","mental health"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly oppose this!\" and repeatedly argues against the policy, calling it \"anti-scientific transgender ideology\" and \"utterly false and destructive.\" They also urge government and institutions not to \"force\" acceptance of the policy, indicating clear opposition to adoption.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender policy","religious freedom","First Amendment","science","parental rights"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The comment explicitly says \"STRONGLY OPPOSE!!!\" which clearly indicates rejection of the proposed regulation. No supporting arguments or qualifications are provided beyond the emphatic opposition.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","LGBTQ+ inclusion","school policy"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly Support\" and adds that \"This is good for all children, regardless of their gender or sexuality.\" This clearly endorses adoption of the regulation.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student support","nondiscrimination"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly titles the submission \"Support\" and states that \"Trans rights are human rights\" and that everyone \"deserves to be protected, supported, and respected.\" This clearly endorses the proposed transgender student policies.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","transgender rights","student safety","nondiscrimination"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly oppose transgender legislation\" and threatens to withdraw their children from public schools if the policy is adopted. They argue against restroom access for transgender students, saying \"Stop the insanity,\" which indicates rejection of the regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":["bathroom access","transgender students","parental rights","school choice"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly oppose new guidelines\" and argues that officials should not \"enforce gender promotion in taxpayer funded schools.\" They also claim the policy will \"jeopardize the bodily privacy and safety of our children,\" indicating clear rejection of the regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":["privacy","student safety","parental rights","LGBTQ+ inclusion"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"DO NOT support any policy\" and frames the regulation as something that would \"further illness,\" indicating clear opposition to adoption. The title, \"Oppose Furthering Gender Confusion,\" reinforces that they want the policy rejected.","tone":"negative","tags":["mental health","gender identity","transgender students","opposition"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I Don’t Support This At All\" and argues against the policy as a \"radical change\" that would \"endanger 97% of the students.\" The comment clearly rejects the regulation and frames it as harmful and politically motivated.","tone":"negative","tags":["student safety","bathroom access","privacy","LGBTQ+ inclusion"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"My family is in favor of adopting the Model Policies\" and repeatedly urges schools to \"ensure that ALL students are treated equitably.\" They also argue to \"support transgendered youth\" and conclude that protecting transgender students is \"what we must do.\"","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","equity","privacy","school sports"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I am strongly opposed to this legislation\" and \"Please do not pass this legislation.\" They also argue it would endanger girls, allow restroom/changing room access by \"a person of the opposite gender,\" and harm girls' sports, all of which indicate rejection of the proposed policies.","tone":"negative","tags":["bathroom access","school sports","student safety","parental rights","privacy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"Please do not implement this policy,\" which is a direct rejection of adoption. They also argue that \"Mandating the use of transgender pronouns violates the 1st Amendment,\" indicating substantive opposition to the regulation's requirements.","tone":"negative","tags":["freedom of speech","freedom of religion","pronouns","transgender students","constitutional rights"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I absolutely do not support this!!\" and argues against the policy by insisting people should \"use the bathroom according to what you are equipped with.\" The comment frames the regulation as dangerous, claiming it \"opens the door for so many bad things, including sexual assault.\"","tone":"negative","tags":["bathroom access","student safety","privacy","transgender students"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"ABSOLUTELY NOT, DO NOT IMPLEMENT THIS\" and repeatedly argues the policy is \"terrible\" and \"Simply not ok.\" They object to reduced parental knowledge, bathroom access, pronoun requirements, and school-wide accommodation of transgender students, while suggesting only a separate safe space instead of the proposed policy.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","bathroom access","pronouns","student privacy","LGBTQ+ inclusion"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The comment explicitly says \"Strongly oppose!\" and provides no qualifying language suggesting support or neutrality. It is a direct rejection of the proposed regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","policy opposition"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly disagree with this\" and calls the policy \"awful,\" indicating clear opposition to adoption. They also object that \"the school system is going to teach my kids that any of this is ok\" and insist \"This is for parents to deal with, not the educational system,\" which rejects the regulation's role in schools.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","LGBTQ+ inclusion","public schools","student upbringing"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Oppose this 100%\" and repeatedly condemns the policy as \"absolutely insane\" and \"ridiculous.\" They argue it would allow \"a child to be in the bathroom with the opposite sex\" and increase bullying and safety risks, indicating clear rejection of the regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":["bathroom access","student safety","bullying prevention","opposition to transgender policies"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"Oppose!!!!!!! Please do not pass this!\" and states that if it passes, their kids will be homeschooled permanently. This is a clear request to reject the regulation based on fear for safety reasons.","tone":"negative","tags":["student safety","transgender students","parental rights","homeschooling"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly labels the proposal \"OPPOSED\" and says it is \"not protecting students\" but \"furthering a political agenda.\" They also argue it would add \"more stress and confusion,\" indicating rejection of the regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","student wellbeing","political agenda","school policy"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I will always support not discriminating against a child\" and that schools should provide \"full support\" for a transitioning child. They also endorse a \"positive and supportive environment for everyone,\" which aligns with adopting the regulation's protections for transgender students.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","non-discrimination","student support","school climate","privacy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The comment explicitly says \"Strongly disagree,\" which clearly indicates opposition to the proposed regulation. No supporting reasons or qualifications are provided, but the stance is unambiguous.","tone":"negative","tags":[]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Oppose strongly\" and argues the policies \"go past respect\" and \"steer students toward transgender ideology.\" They also say the state has \"no right to interfere\" with parents and object to bathroom/locker room access, indicating rejection of the regulation as written.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","privacy","bathroom access","gender identity","student safety"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"This Bill should be defeated and never brought up again\" and \"Put this bill in the trash bin,\" which clearly rejects the regulation. They also argue it should be \"left up to parents\" and that schools and government have \"no right or duty to get involved,\" indicating opposition to adoption.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","school policy","transgender students","government overreach"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I write to oppose doing this\" and calls it \"an insane policy,\" which clearly rejects the regulation. Although they mention that \"everyone deserves a safe place to learn,\" that appears to be a general statement rather than support for the proposed policy.