{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I fully support this legislation\" and argues that \"Gender identity should not be a barrier to quality education and a safe school environment.\" They also frame the policy as necessary to protect students and enable learning.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","safe learning environment","civil rights","education access"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"If you let this bill pass,\" indicating opposition to adoption. The statement also frames the policy as harmful and invokes fear about bathrooms, reinforcing a clear anti-policy stance.","tone":"negative","tags":["bathroom access","religious freedom","student safety","transgender students"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"This needs to be thrown out\" and \"will oppose this regulation,\" which clearly rejects adoption. They also argue the policy is \"very threatening regarding their safety\" in bathrooms and locker rooms, indicating substantive opposition rather than a request for changes.","tone":"negative","tags":["student safety","bathroom access","locker rooms","parental rights"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says the school system \"must provide safety for transgender students\" and that \"The school system must provide a safe environment for trans students,\" which clearly endorses the regulation’s goal. They also reject objections to transgender inclusion, stating trans students \"must be treated equally\" and \"No exceptions.\"","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","bullying prevention","nondiscrimination"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.93,"stance_rationale":"The commenter says, \"I strongly disagree with these new rule changes,\" which clearly rejects the proposed policies. They also express concern that the changes \"will affect my children’s psyche,\" indicating opposition based on perceived harm.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","student mental health","transgender policies"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly rejects the policy with the title \"Absolutely Not\" and says they would \"pull every child\" and grandchild from public school if it is adopted. They describe it as forcing \"agendas\" on children, indicating clear opposition to the regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","LGBTQ+ inclusion","public schools","student safety"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"OPPOSE!!!!!!\" and calls the policy \"Horrible horrible horrible,\" indicating clear rejection of the regulation. The rest of the comment argues it will cause \"sex and other issues occurring in restrooms,\" reinforcing opposition to adoption.","tone":"negative","tags":["bathroom access","student safety","privacy","transgender students"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says they are \"STRONGLY opposed\" and states they \"cannot and will not\" comply with key elements of the policy, including using a student's pronouns or affirming gender fluidity. They frame the policy as violating \"Freedom of Religion,\" indicating rejection of adoption.","tone":"negative","tags":["religious freedom","pronouns","gender identity","LGBTQ+ inclusion"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly support\" and states that \"This policy is one step closer to a safer school experience for trans children,\" which clearly endorses adoption of the regulation. The comment offers no objections or qualifications.","tone":"positive","tags":["transgender students","student safety","LGBTQ+ inclusion"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.93,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly oppose\" and adds \"I do not agree with this,\" which clearly indicates rejection of the proposed policies. No supporting reasons or requests for modification are provided, but the stance is unambiguous.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","parental rights","school policy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly disagree with these new policies\" and states they are \"morally wrong,\" which clearly rejects adoption. The threat that \"my children will not be attending public schools\" if it passes further confirms opposition.","tone":"negative","tags":["religious freedom","parental rights","LGBTQ+ inclusion","public schools"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter clearly rejects the policy, saying it is \"giving in to the few\" and asking \"are you kidding me,\" which signals opposition. The reference to \"We can not continue to enable a derelict society\" further indicates they want the regulation rejected or not adopted.","tone":"negative","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","school sports","religious freedom","student privacy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"I strongly appose this legislation\" and calls it \"over reach of government,\" which clearly rejects the proposed policies. The religious statement about being created \"Male and Female\" reinforces opposition to transgender student guidance.","tone":"negative","tags":["religious freedom","parental rights","LGBTQ+ inclusion","government overreach"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"Strongly oppose transgender policies,\" which clearly rejects the proposed regulation. No qualifying language suggests support or neutrality.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender policies","opposition"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly agree with this\" and endorses the underlying principle of nondiscrimination. Phrases like \"Trans rights are human rights\" and \"We need to progress as a society\" indicate clear support for the proposed transgender student policies.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","nondiscrimination","student rights"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I oppose this,\" and argues the policy is \"against God’s intended purpose\" and that people should \"honor\" fixed male/female roles. This is a clear rejection of the proposed transgender student policies.","tone":"negative","tags":["religious freedom","gender identity","LGBTQ+ inclusion","parental rights"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly titles the comment \"oppose\" and argues against the policy by saying children should not be made to feel scared in the bathroom because of transgender students. The phrase \"sexually confused and need mental assistance\" shows rejection of the regulation’s protections for transgender students.","tone":"negative","tags":["bathroom access","transgender students","student safety","privacy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"Totally opposed,\" indicating clear rejection of the proposed transgender student policy. The phrase \"this is so wrong!\" reinforces that they want it rejected rather than adopted.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","school policy","opposition"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says the mandates \"go too far\" and ends with \"Please do not implement them,\" which is a clear rejection of the proposed policy. Although they support safety for transgender children, they argue it should be done through less extreme means and express concern about parental guidance and comfort for young women.","tone":"mixed","tags":["parental rights","student safety","transgender policy","privacy","school facilities"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly oppose transgenders of any kind\" and argues against allowing children to \"mix in bathrooms or shower areas,\" which clearly rejects the proposed transgender student policies. The religious justification does not change the overall opposition to adoption of the regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":["bathroom access","religious freedom","transgender students","student privacy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly rejects the policy with \"Absolutely NO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!\" and says \"Stop re-writing it,\" indicating they do not want the regulation adopted. They also characterize it as \"social engineering\" and \"brainwashing,\" which shows strong opposition to the transgender student policies.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","public education","biology","parental rights","LGBTQ+ inclusion"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"STRONGLY OPPOSE\" and repeatedly asks to \"leave it out of the public schools system.\" They argue the policy is harmful, citing concerns about children's mental health, classroom distractions, bullying, and safety, and urge that these issues be handled privately at home.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","parental rights","student safety","mental health","privacy"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"In support\" and argues the policies \"serve to create a more supportive environments\" and \"keep them safe.\" They also reject opposition based on religion and ask readers to \"Please\" support the amendments, indicating clear approval of adoption.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","mental health","religious freedom","nondiscrimination"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says the measure is \"wrong on so many levels\" and attacks supporters of it, indicating clear opposition to adoption. The statement \"Anyone who supports this measure likely needs therapy\" reinforces a strongly negative rejection of the regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","opposition","mental health","school policy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly oppose the proposed transgender policy\" and argues against allowing transgender students to use bathrooms and locker rooms aligned with their gender identity. They also say they are \"prepared to fight against this policy,\" indicating clear rejection rather than a request for changes.","tone":"negative","tags":["bathroom access","locker rooms","parental rights","transgender policy","school facilities"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter says they \"strongly and adamantly disagree with the proposed guidelines\" and explicitly rejects restroom/locker room accommodations, pronoun guidance, and school involvement. They also argue the policy is harmful and should not be transferred to schools, indicating clear opposition to adoption.","tone":"negative","tags":["bathroom access","pronouns","parental rights","student privacy","LGBTQ+ inclusion"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"totally opposed\" and calls the policy \"child abuse,\" which clearly indicates rejection of the regulation. There is no language suggesting support or neutrality.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","child welfare","opposition"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly rejects the policy with \"Absolutely not\" and says she would not send her children to a school operating this way. Her concern that she does not want her sons \"sharing restrooms with opposite gender\" indicates opposition to the regulation's transgender student accommodations.","tone":"negative","tags":["bathroom access","parental rights","student privacy","LGBTQ+ inclusion"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"We are strongly opposed!