{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I support this policy,\" which directly endorses adoption of the regulation. The title \"In Support\" reinforces that the comment is favorable and not requesting rejection or weakening.","tone":"positive","tags":["transgender students","public schools","policy support"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly Supports\" in the title and states \"Supporting trans kids saves lives,\" which clearly endorses adoption of the policy. There is no indication of opposition or neutrality.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","transgender students"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly support these recommendations\" and argues that the policies help \"all students\" feel safe and able to learn. They also criticize opposition to the policies, comparing it to resistance to school integration, which reinforces clear support for adoption.","tone":"positive","tags":["student safety","LGBTQ+ inclusion","bullying prevention","school climate","nondiscrimination"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly argues that the \"Model Policies are flawed\" and says they \"violate\" parents' fundamental rights. The comment repeatedly criticizes the policies for allowing social transition without parental notice or consent and for permitting transgender-inclusive school practices, indicating clear opposition to adoption.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","religious freedom","privacy","bathroom access","LGBTQ+ inclusion"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly oppose this\" and repeatedly argues the policy should not be adopted, urging schools to \"Teach my kids academics and nothing else.\" They frame the policy as \"indoctrination\" and raise objections about safety and parental authority, indicating clear rejection rather than a request for modification.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","privacy","indoctrination"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The comment explicitly says \"Strongly oppose\" and instructs to \"Vote \\\"NO\\\"\", which clearly indicates rejection of the proposed regulation. No supporting or neutral language is present.","tone":"negative","tags":["opposition","transgender students","school policy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"Strongly oppose the Model Policies\" and states they are \"harmful to children.\" They also argue the policies \"undermine the rights of parents and families,\" indicating clear rejection of adoption.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","transgender students","school policy","child welfare"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter says they are in \"strong support of measures to uplift and protect trans kids\" and explicitly endorses the policy goals. They also frame the regulation as important for \"suicide and transphobic violence prevention,\" which indicates approval of adoption.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","mental health","bullying prevention"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter clearly rejects the policy, calling it \"absolutely twisted,\" \"very disgusting,\" and \"Sickening,\" and asks, \"How is this even being considered?\" They argue it causes confusion and takes away one child's rights to give another more rights, which indicates opposition to adoption of the regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","parental rights","student rights","school discipline","LGBTQ+ inclusion"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly asks to \"help protect our growing trans student population\" and says they \"deserve\" equal opportunities, which clearly endorses the proposed transgender student policies. The comment expresses support for the regulation’s goals rather than opposition or neutrality.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","equal opportunity","transgender students"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly urges advocacy for trans rights and says, \"It’s essential to protect them everywhere\" and \"We must protect our youth.\" The closing statement, \"Trans rights are human rights,\" clearly supports adopting the policy’s protections for transgender students.","tone":"positive","tags":["transgender rights","student protection","LGBTQ+ inclusion","youth safety"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly support this guidance and policy\" and argues it will \"make schools safer for transgender youth.\" They also frame it as extending nondiscrimination protections to transgender students and ask policymakers not to heed opposition.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","nondiscrimination","transgender youth"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Fully support\" and argues that \"Transgender children should be treated equally,\" which clearly endorses adoption of the policy. The statement also supports allowing children \"to be who they want to be,\" indicating approval of the regulation's purpose.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student equality","transgender students"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"Strongly support!\" and adds, \"I am in full support of any legislation to promote the health and wellbeing of trans youth.\" This clearly endorses adoption of the regulation.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student wellbeing","transgender students"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly oppose,\" which directly states rejection of the proposed regulation. The phrase \"Stop abusing the children\" adds a hostile objection to the policy, reinforcing opposition.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","parental rights","student welfare"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly Support!\" and argues that \"there is protection for trans, non-binary and gender non-conforming students in Virginia.\" They further endorse the policy goal of creating \"a safe and affirming environment\" and a \"truly inclusive school environment.\"","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","school climate","non-discrimination"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter says they are \"wholeheartedly opposed to these regulations\" and repeatedly argues against them as \"harmful to children\" and a threat to parental authority. They also object to bathroom and locker room access, calling it \"alarming for the safety particularly of girls,\" which shows clear opposition to the policy.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","bathroom access","locker rooms","student safety","privacy"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly approve of these protections\" and describes the policies as \"life-changing and, quite literally, life-saving\" for trans students. They also affirm that \"All students deserve to have themselves and their identities respected,\" indicating clear support for adoption.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","nondiscrimination","student privacy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Oppose\" and calls the policy \"disastrous for children,\" which clearly indicates rejection of the regulation. There is no supporting language or request for modification, only opposition.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","student safety","children"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says the policies \"reach far beyond such respect and acceptance\" and calls them \"a complete overreach.\" They argue the policy is problematic for redefining gender, hiding information from parents, and placing girls in traumatic situations, all of which indicate opposition to adoption.","tone":"negative","tags":["gender identity","parental rights","student privacy","Title IX","school facilities"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly Support\" and states that \"This proposal will create a safer and healthier learning environment\" and that \"It is time for Virginia to support and protect transgender students.\" These phrases clearly endorse adoption of the regulation.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","school climate","transgender students"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says they \"wholeheartedly endorse\" the proposal and asks for the department's \"approval of this proposal.\" They repeatedly frame it as beneficial and say it will \"make such a tremendous and wonderful difference in trans students' lives.\"","tone":"positive","tags":["transgender students","student safety","LGBTQ+ inclusion","bullying prevention","privacy"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly support - protect trans children!\" and repeatedly endorses the policy goals, including \"giving kids a safe space to be themselves should be a priority in schools.\" The comment argues for affirming transgender students and does not express any opposition to the regulation.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","transgender students","supportive schools","identity affirmation"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I support the model policy protecting transgender students\" and \"Strongly Support.\" They also frame the policy as protecting \"human rights, freedoms and safety\" for transgender people, indicating clear approval of adoption.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student rights","nondiscrimination","student safety","privacy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says the policy is \"in direct conflict\" with women's rights and argues it creates \"inevitable and avoidable dangers,\" concluding that Virginia should \"rework this policy\". Although they acknowledge it is \"well intentioned\" and support private spaces for harassed students, the overall position is to reject or substantially change the regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":["bathroom access","locker rooms","student safety","privacy","women's rights"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.97,"stance_rationale":"The commenter urges the state to be \"extremely cautious before making widespread changes in policy\" and argues against key elements of the guidance, saying \"biological females and males should not share locker rooms or bathrooms\" and that students may not change names/genders freely. Although the comment opens with appreciation for caring for transgender students, the overall message is to weaken or reject the policy as written.","tone":"negative","tags":["bathroom access","locker rooms","parental rights","gender identity","student privacy"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly support\" and argues that students \"receive our acceptance and support.\" As a middle school teacher, they frame the policy as important for students' identity development and well-being, indicating clear approval of the regulation.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student support","school climate"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"STRONGLY SUPPORT!\" and repeatedly urges acceptance of transgender identities, including \"Let people be whatever they think their gender is.