The commenter explicitly says, "Oppose!!!!!!! Please do not pass this!" and states that if it passes, their kids will be homeschooled permanently. This is a clear request to reject the regulation based on fear for safety reasons.


The commenter explicitly labels the proposal "OPPOSED" and says it is "not protecting students" but "furthering a political agenda." They also argue it would add "more stress and confusion," indicating rejection of the regulation.


I will always support not discriminating against a child, always!

The commenter explicitly says, "I will always support not discriminating against a child" and that schools should provide "full support" for a transitioning child. They also endorse a "positive and supportive environment for everyone," which aligns with adopting the regulation's protections for transgender students.


The comment explicitly says "Strongly disagree," which clearly indicates opposition to the proposed regulation. No supporting reasons or qualifications are provided, but the stance is unambiguous.


The commenter explicitly says "Oppose strongly" and argues the policies "go past respect" and "steer students toward transgender ideology." They also say the state has "no right to interfere" with parents and object to bathroom/locker room access, indicating rejection of the regulation as written.


This is a Travesty against children and parents!

The commenter explicitly says, "This Bill should be defeated and never brought up again" and "Put this bill in the trash bin," which clearly rejects the regulation. They also argue it should be "left up to parents" and that schools and government have "no right or duty to get involved," indicating opposition to adoption.


The commenter explicitly says, "I write to oppose doing this" and calls it "an insane policy," which clearly rejects the regulation. Although they mention that "everyone deserves a safe place to learn," that appears to be a general statement rather than support for the proposed policy.


The commenter explicitly rejects the policy, saying "This is wrong!" and "I vote NO!" They also argue it will "confuse kids" and object to gender expression examples like "Shirtless girls?? Skirts on boys," indicating clear opposition to adoption.


The commenter explicitly says, "Oppose strongly!!" and "Do not pass this!" which clearly indicates they want the regulation rejected. No supporting or neutral language appears in the comment.


The comment explicitly rejects the regulation with the phrase "ABSOLUTELY NOT!!!!" and provides no qualifying language suggesting support or modification. Its title, "Gender," indicates the objection is directed at the transgender-student policy itself.


The commenter clearly rejects the policy, calling it "insane" and urging people to "put a stop to the craziness that is taking over." They also invoke religious authority as the preferred guidance instead of the proposed regulation, indicating opposition to adoption.


The commenter explicitly says, "Please do not pass any part of these policies," which is a direct rejection of the regulation. They also argue it takes away "parents rights" and says the policies put "transgender over other students," indicating substantial opposition rather than a request for minor changes.


The comment explicitly says "Strongly oppose," which clearly indicates rejection of the proposed regulation. No supporting or qualifying language is provided.


The comment only says "Strongly disagree" without stating what aspect of the proposed regulation it disagrees with or whether it is opposing adoption of the policy itself. With no substantive explanation, the position is too vague to classify confidently.


The commenter explicitly says, "Strongly oppose to this policy" and repeatedly argues against it, calling it "a waste of resources" and urging, "Do not bully the rest of us that oppose". The comment rejects the policy's premise and asks rhetorical questions meant to undermine transgender accommodations.


The commenter explicitly says "Strongly OPPOSE" and states "There Is no way this should ever even be thought about in our school systems!" They argue the policy will "open the world to more sexual assault" and reject it on parental-protection grounds, indicating clear opposition to adoption.


The comment explicitly says "Opposed" and the body says "Leave stuff alone," which indicates the commenter does not want the regulation adopted or changed. Although brief, the wording clearly rejects the proposed policies.


The commenter explicitly says, "I STRONGLY OPPOSE THIS PROPOSAL" and argues that schools should not "indoctrinate our children" with this policy. They also frame it as violating the rights of non-transgender students, indicating clear rejection of the regulation.


The commenter explicitly says "STRONLY OPPOSED" and argues the policy "will cause more issues than help." They ask to "keep the bathrooms seprate" or create an "additional bathroom," indicating rejection of the proposed transgender student bathroom access guidance.


The commenter explicitly says "Strongly oppose" and calls the policy "an outrage." They argue it "demeans women" and makes "competitive sports for women unfair," indicating rejection of the regulation.


The commenter explicitly says, "I strongly oppose this motion" and repeatedly rejects the policy, including "this is a step too far!!!" and threatening to withdraw children if it passes. Their concerns focus on bathroom access and objection to LGBT-related instruction, indicating opposition to adoption of the regulation.


The commenter explicitly says, "Please do NOT do this" and "I strongly oppose it," which clearly indicates rejection of the proposed regulation. There is no qualifying language or request for modification, only a direct opposition.


Gender is a seperate phenomenon from sex,  anyone who says otherwise doesn't understand science.

The commenter explicitly says, "ya'll are doing a great service for trans individuals" and thanks the agency for "your efforts," which clearly endorses the proposed policies. There is no language opposing or questioning the regulation.


This is a travesty and an offense to God

The commenter explicitly calls the policy "an outrage" and a "travesty," indicating rejection of the regulation. They argue it "demeans women," makes women's sports "unfair," and is "an offense to God and the natural order of life," all of which oppose adoption.


