{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I wholeheartedly support these model policies,\" and frames them as \"protections\" that are medically and legally justified. The comment argues the policies are needed to prevent harm to transgender youth and align with federal law and medical recommendations.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","mental health","nondiscrimination","privacy"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I fully support this document\" and calls it \"a meaningful first step toward protecting the rights of transgender students.\" This is a clear endorsement of adoption.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student rights","transgender students","school policy"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly support this bill,\" which directly indicates approval of the regulation. The title also says \"strongly support,\" reinforcing the same position.","tone":"positive","tags":["support for regulation"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"STRONGLY OPPOSE THIS POLICY\" and repeatedly urges, \"Do not approve this horrible policy.\" They argue it is \"extreme and scary,\" unnecessary, and harmful to children, parents, and female athletes.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","student privacy","LGBTQ+ inclusion","school sports","bathroom access"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strong support for this\" and praises it as a \"Great step in the right direction.\" They also express support for \"our trans students,\" indicating approval of the regulation.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","transgender students","student support"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"Do not approve the draft policies\" and argues the VDOE has \"gone far beyond\" what the General Assembly prescribed. They also state the policies \"infringe the First Amendment rights of parents\" and should not accommodate gender transitions, indicating clear opposition to adoption.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","privacy","bathroom access","school facilities","LGBTQ+ inclusion"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I fully support these policies\" and \"urgently encourage the VDOE to implement this essential policy guidance.\" They also argue the policies would protect transgender students from bullying and support their mental health, indicating clear approval of adoption.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","bullying prevention","mental health","transgender students"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly support\" and \"hope these policies are implemented immediately.\" They also frame the regulation as a needed response to discrimination against transgender and LGBTQ youth, indicating clear approval of adoption.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","transgender students","mental health","anti-discrimination"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I support this guidance\" and explains that they want \"all of the LGBTQ youth\" to be in a \"safe and welcoming\" school environment. The comment clearly endorses adoption of the policy as a means of protecting transgender and LGBTQ students.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","safe learning environment","anti-bullying","privacy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"Strongly opposed to this policy,\" which directly states opposition to adoption. The body reinforces this with negative claims that it is \"anti-God and anti-family\" and will \"destroy children.\"","tone":"negative","tags":["religious freedom","parental rights","LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I fully support these policies\" and \"urgently encourage the VDOE to implement this essential policy guidance.\" The body repeatedly argues the policies would protect transgender and LGBTQ+ students from bullying and support their mental health, indicating clear approval of adoption.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","bullying prevention","mental health","transgender students"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly support the equitable treatment of all Virginia youth,\" and includes \"trans youth and other LGBQIA+\" in schools. This is a clear endorsement of the proposed policies' goals and adoption.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","equity","student rights","public schools"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"Please oppose,\" which clearly indicates they do not want the regulation adopted. The title also says \"Opposed,\" reinforcing the same position.","tone":"negative","tags":[]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly support these changes,\" and frames the regulation as necessary for \"safety and health.\" The comment endorses protections for transgender students and argues against discrimination, indicating clear support for adoption.","tone":"positive","tags":["transgender students","student safety","mental health","anti-discrimination","school climate"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Fully Support!\" and argues that \"Protecting children needs to include ALL children\" and that \"Supporting the rights of these children is essential.\" These statements clearly endorse adopting the transgender student policies, with no opposing language.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","mental health","constitutional rights"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"OPPOSE the insanity and lies\" and argues the proposals are harmful, claiming they will \"encourage the increase of suicide and depression.\" This is a clear rejection of the regulation rather than a request for changes or neutral input.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","student mental health","identity politics","school policy"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says they \"fully support ANY implementation of new policies\" and urges, \"give us that\" and \"Do not let these kids suffer anymore.\" The comment frames the policies as life-saving and beneficial for trans and GNC students, indicating clear approval of adoption.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","mental health","anti-bullying","transgender students"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly titles the comment \"Strongly Support\" and states that \"This policy will help increase equity\" and provide needed support for transgender students. The final sentence criticizes opposition to the policy, reinforcing clear approval of adoption.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","equity","student support","school administration"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly labels the submission \"Oppose\" and says the policy \"undercut parents’ involvement\" and \"endanger the bodily privacy and safety of all students.\" This is a clear rejection of the proposed regulation rather than support or a neutral inquiry.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","privacy","student safety"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly rejects the policy with hostile language, calling the \"Trans rules\" \"lunacy\" and saying they are \"destroying our young women.\" This indicates opposition to adopting the regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","women's rights","school policy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly oppose this law,\" which directly rejects the proposed regulation. The rest of the comment argues against transgender recognition, saying \"God made man... male and female\" and expressing concern about children being exposed to \"members of the opposite sex.\"","tone":"negative","tags":["religious freedom","LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","transgender policy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I do NOT approve of proposed guidelines\" and asks to \"do not approve\" them. They argue the policies are based on \"radical theories\" and call them \"controversial and unscientific,\" indicating clear rejection of the regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","LGBTQ+ inclusion","science curriculum","parental rights","school policy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I am writing to oppose the proposed VDOE policy\" and repeatedly argues against key provisions such as preferred pronouns, restroom/locker room access, and privacy accommodations. Although the comment opens by affirming anti-discrimination principles, the overall position is clearly to reject the proposed policy as written.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","privacy","pronouns","restroom access","religious freedom"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The comment explicitly says \"Stronglyoppose!\", which clearly indicates rejection of the proposed transgender student policy. No supporting or qualifying language is provided.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender policy","opposition"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.89,"stance_rationale":"The commenter says policies should let administrators handle these issues, but insists that \"parents should absolutely remain the decision makers\" and criticizes \"transgender in elementary school.\" The reference to sticking to \"the basics of biology\" and leaving \"gender identity issues\" to families indicates opposition to the proposed guidance as written, or at least a desire to substantially weaken it.","tone":"mixed","tags":["parental rights","transgender students","elementary school","school choice","gender identity"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I oppose this\" and adds \"Not safe for students,\" indicating rejection of the regulation. The statement \"Stop using our tax dollars for anything other than education\" further argues against adoption or funding of the policy.","tone":"negative","tags":["student safety","tax dollars","transgender students","public schools"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly support the proposed guidelines\" and gives a reason: to ensure transgender students have \"a safe and supportive learning environment.\" This is a clear endorsement of adoption.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","supportive learning environment"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly Oppose\" and calls the proposal \"a terrible proposal.\" They argue against transgender-inclusive bathroom and locker room access and claim it will erode \"parents' rights,\" indicating rejection of the regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":["bathroom access","locker room access","parental rights","transgender policy","school facilities"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says they \"completely oppose the VDOEs draft model policies\" and asks to \"leave the rest to parents,\" indicating they do not want the regulation adopted. The reference to \"biological truth to gender\" and that it is \"in no way the responsibility of any school\" reinforces opposition to the policy's purpose.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","parental rights","school curriculum","gender identity"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"DO NOT SUPPORT these completely unacceptable and dangerous policies\" and calls them \"in appropriate in every way.