\" and argues to \"Let the parents determine when/if it is appropriate,\" which indicates rejection of the proposed policies. The comment does not request modifications; it opposes adoption as written.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","transgender students","school policy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I do not approve of these proposed guidelines\" and frames them as harmful, saying they are based on \"radical theories\" that \"eradicate all distinctions between male and female.\" This is a clear rejection of the regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","gender identity","school policy","indoctrination"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"FULLY SUPPORT\" and states they \"fully believe that transgender students should have all rights, opportunity and protections\". This is a clear endorsement of the proposed policies and their protections for transgender students.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","nondiscrimination","privacy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter says they are \"very concerned\" about girls \"changing for PE or using the bathroom with boys\" and concludes, \"This certainly doesn't protect all our children.\" That language indicates opposition to the proposed transgender student policies, especially around facilities and privacy.","tone":"negative","tags":["bathroom access","privacy","student safety","school sports"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly labels the submission \"STRONGLY OPPOSE\" and says \"I believe this law is an overreach of our constitutional rights.\" They argue the policy would \"encourag[e]\" bullying and exclusion of students and parents who \"believe in two genders,\" indicating rejection of the regulation as written.","tone":"negative","tags":["constitutional rights","parental rights","religious freedom","LGBTQ+ inclusion","school discrimination"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly support!\" and \"just support people being themselves,\" which clearly endorses the regulation. The comment also frames the policy as the \"right thing,\" indicating approval rather than criticism.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student identity","supportive schools"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly labels the proposal \"OPPOSE\" and says it is \"so wrong\" and a \"travesty to actually consider this.\" They argue against allowing children to \"pretend to be of opposite sex,\" indicating clear rejection of the regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","parental concerns","student identity","school policy"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I am strongly in support\" and describes the policy as \"a step in that direction\" toward safer schools for trans students. They also endorse schools providing a \"SUPPORTIVE learning environment for all children,\" indicating approval of the regulation's purpose.","tone":"positive","tags":["transgender students","student safety","supportive learning environment","nondiscrimination"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly disagree\" and calls the proposal \"an abomination\" that \"should never have even been allowed to become a bill.\" They also say they would remove their children from public school if it passes, indicating clear opposition to adoption.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","bathroom access","transgender students","school safety"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly rejects the policy, saying \"if this passes, that will happen\" and expressing that they do not want their children subjected to it. The language about \"boys and girls are separate for a reason\" and calling it a \"dumb decision\" indicates clear opposition to adoption.","tone":"negative","tags":["gender separation","student safety","sexual content","school policy"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly support!\" and endorses the policy’s purpose by stating that \"All children must be supported and protected in school.\" This is a clear affirmative position on adopting the regulation.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","supportive schools","nondiscrimination"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly rejects the proposal, saying the policies \"do not serve the good people of our community\" and urging that schools \"MUST reflect the WILL of the PEOPLE.\" This is a clear call against adopting the transgender student policies as written.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","public schools","parental rights","community values"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly SUPPORT the protection of trans students in Virginia public school.\" The rest of the comment is affirming and reinforces approval of the proposed policies.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","nondiscrimination","transgender students"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter repeatedly argues against the policy, saying it \"takes away rights from non trans students,\" that it \"goes much further\" than existing policies, and urging VDOE to \"WAKE UP\" and \"Stop trying push an agenda on our kids.\" Although they offer a limited alternative (non-gender bathrooms/locker rooms), the overall message is to reject the proposed guidance as written.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","bathroom access","locker rooms","pronoun policy","LGBTQ+ inclusion"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly oppose\" and \"Strongly disagree with this,\" indicating rejection of the proposed policies. The rest of the comment argues against affirming transgender identities, saying \"you can’t trick their minds\" and that adults should \"correct them,\" which supports opposition to the regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","transgender students","parental rights","school policy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I oppose this initiative by the DOE strongly\" and asks, \"Please do not put our kids through this.\" They argue the policy is an \"overstep of religious liberties\" and raise objections to restroom access and transgender inclusion, indicating clear opposition to adoption.","tone":"negative","tags":["religious freedom","bathroom access","student safety","parental rights","LGBTQ+ inclusion"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly support any measures to increase protection, education, and resources for trans students\" and argues that the policies will help transgender youth feel \"much safer\" in schools. This is a clear endorsement of the regulation's goals and implementation.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","mental health","transgender students","school support"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I oppose this initiative in the strongest form possible\" and argues it should not be adopted. They also warn it \"will be challenged in litigation,\" reinforcing clear opposition rather than a request for modification.","tone":"negative","tags":["religious freedom","student safety","bathroom access","locker rooms","teacher burden"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly oppose the policies\" and argues against allowing students to use bathrooms and locker rooms based on their \"gender identity.\" They also object to privacy, parental notification, and compelled compliance with beliefs, concluding, \"This is wrong!\"","tone":"negative","tags":["bathroom access","locker rooms","privacy","parental rights","religious freedom"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I fully support legislation promoting the well-being of trans individuals,\" which directly endorses the regulation. They also argue that trans children deserve \"a safe space to learn,\" reinforcing support for the policy's goals of protection and inclusion.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","bullying prevention","safe learning environment"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly oppose this being forced on our children\" and asks, \"Please do not force our children down this road.\" They frame the policy as an unwanted \"agenda\" and argue against it being imposed on students statewide.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","parental rights","gender identity","student safety","medical transition"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.93,"stance_rationale":"The comment title, \"TRANS STUDENTS MATTER,\" and the body, \"all students matter,\" indicate approval of the policy’s inclusive treatment of transgender students. It does not raise objections or request weakening of the regulation.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student rights","nondiscrimination"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I am strongly opposed to this policy\" and repeatedly argues against adoption, urging that trans youth use staff/admin bathrooms instead. The comment frames the policy as harmful and \"poor and misguided,\" indicating rejection rather than support or neutrality.","tone":"negative","tags":["bathroom access","privacy","sex-based facilities","parental rights","transgender students"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly oppose the transgender bill being introduced for public schools,\" which clearly rejects the proposed policy. The title, \"Strongly oppose transgender bill,\" reinforces the same position.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender policy","public schools","opposition"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly endorses the policy’s purpose by saying \"protect trans kids!\" and that \"trans kids deserve to have love and support from their community, especially in schools.\" This is a clear call for supportive school policies for transgender students.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student support","school climate"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"FULLY SUPPORT!!!!\" and states they \"fully believe that transgender students should have all rights, opportunities, and protections\". This clearly endorses adopting the regulation and its protections for transgender students.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","nondiscrimination","school protections"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.97,"stance_rationale":"The commenter calls the proposal a \"misguided\" set of \"proposals and policies\" and urges officials to \"listen to the concerned parents and citizens,\" indicating opposition to adoption. The statement that it is an \"inappropriate subject for classroom\" and fear that great-grandchildren may have to \"go elsewhere\" further shows rejection of the regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","transgender students","school policy","education content"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly states \"Full support of inclusive policies!\" and repeatedly endorses protecting transgender youth and embracing gender diversity. The comment argues that the policies are needed to create \"a safe space\" and to \"protect these young trans citizens,\" indicating clear approval of the regulation.