{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly support these model policies\" and \"look forward to all local school boards developing and adopting policies\" based on them. The comment repeatedly endorses the policies as \"well-researched and thoughtfully formulated\" and praises their focus on student safety and inclusion.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","nondiscrimination","bullying prevention","privacy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly oppose the statewide transgender policy applied to our schools,\" which directly rejects the proposed regulation. There is no qualifying language suggesting support or neutrality.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender policy","public schools"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly oppose the statewide transgender policy\" and repeats that they \"strongly oppose the statewide transgender policy applied to our schools.\" This is a clear rejection of the proposed regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender policy","public schools","opposition"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly Support\" and urges, \"Please, please pass this!\" This is a clear endorsement of adopting the regulation, with no opposing language.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","transgender students"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Most Strongly Oppose\" and argues that the proposed policy \"hurts minors\" and \"robs others of their privacy rights.\" They also state that the current policy is sufficient, indicating they do not want the regulation adopted.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender policy","privacy","minors","student rights"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter repeatedly argues against the policy, saying it will \"cause chaos,\" \"trample[] on the rights of people of faith,\" and lead to \"constant[]\" litigation. Although they endorse stopping bullying in general, their proposed alternatives and criticism show they do not support the regulation as written.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender policies","bathroom access","religious freedom","teacher burden","litigation"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.96,"stance_rationale":"The comment cites suicide attempt statistics for transgender and non-binary youth to argue implicitly for protective policies. The title, \"Support- Prevent Teen Suicide,\" clearly indicates approval of the regulation as a means of helping transgender students.","tone":"positive","tags":["student safety","mental health","LGBTQ+ inclusion","suicide prevention"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I support trans-affirming policies in schools\" and asks, \"Please support transgender students with nondiscrimination policies.\" They frame the regulation as necessary to protect transgender students from discrimination, harassment, and bullying.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","nondiscrimination","student safety","bullying prevention","privacy"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"Strongly support\" and adds affirming language: \"Trans lives deserve dignity and respect.\" This clearly indicates approval of the proposed policies.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","transgender students","dignity and respect"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I support the guidance\" and \"appreciate the attention to this matter.\" They also express approval of \"a more inclusive environment for transgender and non-binary students\" and want children to have access to what they need at school.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","privacy","inclusive schools"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly endorses the initiative, saying \"This work is important and needed\" and calling it \"a model that others can follow.\" The title and body both express approval of supporting transgender/non-conforming children and the proposed policies.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student support","nondiscrimination","school climate"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I am in strong support of these necessary policies\" and calls them \"a bare minimum\" for schools. They further argue schools should provide \"inclusion and equity for all\" and a \"safe environment,\" indicating clear approval of adoption.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","equity","school climate"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly oppose this policy proposal\" and repeatedly argues against key provisions such as withholding information from parents and requiring preferred pronouns. They conclude, \"We don't need new school policies on this front,\" indicating rejection of the regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","pronouns","religious freedom","gender identity","student privacy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"Please vote to oppose this measure as it is currently written\" and repeatedly argues that it \"distracts from the task of education\" and removes parental involvement. Although the comment supports compassion, privacy, and anti-bullying measures, it concludes that the accommodations \"cannot infringe upon the consideration of other students\" and objects to bathroom/locker room access by transgender students.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","privacy","bathroom access","student safety","LGBTQ+ inclusion"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.97,"stance_rationale":"The commenter directly argues that the policy \"will increase suicide rates,\" which is a negative claim about the regulation’s effects and implies it should not be adopted. No supportive language or request for modification is present.","tone":"negative","tags":["student safety","mental health","transgender students"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly oppose\" and rejects the policy in favor of teaching \"absolute truth.\" The reference to \"male and female\" and \"made in the image of God\" indicates opposition to the transgender student policies as proposed.","tone":"negative","tags":["religious freedom","LGBTQ+ inclusion","parental rights"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I am strongly opposed to these transgender policies\" and hopes \"this doesn’t pass.