\" They also object to restroom and locker room access, saying their children will not share those spaces and that they may withdraw from public school if the policies are accepted.","tone":"negative","tags":["bathroom access","school sports","parental rights","privacy","LGBTQ+ inclusion"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly states, \"I strongly oppose the Model Policies for the Treatment of Transgender Students in Virginia’s Public Schools.\" This is a direct rejection of the regulation with no qualifying support or suggested revisions.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender policies","public schools","LGBTQ+ inclusion"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter clearly argues against the regulation, warning that if it \"passes\" it will harm girls and women and claiming it will lead to boys \"crossing over\" into girls' sports and erase Title IX protections. They frame the policy as an imposition by the \"far left\" and say it is not \"real love,\" indicating rejection of the proposed guidance.","tone":"negative","tags":["girls' sports","Title IX","parental rights","LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter says, \"Absolutely against it!\" which is a direct rejection of the proposed policies. They also object that the policies are \"taking over the parents' role,\" indicating opposition to adoption of the regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","transgender policies","school policy","religious freedom"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I support this proposal\" and describes it as \"much needed.\" They also endorse \"equal, kind and fair treatment towards children regardless of their gender identity,\" which clearly favors adoption of the regulation.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","bullying prevention","mental health","nondiscrimination"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"Strongly Support\" and calls the policy \"good for all children, regardless of their gender or sexuality.\" They also argue that medical and educational experts support these policies, indicating approval of adoption.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","safe learning environment","expert guidance"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly states \"Strongly Opposed,\" which directly indicates rejection of the regulation. The phrase \"institutionalized abuse of all students\" is a clear condemnation rather than a request for modification.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","school policy","student safety"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly oppose\" and repeatedly argues the policy should be rejected, calling it \"far-left insanity\" and concluding that schools \"must reject unscientific, irrational policies like the one proposed.\" The body also lists multiple objections to transgender-inclusive policies in schools, including bathrooms, sports, and pronouns.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","bathroom access","school sports","privacy","pronouns"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The comment rejects the proposed policies in highly hostile terms, saying Virginia's children need to \"take their state back\" and attacking the \"malicious left.\" This indicates opposition to the regulation rather than support or neutrality.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","political opposition","culture war","school policy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"We do not support\" and calls it \"Bad policy.\" They also argue it \"undermines family unity and parental involvement\" and \"endangers young women's opportunities,\" indicating rejection of the regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","women's opportunities","family unity","transgender policy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly rejects the policy approach, saying that \"putting the school in this role... and in some instances inbetween parents and children, is unacceptable.\" They also object to teaching children about gender identity concepts, stating that \"not everyone agrees\" with that aspect of the guidance, while only endorsing general anti-bullying efforts.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","gender identity","anti-bullying","school role","LGBTQ+ inclusion"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly Support\" and argues the policy is needed so kids can \"feel safe and accepted\" and not be \"outcasted/treated differently for their gender identity.\" This is clear approval of the regulation's purpose and protections for transgender students.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","anti-bullying","school climate"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly oppose these transgender policies,\" which directly states rejection of the proposed regulation. No supporting or neutral qualifications are provided.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender policies","public schools","opposition"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The comment explicitly says \"Strongly opposed,\" which clearly indicates rejection of the proposed policies. The title \"Trans gender crap\" adds a contemptuous dismissal of the regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","LGBTQ+ inclusion","school policy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The comment explicitly says \"Strongly Opposed\" and dismisses the proposal as \"Bad ideas,\" which clearly indicates rejection of the regulation. There is no indication of support or neutrality.","tone":"negative","tags":[]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter states plainly, \"I oppose these transgender policies,\" which directly indicates rejection of the proposed regulation. No qualifying language suggests support or neutrality.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender policies","LGBTQ+ inclusion"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly disagree!!\" in response to the proposed transgender student policies, which indicates opposition to adoption. No supporting reasons or requests for modification are provided, but the stance is clear from the wording.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","LGBTQ+ inclusion","school policy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter rejects the policy’s pronoun requirements, saying it is \"not an issue of fairness or justice\" and objecting to teachers being forced to use preferred pronouns \"under penalty of disciplinary action.\" They explicitly ask that any policy be only \"suggested\" rather than mandatory, indicating opposition to the regulation as written.","tone":"negative","tags":["pronouns","teacher rights","disciplinary action","classroom control","transgender students"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I do not support this legislation,\" which directly rejects the proposed policy. They also argue it is a \"violation of my constitutionally protected religious freedom\" and claim it would \"put our children in more danger,\" both of which indicate opposition rather than a request for modification.","tone":"negative","tags":["religious freedom","student safety","transgender students","LGBTQ+ inclusion"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly writes \"Oppose.\" and frames the policy as \"taking away parental rights and choices,\" indicating they do not want the regulation adopted as written. The title suggests support for trans students in general, but the stated objection is to this policy approach.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","transgender students","school policy","student privacy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly states \"Strongly oppose,\" which directly indicates rejection of the proposed policies. The title references \"restrooms/locker rooms,\" suggesting opposition is tied to transgender student access to school facilities.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","bathroom access","locker rooms","school facilities"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter gives \"wholehearted support for any guidelines\" that \"support vulnerable children and respect their pronouns and their individuality.\" This is a clear endorsement of the proposed transgender student policies rather than a request for changes or criticism.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","pronouns","student support","diversity"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.93,"stance_rationale":"The comment title, \"Absolutely not ok,\" clearly rejects the proposed policies. The body, \"Very sad it has come to this,\" expresses disapproval of the regulation rather than support or a neutral question.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","school policy","LGBTQ+ inclusion"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly labels the submission \"Strongly opposed\" and argues that \"Gender is decided by God and not for us to choose,\" which rejects the premise of the transgender student policies. The comment provides a religious objection rather than support or neutral feedback.","tone":"negative","tags":["religious freedom","gender identity","transgender students","LGBTQ+ inclusion"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly support these guidelines,\" which directly endorses adoption of the regulation. The title also states \"Comment in Support,\" reinforcing the same position.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","transgender rights","school policy"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly support\" and adds \"Please support LGBTQIA+ students,\" which clearly endorses adoption of the policy. The phrase \"I love this\" reinforces a positive approval of the regulation.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student support","nondiscrimination"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly states \"Strongly against,\" which clearly indicates opposition to adopting the proposed regulation. No supporting reasons are provided, but the stance is unambiguous.","tone":"negative","tags":[]}