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","bullying prevention","student safety","school policy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly rejects the policy, saying \"This is wrong!\" and \"I vote NO!\" They also argue it will \"confuse kids\" and object to gender expression examples like \"Shirtless girls?? Skirts on boys,\" indicating clear opposition to adoption.","tone":"negative","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","gender identity","student privacy","school dress codes"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"Oppose strongly!!\" and \"Do not pass this!\" which clearly indicates they want the regulation rejected. No supporting or neutral language appears in the comment.","tone":"negative","tags":[]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The comment explicitly rejects the regulation with the phrase \"ABSOLUTELY NOT!!!!\" and provides no qualifying language suggesting support or modification. Its title, \"Gender,\" indicates the objection is directed at the transgender-student policy itself.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","LGBTQ+ inclusion","school policy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter clearly rejects the policy, calling it \"insane\" and urging people to \"put a stop to the craziness that is taking over.\" They also invoke religious authority as the preferred guidance instead of the proposed regulation, indicating opposition to adoption.","tone":"negative","tags":["religious freedom","LGBTQ+ inclusion","transgender students","opposition to policy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"Please do not pass any part of these policies,\" which is a direct rejection of the regulation. They also argue it takes away \"parents rights\" and says the policies put \"transgender over other students,\" indicating substantial opposition rather than a request for minor changes.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","LGBTQ+ inclusion","student rights","school discipline","bullying"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The comment explicitly says \"Strongly oppose,\" which clearly indicates rejection of the proposed regulation. No supporting or qualifying language is provided.","tone":"negative","tags":[]}


{"stance":"unknown","stance_confidence":0.12,"stance_rationale":"The comment only says \"Strongly disagree\" without stating what aspect of the proposed regulation it disagrees with or whether it is opposing adoption of the policy itself. With no substantive explanation, the position is too vague to classify confidently.","tone":"negative","tags":[]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"Strongly oppose to this policy\" and repeatedly argues against it, calling it \"a waste of resources\" and urging, \"Do not bully the rest of us that oppose\". The comment rejects the policy's premise and asks rhetorical questions meant to undermine transgender accommodations.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender policy","student safety","privacy","LGBTQ+ inclusion"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly OPPOSE\" and states \"There Is no way this should ever even be thought about in our school systems!\" They argue the policy will \"open the world to more sexual assault\" and reject it on parental-protection grounds, indicating clear opposition to adoption.","tone":"negative","tags":["student safety","parental rights","sexual assault","transgender students","school policy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.93,"stance_rationale":"The comment explicitly says \"Opposed\" and the body says \"Leave stuff alone,\" which indicates the commenter does not want the regulation adopted or changed. Although brief, the wording clearly rejects the proposed policies.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","school policy","opposition"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I STRONGLY OPPOSE THIS PROPOSAL\" and argues that schools should not \"indoctrinate our children\" with this policy. They also frame it as violating the rights of non-transgender students, indicating clear rejection of the regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","parental rights","indoctrination","school policy","student rights"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"STRONLY OPPOSED\" and argues the policy \"will cause more issues than help.\" They ask to \"keep the bathrooms seprate\" or create an \"additional bathroom,\" indicating rejection of the proposed transgender student bathroom access guidance.","tone":"negative","tags":["bathroom access","student safety","parental rights","privacy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly oppose\" and calls the policy \"an outrage.\" They argue it \"demeans women\" and makes \"competitive sports for women unfair,\" indicating rejection of the regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":["women's rights","school sports","fairness","gender identity"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly oppose this motion\" and repeatedly rejects the policy, including \"this is a step too far!!!\" and threatening to withdraw children if it passes. Their concerns focus on bathroom access and objection to LGBT-related instruction, indicating opposition to adoption of the regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":["bathroom access","parental rights","religious freedom","LGBTQ+ inclusion","student comfort"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"Please do NOT do this\" and \"I strongly oppose it,\" which clearly indicates rejection of the proposed regulation. There is no qualifying language or request for modification, only a direct opposition.","tone":"negative","tags":["opposition","transgender students","school policy"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"ya'll are doing a great service for trans individuals\" and thanks the agency for \"your efforts,\" which clearly endorses the proposed policies. There is no language opposing or questioning the regulation.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","transgender students","nondiscrimination"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly calls the policy \"an outrage\" and a \"travesty,\" indicating rejection of the regulation. They argue it \"demeans women,\" makes women's sports \"unfair,\" and is \"an offense to God and the natural order of life,\" all of which oppose adoption.","tone":"negative","tags":["women's sports","religious freedom","sex equality","transgender students"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly states, \"I support this,\" which directly endorses the proposed regulation. No contrary language or qualifications are included.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","transgender students","school policy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.97,"stance_rationale":"The commenter says the VDOE should \"worry about getting Teachers back to school and not social policy\" and tells the agency to \"butt the hell out,\" indicating opposition to the regulation. Although they suggest a specific accommodation for transgender athletes, the overall message rejects state involvement in this policy area and emphasizes parental control.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","parental rights","school policy","bathroom access","school sports"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly support transgender kids,\" which directly endorses the policy’s purpose. The statement that \"Everyone has right to be loved and respected\" reinforces approval of protections for transgender students.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student rights","support for transgender students"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly states \"Strongly oppose,\" which directly indicates rejection of the proposed regulation. No additional explanation or qualifying language is provided.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender policy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"Strongly oppose this,\" which directly states opposition to the proposed regulation. The additional phrase, \"this would be a disaster,\" reinforces a clearly negative position toward adoption.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","public schools","opposition"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"STRONGLY OPPOSE\" and repeatedly urges rejection: \"This is an assault on parental rights,\" \"This is dangerous for children,\" and \"Don’t do this to parents. Don’t do this to children.\" The comment argues the proposal is \"radical\" and should not be adopted.