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","anti-discrimination","transgender students"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.97,"stance_rationale":"The commenter calls the proposal a \"misguided\" set of \"policies re: transgender education\" and says it is an \"inappropriate subject for classroom,\" indicating rejection of the regulation. They also urge officials to \"listen to the concerned parents and citizens\" and express fear that children may be affected, which supports opposition.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","transgender education","school policy","student welfare"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I oppose indoctrination of any gender issues in public education,\" which indicates rejection of the proposed transgender student policies. The wording targets the regulation’s subject matter rather than asking for clarification or offering neutral input.","tone":"negative","tags":["gender identity","public education","indoctrination"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly support any measures to increase protection, education, and resources for trans students\" and adds that allowing schools more options will help trans youth \"feel much safer.\" This is a clear endorsement of the proposed policies.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","mental health","transgender students","school support"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I fully and unequivocally support\" the policy and describes it as \"critically necessary\". They frame it as protecting \"the health and well-being of transgender students\" and creating \"equitable, safe, non-discriminatory, and fair environments.\"","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","nondiscrimination","equity"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Hugely Support!!!\" and adds \"Trans lives always matter!!,\" which clearly endorses the regulation’s purpose and treatment of transgender students. There is no opposing language or ambiguity.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","transgender students","nondiscrimination"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly states, \"I SUPPORT!!!!!!\" which directly endorses adoption of the proposed policies. The title, \"Transgender Student Inclusiveness,\" also aligns with approval of the regulation.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","transgender students","school policy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter rejects the policy as \"crazy\" and questions its basis: \"Where is the science behind this crazy set of rules?\" They also argue that the accommodations are inadequate and imply the regulation should not be adopted as written, saying it \"does not meet even the minimum standard of 'help.'\"","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","science/evidence","school policy","student support"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I support LGBTQIA+ rights\" and urges adoption of the plan by asking opponents to \"come up with an alternative\" that can provide the same protections. The final line, \"progressive ideas that help everyone!\" further indicates clear support for the regulation.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","anti-bullying","trans rights","school policy"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly support this policy GUIDANCE,\" which directly endorses adoption. They also frame it as helpful direction for schools to \"best support each and every one of their students,\" reinforcing approval.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student support","school guidance"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly urges officials to \"Stop and modify this policy\" and condemns it as \"evil, insane\" and \"totalitarian,\" indicating clear opposition to adoption as written. They only endorse a narrow anti-bullying component, while rejecting the broader transgender policy and claiming it harms children and excludes parents.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender policies","parental rights","student safety","bullying prevention","child welfare"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"Oppose this policy!\" and argues the proposal is harmful, calling transgender identity \"a lie\" and \"abuse.\" They also claim it violates First Amendment rights, indicating they want the policy rejected rather than adopted.","tone":"negative","tags":["religious freedom","parental rights","free speech","LGBTQ+ inclusion"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says they are \"in support of the guidance laid out\" and thanks those who worked on it. They also reject opposition arguments and affirm that \"Trans rights are human rights,\" indicating clear approval of adoption.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","transgender rights","student support","nondiscrimination"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says they \"fully support the rights of transgender and non-binary students\" and endorses protections against \"discrimination, harassment or bullying.\" They also state that every student should feel \"acceptance, support, encouragement, and safety,\" which aligns with adopting the policy.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","bullying prevention","non-discrimination"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"overall, I support this guidance\" and adds that the policy \"does a good job of covering\" treatment by teachers, administrators, and other students. The only reservation is a limited concern about schools mediating parent-child relationships, but it does not outweigh the clear endorsement of the guidance.","tone":"mixed","tags":["transgender students","parental rights","student privacy","school facilities","LGBTQ+ inclusion"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"strongly support!\" and urges, \"Protect students!!\" This clearly endorses adoption of the transgender student policies as a way to protect all students' rights and safety.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","trans rights","nondiscrimination"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"STRONGLY OPPOSE!!\" and \"PLEASE VOTE NO,\" making their position clear. They also call the policy \"a horrible idea\" and argue it threatens \"the privacy and rights of all the kids who aren’t trans,\" indicating rejection of the regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":["privacy","parental rights","LGBTQ+ inclusion","sex education","student rights"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I fully support the protection of the health and well-being of transgender students in Virginia public schools.\" This is a clear endorsement of the proposed policies and their purpose.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","transgender students"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly urges approval with \"SUPPORT!!!!!\" and says \"PROTECT TRANS STUDENTS!!!\" indicating clear endorsement of the regulation. The body frames the policy as necessary to \"keep a student safe,\" which aligns with supporting adoption.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","anti-discrimination","transgender students"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I support this bill!\" and frames the policy as helping students \"feel safe and supported to be whoever they are.\" This is a clear endorsement of adoption.","tone":"positive","tags":["student safety","LGBTQ+ inclusion","supportive schools"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"VERY STRONGLY SUPPORT\" and urges, \"TRANS STUDENTS ARE STILL STUDENTS LET THEM LEARN ! Protect them!!!\" This clearly endorses the regulation and its protections for transgender students.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student rights","student safety","privacy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly oppose\" and repeatedly argues the policy \"should not be allowed\" and \"is not a decision to even be considered.\" They frame the regulation as harmful, claiming it \"promotes division,\" \"discriminates against the core beliefs,\" and will have a \"far more negative effect on society than positive.\"","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","parental rights","religious freedom","school policy","social impact"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"strongly support\" and \"Please adopt the model.\" They also endorse the policy’s purpose, stating it will \"provide transgender children the guidance and support needed\" and that \"All children deserve to be respected and included.\"","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student support","nondiscrimination","privacy"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"SUPPORT SUPPORT SUPPORT\" and urges to \"PROTECT trans students!\" This clearly endorses adoption of the regulation and its protections for transgender students.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","nondiscrimination"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly endorses the policy’s protections for transgender students, arguing there is \"no rational reason\" to deny their needs and that trans children are \"entitled to the same amount of care as cisgender children.\" This is a clear call for support of the regulation’s goals around restroom access and staff support.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student privacy","bathroom access","student support"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Absolutely support the model policies for transgender students\" and the title states \"ADAMANTLY AND STRONGLY SUPPORT TRANS STUDENTS.\" This is a clear endorsement of adopting the regulation.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","transgender students","school policy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.93,"stance_rationale":"The commenter says transgender students “should not be bullied or mistreated,” but then argues that “other children” should not be exposed to “upsetting and confusing situations” and says they may move grandchildren to private schools “to protect them.” The closing complaint, “Where is the common sense?”, signals disapproval of the proposed policies as written.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","parental rights","school choice","student rights"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly support a bill that seeks to protect and support our transgender community and youth.\" The rest of the comment reinforces approval of protections for transgender students and argues they \"deserve the same protected rights.\"","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","transgender rights","student safety","nondiscrimination"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Support trans kids\" and calls for \"Equal rights for all,\" which clearly endorses the regulation’s protective approach toward transgender students. The phrase \"End hatred\" further indicates approval of policies that reduce discrimination and support inclusion.