{"stance":"neutral","stance_confidence":0.95,"stance_rationale":"The comment only says \"Be kind.\" and does not explicitly support or oppose the proposed policies. It reads as a general moral appeal rather than a position on adoption of the regulation.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly rejects the policy with the title \"Absolutely not\" and argues against allowing \"any bathroom/locker room they choose.\" They express concern that it would let \"a male\" enter girls' spaces and make females uncomfortable, indicating clear opposition to adoption.","tone":"negative","tags":["bathroom access","locker rooms","student safety","privacy","sex-specific facilities"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I STRONGLY SUPPORT THIS ACTION!!!\" and expresses hope that the proposed policy \"passes.\" The rest of the comment explains personal reasons for supporting protections for a transgender child.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","transgender students","student support","nondiscrimination"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly Opposed\" and repeatedly asks, \"Please do Not pass this 'guidance'!\" They argue it conflicts with their religious beliefs and parental rights, and say they would homeschool or move to a private Christian school if it passes.","tone":"negative","tags":["religious freedom","parental rights","transgender students","curriculum","privacy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly oppose this policy\" and repeats that they are \"Extremely opposed\" to the policy's implications. They object to transgender student accommodations, especially \"boys in girls bathrooms and vise versa,\" indicating rejection of the regulation rather than support or neutrality.","tone":"negative","tags":["bathroom access","parental rights","student privacy","LGBTQ+ inclusion","school facilities"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The comment explicitly says \"oppose\" and provides no qualifying language suggesting support or neutrality. It is a direct rejection of the proposed regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":[]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly support this document\" and endorses \"efforts put forth to ensure nondiscrimination practices for all students.\" They also specifically include \"those who identify as transgender,\" indicating approval of the regulation's purpose and direction.","tone":"positive","tags":["nondiscrimination","transgender students","student rights","inclusion"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly support the guidance,\" which directly endorses adoption of the regulation. The additional statement, \"We are all equal and worthy of the same dignity and respect,\" reinforces support for the policy's inclusive intent.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","equal dignity","religious support"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly support these proposals\" and endorses the goal that \"Every student deserves to feel safe and welcome in their school.\" The final sentence, \"Trans rights are human rights,\" further confirms approval of the regulation's transgender student protections.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","nondiscrimination","school climate"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"STRONGLY, STRONGLY OPPOSE!!!\" and calls the policy \"highly immoral and unethical.\" They object to the regulation on the grounds that it would allow \"a grow man being able to walk in on a little girl,\" indicating clear rejection of the policy.","tone":"negative","tags":["bathroom access","student privacy","student safety","gender identity"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"STRONGLY support!\" and adds that the policy is \"so necessary for our students.\" The rest of the comment praises \"Inclusive language and education,\" indicating clear approval of the regulation.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student support","inclusive language","education policy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.84,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"this is a wrong approach to deal with these issues,\" which indicates opposition to the proposed policies. The opening phrase \"I appreciate the concerns being addressed\" softens the tone but does not change the overall rejection of the regulation's approach.","tone":"mixed","tags":["transgender students","school policy","nondiscrimination"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter clearly rejects the proposed policies, calling them \"Pedophile policies\" and saying the people behind them \"support violence and the abuse of children.\" This is a direct denunciation of the regulation and its supporters.","tone":"negative","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","privacy","transgender students"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly support this legislation,\" which directly states approval of the regulation. They also justify support by saying students deserve \"a safe and supportive environment\" and that this includes \"recognizing who they are.\"","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","supportive learning environment"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly support!\" and argues that \"Trans rights need to be supported,\" indicating clear approval of the proposed policies. The comment frames the regulation as important for protecting transgender identities and health, not opposing or questioning it.","tone":"positive","tags":["trans rights","LGBTQ+ inclusion","student health","identity recognition"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly support\" and argues that \"Trans rights are Human rights\" and that trans kids deserve acceptance and a \"safe school experience.\" This clearly endorses adopting the regulation.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","trans rights","school climate"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly condemns the policy as \"the institutional sexual abuse of children,\" which is a strong rejection of the proposed transgender student policies. The language indicates they want the regulation rejected rather than adopted.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","student safety","LGBTQ+ inclusion","school policy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly OPPOSE VDOE Transgender Policy\" and argues it \"infringes on Parental Rights\" and promotes a \"politically motivated and abusive agenda.\" The final question is rhetorical and clearly frames the policy as harmful and undeserving of adoption.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","transgender policy","public education","political ideology","school curriculum"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly support the guidance,\" which directly endorses adoption. The additional statement, \"We are all equal and worthy of the same dignity and respect,\" reinforces approval of the policy's inclusive intent.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","equal dignity","nondiscrimination"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The comment explicitly says, \"Oppose 'Model Policy on Treatment of Transgender Students',\" which directly states the writer's position. There is no additional nuance or qualifying language suggesting support or neutrality.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","school policy"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strong support\" and thanks the agency for \"looking out for our most vulnerable children,\" which clearly endorses the regulation. The statement that \"All children deserve to feel safe and respected at school\" aligns with the policy's goals.","tone":"positive","tags":["student safety","LGBTQ+ inclusion","supportive schools"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly support\" and argues that \"gender affirmation and support from family and community is life saving for trans youth and adults.\" They also frame the policy as \"the moral approach\" and \"good and common sense public health policy,\" indicating clear approval of the regulation.","tone":"positive","tags":["transgender students","public health","student support","gender affirmation"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly states \"Strong Support\" and repeats \"Support!\", indicating clear approval of the proposed regulation. There is no language suggesting opposition, neutrality, or ambiguity.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student privacy","nondiscrimination"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly oppose,\" which directly states their position on the regulation. They also describe it as \"an over reach of the public school system\" and say it would \"distance children from parents,\" indicating rejection of the policy's approach.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","public schools","government overreach","transgender students"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly endorses the policy’s underlying purpose by stating, \"Trans rights are human rights,\" and adds that \"trans kids need more protection than ever.\" This indicates clear support for adopting the regulation and its protections for transgender students.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","transgender rights","anti-discrimination"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter says, \"I am strongly opposed to any policies\" and objects to policies that would \"allow personal preferences to determine their sex.\" This clearly rejects the proposed transgender student policies rather than supporting them with changes.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","gender identity","school policy","student rights"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I am in complete support of this document\" and argues that people \"should be allowed to express their gender.\" The rest of the comment defends the policy against religious objections and ends with \"Thank you,\" reinforcing clear approval.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","gender expression","religious freedom","civil rights"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly rejects the policy’s bathroom provisions, saying their daughter will \"NOT share a bathroom with boys, transgender or not\" and demanding, \"Build a separate bathroom!\" They also state their children will leave school early if the school cannot accommodate this, indicating opposition to the regulation as written.","tone":"negative","tags":["bathroom access","parental rights","privacy","student safety","transgender students"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly labels the submission \"Oppose\" and argues the policy will \"lead to the harassment and bullying of religious students\" and be used to \"force religious students to violate the teachings of their faith.\" They also raise objections to the lack of proof of transgender status and question how schools would handle sports participation, indicating rejection rather than support or neutrality.","tone":"negative","tags":["religious freedom","parental rights","school sports","privacy","LGBTQ+ inclusion"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly states, \"Strongly oppose\" and repeats, \"I am strongly opposed to this,\" which clearly indicates rejection of the proposed regulation. No supporting arguments or qualifications are provided.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","school policy","opposition"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"SUPPORT 100%\" and urges the state to \"Protect children. All children\" while asking to \"Make this your step forward,\" which clearly endorses the regulation. The language frames the policy as a way to keep students safe and supported.","tone":"positive","tags":["student safety","LGBTQ+ inclusion","nondiscrimination","bullying prevention"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly support\" and argues that \"Trans rights are human rights\" and that schools should not exclude trans students. This clearly endorses adoption of the regulation as a means of inclusion and protection.