The commenter explicitly states, "I support this," which directly endorses the proposed regulation. No contrary language or qualifications are included.


The commenter says the VDOE should "worry about getting Teachers back to school and not social policy" and tells the agency to "butt the hell out," indicating opposition to the regulation. Although they suggest a specific accommodation for transgender athletes, the overall message rejects state involvement in this policy area and emphasizes parental control.


The commenter explicitly says, "I strongly support transgender kids," which directly endorses the policy’s purpose. The statement that "Everyone has right to be loved and respected" reinforces approval of protections for transgender students.


The commenter explicitly states "Strongly oppose," which directly indicates rejection of the proposed regulation. No additional explanation or qualifying language is provided.


Guidance Document (Model Policies for the Treatment of Transgender Students in Virginia’s Public Sch

The commenter explicitly says, "Strongly oppose this," which directly states opposition to the proposed regulation. The additional phrase, "this would be a disaster," reinforces a clearly negative position toward adoption.


The commenter explicitly says "STRONGLY OPPOSE" and repeatedly urges rejection: "This is an assault on parental rights," "This is dangerous for children," and "Don’t do this to parents. Don’t do this to children." The comment argues the proposal is "radical" and should not be adopted.


The commenter explicitly says "Oppose" and argues against the policy as "another policy designed to confuse and cause separation." The language about "common sense and decency" and children being "preyed upon enough" indicates clear rejection of the regulation.


The commenter explicitly titles the submission "Oppose" and asks to "allow parents to help their children" rather than follow the policy framework. The request to "allow teachers to focus on teaching subject matter" implies disagreement with the regulation's role in schools.


The commenter explicitly says, "I support transgender youth and these model policies," which directly endorses adoption of the regulation. The closing statement, "Let's bring humanity back to our schools," reinforces approval of the policy goals.


The commenter explicitly says, "Will not support this dangerous policy" and argues the policy should not be adopted because it "will endanger the safety of our children" and violate "constitutional right of religion." They also say it "will do nothing but cause problems," indicating clear opposition rather than a request for modification.


The commenter explicitly endorses equal treatment for transgender students, saying they "deserve the same respect and regard" and that schools should "protect them from abuse and discrimination." This clearly supports adopting the proposed policies.


All children and youth have rights to be themselves

The commenter explicitly endorses the underlying policy goals, saying all students should feel "safe, accepted for exactly who they are" and that children need to be "safe and accepted" to receive an effective education. This aligns with support for the transgender student policies and their emphasis on inclusion and safety.


The commenter explicitly says, "I am writing to support this vital set of guidelines and model policies." They further endorse the regulation’s purpose by saying schools should "accommodate our transgender students" and protect them from "discrimination and disparate treatment."


The commenter explicitly says "NO to Transgender ideology" and asks to "Reject the Model Policies," which is a clear rejection of adoption. They also state the policies are "harmful to children" and "undermine the rights of parents and families," indicating opposition rather than a request for modification.


NO to Mandatory Transgender indoctrination

The commenter explicitly says "No to mandatory policies supporting gender confusion," which rejects the proposed transgender student policies. The phrases "Support parental rights" and "The State is not our parent" indicate opposition to state adoption of the regulation.


The commenter explicitly says, "I strongly oppose this policy" and argues it "goes way beyond prevention" and should not be used to "promote gender confusion" in schools. The overall thrust is rejection of the proposed transgender student policies as harmful and ideological.


The commenter explicitly says, "I strongly support this," which directly indicates approval of the regulation. The additional statement that "Trans children deserve to be treated with respect and protected in our schools" reinforces support for the policy's purpose.


The commenter explicitly says, "Support these model policies for transgender youth," which directly endorses adoption of the regulation. No opposing or qualifying language is included.


The commenter explicitly says, "Support this" and adds that it should include "fair changes to support LGBTQIA* community in public schools." This indicates approval of the regulation, possibly with minor modifications rather than rejection.


The commenter explicitly says "I strongly oppose the transgender policy" and "strongly advise you against any transgender policy in our public schools." They argue it would harm girls' privacy and fairness in sports, and emphasize parental authority over school decisions.


The commenter explicitly says, "I support the new guidance" and argues that schools should be "an affirming part of kids' community life." The comment endorses the regulation as beneficial for students' well-being rather than questioning or opposing it.


PLEASE protect our girls by OPPOSING this legislation

The commenter explicitly says "oppose this harmful legislation" and repeats "WE MUST OPPOSE THIS," making their position clear. They argue the policy would allow males into female bathrooms and locker rooms and lead to "sexual abuse and exploitation," indicating strong rejection of the regulation.


The commenter explicitly says, "I strongly support these policies" and repeatedly argues that they will protect students from "bullying and exclusion" and create a "respectful and safe environment." The comment endorses the regulation as a way to help transgender students benefit fully from public school.


I support transgender youth and these model policies.

The commenter explicitly says, "I support transgender youth and these model policies" and adds, "I support these policies." This is a clear endorsement of adopting the regulation.