\" The comment frames the policy as necessary to prevent harm and \"transphobia,\" indicating clear approval of the regulation's goals.","tone":"negative","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","trans rights","student mental health","anti-discrimination","bullying prevention"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"*Strongly* support!\" and urges officials to \"make the extra effort to ensure trans people feel accepted.\" The rest of the comment defends transgender students and argues they \"deserve the right to exist freely and safely,\" indicating clear approval of the regulation's purpose.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","anti-bullying","privacy"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I support this wholeheartedly\" and frames the policy as necessary to \"create a safe and nurturing environment\" for trans youth. The comment advocates for \"protecting trans youth\" and treating them with \"dignity and equity,\" indicating clear approval of the regulation.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","equity","transgender students"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly support this\" and repeatedly argues for protecting transgender students. They condemn opposition as \"bigotry\" and conclude with \"Protect trans kids forever,\" indicating clear approval of the regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","bullying prevention","anti-discrimination","mental health"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly rejects government involvement, saying \"STOP THE GOVT INTRUSIONS\" and \"LEAVE THE KIDS ALONE,\" which indicates opposition to the proposed transgender student policies. The title \"THIS IS THE PARENTS’ BUSINESS\" further signals that they do not want the regulation adopted.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","government intrusion","transgender students","school policy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly Oppose VDOE Transgender Policies\" and argues that schools should not \"help\" students explore gender/sexual identity. They also say the policies \"promote a totally false view of sexuality\" and should not change rules for the majority to accommodate a minority, indicating rejection of the regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","gender identity","parental rights","school policy","nondiscrimination"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I fully support this,\" which directly endorses adoption of the policy. The stated reason, \"for the safety and well-being of all children,\" reinforces approval rather than criticism or neutrality.","tone":"positive","tags":["student safety","LGBTQ+ inclusion","supportive schools"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"STRONGLY OPPOSED\" and argues against the policy's self-identification provisions, stating it is \"not safe or fair\" and that sports classification should be based on \"biological gender.\" The comment clearly rejects the regulation as written rather than supporting it with changes.","tone":"negative","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","bathroom access","school sports","student safety","fairness"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I stand in full support of legislation to protect the health and well being of Transgender youth in Virginia schools.\" They further argue that policies \"must be implemented\" to help transgender students \"grow and thrive,\" which clearly endorses adoption of the regulation.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","bullying prevention","school climate"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"Of course I support!\" and argues that \"trans people have the right to feel safe in their environment.\" They also reject opposition based on religion and call for \"inclusivity,\" indicating clear support for adopting the regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","religious freedom","equality","anti-discrimination"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says the proposal is \"destructive and harmful\" and twice asks to \"Please reject these policies.\" They also state they have \"no plans or intentions of cooperating\" with the proposal, indicating clear opposition to adoption.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","parental rights","school policy","student safety","LGBTQ+ inclusion"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly support this movement\" and calls the legislation \"long overdue.\" They frame the policy as necessary for \"civil rights and protections\" and for helping trans students attend school \"safely and comfortably.\"","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","civil rights","student safety","gender identity","school climate"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly oppose this bad policy!\" and repeatedly urges officials to \"Back off\" and not persist with it. They argue the policy is \"stupid\" and an \"agenda,\" and threaten withdrawal from public schools if it is adopted.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","parental rights","religious freedom","school policy","LGBTQ+ inclusion"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter clearly rejects the policy, calling it a \"Transgender mess\" and saying \"I, for one, do not want\" a transgender student using the same bathroom. The comment also argues the policy would worsen safety and invokes a religious objection: \"Give him some testosterone to help him be what God made him.\"","tone":"negative","tags":["bathroom access","student safety","religious freedom","transgender students","privacy"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"STRONGLY SUPPORT!!!!\" and repeats, \"I STRONGLY SUPPORT THIS,\" which clearly indicates approval of the regulation. There is no qualifying language or criticism.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","transgender students","school policy"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly support this guidance,\" which directly endorses adoption. They also justify it by saying it will make schools \"safer, nondiscriminatory places for all students,\" indicating approval of the regulation's purpose and effects.","tone":"positive","tags":["student safety","nondiscrimination","LGBTQ+ inclusion","bullying prevention"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly expresses \"Immense support for Trans Students\" and ends with \"Support trans students.\" They also endorse core elements of the policy such as bathroom access and preferred name/pronoun use, indicating clear approval of the regulation.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","bathroom access","student privacy","preferred name/pronouns"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly endorses the policy, saying it is \"LONG overdue\" and that \"Putting policies in place for transgender individuals\" is necessary. They frame it as \"HUMAN RIGHTS\" and reject opposition to it, indicating clear support for adoption.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","transgender rights","student support","human rights","religious freedom"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly support this guidance document\" and states it will \"protect trans and queer students in Virginia.\" They also affirm the policy goal by saying transgender students \"deserve to be treated with respect and dignity.\"","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student rights","nondiscrimination","respect and dignity"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I oppose this\" and gives multiple reasons against the policy, including \"Religious views,\" concern about \"my children possibly being exposed to the opposite sex at an inappropriate age,\" and the belief that schools should \"stick to teaching the essentials.\" The comment also rejects transgender inclusion in sex-specific education by arguing that \"men and women's bodily functions are different and that's the way God intended it to be.\"","tone":"negative","tags":["religious freedom","parental rights","student privacy","sex-specific education","LGBTQ+ inclusion"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Vehemently Oppose!\" and repeatedly argues against the policy as \"ABSURD,\" \"absolutely nuts,\" and a threat to parental rights. They object to \"preferred pronouns,\" privacy provisions, and any implication that parents could be reported for abuse, all of which shows clear opposition to adoption of the regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","pronouns","privacy","transgender students","school counseling"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says they are \"writing to support protections for transgender and non-binary students\" and states that \"protections will help facilitate a positive learning environment.\" This is a clear endorsement of adopting the regulation.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","safe learning environment","nondiscrimination"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly support\" and urges the policy to \"Protect trans kids from bullying and abuse.\" They further state that \"This guidance could literally save lives,\" which clearly endorses adoption of the regulation.","tone":"positive","tags":["transgender students","bullying prevention","student safety","mental health"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly labels the comment \"Oppose\" and argues to \"wait\" before allowing changes, saying children's lives should not be \"altered\" until they are older. The reference to regret/change-of-mind statistics and comparisons to driving and voting indicate opposition to the proposed transgender student policies.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","youth decision-making","parental rights","student privacy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"OPPOSED STRONGLY\" and calls the policy \"DISCRIMINATION,\" indicating clear rejection of the regulation. The statement \"WE MUST HAVE FREEDOM TO TEACH OUR CHILDREN THE VALUES WE CHOOSE\" argues against the policy on parental/religious grounds rather than supporting adoption.","tone":"negative","tags":["religious freedom","parental rights","discrimination","transgender students"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I'm writing to support protections for transgender and non-binary students in all of Virginia's public schools.\" They also state that these protections will \"help facilitate a positive learning environment for everyone,\" indicating clear approval of the regulation.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","safe learning environment","non-binary students"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Highly oppose!!\" and states \"I feel allowing transgender in our public schools shouldnt be acceptable.\" They also reject transgender identity as \"a form of abuse\" and argue against allowing children to make this choice, indicating clear opposition to the regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","parental rights","religious freedom","school policy"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I support this,\" and the title endorses the policy goal of a \"safe and supportive environment at school.