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","transgender students","student rights","school safety"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says they are \"Strongly Opposed\" and argues against the policy as \"ridiculous nonsense\" that would \"completely re-shape the rest of society.\" They also object to teacher requirements around pronouns and say they do not believe this group should receive \"special treatment.\"","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","pronouns","special treatment","teacher discipline","LGBTQ+ inclusion"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.9,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"We need to rewrite this bill to create one set of locker rooms,\" which indicates support for changing the policy in a way that expands access and reduces sex-segregated facilities. Although the opening line says \"destroy all gender locker-rooms,\" the overall argument favors the regulation's transgender-inclusive direction rather than opposing it.","tone":"mixed","tags":["bathroom access","locker rooms","LGBTQ+ inclusion","gender identity","school facilities"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter rejects the premise of the transgender student policies, stating \"There is no confusion!\" and invoking religious doctrine instead of supporting the regulation. The phrase \"Bring back the 10 Commandments\" suggests opposition to the policy and a preference for a different moral framework.","tone":"negative","tags":["religious freedom","LGBTQ+ inclusion","transgender students","school policy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter clearly rejects the policy, calling it \"Child Abuse\" and accusing it of \"promoting sex trafficking and perversion.\" They also say they will take it to the senate to fund alternatives, indicating they want the regulation rejected rather than adopted.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","religious freedom","child abuse","school policy","mental health"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Oppose this policy\" and argues that the change would \"seriously harm the religious and privacy rights\" of children, parents, and employees. They also state that parents, not the state, have primary responsibility, indicating rejection of the regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","religious freedom","privacy","gender dysphoria","transgender students"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter says they are \"Very opposed to this policy\" and objects to \"not allowing male and female bathrooms.\" They also argue it would be a \"safety issue for our children,\" indicating clear rejection of the regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":["bathroom access","student safety","transgender policy","privacy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Most strongly opposed to this measure\" and repeatedly argues against the policy, calling it \"pandering nonsense\" and saying schools should \"leave matters of sexuality to parents.\" They object to bathroom/shower access and to recognizing transgender students' identities, indicating clear opposition to adoption.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","bathroom access","sex-segregated facilities","transgender students","school policy"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I STRONGLY SUPPORT\" and \"I fully support this policy!\" They also endorse the policy’s goals of protecting students from \"discrimination or bullying\" and ensuring they can get an education safely.","tone":"positive","tags":["trans rights","student safety","anti-bullying","nondiscrimination","public schools"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly oppose this guidance\" and argues it should not be implemented school-wide yet, stating it \"needs more thinking and consideration before implementing.\" The suggestion to limit it only to students \"classified as such by a doctor\" also indicates rejection of the proposed policy as written.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","school policy","implementation concerns","parental rights"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I very much strongly disagree with this bill,\" indicating clear opposition to adoption. They argue that schools should not provide this guidance and invoke religious beliefs to reject the policy, saying \"The Bible teaches that there are only 2 sexes.\"","tone":"negative","tags":["religious freedom","parental rights","LGBTQ+ inclusion","gender identity"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I fully support addressing the needs of our transgender students,\" which clearly endorses the regulation. The statement that \"All children should be treated with dignity and respect\" reinforces approval of the policy's purpose.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student dignity","nondiscrimination"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly endorses protections for transgender students, saying legislation that \"protects them and supports them\" will help students and that schools should be \"accepting and protecting the rights of trans minors.\" The comment argues against discrimination and in favor of the policy's purpose.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student rights","nondiscrimination","student safety"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter says they are \"highly opposed to the proposed policies\" and repeatedly urges the panel to \"reconsider\" them. They argue the policies do not represent \"ALL students,\" create safety risks, and conflict with their Christian beliefs and educator rights.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","religious freedom","student safety","bathroom access","pronouns"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"STRONGLY SUPPORT!!! PROTECT TRANS YOUTH!!!\" and states that \"protections like these in school are essential for human rights.\" They also argue the policy is needed to support marginalized trans students and reduce bullying and violence.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","bullying prevention","human rights","transgender students"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.93,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says the policy \"reflects flawed policies\" and that trying to \"eliminate gender-based activities is also wrong-headed,\" which indicates opposition to the regulation. Although they support respect for trans and cisgender kids and oppose bullying, the overall thrust is against the model policy as written.","tone":"mixed","tags":["bullying prevention","gender-based activities","women's rights","student safety","transgender students"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly labels the comment \"Strongly Support\" and adds \"Protect trans kids,\" which clearly endorses the proposed transgender student policies. There is no indication of opposition or neutrality.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","transgender students"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly rejects the policy: \"Absolutely not\" and \"I am completely against this petition.\" They object to transgender accommodations in bathrooms, sports, and dress codes, saying it is \"against the bible\" and \"non Christian.\"","tone":"negative","tags":["bathroom access","school sports","dress codes","religious freedom","LGBTQ+ inclusion"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly oppose this policy\" and asks, \"Do not take away the rights\" of students, indicating rejection of the regulation. The reasons given focus on restroom/changing room privacy and \"fair competition in sports,\" which are objections to the policy's treatment of transgender students.","tone":"negative","tags":["bathroom access","privacy","school sports","parental rights","LGBTQ+ inclusion"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly Oppose New Transgender Guidelines,\" which directly states opposition to the regulation. The body reinforces this by claiming the guidance \"destroys the safety of young children,\" indicating a negative view of adoption.","tone":"negative","tags":["student safety","transgender policies","school guidance"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly endorses respecting gender identity and says that accepting trans people \"strengthen[s] the protections of everyone.\" They also reference research on transgender health effects and provide a supporting citation, indicating approval of the proposed policies rather than opposition.","tone":"positive","tags":["transgender students","LGBTQ+ inclusion","student well-being","nondiscrimination","privacy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly oppose VDOE proposed transgender policy\" and argues the policy \"would be detrimental\" and \"I would resign immediately\" if passed. This is a clear rejection of adoption rather than a request for modification.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender policy","educator safety","school policy","student identity"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly Support\" and states that the policies \"go a long way in ensuring schools remain a safe environment for all people.\" They also argue that failing to pass the document \"would send the wrong message,\" indicating clear approval of adoption.","tone":"positive","tags":["student safety","LGBTQ+ inclusion","anti-discrimination","school climate","privacy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The comment explicitly says \"STRONGLY APPOSED!\" twice, which clearly indicates rejection of the proposed regulation. No supporting or neutral language appears.","tone":"negative","tags":[]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly opposed!\" and calls the policy \"highly unethical.\" They object to being \"forced to share restroom/locker room spaces\" with transgender students, indicating rejection of the regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":["bathroom access","locker rooms","parental rights","transgender students","privacy"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly support this policy\" and thanks the agency for bringing it forward. They also frame the policy as promoting \"equity\" and \"equality for all,\" indicating clear approval of adoption.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","equity","religious support","nondiscrimination"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly titles the submission \"Strongly Strongly Oppose\" and argues that schools \"should not infringe\" parental rights. The comment rejects the policy’s privacy/confidentiality approach, especially the idea that schools should not disclose a student’s gender identity to parents.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","privacy","gender identity","transgender students","school disclosure"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"strongly support!\" and argues that \"trans rights are human rights\" and that \"everyone deserves to be able to receive equitable treatment in school.\" They also endorse creating \"spaces in school for them to feel safe,\" which aligns with adopting the regulation.