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","equal rights","student safety","anti-discrimination"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I am opposed to this bill\" and concludes that \"this should not be an issue for schools at all.\" They argue the policy is a \"distraction\" and object to bathroom/locker room access and gender-related accommodations for minors.","tone":"negative","tags":["bathroom access","locker room privacy","parental rights","student privacy","transgender students"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I disagree with this\" and the title is \"Strongly oppose,\" indicating rejection of the regulation. The reference to \"how God created male and female\" shows opposition to the transgender student policies on religious grounds, even while expressing personal kindness.","tone":"negative","tags":["religious freedom","LGBTQ+ inclusion","transgender students","school policy"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly in support of an inclusive policy that protects the well being of all children,\" which clearly endorses adoption of the regulation. The second sentence is also supportive of the policy's inclusion of transgender students, despite criticizing opponents.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student well-being","nondiscrimination"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The comment explicitly says \"TRANS RIGHTS ARE HUMAN RIGHTS\" twice, which strongly signals approval of the transgender student policies and support for protections for trans students. There is no language opposing or questioning the regulation.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","transgender rights","student rights"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly support\" and frames the policy as protecting children: \"Our children deserve protection and respect.\" The phrase \"trans rights are human rights\" clearly endorses the regulation's purpose.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student rights","anti-discrimination","student safety"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter is explicitly \"100% Against This\" and argues that \"Hiding things from them would just create distrust,\" indicating opposition to the transgender student policies. The statement that they \"would not put my child in public schools if that was the case\" reinforces rejection of the regulation as written.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","student privacy","transgender students","public schools"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly support this!\" which directly endorses adoption of the policy. The follow-up, \"Please protect our children!\" reinforces support for the regulation’s protective aims.","tone":"positive","tags":["student safety","transgender students","supportive learning environment"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"i strongly support this\" and argues there is \"no reason not to have policies that support all types of students.\" They also defend the policy against criticism by saying it does not \"encourage transgenderedness and LGBTQ+ behavior.\"","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student respect","anti-discrimination","transgender students"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The title \"TRANS RIGHTS ARE HUMAN RIGHTS\" is a clear endorsement of protections for transgender students and, by implication, support for the proposed policies. There is no language opposing the regulation or asking for changes that would weaken it.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","transgender rights","student rights"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The comment explicitly says \"Strongly oppose,\" which clearly indicates rejection of the proposed regulation. No additional context is provided to suggest any nuance or support for modifications.","tone":"negative","tags":[]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly support\" and argues that \"Every child deserves to be free of harassment and discrimination in schools.\" They further state that \"Trans children need protection\" and criticize those who oppose the policy, indicating clear approval of the regulation.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","bullying prevention","nondiscrimination","mental health"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I support this fully\" and asks, \"Please move to approve this guidance.\" They also endorse the policy’s purpose by stating that \"Trans children, and all children, deserve to learn in an environment where they are fully respected and safe.\"","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","privacy","anonymous comments"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly endorses transgender rights and non-discrimination, saying \"They should not be discriminated against for who they are\" and concluding \"Trans Rights are Human Rights.\" This clearly supports adopting the regulation’s protections for transgender students.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","non-discrimination","student safety","mental health"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I oppose those measures,\" indicating rejection of the proposed policies. Although they add that \"Transgenders must be respected,\" the statement \"but not promoted\" shows opposition to the regulation’s supportive treatment framework.","tone":"negative","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","transgender students","school policy","student respect"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The comment explicitly says \"VOTE NO!\", which is a direct call to reject the regulation. The phrase \"Science deniers believe in more than 2 genders!\" is derogatory and indicates opposition to the transgender student policies.","tone":"negative","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","gender identity","school policy"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly support\" and adds that they \"will defend trans/ human rights,\" which clearly endorses adoption of the policy. There is no indication of opposition or neutrality.","tone":"positive","tags":["transgender rights","human rights","LGBTQ+ inclusion"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly Support!!!\" and defends the policies as protecting children and transgender students. They argue against opponents and justify withholding information from parents in cases where parents may be violent or reject a trans child.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","parental rights","student safety","privacy","religious freedom"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"We should highly support trans children\" and argues that children should \"feel comfortable and accepted.\" The comment endorses education and acceptance, which aligns with adopting the proposed transgender student policies.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student support","school climate","transgender students"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly oppose these guidelines for Transgender students.\" Although they acknowledge that \"transgender students have rights,\" the overall position is against adoption because they question \"the rights of other students who will be affected.\"","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","student rights","parental rights","school policy"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Support support support\" and adds \"Schools should too,\" indicating clear approval of the proposed transgender student policies. The statement \"Science and medicine support trans people\" provides a brief justification for adopting the regulation.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","transgender students","school policy"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I fully support this!\" and adds, \"We need to support Trans youth,\" which clearly endorses adoption of the regulation. There is no indication of opposition or neutrality.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","transgender students","student support"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Support trans children!\" and urges adoption of \"gender affirming schools and communities\". They also state that a \"safer, more supportive, and evidence-based environment in schools will benefit all children,\" which clearly endorses the regulation's goals.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","gender affirmation","school climate"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly oppose!!!\" and states that the policy is \"an infringement on the rights and safety of our children,\" which clearly rejects adoption of the regulation. The language indicates opposition rather than a request for modification or a neutral observation.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","student safety","transgender policies"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I DO NOT support the upcoming policy\" and argues schools should \"stop this nonsense,\" indicating clear opposition to adoption. They also frame the policy as government overreach that would \"take our rights away when it comes to our children.\"","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","transgender students","school curriculum","government overreach"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I support this guidance\" and \"encourage further learning, teaching, and understanding\" of trans and gender-diverse students' needs. The comment frames the policy as helping create a \"safe(r) learning environment\" and protecting students from abuse and mistreatment.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","anti-bullying","dignity and respect","safe learning environment"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly labels the submission \"Opposed\" and argues against \"encouraging children to change their sex altogether.\" They prefer a broader acceptance of gender-nonconforming children without transgender-specific policies, asking why not support them as their birth sex instead of a path to \"hormones and surgeries and sterility.\"","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","gender identity","parental rights","medical transition","school policy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly rejects the proposal, saying \"There is no way this can be allowed\" and calling the ideas \"way to[o] extreme.\" They also frame it as an unwanted \"liberal agenda,\" indicating opposition to adoption of the regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","LGBTQ+ inclusion","parental rights","political ideology"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"STRONGLY SUPPORT\" and reinforces it with \"Trans rights are human rights,\" indicating clear approval of the proposed policies. There is no language suggesting opposition or neutrality.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","transgender rights","civil rights"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly argues the policy should be delayed and rejected, saying the State should \"get this drivel out of our laws and policies\" and that the government has \"no business in this arena.