\" There is no indication of opposition or qualification.","tone":"positive","tags":["student safety","LGBTQ+ inclusion","supportive school environment"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"STRONGLY SUPPORT\" and adds that they \"support any policy which would offer them protection.\" This clearly endorses adoption of the regulation as a protective measure for transgender students.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student rights","student safety","nondiscrimination"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly support the model guidelines\" and urges lawmakers to \"ensure these protections\" for transgender and non-binary students. This is a clear endorsement of adopting the regulation as proposed.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student rights","nondiscrimination","transgender students"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I vote NO!\" and repeatedly argues against the proposal, calling it harmful and an \"agenda.\" They also warn of a \"mass exodus from the public school system\" if it passes, showing clear opposition to adoption.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","bathroom access","student privacy","gender identity","school safety"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The comment explicitly says \"Strongly support,\" which clearly indicates approval of the proposed regulation. No contrary language or qualifications are included.","tone":"positive","tags":[]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly oppose any efforts to normalize transgenderism\" and urges officials to \"stand strong against any attempt to normalize transgenderism in K-12 education.\" They also reject participation in \"a sport or restroom reserved for one of two biological sexes,\" indicating opposition to the policy's core provisions.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","bathroom access","school sports","parental rights","LGBTQ+ inclusion"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly opposed!\" and argues that \"it is not the schools place to decide anything about a child’s gender.\" They also object to the policy's handling of parents, saying leaving parents out is \"just WRONG,\" indicating rejection of the regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","gender identity","school policy","transgender students"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly states \"Strongly support,\" which directly indicates approval of the proposed regulation. No contrary language or qualifications are present.","tone":"positive","tags":[]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Oppose**!!\" and the title \"reaches beyond protections for discrimination\" indicates disagreement with the regulation’s scope. No supportive language is present.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","nondiscrimination","policy scope"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"OPPOSE!!!\" and ends with \"Reject these policies.\" They also describe the proposal as \"horribly destructive and harmful\" and say they have \"no plans or intentions of cooperating\" with it, indicating clear rejection of the regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","parental rights","student mental health","school policy","privacy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter criticizes the policy as a \"push[ed]\" agenda and says Virginia public schools \"can not possibly teach biology correctly when policies goes against science,\" indicating rejection of the regulation. The final line suggests these issues should be handled by \"mental health professionals and doctors and not the local PTA,\" further opposing school policy adoption in this area.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","biology","school policy","parental rights","mental health"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I STRONGLY OPPOSE every single one of the model policies\" and repeatedly states that \"All of this is wrong.\" They also urge officials to \"rethink,\" indicating they want the regulation rejected rather than adopted.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","parental rights","religious freedom","dress code","privacy"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly support!\" which directly endorses the regulation. \"Way overdue\" reinforces that they believe the policy should have been adopted already.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","transgender students","school policy"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly Support\" and asks to \"Protect the rights of trans people\" and ensure \"a safe school environment,\" which aligns with adopting the regulation. There is no opposing language or ambiguity.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","transgender rights","school climate"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter argues the regulations will encourage boundary-testing and “frivolous declarations,” and predicts “boys will make declarations just to get into girls’ restrooms and locker rooms, or to join girls’ sports teams.” The final sentence, “This will not end well,” clearly signals rejection of the proposed policies.","tone":"negative","tags":["peer contagion","bathroom access","school sports","student behavior","LGBTQ+ inclusion"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly support\" and argues that policies should protect transgender youth. Phrases like \"EVERY student deserves the right to a safe environment\" and \"they definitely are deserving of legislations and policies that protect them\" indicate clear approval of the regulation.","tone":"positive","tags":["transgender students","student safety","nondiscrimination","LGBTQ+ inclusion"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly rejects the proposal with \"Absolutely no!\" and adds \"Not for the schools to decide!\" indicating opposition to adopting these transgender student policies. The comment offers no support or neutral inquiry, only a clear rejection of the regulation's approach.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","school policy","parental rights","local control"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The comment explicitly says \"Oppose,\" which directly indicates the commenter does not want the regulation adopted. No additional context is provided to suggest a different interpretation.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender policy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter rejects allowing transgender students to use facilities aligned with their gender identity, stating they have \"no business being in the restroom or locker room designated for the other chromosomal gender.\" This directly opposes the proposed policies' protections around student facility access.","tone":"negative","tags":["bathroom access","locker rooms","student safety","transgender students"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Highly Support\" and describes the plan as \"well-researched, evidence-based.\" They also thank the agency for \"valuing trans youth,\" which clearly endorses adoption of the regulation.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","transgender students","public schools","student support"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly support!\" and adds that \"This document makes a lot of sense.\" They also praise specific provisions, noting the definitions are \"easy to understand\" and that the harassment section is \"really important.\"","tone":"positive","tags":["transgender students","harassment prevention","policy clarity","school safety"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"Utterly OPPOSED\" and asks, \"Please do not enact these regulations.\" They also describe the proposal as \"a tremendous overreach of authority\" and say it would be \"detrimental\" to children and families, indicating clear rejection of adoption.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","government overreach","student welfare","family impact"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I STRONGLY SUPPORT\" and endorses the policy as necessary for \"a safe, equitable experience for all students.\" This is a clear approval of the regulation as proposed.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","equity","public schools"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"This should not be allowed. No question,\" which clearly rejects the regulation. They also argue against transgender accommodations in schools, especially \"in elementary school,\" and insist bathroom access must match the birth certificate, indicating opposition to the policy's core provisions.","tone":"negative","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","bathroom access","elementary school","gender identity","student privacy"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly Support\" and states that the policy is \"absolutely necessary\" for school policies that support trans students. This clearly endorses adoption of the regulation.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","transgender students","school policy"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly Support!\" and argues that \"ALL students should be free to be themselves\" and that schools should allow students to be \"free and safe.\" The suicide reference is used to reinforce approval of the policy as a safety measure, not to oppose it.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","mental health","school climate"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly support this policy.\" They also give reasons in favor, stating it will \"help trans kids\" and improve \"depression, self-harm, and their school performance.\"","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student mental health","student safety","school performance"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly oppose!\" and describes the policy as \"a disaster waiting to happen.\" They object specifically to \"Boys and girls in the same showers/ dressing rooms,\" indicating rejection of the regulation's treatment of school facilities and sex-specific spaces.","tone":"negative","tags":["school facilities","bathroom access","privacy","student safety","sex-specific spaces"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly asks you to \"vote to oppose allowing transgender youth to use the bathroom/locker room of the opposite of their biological sex.\" They argue the policy \"ignores the safety and concerns of young women\" and could affect sports participation and school attendance, indicating rejection of the regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":["bathroom access","locker rooms","student safety","school sports","privacy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Completely opposed!\" and asks, \"Please do not subject innocent children to this,\" indicating clear rejection of the regulation. They also object to specific provisions such as restroom/locker room access, \"no parent notification,\" and \"not allowing for religious exemptions.