\" They also argue the policies would \"bring harm,\" are \"child abuse,\" and threaten restroom safety and privacy, indicating clear rejection of the regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender policies","bathroom access","student safety","privacy","parental rights"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly support\" the policy and asks officials to \"value the guidance and expertise\" behind it. The closing statement, \"You will never be wrong supporting human decency and rights,\" clearly endorses adoption of the regulation.","tone":"positive","tags":["transgender students","student rights","compassion","nondiscrimination"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"These proposals would persecute children\" and argues they would \"Confuse many children,\" \"Result in children being removed from school systems,\" and cause \"undue stress.\" Although they acknowledge \"I understand the intent,\" they conclude that \"there are better ways to accomplish this,\" indicating opposition to the regulation as written.","tone":"negative","tags":["student privacy","bathroom access","school safety","parental concerns","transgender students"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Oppose\" and \"I do not approve\" of the policy, indicating rejection of the regulation. They also argue it is \"ruining children\" and \"undermining family values,\" which shows substantive opposition rather than a neutral remark.","tone":"negative","tags":["religious freedom","family values","LGBTQ+ inclusion","bullying prevention"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly labels the comment \"SUPPORT\" and says \"Equal rights for all humans.\" They also endorse teaching kids that being transgender, non-binary, or gay is okay so they are not \"discriminated\" against or made \"depressed and unhappy and suicidal,\" which clearly supports the regulation's protective aims.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","equal rights","student mental health","anti-discrimination","bullying prevention"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly rejects the policy, calling it \"child abuse\" and saying \"This violates all reason and common sense.\" They argue it would \"jeopardize the privacy and safety of my daughter in bathrooms and locker room\" and say it should not go through.","tone":"negative","tags":["privacy","student safety","bathroom access","parental rights","LGBTQ+ inclusion"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter repeatedly argues the proposal should not be adopted, calling it \"anti-scientific,\" a \"violation of the First Amendment,\" and saying \"this bill takes it a step too far.\" They explicitly reject its pronoun, restroom, and locker room provisions and ask that schools not \"produce science deniers.\"","tone":"negative","tags":["First Amendment","religious freedom","privacy","bathroom access","gender identity"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter strongly endorses the regulation and attacks opponents of transgender protections, saying that failing to pass it \"kills children and ruins lives.\" The comment explicitly defends \"allowing someone to be who they are\" and rejects claims that it harms parents' rights.","tone":"negative","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","transgender students","religious freedom","parental rights","student safety"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Absolutely oppose this\" and argues schools should \"stay clear\" of the issue. They also reject the policy’s implications by demanding \"Separate bathrooms\" and criticizing it as \"Bowing to perversion.\"","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","bathroom access","LGBTQ+ inclusion","school policy"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly support this document and these policies,\" which directly endorses adoption of the regulation. The title, \"Strongly support!,\" reinforces the same position.","tone":"positive","tags":["transgender students","school policy","nondiscrimination"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Opposed\" and asks, \"Please do not let this pass,\" which clearly rejects adoption of the policy. They also describe it as \"reckless\" and \"a clear lack of attachment to reality,\" reinforcing opposition.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","parental rights","school policy","child development"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly support this measure!\" and frames the policy as necessary because their daughter's gay and trans friends are \"often bullied\" and need support. This is a clear endorsement of adopting the regulation.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","bullying prevention","student support"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"STRONGLY OPPOSE\" and states \"I don't want\" the policy because it would \"brainwash the children\" with \"sex confusion.\" This is a clear rejection of the proposed transgender student policies.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","parental rights","sex education","child development"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly oppose this transgender policy,\" which directly rejects adoption. They also argue it is \"harmful\" and call for affirming only \"God-given biological gender as male and female,\" indicating opposition to the policy's transgender accommodations.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender policy","religious freedom","gender identity","parental rights"]}


{
  "stance": "oppose",
  "stance_confidence": 0.99,
  "stance_rationale": "The commenter explicitly rejects the proposal, saying the policies are \"not for the betterment\" of children and that they \"will only lead to greater confusion and danger.\" They also argue that leaving parents out is \"absolutely wrong\" and ask to \"help confused children and don't harm others,\" indicating opposition to adoption.",
  "tone": "negative",
  "tags": [
    "parental rights",
    "student safety",
    "locker rooms",
    "gender dysphoria",
    "school policy"
  ]