The commenter explicitly says "Strongly Support Trans Guidance" and argues that children deserve "dignity" and to be "free from discrimination" in public schools. The comment endorses respectful treatment and compassion for transgender students, which aligns with adopting the regulation.


The commenter explicitly says "SUPPORT for ALL youth including Transgender Youth" and states that Virginia youth "will benefit from policies that empower ALL our youth." They also say the proposed guidelines "need us to enact" and frame them as promoting equality and acceptance.


The commenter explicitly asks you to "REJECT the Model Policies" and says they are "harmful to children." They also argue the policies "undermine the rights of parents and families" and that "Cutting the parents out of the loop" is unacceptable, indicating clear opposition.


I oppose this policy...my grandchildren who are not trans etc. need to be protected also

The commenter explicitly says, "I do not support this policy" and "My grandchildren do not need to learn/be exposed to this information at school," which clearly rejects adoption. The concern that there is "no protection for non trans children" indicates opposition based on perceived harms to other students.


The commenter explicitly says "all students needed to be treated equally and with respect, including trans students," which aligns with adopting the proposed policies. The title "Support ALL Virginia students" also signals approval of the regulation's purpose and protections.


The commenter explicitly says, "I fully support this policy," which directly endorses adoption. They also praise the policy’s goals of recognition, respect, safety, and comfort for students.


I SUPPORT our trans children and policies that support them!

The commenter explicitly says, "I strongly support RCPS and their proposed policies to support trans children" and repeatedly endorses the policies. They also affirm specific provisions like restroom access, pronoun use, and dress freedom, indicating clear approval of the regulation.


The commenter explicitly says, "Please stop this model" and "I want all children to grow up safely," indicating rejection of the proposed policy. They also argue that "Government should not be involved" and ask to "Let parents be parents," which clearly opposes adoption of the model policies.


The commenter explicitly says, "I fully support these measures" and urges Virginia to "continue being a strong force in the advancement of equality for all." The rest of the comment reinforces support by emphasizing safety, understanding, and opposition to bullying/disrespect in schools.


The commenter explicitly says, "I support this plan," which directly states approval of the regulation. They also describe it as "very thoughtful and reasonable," reinforcing a positive endorsement.


The commenter explicitly says, "We strongly support the guidance" and frames it as "protection for trans kids in VA schools." The rest of the comment reinforces approval by emphasizing that children should "feel safe and accepted."


Strongly oppose. Give them separate bathroom

The commenter explicitly says "i strongly oppose" the policy and argues for separate facilities instead of the proposed approach. They object to transgender students using girls' bathrooms, saying they do not want their daughter "to be walked in on by a boy who thinks it would be fun to pretend to be a girl."


The commenter explicitly says, "I support this policy," and the title reads "Strongly Support." This is a clear endorsement of adopting the regulation.


The commenter says, "I am totally opposed to the proposed transgender policy," which directly rejects adoption. They further argue it should be based on "BIOLOGICAL GENDER," indicating they want the policy changed in a way that substantially weakens or reverses the proposal.


I strongly support transgender youth and these policies!

The commenter explicitly says, "I strongly support transgender youth" and "I love these model policies and they should be implemented." This is a clear endorsement of adopting the regulation as written.


The commenter explicitly says, "I strongly support transgender youth and the guidance regulations for schools," which directly endorses adoption of the regulation. There is no opposing language or qualification.


The commenter explicitly says, "I support transgender youth and these model policies," which directly endorses adoption of the regulation. There is no qualifying language or criticism suggesting opposition or neutrality.


The commenter explicitly says, "I oppose this legislation," and repeatedly argues the policies are "intentionally vague," "discriminatory," and contrary to religion, biology, and fairness in sports. They also ask whether the intent is to report parents for child abuse and claim the document could harm other students and teachers, indicating clear rejection rather than support or neutrality.


STRONGLY OPPOSE the proposed Transgender policies

The commenter explicitly says, "I strongly oppose the proposed transgender policies" and asks to "protect ALL students" rather than adopt the policy. They object to shared bathroom/locker room access and propose an alternative accommodation, indicating opposition to the regulation as written.


I strongly support these vulnerable students. All children have the right to protection

The commenter explicitly says, "I strongly support protecting students" and endorses protections for "trans students" and other at-risk groups. They frame the policy as necessary for a "safe and fair education," indicating approval of the regulation's purpose.


The commenter explicitly states, "Strongly support" and "I am in full support," which clearly indicates approval of the proposed regulation. No objections or qualifications are included.


The commenter explicitly rejects the policy, saying "These proposed policies will confuse young, moldable minds" and framing them as forcing teachers to choose between "their values or their careers." The title "Oppose!!!" also makes the opposition unmistakable.


The commenter explicitly says, "I strongly support this legislation!" and praises "evidence-based practices" and policies that "mitigate discrimination." This is a clear endorsement of adopting the regulation.


The commenter explicitly says, "I do NOT Support this policy" and calls it "reckless and not in the best interest of our children." They also argue schools should not be "interfering with the family unit," indicating opposition to adoption of the regulation.