\"","tone":"negative","tags":["bathroom access","locker rooms","parental rights","religious freedom","student safety"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The comment explicitly says \"strongly opposed,\" which clearly indicates rejection of the proposed policy. No supporting reasons or qualifications are provided, but the stance is unambiguous.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","school policy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly calls the proposed policies \"nonsensical\" and says they \"will bring hurtfulness to children and their parents,\" which indicates rejection of the regulation. There is no language suggesting support or a request for modification.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","parental rights","student welfare"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly states, \"I support this policy,\" which directly endorses adoption of the regulation. There is no qualifying language or criticism suggesting opposition or neutrality.","tone":"positive","tags":["transgender students","policy support"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly labels the proposal \"Strongly Opposed\" and repeatedly rejects it as \"big government\" and \"identity politics.\" They argue the policies are \"evil\" and would \"disrupt the family,\" indicating clear opposition to adoption of the regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","parental rights","government overreach","family values","school policy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The comment explicitly says \"opposed!\", which clearly indicates the commenter does not want the regulation adopted. No additional reasoning or qualifications are provided.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","school policy"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I'm in strong support of this measure\" and argues it is \"way past time to grant them protection and equality.\" The final sentence, \"Let transgender people use the bathroom that matches their gender!\" further endorses the policy's goals.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","bathroom access","student rights","privacy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The comment title explicitly says \"Strongly Oppose,\" which clearly indicates the commenter wants the regulation rejected. No body text is provided to suggest any nuance or support for changes.","tone":"negative","tags":[]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"SUPPORT TRANSGENDER STUDENTS\" and states that transgender students \"deserve to be affirmed and protected.\" They also endorse the goal of \"safe, supportive and non-threatening\" school environments, which aligns with adopting the regulation.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","anti-discrimination","supportive schools"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly support protections of all Transgendered persons - especially our youth in schools\" and calls the protections \"a moral imperative.\" This clearly endorses adoption of the regulation.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","privacy","nondiscrimination"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly states \"Strongly opposed!\" twice, which clearly indicates rejection of the proposed regulation. No supporting reasons or qualifications are provided, but the stance is unambiguous.","tone":"negative","tags":[]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly support !!\" and repeatedly urges approval: \"please, support them !!\" The body frames the policy as protecting trans people’s safety and inclusion, indicating clear support for the regulation.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","anti-discrimination","transgender rights"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly oppose\" and argues that \"parents should always be notified about their children,\" indicating rejection of the policy. The statement that \"schools will have children that are not transgender taking advantage of this\" further shows opposition based on concern about misuse.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","privacy","LGBTQ+ inclusion","school policy"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Fully support\" and argues the policy is necessary to ensure a \"SAFE and AFFIRMING environment\" for trans students. They also state that non-discrimination policies should prevent trans students from being \"harassed, attacked\" and that discrimination should not be given \"official sanction in schools.\"","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","bullying prevention","non-discrimination","transgender rights"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I am strongly opposed to this policy\" and concludes, \"This policy will not help any of our children.\" Although they add that transgender children should be \"helped,\" the overall message rejects the regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":["religious freedom","gender identity","transgender students","school policy"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly titles the remark \"Full support\" and says \"This is really great!\" They also endorse the policy direction by praising it as \"the right side of history.\"","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student support","school policy"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly support!!!!!!!\" and adds \"Trans rights is human rights,\" which clearly endorses the proposed transgender student policies. There is no language indicating any objection or reservation.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","transgender rights","student rights"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly oppose this legislation,\" which directly states opposition to the regulation. They also argue that \"These decisions should be made by families\" and criticize \"Taking out gender pronouns,\" indicating they want the policy rejected or substantially changed.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","gender pronouns","elementary education","transgender students"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly oppose!\" and argues against the policy, claiming it could \"create more rape/mistreatment\" and criticizing that \"Leaving parents out of the loop\" is wrong. The final questions about \"Where does it end?\" further indicate rejection of the regulation rather than support or neutrality.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","student safety","transgender policy","privacy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly oppose\" and warns that if the policy passes, \"the number of lawsuits against the state will significantly rise.\" They also argue it will lead to \"horrific\" sexual harassment in school bathrooms, indicating clear rejection of the regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":["student safety","bathroom access","privacy","sexual harassment","lawsuits"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Hard NO\" and repeatedly argues the policy should be \"torn up and thrown away.\" They claim it would endorse \"child abuse,\" violate parental rights and FERPA, and undermine Title IX and girls' sports, all of which indicate clear opposition to adoption.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","privacy","Title IX","bathroom access","school sports"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says they \"strongly encourage the state of Virginia to take all necessary steps\" to protect transgender students and argues that Virginia must \"serve our students - and that INCLUDES our transgender students.\" The comment clearly endorses the proposed policies and even suggests stronger protections.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","equal treatment","school climate"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"strongly oppose,\" which directly states opposition to the regulation. The phrase \"major safety issues\" indicates a negative reason for rejecting it rather than supporting adoption with changes.","tone":"negative","tags":["student safety","transgender students","school policy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"We strongly oppose the draft ideas in this bill\" and argues that \"Biological boys... should NOT be allowed in a girls locker room or bathroom.\" They also warn it will cause parents to withdraw children from public schools, indicating rejection of the regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":["bathroom access","locker rooms","privacy","parental rights","transgender students"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"STRONGLY SUPPORT PROTECTION FOR TRANS CHILDREN\" and asks policymakers to \"help protect children\". The body endorses the regulation’s protective purpose by citing risks like \"harassment, bullying, sexual assault, and assault\" and urging \"caring and respect\" for trans students.","tone":"positive","tags":["transgender students","student safety","bullying prevention","anti-discrimination"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I support the guidance,\" which directly endorses adoption of the regulation. The added statement, \"Trans rights are human rights,\" reinforces approval of the transgender student protections in the policy.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","transgender rights","student rights"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly states, \"Strongly oppose this,\" which directly indicates opposition to adopting the regulation. No supporting reasons or qualifications are provided.","tone":"negative","tags":[]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly support this well-researched, evidence based proposal\" and urges officials to \"Uphold\" it. They also argue the policy would \"protect previously vulnerable students\" and create \"safer, more inclusive learning environments,\" which clearly endorses adoption.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","school climate","mental health","bullying prevention"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly labels the proposal \"Strongly Oppose\" and repeatedly urges rejection, saying \"Let gender questions be handled by parents, not the school system\" and \"Stop confusing the majority of students.\" They argue the guidance harms parental rights and religious beliefs and object to restroom/locker room access provisions.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","religious freedom","bathroom access","privacy","LGBTQ+ inclusion"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly support,\" which directly indicates approval of the proposed regulation. There is no qualifying language or criticism suggesting any opposition or neutrality.","tone":"positive","tags":[]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The comment explicitly says \"Strongly Oppose!!