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","equity","safe schools"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I could not be more opposed to this issue,\" and argues against allowing transgender students to question or change their identity. They also object to \"the opposite gender in bathrooms and locker rooms,\" indicating rejection of the proposed policies.","tone":"negative","tags":["bathroom access","locker rooms","privacy","religious freedom","parental rights"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I support the inclusion of transgender inclusive policies in our public schools.\" They also urge action to \"accept[] and protect[] all students,\" which clearly endorses adoption of the regulation.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","nondiscrimination","school policy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The comment explicitly says \"STRONGLY APPOSED!!!\" and provides no qualifying language suggesting support or neutrality. This is a clear rejection of the proposed regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","opposition"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I support this common sense legislation\" and closes with \"Please pass this legislation.\" They also praise it as using \"best practices\" to create a \"positive inclusive learning experience\" and to protect students of \"all gender identities.\"","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","inclusive schools","best practices"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter says, \"The schools should not teach and decide for the students\" and \"It should not be taught in schools,\" which clearly rejects the proposed transgender student policies. They also emphasize parental control over school guidance, indicating opposition to adoption of the regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","LGBTQ+ inclusion","school policy","religious freedom"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly oppose\" and argues that \"the less regulation we have in our schools from the government the better,\" which clearly rejects the proposed policies. The statement \"I also oppose this morally\" reinforces opposition rather than offering a neutral or supportive view.","tone":"negative","tags":["school choice","government regulation","transgender students","public schools"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly asks policymakers to \"be kind and considerate\" and to \"Protect our trans youth,\" which clearly supports adopting the regulation. The request to prevent students from being \"ostracized or bullied\" aligns with the policy’s goals of support and anti-discrimination.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","bullying prevention","transgender students"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The comment explicitly says \"Strongly opposed!!\", which clearly indicates rejection of the proposed regulation. No supporting or qualifying language is provided.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender policies","opposition"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly endorses equal treatment for transgender students and says public schools should ensure they are not subjected to bullying or discrimination. Phrases like \"Transgender rights are human rights\" and \"We need to allow students to be their most authentic selves\" indicate clear support for the regulation's purpose.","tone":"positive","tags":["transgender rights","anti-bullying","student equality","school climate","LGBTQ+ inclusion"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"Please do not approve this,\" which directly rejects the regulation. The rest of the comment argues against transgender identity, stating there are \"no alternatives\" and that choosing otherwise is \"going against yourself,\" reinforcing opposition.","tone":"negative","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","gender identity","transgender students"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly states, \"I support this\" and repeats it, indicating clear approval of the proposed regulation. No contrary language or qualifications are present.","tone":"positive","tags":["support","transgender students","school policy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Oppose\" and argues the school should \"stop bringing this into the classroom\" and \"stay in your lane,\" indicating rejection of the proposed transgender student policies. The comment frames the regulation as inappropriate school intervention in family matters rather than support for adoption.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","transgender students","school curriculum","student privacy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I am totally opposed to this policy,\" and argues against schools teaching \"alternate choices of gender.\" They also object to shared facilities, warning that mixed-gender bathrooms and locker rooms would be \"a dangerous situation.\"","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","bathroom access","locker rooms","gender identity","school facilities"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"STRONGLY OPPOSE!\" and repeatedly asks \"Please do not do this.\" They argue the policy would be unsafe in bathrooms/locker rooms and harmful to \"women's sports,\" indicating clear rejection of the regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":["bathroom access","locker rooms","school sports","Title IX","student safety"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly rejects the policy as a \"travesty\" and says to \"stop brainwashing our kids,\" indicating they want the regulation rejected. They also object to transgender students participating in activities and facilities, calling the policy \"insane\" and \"beyond evil.\"","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","school sports","sex-based facilities","parental concerns","LGBTQ+ inclusion"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly support this guidance\" and argues it will \"protect transgender students\" and create \"a safe environment to learn and grow.\" They also state it can \"positively impact the mental health of trans youth,\" indicating clear approval of the regulation.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","mental health","nondiscrimination","supportive school environment"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I fully support the model policy.\" They also give a reason aligned with adoption: \"All students need to feel safe and be free from discrimination and bullying at school.\"","tone":"positive","tags":["student safety","bullying prevention","nondiscrimination","LGBTQ+ inclusion"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I absolutely disagree with this legislation\" and \"Please don't pass this,\" which clearly opposes adoption. The phrase \"It is sick and it is crazy\" reinforces rejection of the proposed policy.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","LGBTQ+ inclusion","opposition","religious freedom"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The comment explicitly says \"Strongly opposed!!!\" and repeats \"Strongly opposed!!\", which clearly indicates rejection of the proposed regulation. No supporting or neutral language is present.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","school policy","opposition"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly rejects the policy with the title \"Absolutely NO\" and says \"My children will not go to public schools if this is passed,\" indicating they do not want it adopted. They argue it will \"do harm to all CHILDREN\" and \"opens the door for sexual assault,\" which is a clear call against the regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":["student safety","bathroom access","locker rooms","sexual assault","transgender students"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The comment explicitly says \"Strongly oppose!\" twice, which clearly indicates rejection of the proposed regulation. No supporting or neutral language is present.","tone":"negative","tags":[]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly support this legislation,\" which directly endorses adoption of the policy. The statement \"Trans rights are human rights\" and \"by protecting trans kids we protect all kids\" further indicate affirmative support for the regulation's goals.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","transgender students","student safety","nondiscrimination"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly states, \"I oppose the transgender bill\" and repeats, \"I opposed this bill,\" which clearly indicates rejection of the proposed regulation. No supporting or neutral language is present.","tone":"negative","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","transgender students","school policy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly labels the submission \"OPPOSE\" and argues against \"secrecy from parents\" and policies that would \"take parents out of the debate.\" The comment rejects the regulation’s approach to transgender student privacy and parental notification, indicating opposition to adoption.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","student privacy","transgender students","school policy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The comment explicitly rejects the proposal with \"No thank you,\" which indicates the commenter does not want the regulation adopted. The title \"No\" reinforces the negative position, though no substantive reasons are provided.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","school policy"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly support!!!\" and endorses the guidance because \"Trans and non-binary students deserve and need the measures outlined in this guidance.\" They also state that students should not feel discriminated against and should feel safe at school, which aligns with adoption of the regulation.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","anti-discrimination","school climate"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"STRONGLY AGREE\" and urges, \"RESPECT AND PROTECT DO NOT ALLOW DISCRIMINATION AGAINST TRANSGENDER STUDENTS,\" which clearly supports adopting the policy. The body also frames transgender rights as something to be protected, reinforcing approval of the regulation's purpose.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","anti-discrimination","student safety","transgender rights"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly titles the post \"Opposed to trans gender special treatment\" and repeatedly argues against \"special treatment\" and \"accommodations\" for transgender students. They also object to bathroom access and say schools should not make such accommodations, indicating opposition to the proposed policies.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","bathroom access","equal treatment","school accommodations","privacy"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The comment explicitly says \"Support\" and adds \"Support our transgender community,\" which clearly endorses the regulation. The request \"Gender pronouns please\" is consistent with backing transgender-inclusive policies rather than opposing them.