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","transgender students","school policy","child welfare","political ideology"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Oppose\" and argues against the policy as \"another policy designed to confuse and cause separation.\" The language about \"common sense and decency\" and children being \"preyed upon enough\" indicates clear rejection of the regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","parental concerns","student safety","gender identity","school policy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.97,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly titles the submission \"Oppose\" and asks to \"allow parents to help their children\" rather than follow the policy framework. The request to \"allow teachers to focus on teaching subject matter\" implies disagreement with the regulation's role in schools.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","school policy","teacher role"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I support transgender youth and these model policies,\" which directly endorses adoption of the regulation. The closing statement, \"Let's bring humanity back to our schools,\" reinforces approval of the policy goals.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student support","school climate"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"Will not support this dangerous policy\" and argues the policy should not be adopted because it \"will endanger the safety of our children\" and violate \"constitutional right of religion.\" They also say it \"will do nothing but cause problems,\" indicating clear opposition rather than a request for modification.","tone":"negative","tags":["religious freedom","student safety","privacy","bathroom access","locker rooms"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly endorses equal treatment for transgender students, saying they \"deserve the same respect and regard\" and that schools should \"protect them from abuse and discrimination.\" This clearly supports adopting the proposed policies.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","anti-discrimination","student safety","bullying prevention"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly endorses the underlying policy goals, saying all students should feel \"safe, accepted for exactly who they are\" and that children need to be \"safe and accepted\" to receive an effective education. This aligns with support for the transgender student policies and their emphasis on inclusion and safety.","tone":"positive","tags":["student safety","LGBTQ+ inclusion","school climate","anti-bullying"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I am writing to support this vital set of guidelines and model policies.\" They further endorse the regulation’s purpose by saying schools should \"accommodate our transgender students\" and protect them from \"discrimination and disparate treatment.\"","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","anti-discrimination","bullying prevention"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"NO to Transgender ideology\" and asks to \"Reject the Model Policies,\" which is a clear rejection of adoption. They also state the policies are \"harmful to children\" and \"undermine the rights of parents and families,\" indicating opposition rather than a request for modification.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","transgender students","school policy","family rights"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"No to mandatory policies supporting gender confusion,\" which rejects the proposed transgender student policies. The phrases \"Support parental rights\" and \"The State is not our parent\" indicate opposition to state adoption of the regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","transgender policies","government overreach","religious freedom"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly oppose this policy\" and argues it \"goes way beyond prevention\" and should not be used to \"promote gender confusion\" in schools. The overall thrust is rejection of the proposed transgender student policies as harmful and ideological.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","bullying prevention","parental rights","LGBTQ+ inclusion","school policy"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly support this,\" which directly indicates approval of the regulation. The additional statement that \"Trans children deserve to be treated with respect and protected in our schools\" reinforces support for the policy's purpose.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","transgender students","school climate"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"Support these model policies for transgender youth,\" which directly endorses adoption of the regulation. No opposing or qualifying language is included.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","transgender students","school policy"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"Support this\" and adds that it should include \"fair changes to support LGBTQIA* community in public schools.\" This indicates approval of the regulation, possibly with minor modifications rather than rejection.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","public schools","nondiscrimination"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"I strongly oppose the transgender policy\" and \"strongly advise you against any transgender policy in our public schools.\" They argue it would harm girls' privacy and fairness in sports, and emphasize parental authority over school decisions.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","privacy","school sports","bathroom access","LGBTQ+ inclusion"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I support the new guidance\" and argues that schools should be \"an affirming part of kids' community life.\" The comment endorses the regulation as beneficial for students' well-being rather than questioning or opposing it.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student well-being","school support","affirming schools"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"oppose this harmful legislation\" and repeats \"WE MUST OPPOSE THIS,\" making their position clear. They argue the policy would allow males into female bathrooms and locker rooms and lead to \"sexual abuse and exploitation,\" indicating strong rejection of the regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":["bathroom access","locker rooms","student safety","privacy","transgender students"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly support these policies\" and repeatedly argues that they will protect students from \"bullying and exclusion\" and create a \"respectful and safe environment.\" The comment endorses the regulation as a way to help transgender students benefit fully from public school.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","bullying prevention","student safety","safe learning environment","religious freedom"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I support transgender youth and these model policies\" and adds, \"I support these policies.\" This is a clear endorsement of adopting the regulation.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","nondiscrimination"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly Support Trans Guidance\" and argues that children deserve \"dignity\" and to be \"free from discrimination\" in public schools. The comment endorses respectful treatment and compassion for transgender students, which aligns with adopting the regulation.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","anti-discrimination","student dignity","school climate"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"SUPPORT for ALL youth including Transgender Youth\" and states that Virginia youth \"will benefit from policies that empower ALL our youth.\" They also say the proposed guidelines \"need us to enact\" and frame them as promoting equality and acceptance.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student equality","bathroom access","transgender youth","school policy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly asks you to \"REJECT the Model Policies\" and says they are \"harmful to children.\" They also argue the policies \"undermine the rights of parents and families\" and that \"Cutting the parents out of the loop\" is unacceptable, indicating clear opposition.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","family rights","transgender students","school policy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I do not support this policy\" and \"My grandchildren do not need to learn/be exposed to this information at school,\" which clearly rejects adoption. The concern that there is \"no protection for non trans children\" indicates opposition based on perceived harms to other students.","tone":"negative","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","parental rights","student exposure","student safety"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"all students needed to be treated equally and with respect, including trans students,\" which aligns with adopting the proposed policies. The title \"Support ALL Virginia students\" also signals approval of the regulation's purpose and protections.