\" They also criticize the document as scientifically flawed and accuse it of overstepping into parental authority, indicating clear opposition to adoption of the regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","scientific validity","government overreach","transgender policy","school authority"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly support this bill,\" which directly indicates approval of the regulation. The rest of the comment reinforces that position by arguing trans students should receive \"the same basic respect\" and rejecting opposition to it.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student rights","nondiscrimination"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Oppose\" and argues the policy is \"misguided\" and will \"all it will do\" is cause harm. They list multiple objections, including privacy, parental rights, and safety concerns, indicating they do not want the regulation adopted.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","privacy","student safety","transgender policy","predatory concerns"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says the policy is \"a wonderful start\" and states \"I am in FULL SUPPORT of this policy!\" They also argue it is \"necessary for students,\" indicating clear approval of adoption.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student support","nondiscrimination","school policy"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The comment explicitly says \"SUPPORT TRANS STUDENTS\" and the title \"Trans Rights are Human Rights\" clearly endorses the proposed transgender student policies. There is no language opposing or questioning the regulation.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","transgender students","student rights"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly oppose!\" and \"I TOTALLY DISAGREE WITH ALL THIS!\" They object to a transgender student using shared facilities, saying their daughter should not have to \"see a boy in a locker room or restroom\" and that this is \"a parent choice PERIOD.\"","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","bathroom access","locker rooms","religious freedom","LGBTQ+ inclusion"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly Support\" and urges officials to \"do what is right\" and \"give all children the same treatment\" in favor of transgender youth. They frame opposition as harmful and advocate for the regulation as a means to protect transgender children and their rights.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","transgender students","student rights","nondiscrimination","student support"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly states \"Full support\" and adds the reason \"protect trans kids,\" which clearly endorses adopting the regulation. There is no opposing language or ambiguity.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","transgender students"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.93,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly rejects the policy with the title \"Absolutely Not\" and the body \"Way the extreme,\" indicating they want the regulation rejected or substantially weakened. No supportive language or request for modification is present.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","school policy","opposition"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Support the model policies\" and praises them as \"thoughtful\" guidance that helps schools comply with nondiscrimination law and create a \"safe and supportive learning environment.\" They also state the policy will \"make a concrete difference in improving the lives of young people,\" indicating clear approval of adoption.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","nondiscrimination","privacy","parental support"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I do not agree with the model policies for transgender students in VA schools,\" and argues against bathroom access and participation in female sports. They frame the policies as harmful and a \"slippery slope,\" indicating opposition to adoption of the regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":["bathroom access","school sports","privacy","transgender students","parental rights"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I firmly disagree with this policy\" and argues against it as \"not the solution\". They object to perceived effects such as overriding parental consent and dividing or ostracizing those with different religious or cultural views.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","religious freedom","transgender policy","privacy","student safety"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says that \"passing legislation to protect transgender youth\" is \"extremely necessary\" and concludes that \"legislation to protect transgender youth against discrimination is so important.\" The comment argues against opposition to the policy and in favor of protections for transgender students.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender rights","anti-discrimination","student safety","bullying prevention","privacy"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly argues that \"we must protect them and support them\" and says \"Supporting transgender students' rights will protect their safety.\" The comment endorses the policy’s purpose of protecting trans youth from bullying, misgendering, and harm in schools.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","bullying prevention","mental health","transgender students"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"We kindly oppose these policies\" and calls the draft \"really extreme.\" They also argue the policies could lead to \"sexual violence and bullying\" and insist that \"Parents should always know\" how schools are influencing children, indicating rejection of the regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","student safety","bullying prevention","privacy","transgender policies"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"Oppose this extreme policy\" and asks to \"stop trying to inject controversial political viewpoints into the school,\" which clearly rejects adoption of the regulation. The reference to it \"confusing and hurting children\" reinforces opposition rather than support or neutrality.","tone":"negative","tags":["politics in schools","student wellbeing","transgender policy","controversial content"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I support the right of all students to go to school without fear of persecution\" and \"I also support the right of students to transition and identify however they feel at school,\" which clearly endorses the policy's protections. The closing plea, \"Please do not let transphobes run this discussion,\" further indicates approval of the regulation's transgender protections.","tone":"positive","tags":["transgender protections","student safety","LGBTQ+ inclusion","bullying prevention","school support"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly titles the submission \"Strongly Support\" and says it is the school's duty to protect \"all of its students\". They also endorse naming protections for \"trans/queer students\" and state that students deserve to be safe being themselves, which clearly supports adoption of the policy.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","nondiscrimination","privacy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly rejects the policy, writing \"Absolutely not! NO to the new transgender policy.\" This is a clear call against adoption with no qualifying support or alternative proposal.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender policy","school policy","LGBTQ+ inclusion"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I do not approve of the proposed guidelines\" and opens with \"Strongly Oppose.\" They argue the policies would erase sex distinctions and create privacy and bathroom/locker room problems, indicating rejection of the regulation rather than support for it.","tone":"negative","tags":["privacy","bathroom access","locker rooms","gender identity","parental rights"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.72,"stance_rationale":"The title \"Absolutely Not\" strongly signals rejection of the proposed policies. The body adds \"There needs to be other ideas considered,\" which implies the commenter does not want these regulations adopted as written and prefers alternatives.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","policy opposition","alternative approaches"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I Support This Guidance\" and \"I fully stand by protecting our trans students and gender non-conforming students with everything we can.\" The body repeatedly endorses the policy goals of respect, self-expression, and protection from harm, indicating clear approval of the regulation.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","anti-bullying","privacy","self-expression"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly Disagree with this!\" and rejects the policy. The statement \"We as parents have this right to say no!\" indicates opposition to adopting the regulation as written.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","transgender students","school policy"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"SUPPORT!\" and argues that \"It is essential to support all students\" and respect \"everyone's identity.\" This clearly endorses adoption of the proposed transgender student policies.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student support","nondiscrimination","respect for identity"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I do not agree with this at all\" and \"STRONGLY DISAGREE!!\" They argue against shared bathrooms/changing rooms for transgender students and say, \"Kids DO NOT need transgender polices,\" indicating rejection of the regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":["bathroom access","changing rooms","religious freedom","transgender policies","student safety"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.97,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"strongly oppose\" and rejects the premise of the policy by stating \"there are only 2 sexes.\" The mention of privacy and protection appears as a general objection rather than support for the regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":["sex-based policies","privacy","transgender students","school facilities"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.95,"stance_rationale":"The commenter argues that schools and the state do not have the right to exclude parents from decisions about children and says parental authority is \"the sole prerogative of their parents,\" which directly conflicts with guidance that may limit parental involvement in transgender-related decisions. The language about rights being \"abused\" and foundations being weakened indicates opposition to the policy as written.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","student privacy","school policy","transgender students"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly labels the submission \"SUPPORT\" and says it is \"very important\" that youth are sent to \"a safe and inclusive environment for all.