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","gender identity","transgender students","pronouns"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The comment states \"absolutely not\" twice and provides no supportive language, indicating clear rejection of the proposed regulation. There is no question or neutral information, only a blunt refusal.","tone":"negative","tags":[]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly states, \"I strongly support the guidance,\" which directly endorses adoption of the regulation. There is no qualifying language or criticism suggesting opposition or neutrality.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","transgender students","school policy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly oppose\" and argues the policy is a \"violation of freedom of speech\" and \"freedom of religion.\" They also object that there are \"no accommodations for families who do not want to participate,\" indicating rejection of the regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":["freedom of speech","parental rights","religious freedom","transgender students","school policy"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly support\" and frames the policy as protecting \"Trans children.\" The rhetorical question about treating others well reinforces approval of the regulation’s goals rather than opposition or neutrality.","tone":"positive","tags":["transgender rights","student safety","LGBTQ+ inclusion","anti-discrimination"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I don’t agree that this law is necessary\" and argues that existing anti-bullying laws already cover the issue. They also question bathroom and locker room access and say there needs to be \"more discussion and research\" before changing sex-based separation policies, indicating opposition to adoption as written.","tone":"negative","tags":["anti-bullying laws","bathroom access","locker rooms","parental concerns","student safety"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly calls the policy a \"gross overreach\" and says it \"will not end well,\" indicating clear opposition to adoption. They also argue it is \"forcing transgender agendas on the education system\" and raise objections about \"compelling speach\" and enforcement.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","parental rights","compelled speech","religious freedom","school choice"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter argues against educators handling transgender-related decisions and says parents should be the ones \"making the calls here,\" implying opposition to the policy’s school involvement. The rhetorical questions about whether it is a \"good idea\" for educators to assist and the emphasis on parental authority indicate a desire to reject or substantially weaken the regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","transgender students","school authority","privacy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly rejects the policy, saying it \"should never happen\" and asking why it is being considered at all. They argue it is against \"what the Bible stands for\" and call it something \"the left is trying to push through,\" which clearly opposes adoption.","tone":"negative","tags":["religious freedom","parental rights","LGBTQ+ inclusion","transgender students"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The comment states \"strongly disagree\" in response to the proposed model policies, which clearly indicates opposition to adoption. No supporting reasons or requests for modification are provided, but the stance is unambiguous.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","school policy"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly Support Trans Lives\" and argues that schools should \"support all of its students\" and \"Advocating for and loving our youth... saves lives.\" This is a clear endorsement of the proposed transgender student policies.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student support","school climate","transgender students"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly rejects the policy, saying \"Stop being twisted and perverted\" and \"Don't make the majority of people accept warped people.\" This is a clear call against adopting the transgender student policies.","tone":"negative","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","transgender students","school policy","discrimination"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter strongly rejects the proposed transgender student policies, calling them an \"EVIL agenda\" and saying they have \"no place in grade schools.\" They argue the policies endanger girls' privacy and safety and repeatedly frame the guidance as harmful and deceptive, indicating clear opposition to adoption.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","privacy","student safety","parental rights","girls' sports"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly rejects the policy, writing \"No on Transgender in Schools\" and stating \"I do not believe it is right for children to be exposed to transgenderism.\" They argue the regulation is \"dangerous\" and urge officials to \"listen to those voicing opposition to this,\" indicating clear opposition to adoption.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","parental rights","student safety","identity politics","school policy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"I STRONGLY OPPOSE this\" and argues there is \"no need for this\" policy. They also reject transgender inclusion in sports and restrooms, saying \"I do not want my tax dollars being used for this\" and \"better not be allowed in womans restroom.\"","tone":"negative","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","school sports","bathroom access","taxpayer spending","student safety"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"Please don't do this! This is wrong!\" and asks that the policy not be adopted. They argue it will \"only create potential for strained or ruined relationships\" rather than help students, indicating clear opposition to the regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","student relationships","LGBTQ+ inclusion","school policy"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.95,"stance_rationale":"The commenter asks the agency to \"put you selves in their position\" and to \"help her sustain her successful life,\" which clearly supports policies accommodating the grandchild's transgender identity. The overall message is sympathetic to transgender students and does not request weakening or rejection of the regulation.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student support","gender identity","family impact"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I support this\" and endorses \"any effort to create safe and inclusive spaces for trans students in Virginia public schools.\" This is a clear approval of the proposed policies.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","inclusive schools"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I whole heartedly oppose this new policy\" and repeatedly urges, \"Please don’t force us\" to accept it. They argue the policy is \"dangerous,\" \"absurd and disgusting,\" and should not be normalized, which clearly indicates opposition to adoption.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","LGBTQ+ inclusion","bathroom access","privacy","student safety"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly states, \"I strongly support the guidance,\" which directly endorses adoption of the regulation. There is no qualifying language or criticism suggesting opposition or neutrality.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","nondiscrimination"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"This has to stop\" and \"keep politics out of the schools,\" indicating opposition to the proposed transgender student policies. The reference to \"immoral agendas\" and rejecting children being required to be \"accepting of their choice\" further shows they want the regulation rejected or not implemented.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","politics in schools","parental rights","school curriculum","LGBTQ+ inclusion"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly support!\" and repeats \"Support and protect trans kids!\" indicating clear approval of the proposed policies. The final sentence, \"Let's at least eliminate some bigotry at school,\" further shows support for the regulation's anti-discrimination goals.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","anti-discrimination","bullying prevention"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The comment explicitly says \"Strongly Oppose!\" which clearly indicates rejection of the proposed regulation. No supporting reasons or qualifications are provided.","tone":"negative","tags":[]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The comment explicitly says \"Strongly oppose\" and repeats \"Strongly oppose,\" which clearly indicates rejection of the proposed regulation. No supporting or neutral language is present.","tone":"negative","tags":[]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly oppose it,\" and frames the proposal as harmful: \"It would put children at risk for abuse.\" The language \"divisive and evil\" further indicates rejection of the regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":["student safety","abuse concerns","transgender students","privacy","school policy"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly asks to \"grant rights to fair treatment and allow for anti-discrimination policies in public schools,\" which aligns with adopting the proposed protections. They also argue that school should be a \"safe haven for trans youth,\" indicating clear support for the regulation's purpose.","tone":"positive","tags":["anti-discrimination","transgender students","student safety","mental health","school climate"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly Disapprove\" and argues against \"special rules and policies\" for transgender students. They also say \"Get away from our kids!\" and claim the policy is meant to \"brainwash young children,\" indicating clear opposition to adoption.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","school policy","parental rights","LGBTQ+ inclusion","bullying prevention"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I STRONGLY support transgender students\" and repeats, \"I strongly support transgender students in our schools.\" This is a clear endorsement of the regulation’s purpose and treatment of transgender students.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student support","transgender students"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"Please do not allow transgender individuals in the school system\" and \"No to transgender propaganda!\" which clearly rejects the proposed policies. The sports and child-confusion arguments are presented as reasons to oppose adoption rather than to modify it.","tone":"negative","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","school sports","student safety","parental concerns"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly labels the proposal \"Strongly Opposed\" and says \"this is harmful to ALL kids, teachers and parents,\" which clearly rejects adoption of the regulation. No supportive or neutral language appears.