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student equality","respect","transgender students"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I fully support this policy,\" which directly endorses adoption. They also praise the policy’s goals of recognition, respect, safety, and comfort for students.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","respect and dignity","school climate"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly support RCPS and their proposed policies to support trans children\" and repeatedly endorses the policies. They also affirm specific provisions like restroom access, pronoun use, and dress freedom, indicating clear approval of the regulation.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","bathroom access","pronouns","student safety","dress code"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"Please stop this model\" and \"I want all children to grow up safely,\" indicating rejection of the proposed policy. They also argue that \"Government should not be involved\" and ask to \"Let parents be parents,\" which clearly opposes adoption of the model policies.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","government overreach","child welfare","family autonomy"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I fully support these measures\" and urges Virginia to \"continue being a strong force in the advancement of equality for all.\" The rest of the comment reinforces support by emphasizing safety, understanding, and opposition to bullying/disrespect in schools.","tone":"positive","tags":["equality","student safety","bullying prevention","LGBTQ+ inclusion"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I support this plan,\" which directly states approval of the regulation. They also describe it as \"very thoughtful and reasonable,\" reinforcing a positive endorsement.","tone":"positive","tags":["transgender students","school policy","nondiscrimination"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"We strongly support the guidance\" and frames it as \"protection for trans kids in VA schools.\" The rest of the comment reinforces approval by emphasizing that children should \"feel safe and accepted.\"","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","transgender students","school climate"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"i strongly oppose\" the policy and argues for separate facilities instead of the proposed approach. They object to transgender students using girls' bathrooms, saying they do not want their daughter \"to be walked in on by a boy who thinks it would be fun to pretend to be a girl.\"","tone":"negative","tags":["bathroom access","student privacy","parental rights","transgender students"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I support this policy,\" and the title reads \"Strongly Support.\" This is a clear endorsement of adopting the regulation.","tone":"positive","tags":["transgender students","public schools","parental support"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter says, \"I am totally opposed to the proposed transgender policy,\" which directly rejects adoption. They further argue it should be based on \"BIOLOGICAL GENDER,\" indicating they want the policy changed in a way that substantially weakens or reverses the proposal.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender policy","biological sex","school policy","LGBTQ+ inclusion"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly support transgender youth\" and \"I love these model policies and they should be implemented.\" This is a clear endorsement of adopting the regulation as written.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","transgender youth","policy support"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly support transgender youth and the guidance regulations for schools,\" which directly endorses adoption of the regulation. There is no opposing language or qualification.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","transgender youth","school policy"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I support transgender youth and these model policies,\" which directly endorses adoption of the regulation. There is no qualifying language or criticism suggesting opposition or neutrality.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","transgender students","school policy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I oppose this legislation,\" and repeatedly argues the policies are \"intentionally vague,\" \"discriminatory,\" and contrary to religion, biology, and fairness in sports. They also ask whether the intent is to report parents for child abuse and claim the document could harm other students and teachers, indicating clear rejection rather than support or neutrality.","tone":"negative","tags":["religious freedom","parental rights","privacy","school sports","LGBTQ+ inclusion"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly oppose the proposed transgender policies\" and asks to \"protect ALL students\" rather than adopt the policy. They object to shared bathroom/locker room access and propose an alternative accommodation, indicating opposition to the regulation as written.","tone":"negative","tags":["bathroom access","locker rooms","student safety","parental rights","transgender students"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly support protecting students\" and endorses protections for \"trans students\" and other at-risk groups. They frame the policy as necessary for a \"safe and fair education,\" indicating approval of the regulation's purpose.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","bullying prevention","nondiscrimination"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly states, \"Strongly support\" and \"I am in full support,\" which clearly indicates approval of the proposed regulation. No objections or qualifications are included.","tone":"positive","tags":[]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly rejects the policy, saying \"These proposed policies will confuse young, moldable minds\" and framing them as forcing teachers to choose between \"their values or their careers.\" The title \"Oppose!!!\" also makes the opposition unmistakable.","tone":"negative","tags":["gender identity","parental rights","religious freedom","teacher rights"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly support this legislation!\" and praises \"evidence-based practices\" and policies that \"mitigate discrimination.\" This is a clear endorsement of adopting the regulation.","tone":"positive","tags":["nondiscrimination","evidence-based policy","student privacy","transgender students"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I do NOT Support this policy\" and calls it \"reckless and not in the best interest of our children.\" They also argue schools should not be \"interfering with the family unit,\" indicating opposition to adoption of the regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","religious freedom","LGBTQ+ inclusion","school policy"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly support transgender youth and these model policies\" and praises them for creating a \"positive, safe, and nurturing learning environment.\" They also express appreciation for specific provisions and only note a hope for more emphasis on athletics equity, which does not change the overall supportive stance.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","dress codes","school sports","equity"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"STRONGLY SUPPORT\" and \"I support transgender youth and these model policies.\" They also frame the policies as necessary support for transgender students: \"They need and deserve ALL the support we can give them!\"","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student support","transgender students","school policy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly titles the submission \"Oppose 'transgender' policy\" and says the school should not \"participate in determining the 'identities' of its students.\" They also argue the policy would \"putting many children in harm’s way\" and that \"You are hurting these students, not helping,\" indicating clear rejection of the regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","transgender policy","student safety","school role"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly support transgender youth and your model policies\" and repeats, \"I strongly support this movement.\" The comment also endorses the goal of preventing discrimination and making schools welcoming, which aligns with adoption of the regulation.