}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Absolutely Oppose is the Strongest Terms!\" and repeatedly argues the policy is \"wrong on so many levels.\" They also call it \"anti-science\" and claim it endangers children, indicating clear rejection of the regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","student safety","bathroom access","locker rooms","religious freedom"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly support these policies\" and adds that \"It's time to affirm transgender yout[h],\" indicating clear approval of the regulation. There is no opposing language or request to weaken the policies.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","transgender students","nondiscrimination"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I wholeheartedly support these policies\" and describes them as beneficial for students. They also express hope that Virginia children \"can learn to be inclusive,\" indicating approval of adoption.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student support","inclusive education","transgender students"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"Why would we want to support gender confusion\" and refers to the proposals as \"extreme,\" indicating rejection of the regulation. They also object to \"boys in girls' locker rooms and bathrooms\" and argue schools should \"focus on teaching content,\" which shows opposition to the policy's transgender student provisions.","tone":"negative","tags":["gender identity","bathroom access","locker rooms","teacher concerns","student anxiety"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly begins with \"No\" and calls the policy an \"unjust burden and irresponsible.\" They argue it would dismiss parental rights, cause lawsuits, and create confusion and resentment, all of which indicate rejection of the regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","teacher burden","student rights","lawsuits","transgender policies"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly oppose!\" and frames the policy as harmful, stating \"I fear for my grandchildren.\" The reference to \"Bullying not by peers, but by curricula forced upon teachers\" indicates rejection of the regulation rather than support or a neutral question.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","curriculum","bullying","student safety"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly urges approval of the policy, saying to \"Allow students to their right to live their life in the manner they choose\" and criticizing the opposing letter as \"misleading\" and a \"scare tactic.\" They also argue that blocking students from being authentic is harmful, which supports adoption of the regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":["pronouns","LGBTQ+ inclusion","student identity","parental rights","student mental health"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly urges support for measures that would \"protect transgender youth and students\" and asks decision-makers to \"go to bat for them\" to guarantee \"equal protections.\" The comment clearly favors adopting anti-discrimination protections for transgender and non-binary students.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","anti-discrimination","student rights","equal protection"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Please scrap this idea !!\" and calls the policy \"a BAD IDEA,\" indicating clear opposition to adoption. The reference to \"Transgender Indoctrination\" and objections to \"any teachings that deviate from Creations plan\" further show they want the regulation rejected.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender inclusion","religious freedom","education policy"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly states, \"I support these model policies,\" which directly endorses adoption of the regulation. No reservations or requests for changes are included.","tone":"positive","tags":["transgender students","school policy","nondiscrimination"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"STRONGLY SUPPORT\" and asks to \"protect all children\" by offering \"a safe place for them to learn,\" which aligns with adopting the regulation. The language is clearly affirmative toward the proposed policies for transgender students.","tone":"positive","tags":["student safety","LGBTQ+ inclusion","safe learning environment","nondiscrimination"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly support these measures\" and argues they should be implemented to \"protect trans students.\" They also state that failing to adopt the policies would \"deny them an education outright,\" which clearly favors approval of the regulation.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","education access","transgender students"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly endorses the policy, saying \"Treating transgender students fairly is a human right\" and that it \"protects all students.\" They also urge, \"Keep VA schools safe!\" which supports adoption of the regulation's protections and safe-access provisions.","tone":"positive","tags":["transgender students","student safety","equal access","school climate","anti-discrimination"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I support the model policies,\" which directly endorses adoption. The additional statement that \"Everyone needs to be able to be sure that their identities are fully respected\" reinforces approval of the regulation's purpose.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student rights","respectful treatment"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I fully support this bill\" and argues it will \"protect\" transgender children and help schools focus on supporting all students. The comment describes personal hardship under current conditions and frames the regulation as a positive \"win-win.\"","tone":"positive","tags":["transgender students","student privacy","bathroom access","school facilities","student support"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly support this measure\" and argues that \"All transgender and non binary students deserve to have policies in place that protect their rights.\" This is a clear endorsement of adopting the regulation.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student rights","nondiscrimination","transgender students"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I stand with our youth\" and argues that \"Allowing all people to be who they are\" affirms their right to exist and safety. This is clear support for the proposed transgender student policies.