I strongly support protections for transgender students.

The commenter explicitly says, "I strongly support transgender youth and these model policies" and praises them for creating a "positive, safe, and nurturing learning environment." They also express appreciation for specific provisions and only note a hope for more emphasis on athletics equity, which does not change the overall supportive stance.


The commenter explicitly says "STRONGLY SUPPORT" and "I support transgender youth and these model policies." They also frame the policies as necessary support for transgender students: "They need and deserve ALL the support we can give them!"


The commenter explicitly titles the submission "Oppose 'transgender' policy" and says the school should not "participate in determining the 'identities' of its students." They also argue the policy would "putting many children in harm’s way" and that "You are hurting these students, not helping," indicating clear rejection of the regulation.


The commenter explicitly says, "I strongly support transgender youth and your model policies" and repeats, "I strongly support this movement." The comment also endorses the goal of preventing discrimination and making schools welcoming, which aligns with adoption of the regulation.


The commenter explicitly says they are "in favor of supporting all of our students" and asks the state to act on that basis. They also invoke LGBTQ+ student mental health statistics as justification, which supports adoption of the policy rather than rejection.


The commenter explicitly says "STRONGLY SUPPORT" and states that the guidelines are "long overdue." They also endorse the policy goals of safety, inclusion, and support for transgender students, saying they "deserve all of the same support" in school.


The commenter explicitly says, "STRONGLY SUPPORT" and "I support the guidance," which directly endorses adoption of the regulation. The phrase "we need to support all children" reinforces approval of the policy's purpose.


The commenter explicitly says, "I full heartedly support these bills" and calls them "a great start" to protecting transgender people. They also argue that opposing them is harmful, saying it is "hate-fueled and cowardly" and would "put trans people in dangerous situations."


The commenter explicitly says "STRONGLY SUPPORT" and adds that "our schools model respect for everyone," which clearly endorses adoption of the policy. There is no indication of any objection or request to weaken the regulation.


The commenter explicitly says, "I strongly support transgender youth and these model policies," which directly endorses adoption of the regulation. There is no qualifying language or criticism suggesting opposition or neutrality.


The commenter explicitly says "Strongly support" and explains that the policy will "create a more safe space of inclusion and welcoming for the students." This is clear approval of the regulation as proposed.


Model Policies for the Treatment of Transgender Students in Virginia’s Public Schools

The commenter explicitly says, "I strongly support transgender youth and this model policy," which clearly endorses adoption of the regulation. There is no opposing language or qualification.


Prioritize the safety of our children by opposing this bill.

The commenter explicitly says, "opposing this bill" and "this is not the way," indicating rejection of the proposed policies. Although they express support for protecting transgender students, they argue the regulation would endanger others and propose alternative accommodations instead of adoption as written.


Opposed - inequitable and discriminatory

The commenter explicitly says, "I oppose these guidelines" and repeatedly asks the Department of Education to "reconsider" them. The body argues the policies are "inequitable and discriminatory," objecting to parental rights, gender affirmation, bathroom access, religious exemptions, and alleged coercion.


Transgender students civil rights and protection

The commenter explicitly says, "I STRONGLY SUPPORT the implementation of this guidance." They also argue the policies are needed for "civil rights" and to protect transgender students' "very lives," which clearly endorses adoption.


The commenter explicitly says, "Firmly Oppose" and states, "I absolutely disagree with the bathroom and locker room policies proposed." This is a clear rejection of the regulation, at least as it relates to facility access policies.


The commenter explicitly endorses the policy with the title "Yes!" and states, "Everyone should be able to be who they truly are at school," which aligns with supporting transgender student protections and inclusion. There is no language opposing or questioning the regulation.


The commenter explicitly says "Strongly Support" and "I strongly agree with protecting ALL Virginians." The rest of the comment praises equal rights and opposing "bigotry and shortsightedness," which clearly indicates approval of the proposed transgender student policies.


The commenter explicitly says, "I would like to support VDOE model for protecting trans and binary students," which directly endorses the regulation. They also state that these students and their families "need all the support and help they can get," reinforcing approval.


Excellent Policy Guidance Document - I fully support the recommendations.

The commenter explicitly says, "I fully support the recommendations" and calls it an "Excellent Policy Guidance Document." Although they criticize one area as "too superficial and evasive" and ask for more concrete suggestions, that is a request for improvement rather than opposition to adoption.


About 99.4% of our children do not have gender confusion.  Why force them to have it?

The commenter explicitly says the policy is "a formula for creating unnecessary confusion" and that "This policy must be revised" to protect privacy and rights, indicating opposition to the proposal as written. They also object to specific provisions such as "opening the girls' restrooms to boys" and warn of "emotional and psychological harm," which shows they want it rejected or substantially weakened.


The commenter explicitly rejects the policy, saying "This bill will do absolutely no good" and "If this passes my children will not enter the school system." They argue schools should focus on "general education" and that this issue is "extremely private," indicating opposition to adoption.