\" and provides no qualifying language or support for the regulation. This is a clear rejection of the proposed policies.","tone":"negative","tags":[]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"Strongly Oppose\" and states, \"This bill should not go through,\" which clearly rejects the regulation. The reason given is concern about \"denying parents on information of their own kids,\" indicating opposition based on parental rights and information access.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","student privacy","transgender policies"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The comment explicitly says \"Oppose!!\" and the title \"NO, NO, NO, NO, NO, NO!\" strongly signals rejection of the proposed regulation. There is no indication of support or neutrality.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","opposition"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly support this proposal\" and repeats support with \"Support, support, support!\" They also endorse the policy's purpose, saying it is \"absolutely necessary\" and will help keep students \"safe, included, and welcomed.\"","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","inclusive schools","transgender students"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.93,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says the policy would \"make things worse\" and \"harder for children to know who they are,\" which indicates rejection of the proposed regulation. The title \"Strongly Appose\" also signals opposition despite the misspelling.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","student identity","school policy"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"STRONGLY SUPPORT\" and repeatedly urges that \"We need to support trans kids.\" The comment endorses the regulation as a way to prevent discrimination and provide \"love, support, and care.\"","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","anti-discrimination","transgender students"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly opens with \"In strong support of this!!!\" and repeatedly endorses the policy, praising efforts to treat trans and non-binary students with respect. They argue for chosen names/pronouns, gender-neutral spaces, and making schools \"a safer and more inclusive place,\" all of which indicate clear support for adoption.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student privacy","bathroom access","school safety","bullying prevention"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly states, \"I support transgender affirming policies in Virginia schools.\" This directly endorses adoption of the proposed policies rather than opposing or questioning them.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","transgender students","school policy"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I write in support of the Model Policies\" and repeatedly endorses the guidance as making schools \"supportive and inclusive\" and \"a better place to learn.\" The comment argues the proposal will help transgender and nonbinary students belong and create a better learning environment for all.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","transgender students","school climate","equal access","student safety"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly states, \"I am 100% opposed\" and repeatedly says the policy \"should not become policy\" and is \"discriminatory.\" The body argues against multiple provisions, including restroom access, pronoun use, privacy, and dress code changes, all in opposition to adoption.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","bathroom access","privacy","pronouns","dress code"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I am STRONGLY opposed to this policy\" and repeatedly argues against adoption, calling it \"wrong\" and \"a cruel policy toward parents.\" The statement \"Parents need to be in charge\" indicates opposition to the regulation's approach.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","transgender students","school policy"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Full support\" and repeatedly urges action to make schools \"safer\" and more accessible for transgender students. They endorse the policy’s goals of correcting records, protecting privacy, and reducing harassment, while arguing against objections to trans-inclusive school policies.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","privacy","bullying prevention","student records"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly endorses the proposal as \"essential,\" \"much needed,\" and \"overdue,\" and closes with \"Let's do it!\" They argue it would \"protect previously vulnerable students\" and create \"safer, more inclusive learning environments,\" showing clear support for adoption.","tone":"positive","tags":["transgender students","student safety","LGBTQ+ inclusion","school climate","student rights"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly support!\" and is advocating for adoption of the policy. The rest of the comment attacks opponents of the regulation, reinforcing clear support rather than opposition or neutrality.","tone":"negative","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","transgender students","anti-discrimination"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"YES!!! Strongly support\" and calls the policy \"a very welcome change that is long overdue.\" They further endorse the goals of the regulation by emphasizing that no child should be afraid at school and praising \"Inclusivity, empathy, and respect.\"","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","bullying prevention","school climate"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The comment is a clear rejection of the proposed policies, using emphatic language like \"Nope nope nope!!!\" and \"Forget about it.\" It offers no supporting reasons or nuance, but the intent is plainly to oppose adoption.","tone":"negative","tags":[]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I support positive trans-gender policies for Virginia students\" and argues that \"These kids need policies and procedures that support a healthy environment.\" This is a clear endorsement of adopting the regulation.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student support","school climate"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The comment is explicitly hostile to the policy, claiming \"these policies are about\" harming children and framing them as \"sodomizing children again.\" This is a clear rejection of the proposed transgender student policies rather than a request for modification or clarification.","tone":"negative","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","transgender students","political attack"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly oppose this 'transgender family' agenda in schools\" and argues it is not the school's responsibility or right to introduce it. They also urge schools to \"stick to educating our children on the basics,\" indicating rejection of the regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","LGBTQ+ inclusion","school curriculum","student mental health","privacy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly oppose!\" and argues against shared facilities for transgender students, stating \"I do not want someone of the opposite sex in my children’s bathroom/locker room.\" This is a clear rejection of the proposed policies rather than support or neutral feedback.","tone":"negative","tags":["bathroom access","locker rooms","parental rights","traditional values","transgender students"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly support!!!\" and asks to \"Protect trans kids,\" which clearly endorses adoption of the policy. They also state that everyone should feel \"safe and protected\" in school, reinforcing support for the regulation's protective aims.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","transgender students","school climate"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I STRONGLY SUPPORT THIS BILL,\" which directly endorses adoption of the regulation. The additional statement \"TRANS LIVES MATTER TOO\" reinforces support for transgender protections.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","transgender students","nondiscrimination"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Totally OPPOSE this 'model policy'\" and \"Very strongly oppose this gender policy.\" They argue the state is \"usurping the role of parents,\" object to \"forcing biologically opposite sex students into the same restrooms and locker rooms,\" and say the policy will make students uncomfortable.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","religious freedom","bathroom access","locker rooms","transgender students"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly opposed\" and calls the policy \"absolutely ridiculous\" and \"gone too far.\" They argue it would \"put ALL of the females at risk\" and object to transgender students using sex-segregated locker rooms, indicating rejection of the regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":["bathroom access","locker rooms","student safety","transgender students","privacy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"STRONGLY OPPOSE!!\" and asks, \"Please, please do not allow these guidelines to make their way into our education.\" They argue the policy would be \"endangering our children\" and taking rights from teachers and parents, which clearly rejects adoption.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","student safety","transgender policies","education policy"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly support\" and urges officials to \"pass this, save lives.\" They also praise the policy for supporting \"gender non-conforming and trans youth\" and reducing mental stress, which clearly endorses adoption.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student mental health","student safety","transgender students"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly support this policy\" and repeats that there is \"no reason not to pass this policy.\" They argue it protects transgender students from harm and should be adopted as written or with approval.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","privacy","bathroom access","dress code"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly SUPPORTING this decision,\" which clearly endorses adoption of the regulation. There is no contrary language or qualification.","tone":"positive","tags":[]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter says, \"I strongly agree with treating people the same\" and objects to discrimination, which supports adopting the policy. The reference to constitutional principles reinforces approval of equal treatment rather than opposition to the regulation.