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","parental rights","student safety","school policy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly oppose the language in this document\" and \"I oppose other parts of this document as well.\" They object to specific provisions on \"preferred pronouns\" and \"preferred language among students and their parents,\" arguing the policy is too broad and harmful.","tone":"negative","tags":["pronouns","parental rights","school policy","student privacy","LGBTQ+ inclusion"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I fully support this measure\" and describes the policies as \"common sense\". They also frame opposition as equivalent to allowing children to be \"bullied or excluded,\" which clearly endorses adoption of the regulation.","tone":"positive","tags":["transgender students","student wellbeing","bullying prevention","inclusion"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly back legislation which supports our transgender students in Virginia\" and repeatedly argues that \"Transgender inclusion is key\" to a safer, more welcoming environment. The comment endorses specific elements of the policy such as pronouns, inclusive curriculum, affirming facilities, and supportive counselors.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","privacy","bathroom access","bullying prevention"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"OPPOSED!!!\" and refers to the policy as an \"abomination,\" indicating clear rejection of the regulation. The biblical reference is used as a reason for opposition rather than a request for changes or a neutral observation.","tone":"negative","tags":["religious freedom","LGBTQ+ inclusion","transgender students"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly urges approval of the policy, saying \"Protect trans kids\" and \"Support trans lives!\" They also ask to \"Do the right thing!\" and advocate for equal rights and access, which clearly aligns with supporting the regulation.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","equal rights","anti-bullying"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly oppose the model policies\" and repeats that \"This document needs revision.\" They argue the policies infringe on \"girls'\" privacy, \"women’s sports,\" \"conscience rights,\" and parental authority, concluding that \"Kids don’t belong to the state.\"","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","privacy","school sports","conscience rights","transgender students"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly labels the proposal \"OPPOSED\" and describes it as \"a direct attack on the traditional, nuclear stable family\" and \"an attack on schools,\" indicating rejection of the regulation. There is no language suggesting support or a request for modification.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","family values","transgender students","schools"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly labels the submission \"Full Support\" and argues that \"All people deserve protection from discrimination.\" They also endorse providing \"proper education and resources\" for transgender people, which aligns with adopting the regulation.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","anti-discrimination","student support","mental health"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.97,"stance_rationale":"The commenter rejects the policy outright, opening with the title \"No\" and questioning whether the regulation creates an \"enriched and adequate environment for education.\" The comment argues for \"real boys and girls\" and asks whether the policy is \"discrimination or disinformation,\" indicating opposition to transgender-inclusive guidance.","tone":"negative","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","bullying prevention","discrimination","gender identity"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I vehemently oppose\" and \"I vehemently disagree with these 'transgender' rules,\" then urges officials to \"decline these new rules.\" The comment argues the policy is harmful and calls it \"child abuse\" and a \"travesty,\" indicating clear opposition to adoption.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","parental rights","free speech","child welfare","gender dysphoria"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I support these model policies\" and reiterates that \"All children have a right to learn, free from discrimination and harassment.\" They further clarify inclusion by stating \"ALL children, including transgender students,\" indicating clear approval of the regulation.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","nondiscrimination","student safety","bullying prevention"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly oppose this transgender policy!\" and calls it \"child abuse,\" which clearly indicates rejection of the regulation. The phrase \"anyone who supports this is complicit\" further reinforces opposition.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender policy","child abuse","science","school policy"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly support this bill,\" which clearly endorses adoption of the regulation. The title also reinforces this position by stating \"Strongly support codifying protections for transgender.\"","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","transgender protections"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly opposed!\" and argues against the policy by claiming it would let boys access girls' locker rooms. The comment is clearly rejecting the regulation rather than supporting it with changes.","tone":"negative","tags":["bathroom access","locker rooms","student privacy","gender identity","school safety"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I fully support trans students\" and endorses \"access to equitable education and an environment free from bullies,\" which aligns with adopting the proposed policies. There is no language opposing or questioning the regulation.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","bullying prevention","student safety","equity"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The comment explicitly says \"STRONGLY DISAGREE,\" which clearly indicates opposition to the proposed regulation. No supporting reasons or qualifications are provided, but the stance itself is unambiguous.","tone":"negative","tags":[]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says they are \"1000% opposed and against this policy\" and repeatedly argues it should not be adopted, calling it \"completely insane\" and predicting \"mass chaos and confusion.\" They also object to specific provisions like locker room access and pronoun use, indicating clear opposition to the regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","bathroom access","pronouns","parental rights","student privacy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly objects to the policy, saying “don’t punish and restrict everyone else cause of it” and criticizing “special privileges” for transgender students. The phrase “Don’t shove your beliefs down others throats!!” further indicates rejection of the regulation rather than support or neutrality.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","parental rights","school policy","special privileges","LGBTQ+ inclusion"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly states, \"I strongly support!\" which directly indicates approval of the proposed regulation. There is no qualifying language or criticism suggesting any opposition or neutrality.","tone":"positive","tags":[]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly oppose the proposition,\" which directly states opposition to the regulation. The additional claim that it will \"start in schools and then move to churches\" and \"can ruin kids lives\" reinforces a negative position rather than support or neutrality.","tone":"negative","tags":["religious freedom","student safety","LGBTQ+ inclusion"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"Support\" and \"We need to support our transgender students,\" which clearly endorses the regulation. The phrase \"This is a step in the right directions\" further indicates approval of the policy.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student support","nondiscrimination"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly Support\" and states the policies \"should absolutely be adopted ASAP.\" They also describe the guidance as \"common sense practices\" that help students and school divisions, indicating clear approval of adoption.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student support","school policy","bullying prevention"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"SUPPORT !!!!!\" and \"STRONGEST SUPPORT POSSIBLE!!!\" in favor of the policy. They also criticize those opposing transgender inclusion, indicating clear approval of the regulation's purpose and protections for trans students.","tone":"negative","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student rights","anti-discrimination","transgender students"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"STRONGLY OPPOSED!!!!\" and \"I will not go along with this,\" indicating clear rejection of the proposed policies. They also argue it \"puts our kids in danger\" and say their children will not attend public schools if it is allowed, which reinforces opposition.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","student safety","religious freedom","LGBTQ+ inclusion"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter says \"a specific document is not needed\" and that the writers should not \"force this on children and families,\" which clearly rejects the proposed policy. They also argue existing bullying policies are sufficient and that the guidance is not appropriate for schools beyond being \"an informative peice.\"","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","school policy","bullying prevention","parental rights","religious freedom"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.96,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly rejects the policy, writing \"Absolutely Not\" and \"Our family strongly disagrees with this action.\" This is a clear opposition to adopting the regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","school policy","parental rights"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly in support of trans kids\" and urges, \"Protect trans kids,\" which clearly endorses the regulation’s protective purpose. There is no language opposing or questioning the policy.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","transgender students"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I am in full support\" and thanks the authors for \"these thoughtful guidelines.\" They also state the policies will \"support our Transgender and LGBTQ youth,\" indicating clear approval of adoption.