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","supportive environment","youth rights"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says passing the guidance document is \"a huge step in the right direction\" and that \"This will save and improve lives.\" They also thank the recipient and frame the policy as necessary for \"the most basic human rights,\" indicating clear support for adoption.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","bullying prevention","human rights"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I support the guidance\" and asks to \"Please support the guidance.\" They also explain that the policy is needed to protect transgender students from bullying and physical harm, indicating clear approval of the regulation.","tone":"positive","tags":["transgender student protection","bullying prevention","student safety","LGBTQ+ inclusion"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly Support!\" and repeats support for \"best practices for school districts\" and for teaching staff how to support students. The comment frames the policy as necessary to \"support students and create safe schools,\" indicating clear approval of the regulation.","tone":"positive","tags":["student safety","equity","best practices","safe schools"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly support the adoption of this guidance\" and frames it as necessary to \"protect the rights, safety, and wellbeing of our trans students.\" The comment also endorses the policy’s purpose by arguing it is \"the right and just thing to do.\"","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","bullying prevention","nondiscrimination","transgender students"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"I strongly oppose\" and repeatedly argues the policy should not be adopted, calling it \"horrific\" and saying it will \"confuse our children\" and worsen bullying. They also object to schools \"hide this from parents,\" indicating opposition to the regulation’s core approach.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","religious freedom","LGBTQ+ inclusion","student privacy","bullying prevention"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I support the guidance\" and adds a reason: \"keep our schools safe for all students.\" This clearly endorses adoption of the regulation.","tone":"positive","tags":["student safety","LGBTQ+ inclusion","school climate"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly labels the submission \"Strongly Oppose\" and argues that it is \"downright wrong to disregard the role of parents in public education.\" They reject the policy framework as beyond the school's role, saying \"It is not the role of the school to change social structures.\"","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","school policy","bullying prevention","student safety"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"100 % in favor of accommodations!\" and adds that the policy is \"LONG overdue.\" They further endorse the underlying goal by stating that every child deserves to be treated \"with dignity and respect\" and protected from interference with their right to an education.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student dignity","education access","nondiscrimination"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says they are \"writing in favor of the supports identified in this guidance document\" and endorses practices like \"using a student's preferred pronouns\" and \"respecting gender identity.\" They also describe it as \"a forward step\" toward a more equitable school environment, indicating clear support for adoption.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","gender identity","pronouns","school climate","equity"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I am in strong support,\" which directly endorses the regulation. They also justify this by saying all community members should have \"a supportive learning environment away from hate and discrimination,\" aligning with the policy's goals.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","anti-discrimination","student safety","supportive learning environment"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"IN ABSOLUTE SUPPORT\" and urges, \"Please pass this!\" They also state the state is in need of protections for \"our trans population and members of the LGBTQ community\" and that they should be treated fairly in schools.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","transgender rights","student protections","school fairness"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly OPPOSE\" and calls the policies \"an atrocious abuse\" and \"OVERREACH at the UTMOST,\" indicating clear rejection of the regulation. They argue it removes parents from decision-making and should \"never be considered,\" which is opposition to adoption.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","student safety","government overreach","transgender students"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.93,"stance_rationale":"The title explicitly says \"Strongly Support,\" indicating approval of the regulation. The body, though truncated, says \"Virginia public schools must support and students,\" which is consistent with endorsing support for students and the policy framework.","tone":"positive","tags":["transgender students","public schools","student support"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly support the guidance!\" This is a clear endorsement of adopting the regulation as proposed.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","transgender students","school policy"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly Support!!\" and calls the changes \"essential to protecting trans children in schools.\" They also argue that opposing the policies would mean failing to protect students' mental wellbeing and human rights.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","mental health","religious freedom","human rights"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.97,"stance_rationale":"The commenter argues the guidelines are not safe and says they \"need to be revised\" to give authorities and parents more protective power, rather than relying on students' \"honesty.