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","anti-discrimination","school climate"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says they are \"in favor of supporting all of our students\" and asks the state to act on that basis. They also invoke LGBTQ+ student mental health statistics as justification, which supports adoption of the policy rather than rejection.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student support","mental health","suicide prevention"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"STRONGLY SUPPORT\" and states that the guidelines are \"long overdue.\" They also endorse the policy goals of safety, inclusion, and support for transgender students, saying they \"deserve all of the same support\" in school.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","nondiscrimination","school environment"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"STRONGLY SUPPORT\" and \"I support the guidance,\" which directly endorses adoption of the regulation. The phrase \"we need to support all children\" reinforces approval of the policy's purpose.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student support","nondiscrimination"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I support transgender youth and these model policies,\" which directly endorses adoption of the regulation. There is no qualifying language or criticism suggesting opposition or neutrality.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","transgender students","school policy"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I full heartedly support these bills\" and calls them \"a great start\" to protecting transgender people. They also argue that opposing them is harmful, saying it is \"hate-fueled and cowardly\" and would \"put trans people in dangerous situations.\"","tone":"negative","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","anti-discrimination","mental health","bullying prevention"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"STRONGLY SUPPORT\" and adds that \"our schools model respect for everyone,\" which clearly endorses adoption of the policy. There is no indication of any objection or request to weaken the regulation.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","school climate","respect"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly support transgender youth and these model policies,\" which directly endorses adoption of the regulation. There is no qualifying language or criticism suggesting opposition or neutrality.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","transgender youth","school policy"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly support\" and explains that the policy will \"create a more safe space of inclusion and welcoming for the students.\" This is clear approval of the regulation as proposed.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","school climate"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly support transgender youth and this model policy,\" which clearly endorses adoption of the regulation. There is no opposing language or qualification.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","transgender students","school policy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"opposing this bill\" and \"this is not the way,\" indicating rejection of the proposed policies. Although they express support for protecting transgender students, they argue the regulation would endanger others and propose alternative accommodations instead of adoption as written.","tone":"negative","tags":["student safety","bathroom access","privacy","transgender students","school facilities"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I oppose these guidelines\" and repeatedly asks the Department of Education to \"reconsider\" them. The body argues the policies are \"inequitable and discriminatory,\" objecting to parental rights, gender affirmation, bathroom access, religious exemptions, and alleged coercion.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","privacy","bathroom access","religious freedom","LGBTQ+ inclusion"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I STRONGLY SUPPORT the implementation of this guidance.\" They also argue the policies are needed for \"civil rights\" and to protect transgender students' \"very lives,\" which clearly endorses adoption.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","civil rights","mental health","bullying prevention"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"Firmly Oppose\" and states, \"I absolutely disagree with the bathroom and locker room policies proposed.\" This is a clear rejection of the regulation, at least as it relates to facility access policies.","tone":"negative","tags":["bathroom access","locker rooms","parental rights","transgender students"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly endorses the policy with the title \"Yes!\" and states, \"Everyone should be able to be who they truly are at school,\" which aligns with supporting transgender student protections and inclusion. There is no language opposing or questioning the regulation.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student rights","school climate"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly Support\" and \"I strongly agree with protecting ALL Virginians.\" The rest of the comment praises equal rights and opposing \"bigotry and shortsightedness,\" which clearly indicates approval of the proposed transgender student policies.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","equal rights","nondiscrimination","student protection"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I would like to support VDOE model for protecting trans and binary students,\" which directly endorses the regulation. They also state that these students and their families \"need all the support and help they can get,\" reinforcing approval.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student support","nondiscrimination","transgender students"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I fully support the recommendations\" and calls it an \"Excellent Policy Guidance Document.\" Although they criticize one area as \"too superficial and evasive\" and ask for more concrete suggestions, that is a request for improvement rather than opposition to adoption.","tone":"positive","tags":["transgender students","parental rights","student safety","policy guidance"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says the policy is \"a formula for creating unnecessary confusion\" and that \"This policy must be revised\" to protect privacy and rights, indicating opposition to the proposal as written. They also object to specific provisions such as \"opening the girls' restrooms to boys\" and warn of \"emotional and psychological harm,\" which shows they want it rejected or substantially weakened.","tone":"negative","tags":["bathroom access","privacy","parental rights","LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly rejects the policy, saying \"This bill will do absolutely no good\" and \"If this passes my children will not enter the school system.\" They argue schools should focus on \"general education\" and that this issue is \"extremely private,\" indicating opposition to adoption.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","student privacy","transgender students","school counseling","education priorities"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says the proposed bill is \"created by a politician / group that does not follow the will of Jesus\" and that \"Proposed bills like this are drawn up without the guidance of God,\" indicating rejection of the regulation. They also state there is \"only boy , girl, woman, man,\" which directly opposes the transgender student policies.","tone":"negative","tags":["religious freedom","LGBTQ+ inclusion","transgender students","parental rights"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly support\" and adds \"Let’s treat each other with respect and dignity,\" which aligns with approving the regulation. There is no indication of opposition or neutrality.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","respect and dignity","student rights"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I support the guidance\" and further praises it as \"factual, researched, humane.\" They also state it will \"produce the best outcomes for our young people,\" indicating clear approval of adoption.","tone":"positive","tags":["transgender students","student safety","LGBTQ+ inclusion","school climate"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly support transgender youth,\" which clearly endorses the regulation’s purpose and implementation. There is no opposing language or ambiguity.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","transgender students","student support"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly labels the proposal \"Strongly Oppose\" and says the policies \"do not offer\" needed space for differing beliefs. They argue the model policies are \"a terrible solution\" and should be handled \"on a district level\" instead of adopted as written.