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","nondiscrimination","equal treatment"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The comment is explicitly titled \"STRONGLY SUPPORT,\" which directly states approval of the regulation. Although the body is mostly insulting and does not add policy arguments, it does not express opposition to the proposed policies.","tone":"negative","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","transgender students","school policy"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly states, \"I very much SUPPORT this,\" which directly endorses adoption of the regulation. There is no qualifying language or criticism.","tone":"positive","tags":[]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Must Absolutely Oppose\" and argues against the policy throughout, warning about \"bathrooms/locker rooms,\" \"transgender indoctrination,\" sports competition, and medical/social transition. They also urge that the regulations not be created, saying \"Before creating permanent regulations... there should be greater public information and debate.\"","tone":"negative","tags":["bathroom access","school sports","parental rights","LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly support this!\" and frames the policy as necessary because \"LGBTQ+ children deserve to feel accepted and safe.\" The comment offers personal experience in favor of adoption rather than criticism or neutrality.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","bullying prevention","safe learning environment"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly states, \"I strongly support this!!!\" which directly endorses adoption of the regulation. There is no qualifying language or criticism.","tone":"positive","tags":["support","transgender students","LGBTQ+ inclusion"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I am fully in support of the new policy\" and repeats that they are \"in support of this new policy.\" They also endorse its purpose of \"safer and better treatment of trans and non-binary students in schools.\"","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","non-discrimination","transgender students"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"AGREE\" and reinforces it with \"Yes!\", indicating clear approval of the proposed regulation. No contrary language or reservations are present.","tone":"positive","tags":["transgender students","LGBTQ+ inclusion","school policy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"Please oppose this legislation,\" which directly states opposition to adoption. The body reinforces this by arguing it \"goes way beyond protection of children,\" indicating they want the policy rejected.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","parental rights","child welfare","gender identity"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly states \"STRONGLY SUPPORT.\" twice, which clearly indicates approval of the proposed regulation. No contrary language or qualifications are present.","tone":"positive","tags":[]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly support\" and asks to \"Revamp school policy re: trans kids, to support and protect our children.\" They also urge that protections for trans youth be codified, which clearly endorses adoption of the regulation.","tone":"positive","tags":["transgender students","student safety","privacy","nondiscrimination","school policy"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly support this proposal\" and argues that it would \"create a safer learning environment\" for transgender students. They also frame discrimination as unacceptable and say schools should support students in how they express themselves.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","anti-discrimination","school climate","transgender students"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly disagree with what they’re trying to do here,\" which indicates opposition to the proposed policies. The statement \"I am very scared for my kid’s future\" reinforces a negative reaction to the regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","student safety","transgender students"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.93,"stance_rationale":"The comment explicitly says \"AGREE\" and provides no contrary language, indicating approval of the proposed regulation. With only a one-word endorsement, there is little nuance beyond support.","tone":"positive","tags":[]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly support this proposal\" and repeatedly argues for adoption, stating it would create \"a safer and more effective learning environment.\" They also defend the policy’s benefits for transgender students and reject the idea that it harms others.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","mental health","academic achievement","anti-discrimination"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"This proposal should be rejected,\" which is a clear call to oppose adoption. The opening phrase \"Strongly Oppose\" reinforces that position, and the rest of the comment argues the policy causes harm.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","student privacy","parental rights","LGBTQ+ inclusion"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly rejects the policy as \"an abomination\" and says they \"will never call them by what they elect to be called,\" indicating opposition to the transgender student guidance. They also argue public schools should be \"de-funded\" because of this policy, which shows they want it rejected or substantially weakened.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","LGBTQ+ inclusion","parental rights","school choice","privacy"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"Fully support and agree,\" indicating approval of the proposed policies. The statement \"all children must be protected\" reinforces support for the regulation's protective aims.","tone":"positive","tags":["student safety","transgender students","nondiscrimination","privacy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly rejects the policy with repeated statements of \"NO! NO! NO!\" and specifically opposes \"locker room choices\" and \"bathroom choices.\" They argue the regulation risks \"physical safety\" and privacy, and prefer sex-segregated facilities or family bathrooms instead of the proposed approach.","tone":"negative","tags":["bathroom access","locker rooms","privacy","student safety","transgender students"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"Strongly Agree! Support Trans Youth!!!\" and adds, \"We must support trans youth!\" This clearly endorses adoption of the proposed policies and expresses approval of their purpose.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student support","transgender youth"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"oppose ALL\" and argues children should not be encouraged toward these policies, calling them \"Morally Spiritually CORRUPT.\" They also state such choices should wait until \"the age of EIGHTEEN,\" indicating rejection of the regulation's support for transgender students.","tone":"negative","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","parental rights","student privacy","religious freedom"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"We are going way too far\" and argues the policies are \"dangerous,\" concluding that adopting them would be \"gross negligence\" toward children. The comment repeatedly frames the regulation as a threat to safety and mental health, indicating clear opposition to the proposed policies.","tone":"negative","tags":["student safety","bathroom access","privacy","mental health","transgender students"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"Strongly support and agree!\" which directly endorses the proposed regulation. There is no qualifying language or criticism suggesting opposition or neutrality.","tone":"positive","tags":[]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly support!\" and urges to \"Protect trans youth!!\" This is a clear endorsement of adopting the proposed transgender student policies.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","transgender students"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter repeatedly argues the policy is unclear and harmful, asking whether it would exclude parents, burden churches, and negatively affect cisgender students. They object to bathroom/changing-room access and bullying provisions, saying the policies may \"result in excluding gender-based activities altogether\" and that disagreement with transgender ideas \"should not\" count as bullying.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","privacy","bathroom access","school sports","bullying prevention"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter says they \"Strongly and absolutely support\" the guidance and argues it will create \"safe and engaging learning environments\" for transgender students. They explicitly frame the policies as needed \"protections\" that will help build a \"positive and inviting learning environment.\"","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","mental health","anti-bullying","privacy"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"This guidance is simply the right thing to do\" and opens with \"Strongly Support,\" indicating clear approval of the regulation. They also urge officials to \"stay human,\" reinforcing support for protections for transgender students.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","transgender students","nondiscrimination","pronouns","privacy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly urges officials to \"reject this irresponsible 'model guidance'\" and says schools should not adopt it. The body repeatedly criticizes the policy as denying \"binary sex,\" undermining \"parents over children,\" and causing \"irreversible damage,\" all of which indicate clear opposition.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","transgender students","LGBTQ+ inclusion","student privacy","school authority"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly support\" and adds \"Support our trans community,\" which clearly endorses the regulation. There is no indication of opposition or neutrality.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","transgender students","support"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"Please support trans and nonbinary students\" and argues that it is important to \"protect and respect\" LGBTQ+ community members. This clearly endorses the proposed policies rather than opposing them.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","nonbinary students","transgender students"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly support\" and urges action to \"Protect trans youth,\" which clearly endorses adoption of the regulation. The comment frames the policy as beneficial for \"the well-being of our communities and their own development.\"","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","transgender students","youth well-being"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly support this guidance document\" and argues that it will \"literally save lives.\" They also endorse schools providing \"support, resources, and protection for trans students,\" which clearly favors adoption of the regulation.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","bullying prevention","mental health","transgender students"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"I strongly OPPOSE this!