\" They also warn that parents \"won’t 'feel safe' in public schools\" under the proposal, indicating opposition to the regulation as written.","tone":"negative","tags":["student safety","parental rights","privacy","transgender students","school policy"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"STRONGLY SUPPORT\" and states that the policy \"is extremely important\" and \"Virginia needs to pass this.\" They argue the changes will help trans students feel safe and respected and that the state should \"do the bare minimum\" to care for students.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","school policy","anti-discrimination"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly disagree,\" and argues it is \"unfair to young women participating in sports\" to allow a transgender person to compete against them. The comment frames the policy as harming girls' team placement and scholarship opportunities, indicating opposition to the regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":["school sports","fairness in athletics","LGBTQ+ inclusion","student opportunities"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly support this guidance\" and describes it as \"a necessary step\". The comment endorses the regulation as helping create \"safe places for ALL students to learn and grow.\"","tone":"positive","tags":["student safety","LGBTQ+ inclusion","supportive learning environment"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I support efforts to accommodate the trans community in Virginia public schools\" and adds that the proposal would \"positively address several issues.\" This is a clear endorsement of adopting the regulation.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","transgender students","public schools"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly support the rights of transgender students\" and also supports \"the lawmakers protecting their rights within the schools.\" This is a clear endorsement of the regulation's purpose and adoption.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student rights","nondiscrimination"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly Support\" and calls the model policy \"a good step towards supporting all of our children.\" They argue it creates \"a safe and secure place\" and say we should \"move in the right direction,\" which clearly endorses adoption.","tone":"positive","tags":["transgender students","student safety","inclusive schools","learning environment","anti-discrimination"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly support creating and executing law that protects Virginia’s transgender students.\" They also endorse the goal of ensuring students can attend school \"without a fear of being intimidated or threatened,\" which aligns with adopting the regulation.","tone":"positive","tags":["transgender students","student safety","anti-bullying","public education","nondiscrimination"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly rejects the policy framework, saying they do not believe the government should \"usurp the rights and responsibilities of Parents\" and arguing schools should focus only on academics. They also oppose related transgender-support measures, calling puberty blockers \"criminal\" and saying preferred pronouns are \"a distraction\" for school personnel.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","transgender policies","puberty blockers","preferred pronouns","school facilities"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly SUPPORT\" and adds \"Trans rights are human rights!\" indicating clear approval of the regulation. The statement that \"All children deserve equal treatment however they choose to identify\" aligns with the policy's purpose of protecting transgender students.","tone":"positive","tags":["transgender rights","equal treatment","LGBTQ+ inclusion"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly endorses equal protections for transgender students, saying the document \"should not even have to be made\" because students deserve \"the same protections\" and \"SAFE and FAIR access\". They argue transgender students are \"no less part of their school\" and ask, \"Who are you to say they shouldn't have the same rights?\"","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student rights","nondiscrimination","school safety"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly endorses the policy’s underlying protections, saying “trans people are real and deserve the same respect any cisgender student gets.” They also state the boundaries in the proposal would have made them “feel so much safer,” which indicates support for adoption.","tone":"positive","tags":["transgender students","student safety","respect","LGBTQ+ inclusion"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly oppose these policies\" and repeats that they \"strongly oppose these guidelines.\" They object to the policies on religious/conscience grounds and argue they allow students to be \"interrogated without the knowledge of their parents,\" indicating rejection rather than support or neutrality.","tone":"negative","tags":["religious freedom","parental rights","privacy","transgender policies","student rights"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.93,"stance_rationale":"The comment says, \"Students matter regardless of gender,\" which clearly affirms equal treatment for transgender students and aligns with the regulation's nondiscrimination goals. It does not request changes or express opposition, so it supports adoption in principle.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","nondiscrimination","student rights"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly titles the submission \"Oppose transgender education\" and says \"I do not want my elementary school children being told that they can change their gender.\" They also reject related requirements such as informing parents, affirming students, and using gender-neutral pronouns, calling the policy \"outrageous\" and \"anti-American.\"","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","parental rights","religious freedom","pronouns","school policy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says the proposed policy is \"highly flawed\" and says lawmakers should \"do better,\" indicating opposition to adoption as written. Although they affirm that children should be safe and respected, they argue the policy goes \"woefully beyond\" rights protections and \"stripping away the rights of parents,\" which is a clear rejection of the proposal.