Mark 10 ;13 -16 / Jesus blesses little children

The commenter explicitly says the proposed bill is "created by a politician / group that does not follow the will of Jesus" and that "Proposed bills like this are drawn up without the guidance of God," indicating rejection of the regulation. They also state there is "only boy , girl, woman, man," which directly opposes the transgender student policies.


The commenter explicitly says "Strongly support" and adds "Let’s treat each other with respect and dignity," which aligns with approving the regulation. There is no indication of opposition or neutrality.


The commenter explicitly says, "I support the guidance" and further praises it as "factual, researched, humane." They also state it will "produce the best outcomes for our young people," indicating clear approval of adoption.


The commenter explicitly says "Strongly support transgender youth," which clearly endorses the regulation’s purpose and implementation. There is no opposing language or ambiguity.


The commenter explicitly labels the proposal "Strongly Oppose" and says the policies "do not offer" needed space for differing beliefs. They argue the model policies are "a terrible solution" and should be handled "on a district level" instead of adopted as written.


Strongly support, and approve of these models

The commenter explicitly says, "Strongly support and approve of these models," which directly endorses adoption of the regulation. There is no qualifying language or criticism suggesting opposition or neutrality.


Strongly oppose, not the role of public schools

The commenter explicitly says "Strongly oppose" and characterizes the policy as "indoctrination of our students," indicating clear rejection of the regulation. The phrase "not the role of public schools" reinforces opposition to adopting the model policies.


The commenter explicitly says "Strongly oppose" and asks to "Reject the Model Policies." The stated reason is that the policies "undermine the rights of parents and families," which clearly indicates opposition to adoption.


The commenter explicitly titles the submission "Strongly Support" and states that the policy is needed "to protect the civil rights of transgender students." This is a clear endorsement of adopting the regulation.


The commenter explicitly rejects the policy’s core purpose, saying minors "should not be identified as transgender" and that "no arrangements to accommodate them as transgender be made in our school system." They also argue schools should treat students by "birth sex" and that transgender issues "should not be acknowledged or taught," which clearly opposes adoption of the regulation.


The commenter explicitly says "Strongly agree" and repeatedly endorses the policy’s goal of protecting transgender/LGBTQ students, stating that "Safety, both physical and mental, must be the priority." The comment argues the regulation would create "equal opportunity" and a better learning environment, indicating clear support for adoption.


The commenter explicitly says "STRONGLY SUPPORT: PROTECT TRANSGENDER YOUTH" and argues that it is "crucial to provide aid to transgender youth." This clearly endorses adopting the regulation to support transgender students.


The commenter explicitly urges readers to "be inclusive" and to "open our hearts to kindness," framing the policy as an invitation to embrace diversity. The language strongly endorses the regulation’s inclusive treatment of transgender students rather than opposing it.


The commenter explicitly says, "I strongly support this guidance document" and argues that schools should prioritize "student well-being." They also state the policy supports a "specifically marginalized group" without diminishing support for cisgender students, indicating clear approval of adoption.


Strongly support transgender youths and this policy

The commenter explicitly says, "I am strongly in favor of the proposed policy" and argues it will "provide safety and privacy to transgender youth." The final sentence, "It is far past time to do this," further confirms support for adoption.


The commenter says, "All children deserve support and protection," which aligns with the regulation’s goal of creating a safe and supportive environment for transgender students. There is no language opposing the guidance or suggesting it should be weakened.


The commenter explicitly states, "I support!" which directly indicates approval of the proposed regulation. No contrary language or qualifications are included.


The comment explicitly rejects the policy with the imperative "Leave children alone!!!" and the title "STOP the INSANITY," indicating opposition to the transgender student guidance. It offers no support or constructive changes, only a demand to halt the policy.


The commenter explicitly says, "I support them," referring to the transgender student policies. The title "Trans rights are human rights" also clearly signals approval of the regulation's purpose and adoption.


The commenter explicitly says, "I strongly support these policies," which directly indicates approval of the regulation. There is no qualifying language or criticism suggesting otherwise.


The commenter explicitly says, "I strongly support policies that protect transgender students," which directly endorses adoption of the regulation. The additional sentence, "They need our love and support," reinforces approval rather than raising objections or questions.


The commenter explicitly says "Strongly support OUR transgender students" and praises the guidance for "prioritizing student well-being." They also state it "seeks to validate and support a specifically marginalized group," which clearly endorses adoption of the policy.


The commenter explicitly says, "I do not support this bill" and argues it is "dangerous and reckless." They also urge against adoption by saying they would "pull my children out of school if this passes," indicating clear opposition to the regulation.


The commenter explicitly says "Strongly support this bill" and repeatedly endorses the policy, stating that "Transgender youth need our love and support" and that the bill will "help most importantly our transgender youth." The comment argues the regulation would create "a more kind and loving environment for everyone," indicating clear approval.


The commenter explicitly says, "I strongly oppose," and argues against transgender students sharing bathrooms with cisgender students. They also object to schools addressing these issues, saying it is "the parents responsibility," which indicates rejection of the regulation.