\" and argues against the policy on parental involvement grounds. They state that \"Parents should be involved in anything to do with their child(ren)\" and object to schools having the ability to exclude parents, indicating rejection of the regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","transgender students","school policy","parental involvement"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I am writing in support of the Model Policies\" and repeatedly argues that the rule \"will make Virginia schools a better place to learn.\" They endorse preferred names/pronouns, bathroom and locker room access, and a safe, welcoming environment for transgender and nonbinary students.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","privacy","bullying prevention","bathroom access"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I vehemently reject this potential policy\" and \"strongly advise pulling your kids out of the VA public schools,\" which clearly opposes adoption. The comment also frames the policy as a harmful \"left wing agenda\" and urges action to stop it.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","public schools","parental rights","political ideology","school policy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly oppose this legislation!!\" which directly states opposition to adoption. The follow-up about \"younger children need guidance, not more confusion\" reinforces that they believe the policy is harmful.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","parental concerns","child development","school policy"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"I strongly support\" the proposal and praises \"creating safe spaces and frameworks\" for students. They also describe the policy as valuable for allowing students \"the space and agency to be themselves,\" which clearly endorses adoption.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","safe spaces","student identity"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly support this well-researched and evidence-based proposal\" and argues it would \"protect previously vulnerable students\" and create \"safer, more inclusive learning environments.\" The comment endorses adoption of the policy as written, with no expressed objections or requests to weaken it.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","inclusive schools","mental health","bullying prevention"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I fully support all legal protections socio-emotional resources for all LGBTQIA youth\" and argues that \"protocols must align with their identities.\" The comment clearly endorses the regulation’s protections for transgender and nonbinary students rather than opposing them.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","privacy","gender identity","support services"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"Lovingly oppose\" and repeatedly states they \"do not believe an acceptable solution has been reached with this legislation.\" They argue the policy is too lax, \"draconian\" in enforcement, and object to being required to use preferred pronouns or names, indicating opposition to adoption as written.","tone":"negative","tags":["bathroom access","student safety","privacy","parental rights","religious freedom"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Agree wholeheartedly\" and frames the policy as a matter of respect: \"What does it cost anyone to treat others with respect???\" This indicates clear approval of the transgender student policies, even if the commenter notes disagreement with some people.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","respect","student dignity"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly support this legislation,\" and frames the policy as necessary to \"protect our most vulnerable students.\" The comment also argues that Virginia should be a place where \"all youth thrive in our schools,\" which clearly endorses adoption of the regulation.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","bullying prevention","mental health"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Support Trans students\" and argues that \"By supporting trans students\" schools can promote acceptance and safety. The comment clearly endorses the policy's goals of helping students feel \"safe, accepted\" and able to \"fully express themselves.\"","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","acceptance","school climate"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"Vote no to transgender emotion\" and \"Do not add fuel to their physical and mental illness,\" which clearly rejects the proposed transgender student policies. The comment argues that \"Science says two genders\" and frames the regulation as contrary to facts and science.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","LGBTQ+ inclusion","science","mental health","school policy"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I fully support the Model Policies for the Treatment of Transgender Students\" and repeatedly argues that the policies create a \"safe, nurturing, and welcoming space for ALL students.\" They also endorse specific provisions like participation in PE, sports, and restroom access matching a student's lived identity.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","privacy","school sports","bathroom access"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly states, \"I support the guidance,\" which directly endorses adoption of the proposed regulation. The title also says \"Support,\" reinforcing the same position.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","transgender students","school policy"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly Support\" and states that \"It is critical we support this timely policy\". They frame the policy as protecting \"civil and human rights of trans students,\" which clearly endorses adoption.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","civil rights","student safety","transgender students"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly support this\" and repeatedly asks, \"Please pass this bill.\" They argue the policy would let transgender students be themselves, improve mental health, and \"save innocent lives from suicide,\" which is clear advocacy for adoption.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student mental health","bathroom access","privacy","school safety"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly urges protection for transgender children and says, \"Treat all children as deserving of protection under the law.\" They also ask decision-makers not to \"guide you to harm the least among us,\" which clearly supports adopting the policy.","tone":"positive","tags":["transgender students","child welfare","human rights","school policy"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly support this bill\" and asks lawmakers to \"consider\" it and \"see it pass.\" The rest of the comment reinforces approval by emphasizing inclusion, equality, and protection from bullying and transphobia.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","bullying prevention","student equality","student safety"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I cannot support this\" and frames the policy as \"spiritually, morally, and biologically wrong,\" which clearly rejects adoption of the regulation. The title \"OPPOSE!\" reinforces the negative position.","tone":"negative","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","transgender students","parental concerns","religious freedom"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly asks to \"please support non binary students,\" which clearly endorses the regulation’s protective intent. There is no language opposing or questioning the policy.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","nonbinary students","student support"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly support this proposition to support and protect transgender students.\" They further argue the policy \"will benefit ALL students,\" indicating clear approval of adoption.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","transgender students","school climate","student safety","bullying prevention"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly approve\" and \"I agree with the proposed policies.\" They also express support for the underlying purpose by stating \"Trans rights are human rights\" and \"Protect trans kids.\"","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","transgender rights","student safety","inclusivity"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly urges approval of the policy, saying \"We need protections for these students\" and \"Support trans kids.\" They also argue for continuing efforts to make schools \"a safe place for all students,\" which clearly endorses the regulation's purpose.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","anti-bullying","privacy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The comment explicitly says \"VEHEMENTLY OPPOSED!!!,\" which is a clear rejection of the proposed transgender student policy. No supporting or neutral language is present.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","policy opposition"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I oppose this as it stands,\" which directly rejects the regulation in its current form. They also argue that \"parents should be involved in everything that effects their child\" and that \"The state should not have ultimate power over someone's child,\" indicating opposition to the policy's approach.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","state authority","transgender students"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly rejects the policy, saying \"STOP giving control to our youth\" and arguing that parents and adults should \"remain in control.\" They also frame the regulation as harmful, claiming it adds burdens to teachers and will increase abuse and bullying risks.","tone":"negative","tags":["teacher burden","parental rights","student safety","bullying prevention","sexual abuse"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly rejects the policy, asking why it is being imposed and saying \"STOP giving control to our youth\" and that \"parent and adults need to remain in control.\" They also argue it will create safety problems and add burdens on teachers, indicating opposition to adoption.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","teacher burden","student safety","bullying prevention","privacy"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"STRONGLY SUPPORT\" and states that \"Discrimination based on someone’s gender identity is wrong and has to be stopped!!!\" This clearly endorses the regulation’s anti-discrimination purpose.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","anti-discrimination","student rights"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly states, \"I strongly oppose these measures,\" which directly indicates rejection of the proposed regulation. The title also says \"OPPOSE,\" reinforcing the same position.