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","transgender students","student support","nondiscrimination"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.86,"stance_rationale":"The comment opens with \"Absolutely not,\" which strongly rejects the proposed policies. The rest of the comment emphasizes privacy and not wanting others to \"force my views on others,\" suggesting opposition to the regulation’s treatment of transgender students and related school practices.","tone":"negative","tags":["privacy","parental rights","transgender students","school policy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says to \"vote vehemently against any legislation\" that would \"confuse and misguide\" children, which directly rejects the proposed transgender student policies. The body also argues that \"People are NOT transgender\" and frames the regulation as morally wrong, reinforcing opposition.","tone":"negative","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","religious freedom","parental rights","student identity"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly oppose\" and demands \"Stop this nonsense immediately,\" which clearly rejects the regulation. The statement that transitioning a child is \"absolutely child abuse\" shows opposition to the policy's underlying treatment of transgender students.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","child welfare","medical transition","school policy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"strongly oppose bathroom choice in Virginia,\" which clearly rejects a key part of the proposed transgender student policies. The title, \"Oppose Gender Bathroom Choice- Strongly oppose,\" reinforces that they want this aspect of the regulation rejected.","tone":"negative","tags":["bathroom access","transgender students","school facilities","privacy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"strongly oppose\" and characterizes the policy as \"child abuse,\" which clearly indicates rejection of the regulation. There is no language suggesting support or neutrality.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","child welfare","opposition"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly rejects the policy as \"radical social engineering\" and says it is \"wrong,\" arguing that it would \"force an agenda on everyone.\" This is a clear call against adopting the guidelines rather than a request for modification.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender policies","anti-bullying","student rights","school guidance"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly states \"strongly oppose this,\" which directly indicates rejection of the proposed regulation. No supporting reasons or qualifications are provided.","tone":"negative","tags":[]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says they are in \"strong support\" and argues that schools should provide \"a welcoming and safe environment for all students.\" They further endorse the policy’s purpose by stating that protecting trans students \"literally saves lives\" and expressing hope for Virginia schools to \"do better for our trans and nonbinary students.\"","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","mental health","transgender students"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"Absolutely oppose\" and \"I am definitely against this,\" which clearly indicates rejection of the proposed regulation. The question \"What is happening in Virginia?\" reinforces disapproval rather than support or neutrality.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","school policy","opposition"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.93,"stance_rationale":"The commenter criticizes the document’s framing, saying the terminology is \"full of terms defined in the light of gender identity being separate from birth sex\" and that the authors have \"already chosen a side.\" This indicates opposition to the regulation as written rather than a neutral request for information.","tone":"negative","tags":["gender identity","terminology","transgender students","policy framing"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"OPPOSED!\" and \"Opposed to VA proposal model of transgender student policies,\" which clearly rejects the regulation. The religious reference reinforces disapproval rather than support for adoption.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","LGBTQ+ inclusion","religious objections"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly calls the policy \"reckless\" and asks, \"Please put policies in place\" that keep children comfortable in their birth sex instead of accepting transgender students. They object to restroom/locker room access and say \"accepting them is not the way to do it,\" indicating clear opposition to adoption of the regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","bathroom access","locker rooms","parental rights","religious freedom"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly states \"Strongly Opposed\" and repeats \"NO! NO! NO!\", which clearly indicates rejection of the proposed regulation. There is no qualifying language suggesting support or neutrality.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","school policy","opposition"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly oppose\" and \"Do not support,\" which clearly indicates rejection of the proposed regulation. No qualifying language suggests support or neutrality.","tone":"negative","tags":[]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter uses explicitly hostile language toward the policy, calling it a \"CULT\" and \"LIES,\" and says it \"should scare the hell out of everyone.\" The statement that it is \"criminal\" indicates they want the regulation rejected or viewed as harmful.","tone":"negative","tags":["privacy","LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","parental rights"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says they \"strongly support these model policies\" and describes the guidance as \"sensible policy updates\" that would benefit transgender students. They also state that implementing the guidance is \"a step in the right direction,\" indicating clear approval of adoption.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","school policy","transgender students"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly oppose\" and urges, \"Stop with this nonsense.\" They object to transgender students using female restrooms, locker rooms, and sports, calling the policy \"dangerous\" and \"abusive.\"","tone":"negative","tags":["bathroom access","locker rooms","school sports","student safety","women's rights"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly urges stronger protections for transgender students, saying \"We have to do everything we can to increase basic human protections and rights\" and that \"Trans children are entitled to feel safe and respected.\" They condemn exclusionary policies as \"despicable,\" indicating clear support for adopting the regulation.","tone":"positive","tags":["transgender students","student safety","nondiscrimination","LGBTQ+ inclusion","privacy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says the proposal is \"not worthy of anything but rejection\" and repeatedly argues it \"tramples on the rights\" of students. They also criticize it as unsafe, illegal, and lacking evidence, indicating clear opposition to adoption.","tone":"negative","tags":["student safety","privacy","bathroom access","evidence-based policy","parental rights"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"Please don't approve this proposal\" and repeatedly argues it is \"too subjective\" and would \"aid bullies and predators.\" They frame the policy as harmful to people of faith and unsafe for students, indicating clear opposition to adoption.","tone":"negative","tags":["religious freedom","bathroom access","student safety","privacy","LGBTQ+ inclusion"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says they \"strongly believe\" students should be able to use the bathroom they are most comfortable using, which aligns with supporting the proposed transgender student policies. They also endorse inclusive bathroom policies and argue they do not harm safety, indicating approval rather than opposition.","tone":"negative","tags":["bathroom access","transgender students","student privacy","school safety","LGBTQ+ inclusion"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly labels the proposal \"Strongly Oppose\" and repeatedly argues against it, calling it \"wasting taxpayer money\" and saying \"This legislation will not provide equity for all students.\" They also state that schools are not the place for gender identity issues and warn it would put cisgender students at risk and undermine staff authority.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","school policy","teacher authority","student safety","LGBTQ+ inclusion"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Fully Support the Protection of Trans Children’s Rights\" and argues that transgender children are \"deserving of the same protections and rights that every other child receives.\" They also state that the policy \"is needed and necessary now more than ever,\" indicating clear support for adoption.","tone":"positive","tags":["transgender students","student rights","nondiscrimination","privacy","LGBTQ+ inclusion"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly oppose\" and argues the policy is \"confusing to kids\" and \"unsafe for girls,\" indicating rejection of the regulation. The question about whether schools have time to deal with resulting problems further shows opposition rather than support or neutrality.","tone":"negative","tags":["student safety","girls' safety","mental health","school administration"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly rejects the proposal multiple times, saying \"Absolutely NOT. NO\" and \"I do not want these polices to be put into place.\" They also state they will \"do everything in my power to prevent this from happening,\" indicating clear opposition to adoption.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","parental rights","religious freedom","school policy","student privacy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly opposed\" and calls the policy \"an enormous overreach\". They also argue it is \"dangerous for children,\" indicating clear rejection of the regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","school policy","student safety","government overreach"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly support this initiative for trans and gender non-conforming students.\" This is a clear endorsement of the guidance as proposed.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","transgender students","school policy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says to \"Stop\" the policies and calls them \"an abject abrogation of duty\" and \"ridiculous,\" indicating clear opposition to adoption. They also argue the document would be harmful and should not be implemented in schools.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","parental rights","student privacy","school safety","LGBTQ+ inclusion"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strong support\" and asks the Virginia Department of Education to \"protect transgender kids.\" They also endorse affirming treatment, saying \"we need to protect them and celebrate them,\" which clearly supports adoption of the regulation.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","bullying prevention","transgender students"]}