\" This clearly endorses adopting the regulation as written or in principle.","tone":"positive","tags":["student safety","inclusion","LGBTQ+ inclusion"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I disagree with this policy\" and titles the comment \"Do not support.\" They argue it infringes on \"the rights of Parents,\" oppose shared facilities, and say transgender accommodation \"should not be forced,\" indicating rejection of the regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","bathroom access","locker rooms","privacy","LGBTQ+ inclusion"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I STRONGLY SUPPORT any efforts to protect transgender and gender diverse persons\" and hopes Virginia \"continues to support and reinforce safety for these communities.\" The comment endorses the regulation’s purpose and cites medical evidence in favor of it.","tone":"positive","tags":["transgender rights","student safety","LGBTQ+ inclusion","mental health","nondiscrimination"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"STRONGLY AGREE,\" which clearly supports the regulation. The body reinforces approval by stating that transgender people \"are no different from us\" and that \"gender is a social construct,\" aligning with the policy's inclusive treatment of transgender students.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","transgender students","nondiscrimination"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says they are \"in STRONG support of any and all laws pertaining to the protection of transgender people\" and says they hope lawmakers adopt these protections. The comment repeatedly endorses the proposed protections as necessary for transgender students' safety and rights.","tone":"positive","tags":["transgender rights","student safety","LGBTQ+ inclusion","anti-discrimination","mental health"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I am in strong support of these efforts\" and repeatedly urges protection for \"transgender/non-binary and gender non-conforming students.\" The comment asks to \"protect these shining children,\" indicating clear approval of adopting the regulation.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","anti-bullying","privacy","supportive school climate"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly endorses the policy, saying \"This bill could help save lives\" and \"This bill is just the beginning\" of reducing suicide rates for trans individuals. They describe personal experiences of harassment and assault to argue for stronger protections for transgender students.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","bullying prevention","mental health","school climate"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"Strongly Oppose! Vote NO\" and repeats \"Vote NO on the proposed transgender policy changes.\" They argue the changes \"undermine the rights of parents, teachers, and school administrators\" and \"harm our children,\" indicating clear rejection of adoption.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","transgender policy","school governance","student safety"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The comment explicitly says \"Support transgender people,\" which clearly endorses the policy direction. The statement that \"Transgendered people are no different from us\" and that \"gender is a social construct\" further signals agreement with the regulation's inclusive treatment of transgender students.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","transgender rights","student equality"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly states, \"I do not support,\" which directly indicates opposition to the proposed regulation. No additional context suggests any nuance or conditional support.","tone":"negative","tags":[]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"OPPOSED!\" and repeatedly urges rejection of the policy, calling it \"insanity,\" \"criminal,\" and \"tripe\" that should not be \"foisting this ... on our children.\" The comment clearly argues against adopting the transgender student policies and demands the authors be fired.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","LGBTQ+ inclusion","student privacy","school policy","parental rights"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly support the rights of transgender youth in our schools!\" and argues that schools and the state should \"protect the vulnerable\" through these policies. The comment rejects opposing arguments and endorses the regulation's purpose of supporting transgender students.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student rights","student safety","parental rights","anti-discrimination"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I support this measure,\" which directly endorses adoption of the regulation. The explanation that \"Trans children need the support and validation that every other child gets\" reinforces approval of the policy's purpose.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student support","transgender students"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly states, \"I support the guidance.\" This is a direct endorsement of the proposed regulation with no qualifications or objections.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","transgender students","school policy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly begins with \"Opposed\" and repeatedly argues the bill should not proceed, saying \"this bill should be tabled\" unless accommodations are changed. They object to transgender students' access to shared facilities and frame the policy as a safety risk and \"slippery slope\" for predators.","tone":"negative","tags":["bathroom access","student safety","privacy","parental rights","transgender students"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says it is \"inappropriate to mandate certain behaviors in schools K-12\" and argues the proposed policies \"will, in effect, force\" students to disclose gender identity too early. They conclude that the policies are not wisely tailored and that implementation \"will invite more harm than good,\" indicating opposition to adoption.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","student privacy","parental rights","school implementation","LGBTQ+ education"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter clearly rejects the policy, calling it \"absolutely ridiculous\" and saying \"No!!\" multiple times. They also object to \"allowing this in schools of children\" and express resistance to anyone trying to \"take my kids for this,\" indicating opposition to the regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","parental rights","school policy","student privacy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly rejects the regulation with \"Absolutely NO!!!\" and \"Absolutely No!\". The statement \"This shouldn’t even be a topic!\" indicates they do not want the policy considered or adopted.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","policy opposition"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I think this policy definitely oversteps parental rights\" and refers to \"many disturbing proposed policies within the draft,\" indicating opposition to adoption. Although they state support for transgender people and children's wellbeing, the overall position is against the policy because of concerns about school authority and withholding information from parents.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","privacy","transgender students","school policy","student wellbeing"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"do NOT support this\" and repeatedly urges rejection, arguing the policy would create a \"totalitarianism environment\" and make teachers \"judge and jury\" in family matters. They also state \"Do NOT MAKE OUR JOB MORE DIFFICULT!\" and that transgender issues are \"not a problem to be solved in SCHOOL,\" indicating clear opposition to adoption.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","parental rights","teacher workload","school authority","constitutional concerns"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I am in support of Transgender rights\" and supports \"any policies made that benefit their well being and quality of life.\" This is a clear endorsement of the proposed transgender student policies.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","transgender rights","student well-being"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I completely support\" and adds that it is \"a necessary legislation for every school to have.\" This is a clear endorsement of adopting the regulation.","tone":"positive","tags":["transgender students","school policy","LGBTQ+ inclusion"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"We need protections for all LGBT students within the school system\" and supports the policy as \"a good place to start.\" The comment argues the regulation is necessary to prevent bullying, outing, and harm to transgender students, indicating clear approval of stronger protections.","tone":"negative","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","bullying prevention","privacy","parental rights"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I am opposed to presenting such options to pre-adolescent children,\" and argues that students are \"too young to decide to change their genders.\" This clearly rejects the proposed transgender student policies rather than supporting them with changes.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","gender identity","parental concerns","student age","school policy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly Opposed\" and argues the policy is government overreach, calling it \"a slippery slope\" and \"bordering on Communist.\" They also say sharing it with younger students is \"cruel\" and liken it to potential abuse, indicating clear rejection of the regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":["government overreach","transgender students","parental rights","student age appropriateness","school guidance"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly rejects the policy, saying \"Enough\" and \"Just teach core curriculum\" while criticizing the guidance as \"Orwell's 1984\" and accusing it of protecting a child from their parent. The quoted passage about not notifying parents is used as evidence against the regulation, indicating they want it stopped rather than adopted.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","transgender students","privacy","school policy","teacher role"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly states \"strong opposition to the proposed VDOE rule changes\" and argues that transgender-related decisions should be left to families rather than schools. They also say school-aged children should not make this \"life-changing decision\" and frame the policy as inappropriate for school administrators to handle.