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","opposition","school policy"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly urges approval with the title \"SUPPORT OUR TRANS AND NB YOUTH!\" and states that \"ALL students deserve to feel safe, comfortable, and happy\" under the policy. They also criticize opposition to the regulation, indicating clear support for adoption.","tone":"negative","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","transgender students","school climate"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly Oppose this Bill\" and argues the policy \"violates children and parents with religious convictions\" and \"will not protect our children nor benefit their development.\" They also state that existing anti-bullying rules are \"valuable and sufficient,\" indicating rejection of the proposed guidance.","tone":"negative","tags":["religious freedom","parental rights","bathroom access","privacy","LGBTQ+ inclusion"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I fiercely oppose this policy\" and calls it \"Strong Opposition.\" They argue it would infringe on \"biological female-only spaces\" and \"endanger and violate girls/young women,\" indicating clear rejection of the regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":["bathroom access","locker rooms","girls' safety","biological sex","transgender students"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly Oppose!\" and argues the guidance \"overreaches the role of Government\" and would be \"a travesty to the Virginia family unit.\" These statements clearly reject adoption of the proposed policies.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","government overreach","family values","transgender students"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"STRONGLY OPPOSE\" and repeatedly urges the draft be rejected, calling it \"extremely dangerous, ridiculous and unnecessary\" and saying it \"needs to be discarded.\" They argue schools should not implement these policies and should \"return to their core mission.\"","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","school policy","parental rights","student identity","school mission"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly labels the proposal as \"Strong Oppose!!\" and says it is \"nothing short of a deceit\" to issue it as guidance. They repeatedly demand, \"Put it up for public vote!!,\" indicating they do not want the regulation adopted in its current form.","tone":"negative","tags":["public referendum","opposition","transgender policies","government process"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I fully support this guidance\" and repeatedly argues that it \"means more protection for youth\" and should be adopted to help LGBTQ students. They also urge schools to \"adapt and educate\" rather than continue harming children, which clearly favors approval of the regulation.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","mental health","bullying prevention","privacy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says they are \"STRONGLY OPPOSED!!!!!\" and calls the policies \"child destroying policies,\" which clearly indicates rejection of the regulation. There is no language suggesting support or a request for modification.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","LGBTQ+ inclusion","school policy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I oppose this initiative\" and asks, \"Please don't deny biological truth,\" indicating rejection of the proposed transgender student policies. The comment argues that teaching children they can choose their sex is \"a lie\" and warns of \"real and irreversible ramifications,\" which is a clear substantive opposition.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","biological sex","parental concerns","student welfare","school policy"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly support this document,\" which directly endorses adoption of the regulation. The additional statement, \"Trans youth need support from their schools,\" reinforces approval of the policy's purpose.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student support","transgender students"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly states, \"I strongly oppose this policy\" and repeats, \"I am opposed to the proposed transgender policy.\" The body argues it is an \"outrageous theft of parental authority\" and an \"ideological takeover,\" indicating clear rejection of the regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","transgender policy","indoctrination","school policy"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly defends the policy, saying that preventing harassment and discrimination \"is not oppressive\" and that allowing trans women to use the correct restroom \"poses no threat to students.\" The comment attacks opponents of the regulation and does not ask for weakening or rejection.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","bathroom access","student safety","anti-discrimination","privacy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly labels the proposal \"Oppose\" and calls it \"Another attack on the importance of the family dynamic.\" They argue the state should not have authority over family decisions and say the policy violates \"religious freedom\" and \"freedom of speech,\" indicating rejection of the regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","religious freedom","free speech","transgender policy"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.96,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly titles the submission \"Support of the the Virginia Department of Education (VDOE) model policies\" and praises \"inclusive behavior\" as \"the BEST.\" The body frames the policies as beneficial for children and education, indicating approval rather than criticism.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","bullying prevention","nondiscrimination"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The comment explicitly states \"Strongly oppose\" and repeats it as the entire body, indicating clear rejection of the proposed regulation. There is no qualifying language or request for modification, only opposition.","tone":"negative","tags":[]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly support this guidance\" and gives reasons favoring adoption. They argue that \"Trans students deserve to be treated with dignity and equal access to education\" and that schools need guidance to respect these students' rights.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student rights","equal access","school climate"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly oppose this action!\" and repeatedly states that \"This policy should not be implemented.\" They argue it is \"very detrimental to the health and well being of our precious children\" and would violate parental rights and student safety.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","parental rights","student safety","privacy","school policy"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I support this guidance,\" which directly endorses adoption of the regulation. They further explain that \"every child should feel free to be and express themselves in a safe environment in school,\" reinforcing approval of the policy's purpose.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","school climate"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Oppose\" in the title and argues the policy should not allow transgender people to use bathrooms of the opposite biological sex. They propose an alternative—\"a single stalled bathroom\"—to replace the policy, indicating opposition to the regulation as written.","tone":"negative","tags":["bathroom access","student safety","privacy","transgender students","parental rights"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly support this bill\" and frames the policy as providing \"support and protection for transgender and gender-diverse children and adolescents.\" They also cite the AAP policy statement as backing for the regulation, indicating approval rather than criticism.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","healthcare","nondiscrimination"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly support inclusive care for these children in our school,\" which clearly endorses the regulation. They also reinforce approval by citing the American Academy of Pediatrics policy statement as supporting evidence.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student support","school policy","pediatric health"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly titles the submission \"Oppose the policy\" and says the current approach is \"completely unacceptable.\" They argue the policy should not allow \"a biological male\" into female spaces and suggest a different, separate-facilities solution instead of the regulation as written.","tone":"negative","tags":["bathroom access","locker rooms","privacy","parental rights","transgender students"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly oppose\" and argues against allowing transgender students access to restrooms/changing rooms, stating their daughter should \"never be required or allowed to share a restroom or changing room with a biological male.\" They also say they would \"pull my kids from public schools\" if implemented, indicating clear rejection of the regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":["bathroom access","parental rights","privacy","pronouns","school choice"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"Strongly oppose this--it's NOT science-based!\" and argues the policies should not be adopted. They also say the policies are \"NOT keeping students safe\" and object to privacy and parental concerns, indicating rejection of the regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","privacy","parental rights","student safety","science-based policy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly labels the document \"Strongly Oppose\" and argues that the guidelines are \"discriminatory, unfair, and unsafe.\" They object to restroom and locker room access, pronoun/name use, dress codes, and sports participation, asking \"Why isn't the school system standing up for them?\"","tone":"negative","tags":["bathroom access","locker rooms","school sports","dress codes","parental rights"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly labels the submission \"STRONG SUPPORT\" and says the policies are \"the basic rights and safety of transgender students.\" They also state it is \"VITAL to give these students school support\" and that \"It’s the least schools can do,\" clearly endorsing adoption.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","anti-bullying","transgender students","school support"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I am completely opposed to this legislation,\" which directly indicates rejection of the proposed policies. The statement that it is \"damaging to children, families, and our schools\" reinforces opposition rather than support or neutrality.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","school policy","family concerns","student welfare"]}