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","religious freedom","teacher rights","local control","school policy"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"Strongly support and approve of these models,\" which directly endorses adoption of the regulation. There is no qualifying language or criticism suggesting opposition or neutrality.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","transgender students","school policy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly oppose\" and characterizes the policy as \"indoctrination of our students,\" indicating clear rejection of the regulation. The phrase \"not the role of public schools\" reinforces opposition to adopting the model policies.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","LGBTQ+ inclusion","public schools","indoctrination"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly oppose\" and asks to \"Reject the Model Policies.\" The stated reason is that the policies \"undermine the rights of parents and families,\" which clearly indicates opposition to adoption.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","family rights","transgender students"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly titles the submission \"Strongly Support\" and states that the policy is needed \"to protect the civil rights of transgender students.\" This is a clear endorsement of adopting the regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","civil rights","student protection","transgender students"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly rejects the policy’s core purpose, saying minors \"should not be identified as transgender\" and that \"no arrangements to accommodate them as transgender be made in our school system.\" They also argue schools should treat students by \"birth sex\" and that transgender issues \"should not be acknowledged or taught,\" which clearly opposes adoption of the regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","parental rights","school accommodations","sex-based treatment","curriculum"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly agree\" and repeatedly endorses the policy’s goal of protecting transgender/LGBTQ students, stating that \"Safety, both physical and mental, must be the priority.\" The comment argues the regulation would create \"equal opportunity\" and a better learning environment, indicating clear support for adoption.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","bullying prevention","mental health","nondiscrimination"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"STRONGLY SUPPORT: PROTECT TRANSGENDER YOUTH\" and argues that it is \"crucial to provide aid to transgender youth.\" This clearly endorses adopting the regulation to support transgender students.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student support","transgender youth","school safety"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly urges readers to \"be inclusive\" and to \"open our hearts to kindness,\" framing the policy as an invitation to embrace diversity. The language strongly endorses the regulation’s inclusive treatment of transgender students rather than opposing it.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","inclusivity","student rights","kindness"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly support this guidance document\" and argues that schools should prioritize \"student well-being.\" They also state the policy supports a \"specifically marginalized group\" without diminishing support for cisgender students, indicating clear approval of adoption.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student well-being","school safety","transgender students"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I am strongly in favor of the proposed policy\" and argues it will \"provide safety and privacy to transgender youth.\" The final sentence, \"It is far past time to do this,\" further confirms support for adoption.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","privacy","bullying prevention"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.96,"stance_rationale":"The commenter says, \"All children deserve support and protection,\" which aligns with the regulation’s goal of creating a safe and supportive environment for transgender students. There is no language opposing the guidance or suggesting it should be weakened.","tone":"positive","tags":["student safety","supportive environment","LGBTQ+ inclusion"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly states, \"I support!\" which directly indicates approval of the proposed regulation. No contrary language or qualifications are included.","tone":"positive","tags":[]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The comment explicitly rejects the policy with the imperative \"Leave children alone!!!\" and the title \"STOP the INSANITY,\" indicating opposition to the transgender student guidance. It offers no support or constructive changes, only a demand to halt the policy.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","parental rights","school policy"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I support them,\" referring to the transgender student policies. The title \"Trans rights are human rights\" also clearly signals approval of the regulation's purpose and adoption.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","transgender rights"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly support these policies,\" which directly indicates approval of the regulation. There is no qualifying language or criticism suggesting otherwise.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","transgender students","school policy"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly support policies that protect transgender students,\" which directly endorses adoption of the regulation. The additional sentence, \"They need our love and support,\" reinforces approval rather than raising objections or questions.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student support","nondiscrimination"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly support OUR transgender students\" and praises the guidance for \"prioritizing student well-being.\" They also state it \"seeks to validate and support a specifically marginalized group,\" which clearly endorses adoption of the policy.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student well-being","safe schools","nondiscrimination"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I do not support this bill\" and argues it is \"dangerous and reckless.\" They also urge against adoption by saying they would \"pull my children out of school if this passes,\" indicating clear opposition to the regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":["bathroom access","student safety","privacy","school facilities","parental rights"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly support this bill\" and repeatedly endorses the policy, stating that \"Transgender youth need our love and support\" and that the bill will \"help most importantly our transgender youth.\" The comment argues the regulation would create \"a more kind and loving environment for everyone,\" indicating clear approval.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student mental health","school climate","anti-bullying","transgender youth"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly oppose,\" and argues against transgender students sharing bathrooms with cisgender students. They also object to schools addressing these issues, saying it is \"the parents responsibility,\" which indicates rejection of the regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":["bathroom access","privacy","parental rights","LGBTQ+ inclusion"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"OPPOSE!\" and repeatedly urges officials to \"Do not force this in schools.\" They also reject the policy as \"insane\" and say they will not allow their children to be exposed to it, indicating clear opposition to adoption.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","bathroom access","student safety","privacy","religious freedom"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly oppose all of this bill\" and objects to specific provisions about bathroom/changing facility notification and parental reporting. They argue the policy would create \"gender confusion\" and harm children, indicating clear opposition to adoption of the regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","bathroom access","privacy","religious freedom","LGBTQ+ inclusion"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"STRONGLY SUPPORT\" and \"I strongly support all efforts to protect trans kids,\" which clearly endorses the regulation. The phrase \"Keep religion out of our schools\" reinforces support for policies protecting transgender students in public schools.