The commenter explicitly says "OPPOSE!" and repeatedly urges officials to "Do not force this in schools." They also reject the policy as "insane" and say they will not allow their children to be exposed to it, indicating clear opposition to adoption.


"So God created mankind in His own image....male and female HE created them." Genesis 1:27

The commenter explicitly says, "I strongly oppose all of this bill" and objects to specific provisions about bathroom/changing facility notification and parental reporting. They argue the policy would create "gender confusion" and harm children, indicating clear opposition to adoption of the regulation.


The commenter explicitly says "STRONGLY SUPPORT" and "I strongly support all efforts to protect trans kids," which clearly endorses the regulation. The phrase "Keep religion out of our schools" reinforces support for policies protecting transgender students in public schools.


The commenter explicitly says "Strongly support!" and adds that "All students deserve equitable treatment," which clearly endorses adoption of the regulation. There is no indication of opposition or neutrality.


The commenter explicitly says, "I strongly support this measure" and praises schools for treating "all humans with dignity and respect." They also endorse creating "a safe learning environment," which aligns with adoption of the policy.


The commenter explicitly praises the proposal as "well thought out" and says "This proposal is a step in the right direction" and "Let's support our youth." They also endorse specific elements like "gender-inclusive dress codes, single user bathrooms and private dressing areas, and professional training and development."


The commenter explicitly rejects the policy’s approach, saying “we need a solution to support all our students” but “forcing children” into bathrooms, sports, and beliefs “is not the solution.” They also argue against recognizing transgender identity in sex-based contexts, stating “we will never be the same sex” and objecting to “sports and scholarships against others with unfair advantage.”


The commenter explicitly states, "I strongly oppose this bill," which clearly indicates rejection of the proposed regulation. No additional context suggests any support or neutrality.


The commenter explicitly says, "I strongly support these efforts" and thanks VDOE for drafting the guidance. They also state the policies are "needed" to ensure "safe, inclusive learning environments," indicating clear approval of adoption.


The commenter explicitly endorses the policy, saying "Yes, this is a teachable moment" and repeatedly urging that "This is a time to be inclusive in all manners possible." They also defend the policy’s privacy and facility provisions by stating there is "no risk of sharing bathroom facilities" and that it is "not an open invitation for sexual assault."


The commenter explicitly says "Strongly Support" and argues that "Trans students have the same rights to an education free from administrative discrimination." They also endorse the policy by stating that adopting anti-discriminatory policies will not harm cis students.


The commenter explicitly says, "I am strongly opposed to implementation of these policies," which directly indicates opposition to adoption. They also object to provisions that "permit a school to exclude parents from decisions about their children," reinforcing that they want the proposal rejected or substantially changed.


The commenter explicitly says "STRONGLY OPPOSE" and repeats that they do "not let this state mandate be enacted." They object to government involvement in transgender policies and want the regulation rejected rather than adopted.


The comment explicitly says "VERY STRONGLY OPPOSE!!" which clearly indicates rejection of the proposed regulation. No supporting reasons are provided, but the stance is unambiguous.


The commenter explicitly says, "Oppose" and "strongly object" to the draft policy. They argue it would "interfere with parental rights," create "privacy issues" in bathrooms and locker rooms, and is "extreme and unacceptable," all of which indicate rejection of the regulation.


Strongly Support Protections for Transgender Students

The commenter explicitly says, "My family and I strongly support additional protections for transgender students," which clearly endorses the regulation. There is no opposing language or ambiguity.


The commenter explicitly says, "I strongly oppose this transgender policy." They also argue against the policy on religious and biological grounds, stating that people are "distinctly biologically male or female" and that gender is "a biological fact."


The commenter says, "I'm strongly opposed to forcing a transgender policy in schools," which directly rejects adoption of the regulation. They also argue it should not "infringe on the rights and safety of other students," indicating opposition to the policy as written.


Strongly oppose the transgender integration

The commenter explicitly says, "I strongly oppose ANY integration" and asks to "Please stop the madness of this bill." They argue schools should not include this topic and that it usurps "parents' rights," indicating clear opposition to adoption of the regulation.


Oppose Policies Regarding "Transgender" Ideology

The commenter explicitly says the proposed policies' goal is to bring equality to an ideology that is "unbiblical" and argues for "policies that allow explicit sexual immorality" to be rejected. The title also states "Oppose Policies Regarding 'Transgender' Ideology," making the opposition clear.


The commenter explicitly titles the comment "Support" and says the guidance would help schools "provide a safe and inclusive educational experience for all students." They clearly endorse the regulation, especially for "our LGBT youth."


The commenter explicitly labels the comment "Support" and says it is "wonderful to commit to this ideal through schools." They also endorse the policy as promoting respect and kindness for transgender and non-binary youth, while criticizing opposition as "based in fear."


The commenter explicitly says "Vehemently oppose!" and asks "Please opposed this!" indicating clear rejection of the regulation. They also describe it as a "gross violation of human rights, religious freedom, and the rights of parents," which reinforces opposition.