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","transgender policy","student safety","privacy"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly წერს \"100% SUPPORT\" and says they want \"safe and inclusive schools for all current and future students in Virginia,\" which clearly endorses the regulation's purpose. They also identify as \"a non binary person,\" reinforcing support for transgender-inclusive policies.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","school climate","nonbinary identity"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says they are \"strongly opposed\" and concludes, \"I am strongly against every single one of them.\" They argue the policies violate parental rights, religious freedom, and student safety, and repeatedly call the policies \"horrific.\"","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","religious freedom","bathroom access","student safety","LGBTQ+ inclusion"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly labels the submission \"Support - Trans Rights are Human Rights\" and argues that the policies should protect \"Trans youth\" and normalize gender identity discussions. They also say religion should not be used as an excuse to \"neglect the needs of others,\" indicating approval of the regulation's protections for transgender students.","tone":"positive","tags":["transgender rights","student safety","religious freedom","LGBTQ+ inclusion","privacy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"STRONGLY OPPOSE!\" and calls the policy \"ludicrous,\" which clearly indicates rejection of the regulation. There is no language suggesting support or neutrality.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","policy opposition"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"Please support the policies listed in the Guidance Document\" and repeatedly argues the policies are \"the bare minimum\" that should be done. They also state that conceding on any part would harm transgender students, indicating clear approval of adoption.","tone":"negative","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","bullying prevention","privacy","school facilities"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly support!\" and \"I am in full support of the fair treatment of all of God's children,\" which clearly endorses the regulation. The statement \"Trans rights are human rights\" also indicates approval of the policy's purpose.","tone":"positive","tags":["transgender rights","equal treatment","religious support"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter says they do not want their children in a school under these policies and objects to \"remove parental rights\" and to children being exposed to \"teachings, values, hidden and blatant agendas.\" This indicates opposition to adopting the regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","student safety","LGBTQ+ inclusion","school policy"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly support this legislation\" and praises \"Proactive action\" for supporting trans students. The comment clearly endorses adoption of the regulation and frames it as beneficial for an \"inclusive culture.\"","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","transgender students","student support","school climate"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I do not support this proposed policy\" and repeatedly argues it would \"take away the feeling of safety\" and violate \"parents rights to be informed.\" They also call out specific sections as harmful, saying the policy would \"isolate and discriminate\" and create risks in bathrooms/locker rooms and around parental notification.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","bathroom access","locker rooms","student privacy","student safety"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly support\" and argues the policy is \"morally right\" and \"legally correct.\" They further state Virginia \"can and must\" use its power to \"protect the rights of trans people,\" which clearly endorses adoption of the regulation.","tone":"positive","tags":["transgender rights","civil rights","student safety","mental health","nondiscrimination"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I fully support this policy guidance\" and thanks VDOE for developing it. They also argue it will \"help school districts\" create a \"more welcoming and inclusive learning environment,\" indicating clear approval of adoption.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","school climate","nondiscrimination","transgender students"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Support strongly!\" and argues that \"We must must must protect a child’s right to safety at school,\" which clearly endorses adoption of the policy. The comment also dismisses opposition as not having \"taken the time actually read it,\" reinforcing support for the regulation.","tone":"positive","tags":["student safety","support for transgender students","bullying prevention","school policy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly rejects the policy, saying they \"can't believe\" schools should \"change to cater to this belief\" and calling it \"offensive and morally corrupt.\" The statement \"I will homeschool if this finds it's way in our schools\" indicates opposition to adoption.","tone":"negative","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","parental rights","religious freedom","school policy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter clearly rejects the policy, calling it \"perverse,\" saying the government is \"forcibly crossing into schools and family life,\" and urging to \"Keep our children innocent!\" They also express fear about transgender acceptance in schools and potential bathroom issues, indicating opposition to adoption of the regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","religious freedom","bathroom access","student privacy","LGBTQ+ inclusion"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly endorses transgender rights with \"Trans rights are human rights\" and urges approval through a supportive appeal: \"Love one another. Please.\" There is no criticism or request to weaken the policy.