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","transgender students","religious freedom","public schools"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly support!\" and adds that \"All students deserve equitable treatment,\" which clearly endorses adoption of the regulation. There is no indication of opposition or neutrality.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","equity","student rights"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly support this measure\" and praises schools for treating \"all humans with dignity and respect.\" They also endorse creating \"a safe learning environment,\" which aligns with adoption of the policy.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","nondiscrimination","school climate"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly praises the proposal as \"well thought out\" and says \"This proposal is a step in the right direction\" and \"Let's support our youth.\" They also endorse specific elements like \"gender-inclusive dress codes, single user bathrooms and private dressing areas, and professional training and development.\"","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","privacy","dress codes","bathroom access"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly rejects the policy’s approach, saying “we need a solution to support all our students” but “forcing children” into bathrooms, sports, and beliefs “is not the solution.” They also argue against recognizing transgender identity in sex-based contexts, stating “we will never be the same sex” and objecting to “sports and scholarships against others with unfair advantage.”","tone":"negative","tags":["women's rights","bathroom access","school sports","parental rights","LGBTQ+ inclusion"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly states, \"I strongly oppose this bill,\" which clearly indicates rejection of the proposed regulation. No additional context suggests any support or neutrality.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","opposition"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly support these efforts\" and thanks VDOE for drafting the guidance. They also state the policies are \"needed\" to ensure \"safe, inclusive learning environments,\" indicating clear approval of adoption.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","inclusive schools","nondiscrimination"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly endorses the policy, saying \"Yes, this is a teachable moment\" and repeatedly urging that \"This is a time to be inclusive in all manners possible.\" They also defend the policy’s privacy and facility provisions by stating there is \"no risk of sharing bathroom facilities\" and that it is \"not an open invitation for sexual assault.\"","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","privacy","bathroom access","student safety","nondiscrimination"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly Support\" and argues that \"Trans students have the same rights to an education free from administrative discrimination.\" They also endorse the policy by stating that adopting anti-discriminatory policies will not harm cis students.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","nondiscrimination","student rights","school policy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I am strongly opposed to implementation of these policies,\" which directly indicates opposition to adoption. They also object to provisions that \"permit a school to exclude parents from decisions about their children,\" reinforcing that they want the proposal rejected or substantially changed.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","transgender students","school policy","privacy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"STRONGLY OPPOSE\" and repeats that they do \"not let this state mandate be enacted.\" They object to government involvement in transgender policies and want the regulation rejected rather than adopted.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","state mandate","transgender policies","government overreach"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The comment explicitly says \"VERY STRONGLY OPPOSE!!\" which clearly indicates rejection of the proposed regulation. No supporting reasons are provided, but the stance is unambiguous.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender policy","opposition"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"Oppose\" and \"strongly object\" to the draft policy. They argue it would \"interfere with parental rights,\" create \"privacy issues\" in bathrooms and locker rooms, and is \"extreme and unacceptable,\" all of which indicate rejection of the regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","privacy","religious freedom","bathroom access","dress codes"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"My family and I strongly support additional protections for transgender students,\" which clearly endorses the regulation. There is no opposing language or ambiguity.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","nondiscrimination"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly oppose this transgender policy.\" They also argue against the policy on religious and biological grounds, stating that people are \"distinctly biologically male or female\" and that gender is \"a biological fact.\"","tone":"negative","tags":["religious freedom","gender identity","transgender policy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter says, \"I'm strongly opposed to forcing a transgender policy in schools,\" which directly rejects adoption of the regulation. They also argue it should not \"infringe on the rights and safety of other students,\" indicating opposition to the policy as written.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender policy","student safety","parental rights","school rights"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly oppose ANY integration\" and asks to \"Please stop the madness of this bill.\" They argue schools should not include this topic and that it usurps \"parents' rights,\" indicating clear opposition to adoption of the regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","LGBTQ+ inclusion","curriculum","student privacy","religious freedom"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says the proposed policies' goal is to bring equality to an ideology that is \"unbiblical\" and argues for \"policies that allow explicit sexual immorality\" to be rejected. The title also states \"Oppose Policies Regarding 'Transgender' Ideology,\" making the opposition clear.","tone":"negative","tags":["religious freedom","LGBTQ+ inclusion","transgender students","school policy"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly titles the comment \"Support\" and says the guidance would help schools \"provide a safe and inclusive educational experience for all students.\" They clearly endorse the regulation, especially for \"our LGBT youth.\"","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","school policy","bullying prevention"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly labels the comment \"Support\" and says it is \"wonderful to commit to this ideal through schools.\" They also endorse the policy as promoting respect and kindness for transgender and non-binary youth, while criticizing opposition as \"based in fear.\"","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student respect","school climate","transgender students"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Vehemently oppose!\" and asks \"Please opposed this!\" indicating clear rejection of the regulation. They also describe it as a \"gross violation of human rights, religious freedom, and the rights of parents,\" which reinforces opposition.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","religious freedom","human rights"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly Support\" and asks to \"keep our transgender students safe,\" which clearly endorses adopting the policy. The comment expresses approval of the regulation’s protective purpose rather than opposition or neutrality.","tone":"positive","tags":["transgender students","student safety","supportive schools","nondiscrimination"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly support this guidance\" and endorses treating transgender students \"with the dignity and respect they deserve.\" This is a clear affirmative position on adopting the regulation.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","dignity and respect"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly labels the proposal \"Strongly Supported\" and says \"Strong, data supported guidance is exactly what is necessary,\" which clearly endorses adoption. There is no indication of opposition or neutrality.