The commenter explicitly says "Strongly Support" and asks to "keep our transgender students safe," which clearly endorses adopting the policy. The comment expresses approval of the regulation’s protective purpose rather than opposition or neutrality.


The commenter explicitly says, "I strongly support this guidance" and endorses treating transgender students "with the dignity and respect they deserve." This is a clear affirmative position on adopting the regulation.


The commenter explicitly labels the proposal "Strongly Supported" and says "Strong, data supported guidance is exactly what is necessary," which clearly endorses adoption. There is no indication of opposition or neutrality.


The commenter explicitly says, "I fully support legislation needed to promote the health and well-being of trans youth," which clearly endorses the regulation. The title "FULLY SUPPORT" reinforces that the commenter wants the policy adopted.


The commenter explicitly says "Strongly oppose transgender mandates" and argues the policy is "irresponsible and irrational". They repeatedly call for rejection by claiming it harms children, undermines "parental rights and student safety," and creates "a recipe for disaster."


The commenter explicitly says, "I strongly oppose" and states, "I do not support activation of any programs within the school systems to promote this." They object to transgender-related guidance in schools and frame it as unwanted "influence from sources other than parents."


The commenter explicitly says, "I STRONGLY OPPOSE" and repeats that the proposal is "not a well rounded nor balanced proposal" that "will cause more harm than good." They object to parental notification limits, religious objections, and restroom/dressing room access for transgender students.


The commenter explicitly urges approval of the policy, saying "Protect our trans students and support them!" They also frame the regulation as necessary so students feel "accepted, supported, and protected," which clearly endorses the proposed guidance.


The commenter explicitly says, "I ADAMANTLY OPPOSE these policies!" and argues that schools have "no business" implementing them. The reference to "indoctrinating young people" and "leftist ideas" indicates rejection of the proposed transgender student policies.


The commenter explicitly says, "I strongly support any effort" to create "an inclusive and safe environment for transgender youth in Virginia schools." This is a clear endorsement of the regulation's purpose and implementation.


The commenter explicitly says "Absolutely oppose" and argues the policy "should not be imposed on children under 18." This is a clear rejection of the proposed transgender student policies.


The commenter explicitly says, "Strongly support protection for our trans kids" and asks, "Please protect our trans students!" This clearly endorses the regulation’s purpose of protecting transgender students in schools.


The commenter explicitly says "STRONGLY OPPOSE" and "I ADAMANTLY OPPOSE these policies!" They also argue that schools are "infringing on the rights of parents and children" and accuse the policies of "indoctrinating young people," indicating rejection of the regulation.


The commenter explicitly says, "I fully support this proposal," which directly indicates approval of the regulation. They also explain why, stating that "trans kids (and all kids) deserve to feel safe, respected, and valued in school."


The commenter explicitly says "Strongly oppose these suggestions" and states they would not send their children to a Virginia public school if these measures were in place. They argue children are not equipped to handle these issues without parental guidance, indicating rejection of the policy.


The commenter explicitly says, "I support the implementation of the Model Policies" and argues that schools should "welcome" and "support" trans, genderqueer, and nonbinary students. They also state the policies should be "rooted in love rather than fear," indicating clear approval of adoption.


The commenter explicitly says "Strongly Support" and argues that supporting transgender students is important for "a childs mental health" and for making them feel "welcome and supported." This clearly endorses adoption of the proposed policies.


The commenter explicitly says, "I strongly support this" and repeatedly endorses the policy as "very important" and a "basic level of accommodation and security." They also argue that the document "does a good job" and hope it "can become standard procedure," indicating clear approval rather than criticism.


The commenter explicitly says "Strongly support protecting transgender kids rights" and asks, "Please protect these kids." This clearly endorses adoption of the proposed policies and their protections for transgender students.


Strongly support protections for transgender students

The commenter explicitly says they "strongly support state guidelines to protect transgender students" and argues schools should "do our part to protect all children." They also urge rejection of opposing views, indicating clear support for adoption of the regulation.


The commenter explicitly labels the proposal "Strongly Oppose" and says it is "absolutely ridiculous" and "not fair." They also state that if it is implemented, "my child will not be enrolled in VA Public schools," indicating clear rejection of the regulation.


The commenter explicitly says, "strongly disagree with this" and objects to transgender girls using girls' changing areas, stating their daughters "will not be comfortable changing cloths in front of a boy that identifies himself as a girl." They also argue it will create "unsafe hurdles for our children," indicating opposition to the policy.


The commenter explicitly says, "Support the Model Policies for the Treatment of Transgender Students" and praises the document as something that can "reduce stigma" and "promote an inclusive learning environment." They also state that the policy "covers key issues that schools must address," indicating approval of adoption.


The commenter explicitly says, "My family and I support legislation" and frames it as increasing "the health, safety, and well-being of transgender youth in Virginia schools." This is a clear endorsement of the regulation's goals and adoption.


The commenter explicitly says "Strongly support" and urges officials to "Passing something like this" and "I hope you take it." They frame the policy as providing "basic protections and rights" and say it "will save lives," indicating clear approval of adoption.