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","religious freedom","transgender students","school policy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly argues the policies will \"cause immeasurable harm\" and says the state would be \"much better advised to wait\" rather than implement them. They object to privacy, parental rights, pronoun use, athletics, and legality concerns, all indicating opposition to adoption.","tone":"negative","tags":["privacy","parental rights","religious freedom","school sports","First Amendment"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"In full support\" and argues that \"The policies outlined here will ensure\" students are safe and supported. They endorse the regulation as a way to protect trans and non-binary students from bullying and harassment.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","bullying prevention","school climate","transgender students"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says they \"appreciate\" the document, found it \"well written and inclusive,\" and asks for additions and refinements rather than rejection. Their suggestions aim to strengthen implementation, such as \"professional development for educators\" and \"safe spaces within schools.\"","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","transgender students","teacher training","student safety","safe spaces"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I commend the Department of Education on taking this step\" and praises the guidelines as making schools \"welcoming, safe, and supportive for all students.\" The comment argues the policies align with pediatric recommendations and improve child mental health, indicating clear approval of adoption.","tone":"positive","tags":["student safety","mental health","LGBTQ+ inclusion","bullying prevention","school climate"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I oppose your plan for transgender students\" and states, \"I do not support this laissez faire approach.\" Although they briefly say, \"I applaud your efforts to help these students,\" the overall position is clearly against the proposed policies.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","parental rights","religious freedom","school policy"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I am writing in support of the Model Policies\" and repeatedly endorses the rule as making schools \"a better place to learn\" and \"safe and welcoming\" for transgender and nonbinary students. The comment argues the policy promotes equal access, dignity, and protection from bullying and discrimination.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","bullying prevention","nondiscrimination","mental health"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly endorses protections for transgender students, saying schools should be \"a safe space\" and that there are \"necessary steps to take in order to protect transgender persons.\" The closing plea, \"Please protect our adolescent population,\" supports adopting the policy.","tone":"positive","tags":["student safety","transgender students","safe schools","LGBTQ+ inclusion"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly titles the remark \"Strong Support\" and says protective measures like those suggested by VDOE \"are a step towards creating safe and inclusive spaces.\" The comment endorses the regulation as a response to discrimination and mental health harms faced by trans youth.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","mental health","anti-discrimination"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The comment explicitly says \"Reject Totalitarian Policy Proposals,\" which is a direct call to reject the regulation. It provides no supporting details or suggested amendments, only opposition.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","school policy","government overreach"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly oppose this unbalanced approach to transgender,\" indicating clear rejection of the proposed policy. The rest of the comment argues against accommodating transgender students and says, \"The government cannot protect everyone and every feeling,\" reinforcing opposition rather than support or neutrality.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","religious freedom","parental rights","school policy"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly argues that \"making school a safer space\" is beneficial and says trans students \"deserve to live,\" indicating clear support for the policy's protections. They also state that \"a more inclusive environment can improve life for all students,\" which endorses adoption of the regulation.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","mental health","pronouns","school climate"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly argues that transgender students should be protected, saying \"Trans students are students\" and that failing to protect them \"would be disgraceful.\" They also state the policy \"would help change students lives, and even save lives,\" which clearly supports adoption of the regulation.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","mental health","equal rights"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"Delete entire section\" and \"Remove delete this section,\" indicating they want the policy rejected or removed. They also object that \"In no way should parents be questioned in raising their children,\" which directly opposes the guidance on handling transgender students and parental acceptance issues.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","transgender students","child protective services","school policy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"Stop Transgender\" and calls it \"morally wrong and child abuse,\" which clearly rejects the proposed transgender student policies. There is no indication of support or neutrality.","tone":"negative","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student rights","child welfare"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I support any move toward leveling the playing field for students\" and frames the regulation as helping transgender youth feel safer and supported. The comment consistently endorses the policy's goals of support, safety, and affirmation for transgender students.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","mental health","school support","equity"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I support transgender rights\" and frames the policy as a \"human rights issue.\" They also express approval of providing \"all our children a place to thrive,\" which aligns with adopting the regulation.","tone":"positive","tags":["transgender rights","student safety","LGBTQ+ inclusion","human rights"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly support these guidelines\" and argues they \"strengthen and broaden protections\" for transgender youth. They also call the guidelines \"commonsensical and long overdue,\" indicating clear approval of adoption.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","privacy","mental health","nondiscrimination"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I support these guidelines\" and urges that Virginia \"should adopt [them] as soon as possible.\" They also frame the policy as necessary to protect LGBTQ youth, prevent harassment and discrimination, and provide a safe learning environment.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","bullying prevention","human rights","nondiscrimination"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"This should be a given\" and that \"this policy will help\" protect transgender students from bullying and harassment. They also reject efforts to weaken it, stating that any attempt to invalidate rights or identities \"has no place in a school.\"","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","bullying prevention","nondiscrimination","school climate"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I am opposed to the guidelines being suggested dealing with transgender students\" and argues the proposal will \"lead to further discrimination.\" They also reject \"special circumstances for one group of students\" and suggest a different approach instead, indicating opposition to adoption as written.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","discrimination","bullying prevention","student rights","special accommodations"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I oppose the policies being pushed forward,\" which directly rejects adoption of the regulation. The statement that they are \"pulling my child out of public school in part due to policies like this\" reinforces opposition to the policy direction.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender policies","public schools","parental rights","school choice"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"Please please please remove this requirement\" and frames the policy as harmful to \"a majority of students.\" They object to transgender students using shared facilities and argue it creates discomfort and safety risks for girls.","tone":"negative","tags":["bathroom access","locker rooms","student safety","parental rights","privacy"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I heavily support\" the proposal and calls it \"A long needed proposal.\" They also endorse equal care for all children and support for children who have experienced bias, which aligns with the regulation's anti-discrimination and supportive-environment goals.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","anti-discrimination","bullying prevention"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I fully support legislation needed to promote the health and well-being of trans youth,\" which clearly endorses the regulation. The title \"Fully Support\" reinforces that the commenter wants the policy adopted.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student well-being","transgender students","supportive policies"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly support this\" and describes it as \"a great step in the right direction.\" The statement that \"EVERYONE deserves to feel safe\" indicates approval of the regulation's purpose and adoption.","tone":"positive","tags":["student safety","LGBTQ+ inclusion","nondiscrimination","supportive learning environment"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly rejects the policy, saying it is \"NOT the role of the schools\" and that supporting transgender students' wishes is \"criminal.\" They object to restroom/locker room access, parental notification limits, and the inclusion of \"LGBT ideology\" in schools.","tone":"negative","tags":["bathroom access","privacy","parental rights","LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly oppose\" and argues the policies \"will not help\" and \"will harm\" most students. They also reject removing sex-segregated bathrooms, stating that \"girls/female only and boys/male only bathrooms must not be removed.\"","tone":"negative","tags":["bathroom access","sex-segregated facilities","parental rights","student privacy","LGBTQ+ inclusion"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"cutting off parental knowledge and input is unacceptable\" and that the policy \"appears to aim to cut parents out of decisions\" with \"life altering effects.