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","evidence-based policy","student safety"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I fully support legislation needed to promote the health and well-being of trans youth,\" which clearly endorses the regulation. The title \"FULLY SUPPORT\" reinforces that the commenter wants the policy adopted.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student well-being","transgender students"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly oppose transgender mandates\" and argues the policy is \"irresponsible and irrational\". They repeatedly call for rejection by claiming it harms children, undermines \"parental rights and student safety,\" and creates \"a recipe for disaster.\"","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","student safety","bathroom access","privacy","LGBTQ+ inclusion"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly oppose\" and states, \"I do not support activation of any programs within the school systems to promote this.\" They object to transgender-related guidance in schools and frame it as unwanted \"influence from sources other than parents.\"","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","transgender students","school policy","LGBTQ+ inclusion"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I STRONGLY OPPOSE\" and repeats that the proposal is \"not a well rounded nor balanced proposal\" that \"will cause more harm than good.\" They object to parental notification limits, religious objections, and restroom/dressing room access for transgender students.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","religious freedom","bathroom access","privacy","LGBTQ+ inclusion"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly urges approval of the policy, saying \"Protect our trans students and support them!\" They also frame the regulation as necessary so students feel \"accepted, supported, and protected,\" which clearly endorses the proposed guidance.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","supportive school climate","transgender students"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I ADAMANTLY OPPOSE these policies!\" and argues that schools have \"no business\" implementing them. The reference to \"indoctrinating young people\" and \"leftist ideas\" indicates rejection of the proposed transgender student policies.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","transgender policies","indoctrination","school authority"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly support any effort\" to create \"an inclusive and safe environment for transgender youth in Virginia schools.\" This is a clear endorsement of the regulation's purpose and implementation.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","inclusive schools"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Absolutely oppose\" and argues the policy \"should not be imposed on children under 18.\" This is a clear rejection of the proposed transgender student policies.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","parental rights","minors","gender identity"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"Strongly support protection for our trans kids\" and asks, \"Please protect our trans students!\" This clearly endorses the regulation’s purpose of protecting transgender students in schools.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","anti-bullying","nondiscrimination"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"STRONGLY OPPOSE\" and \"I ADAMANTLY OPPOSE these policies!\" They also argue that schools are \"infringing on the rights of parents and children\" and accuse the policies of \"indoctrinating young people,\" indicating rejection of the regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","indoctrination","transgender students","school policy"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I fully support this proposal,\" which directly indicates approval of the regulation. They also explain why, stating that \"trans kids (and all kids) deserve to feel safe, respected, and valued in school.\"","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","school climate"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly oppose these suggestions\" and states they would not send their children to a Virginia public school if these measures were in place. They argue children are not equipped to handle these issues without parental guidance, indicating rejection of the policy.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","transgender students","school policy","student development"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I support the implementation of the Model Policies\" and argues that schools should \"welcome\" and \"support\" trans, genderqueer, and nonbinary students. They also state the policies should be \"rooted in love rather than fear,\" indicating clear approval of adoption.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","anti-bullying","equity","religious freedom"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly Support\" and argues that supporting transgender students is important for \"a childs mental health\" and for making them feel \"welcome and supported.\" This clearly endorses adoption of the proposed policies.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student mental health","school climate","supportive environment"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly support this\" and repeatedly endorses the policy as \"very important\" and a \"basic level of accommodation and security.\" They also argue that the document \"does a good job\" and hope it \"can become standard procedure,\" indicating clear approval rather than criticism.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student privacy","confidentiality","transgender students","school safety"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly support protecting transgender kids rights\" and asks, \"Please protect these kids.\" This clearly endorses adoption of the proposed policies and their protections for transgender students.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","transgender rights"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says they \"strongly support state guidelines to protect transgender students\" and argues schools should \"do our part to protect all children.\" They also urge rejection of opposing views, indicating clear support for adoption of the regulation.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","anti-bullying","privacy","mental health"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly labels the proposal \"Strongly Oppose\" and says it is \"absolutely ridiculous\" and \"not fair.\" They also state that if it is implemented, \"my child will not be enrolled in VA Public schools,\" indicating clear rejection of the regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","gender identity","pronouns","religious freedom","school enrollment"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"strongly disagree with this\" and objects to transgender girls using girls' changing areas, stating their daughters \"will not be comfortable changing cloths in front of a boy that identifies himself as a girl.\" They also argue it will create \"unsafe hurdles for our children,\" indicating opposition to the policy.","tone":"negative","tags":["bathroom access","student safety","privacy","transgender students","school facilities"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"Support the Model Policies for the Treatment of Transgender Students\" and praises the document as something that can \"reduce stigma\" and \"promote an inclusive learning environment.\" They also state that the policy \"covers key issues that schools must address,\" indicating approval of adoption.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","inclusive learning environment","teacher guidance","student support"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"My family and I support legislation\" and frames it as increasing \"the health, safety, and well-being of transgender youth in Virginia schools.\" This is a clear endorsement of the regulation's goals and adoption.","tone":"positive","tags":["transgender students","student safety","well-being","school policy"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly support\" and urges officials to \"Passing something like this\" and \"I hope you take it.\" They frame the policy as providing \"basic protections and rights\" and say it \"will save lives,\" indicating clear approval of adoption.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","bullying prevention","mental health","privacy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I DO NOT approve of these new transgender policies\" and \"DO NOT allow these policies in place in Virginia public schools.\" They argue the policies are an \"overreach\" and harmful, indicating clear opposition to adoption.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","school policy","transgender students","public schools"]}