The commenter explicitly says, "I DO NOT approve of these new transgender policies" and "DO NOT allow these policies in place in Virginia public schools." They argue the policies are an "overreach" and harmful, indicating clear opposition to adoption.


The commenter explicitly says, "I strongly support protections for transgender students" and thanks the Department and legislature for "implementing and upholding protections." The comment argues the policy is needed to keep students safe and ensure equal educational access.


The commenter explicitly says, "Support Trans Students!" and argues that schools should "provide a safe, supportive learning environment" and be "at the forefront of inclusivity." They are clearly endorsing the proposed policies and urging adoption rather than rejection or weakening.


The commenter explicitly says, "I strongly oppose," which directly states opposition to the regulation. Their suggested alternative—"create extra bathrooms for transgender students"—indicates they want the policy changed substantially rather than adopted as written.


The commenter explicitly says, "I would ever support this" and "Do NOT support!" They argue the policy could have "negative long term effects," object to transgender students using locker rooms/bathrooms, and say such matters should stay "between them & their family until they turn 18."


Strongly support - Acceptance and support can't stop at LGB

The commenter explicitly opens with "Strongly support" and repeatedly endorses the policies, saying "I fully support educating students about transgender identity" and arguing against objections to access and recognition. They also urge implementation of the policies and frame them as necessary for acceptance and safety.


Strongly opposed/Model Policies,Treatment of Transgender Students in VA Public Schools as written

The commenter explicitly says, "I am against the policy as written" and repeatedly objects to key provisions, including schools helping students explore gender identity without parental knowledge, preferred pronouns, and shared restroom/locker room access. They also argue parents should have "Full access" and that the policy would create unfair harassment allegations, indicating clear opposition to adoption as written.


The commenter explicitly says, "I am in full support" of the policy and endorses "a safe and supportive environment for all students including transgender students." This is a clear affirmative position in favor of adoption.


The commenter explicitly says, "Strongly Oppose," which directly states opposition to the regulation. The phrase "Without the science" suggests they believe the policy lacks scientific basis and should not be adopted.


The commenter explicitly says, "Fully support" and adds, "I fully stand for a safe and supportive environment for all students, including transgender students." This clearly endorses adoption of the regulation.


The commenter explicitly says, "I strongly support these new policies" and frames them as necessary to "protect their rights" and improve the school environment. The rest of the comment describes harassment and staff inaction as reasons for adopting the policies, not rejecting them.


The commenter explicitly says "STRONGLY SUPPORT" and "I fully support legislation needed to promote the health and well-being of trans youth." This clearly endorses adoption of the regulation and frames it as important policy action.


The commenter explicitly titles the comment "Strongly Support" and argues that "Trans students deserve to live their truth" and should be "fully and wholly accepted." The comment endorses the policy’s goal of protecting gender expression and safe spaces, while criticizing opposition to it.


The commenter explicitly endorses the policy’s underlying goal by saying, "Treat all students with equal dignity" and that "Transgender students deserve the same rights, respect and education." This is a clear affirmative statement in favor of the regulation’s protections for transgender students.


The commenter explicitly says, "Strongly oppose transgender studies and promotion," which clearly rejects the regulation’s subject matter. Although the wording is brief and somewhat imprecise, it indicates opposition to the proposed transgender student policies rather than support for them.


The commenter explicitly says "STRONGLY OPPOSE" to the transgender policy. The statement "males are males and females are females" indicates rejection of the policy's premise and support for not adopting it.


The commenter explicitly states, "I am in full and unequivocal support" of the measures. They also say the policies help trans students "feel safe and supported," indicating clear approval of the regulation.


The commenter explicitly says "STRONGLY OPPOSED," "I will not support this extremism," and argues the policy is "absolutely insane and dangerous" and an overstep by schools. They object to children exploring gender identity at school without parental consent and raise concerns about sex-specific accommodations like "Females allowed topless if they identify as male."


Strongly support these guidance policies protecting trans students in public schools

The commenter explicitly says, "I strongly support this guidance document" and describes it as "protecting trans students in public schools." This is a clear endorsement of adopting the policies as proposed.


The commenter states "strong opposition to the proposed Model" and argues it is "bad from both a scientific and public policy perspective." They specifically object to transgender women participating in women's sports, saying it gives an unfair and "dangerous advantage" and harms women's athletics and scholarships.


The commenter says they "absolutely oppose any effort" to allow "biologically advantaged males" to compete against females in sports and explicitly asks, "Please stop this potential abuse of women now!" This is a clear rejection of the regulation, at least as it relates to transgender students' participation in sports.


The commenter explicitly states "STRONGLY OPPOSE" and repeats it as the entire body, indicating clear rejection of the proposed regulation. There is no qualifying language suggesting support or neutrality.


STRONGLY OPPOSE  males are males and females are females

The commenter explicitly says "STRONGLY OPPOSE" to the proposed policies. The phrase "males are males and females are females" rejects the regulation’s transgender-related framework and indicates opposition to adoption.