\" Although they affirm that transgender children should be treated \"with compassion and understanding\" and that bullying should not be tolerated, the overall thrust is opposition to the policy as written because of parental rights concerns.","tone":"mixed","tags":["parental rights","privacy","transgender students","student welfare","medical consent"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The comment explicitly says \"OPPOSE\" in both the title and body, indicating clear rejection of the proposed regulation. No supporting reasons or qualifications are provided.","tone":"negative","tags":[]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I oppose the proposed legislation\" and repeatedly argues against it on safety, fairness, parental consent, and liability grounds. They call it \"a lawsuit waiting to happen\" and say they would not support officials who promote it.","tone":"negative","tags":["bathroom access","parental rights","school sports","student safety","privacy"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly labels the comment \"SUPPORT\" and repeatedly affirms the policy goals by saying students \"deserve to feel safe and included\" and that they \"support you, I love you, and I believe in you.\" This is clear endorsement of the regulation’s intent to protect transgender students.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","supportive environment","anti-bullying"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Very strong support\" and argues the policy should be implemented because it would \"provide a more supportive and productive environment\" and \"help save children’s lives.\" The comment clearly endorses the regulation’s adoption and its protections for transgender students.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","mental health","anti-discrimination","supportive school environment"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly OPPOSE this\" and repeats \"I STRONGLY OPPOSE.\" They argue the policy will \"cause confusion,\" create \"abuse in bathrooms and locker rooms,\" and is \"a sexual agenda,\" all of which indicate rejection of the regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","bathroom access","school privacy","LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I support this bill\" and endorses its anti-bullying purpose. The phrase \"support stopping any kind of bullying in our school system\" indicates approval of the regulation's goals.","tone":"positive","tags":["bullying prevention","student safety","LGBTQ+ inclusion"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly labels the submission \"Strong support\" and says \"This type of policy is necessary\". They argue it will reduce mental health harms and bullying and that parents are informed, which clearly endorses adoption of the policy.","tone":"positive","tags":["mental health","bullying prevention","transgender students","parental rights","privacy"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"I Strongly Support\" and argues that \"all youth have a human right to feel safe in schools.\" They further endorse policies that promote safety and justice, indicating clear approval of the regulation.","tone":"positive","tags":["student safety","LGBTQ+ inclusion","nondiscrimination","school climate"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I disapprove of this radical push,\" indicating rejection of the proposed transgender student policies. The reference to \"brainwashing of our children and grandchildren\" further shows opposition to adoption of the regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","parental rights","LGBTQ+ inclusion","school policy"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly support this\" and repeatedly endorses the policy’s goals of safety and support for trans students. They argue against objections to restroom/locker room access and conclude that \"all trans kids deserve love and support and to feel safe in school and at home.\"","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","privacy","bathroom access","supportive school environment"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"Oppose\" and states they \"Oppose lack of Privacy and Endangerment\" in the policy. They argue the policy is \"not a just or fair solution\" and object to bathroom access, saying it is \"ridiculous that anyone can enter the girl's bathroom without being questioned.\"","tone":"negative","tags":["privacy","bathroom access","parental rights","student safety"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly OPPOSE this\" and repeats \"I STRONGLY OPPOSE.\" They argue the policy will \"cause confusion,\" create \"abuse in bathrooms and locker rooms,\" and should not be implemented in schools.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender policy","bathroom access","locker rooms","parental rights","education policy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I oppose forcing... everyone to accept this draconian agenda\" and objects to boys using girls' bathrooms and pronoun enforcement. These statements clearly reject the proposed transgender student policies rather than support or neutrally discuss them.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","bathroom access","pronouns","LGBTQ+ inclusion","student privacy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter says, \"I strongly object to this bill\" and argues the state has \"no right to indoctrinate and confuse our children with this gender lie.\" They explicitly reject the premise of the policy by insisting \"There are two genders\" and that any DOE bill saying otherwise \"will not change the truth.\"","tone":"negative","tags":["gender identity","religious freedom","parental rights","LGBTQ+ inclusion"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says they are \"in full support\" of the policies and urges VDOE to \"implement this essential policy guidance.\" They also argue the policies will protect students and help educators support them, which clearly favors adoption.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","bullying prevention","nondiscrimination","teacher support"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly states, \"I support the guidance,\" which directly endorses adoption of the proposed regulation. No qualifications or objections are included.","tone":"positive","tags":["support for guidance"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.86,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I object to change of policy,\" which indicates opposition to adopting or revising the proposed policy. No supporting reasons or requests for modification are provided, but the plain objection is enough to classify the stance as oppose.","tone":"negative","tags":["policy change"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly labels the submission \"Opposed\" and argues that schools and the state should \"stay out of the business of sexual orientation.\" They also say it is \"ridiculous\" to think elementary school children can make \"life long decisions,\" indicating rejection of the transgender student policies.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","child welfare","school policy","sexual orientation","transgender students"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"Protect trans kids\" and states that they \"deserve equal rights,\" which clearly supports the regulation’s goal of protecting transgender students. The comment offers no criticism or request to weaken the policy.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student rights","equal rights","transgender students"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"Opposed to these policies,\" which directly states rejection of the regulation. The added claim that they \"will create unsafe conditions for students\" reinforces opposition rather than support or neutrality.","tone":"negative","tags":["student safety","transgender policies","school environment"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly labels the submission \"Support\" and states, \"It is our obligation to support, educate and value ALL our young people.\" They further emphasize inclusion by saying, \"Transgender students are included in ALL!\"","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student support","nondiscrimination"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says the proposal is \"absolutely necessary\" and \"wholeheartedly believe[s] this proposal is a necessity.\" They also endorse its purpose of helping transgender peers feel \"more welcomed\" and preventing \"unfair discrimination.\"","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","anti-discrimination","student support","school climate"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly support this bill\" and argues it is \"essential\" for protecting transgender students from mistreatment and discrimination. They also endorse guidance on restroom and gender-related facility use, saying students should feel safe using facilities that match their gender identity.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","bullying prevention","bathroom access","anti-discrimination"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly labels the proposal \"Strongly Opposed\" and adds a hostile rejection: \"those who are for it can leave the country.\" This clearly indicates they want the regulation rejected rather than adopted.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","opposition","hostility"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly rejects the policy, saying \"this document is not going to help children\" and repeatedly arguing it is \"dangerous for all school children.\" They object to privacy/confidentiality provisions, bathroom access, and sports participation, and warn it would create \"chaos\" and be \"detrimental\" to education.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","privacy","bathroom access","school sports","LGBTQ+ inclusion"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter says they \"completely object\" to the proposed policies and argues they \"supersede the rightful authority and responsibility of parents.\" They also oppose bathroom/locker room access and criticize the policies as \"politically motivated nonsense,\" indicating clear rejection of the regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","bathroom access","privacy","LGBTQ+ inclusion","student records"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I applaud the state of Virginia for addressing the safety of its gender-diverse students\" and argues that supportive schools \"will go a long way to preserving life and mental health.\" The comment clearly endorses the proposed policies and frames them as necessary protection for transgender students.","tone":"positive","tags":["student safety","LGBTQ+ inclusion","mental health","bullying prevention","family support"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"strong support for this!\" and describes the policies as \"a wonderful step the right direction.\" They also affirm the underlying purpose by stating that \"everyone’s identities should be respected.\"","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","transgender students","student rights","school policy"]}