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","transgender rights","nondiscrimination"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"support trans students\" and argues that policies should \"make them feel safe and wanted.\" They frame the regulation as beneficial because it can help reduce suicide risk among LGBT students, indicating clear approval of the proposed guidance.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","mental health","bullying prevention"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strong support!\" and endorses the policy’s underlying purpose by stating that \"Everyone should have the freedom to express who they truly are and feel supported in doing so.\" The phrase \"Trans rights are human rights!\" clearly indicates approval of the regulation’s protections for transgender students.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","transgender rights","student support","nondiscrimination"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly support this legislation,\" which directly endorses adoption of the regulation. The additional statement that \"Hatred and bigotry have no place in this country's education system\" reinforces support for the policy's goals.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","anti-discrimination","school climate","bullying prevention"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly urges adoption, saying \"these policies are necessary\" and that \"our schools should support students in their journeys of self-discovery.\" They also suggest the rulemaking could be improved with more specific language, which indicates support with enhancements rather than opposition.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student well-being","nonbinary students","gender identity","school support"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly support this proposed guidance\" and urges the Commonwealth to ensure schools provide \"a safe and nurturing environment for all kids.\" This is a clear endorsement of adopting the regulation.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","supportive school environment"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly rejects the policy with \"No!\" and objects to transgender students' restroom access, saying \"Keep boy parts out of girl restrooms at school!\" This indicates opposition to the regulation's protections for transgender students.","tone":"negative","tags":["bathroom access","transgender students","religious freedom","school facilities"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly oppose,\" which directly states opposition to the regulation. The reason given, \"it's not safe for our students,\" indicates they want the policy rejected on safety grounds.","tone":"negative","tags":["student safety","transgender students","school policy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly states, \"I completely oppose this,\" which directly rejects the proposed regulation. The title also says \"Oppose,\" reinforcing the same position.","tone":"negative","tags":[]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly asks to \"revise this policy\" and says \"Males should not be allowed in the female locker room,\" indicating opposition to the proposed transgender student policies as written. They argue the policy \"does not accomplish\" respectful treatment and should instead \"acknowledge there are two sexes and two genders,\" which is a substantive rejection of the regulation's framework.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender policy","bathroom access","locker rooms","sex-based definitions","parental rights"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly oppose this bill\" and repeatedly criticizes the policy as a \"travesty\" and \"a disgrace.\" They argue teachers should focus on academics and reject the regulation's approach to transgender students.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","school policy","parental rights","sex education","teacher role"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly labels the proposal \"Strongly Oppose\" and repeatedly asks officials to \"resist making these destructive changes.\" They argue the policies are \"the wrong way\" and would lead to \"negative, divisive results,\" indicating clear opposition to adoption.","tone":"negative","tags":["religious freedom","teacher rights","LGBTQ+ inclusion","bullying prevention","school policy"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I am in complete agreement for supporting trans rights,\" which clearly endorses the regulation’s purpose. The title, \"Strongly In Support Of Trans Rights,\" reinforces that they want the policy adopted.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","transgender rights"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I fully support any legislation\" and frames that support around \"the health and well-being of trans youth.\" This indicates clear approval of the proposed transgender student policies.","tone":"positive","tags":["transgender students","student well-being","LGBTQ+ inclusion"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly Opposed\" and repeatedly rejects the policy as \"Godless legislation\" and \"lawlessness.\" They ask readers to \"not conform to this 'new' normal,\" indicating they want the regulation rejected rather than adopted.","tone":"negative","tags":["religious freedom","bathroom access","LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","parental rights"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly oppose\" and argues that people should not be \"empower[ed]\" to \"become someone they are not,\" which rejects the regulation’s transgender-supportive framework. The religious framing that \"God made people male and female\" is used to oppose the policy’s recognition of transgender students.","tone":"negative","tags":["religious freedom","gender identity","transgender students","school policy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.97,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"STRONGLY OPPOSED!\" and argues that the policy would \"further confuse them and stress them out more,\" indicating rejection of the regulation. The reference to \"adding this to the curriculum\" shows opposition to the transgender-student guidance being adopted in schools.","tone":"negative","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student mental health","curriculum","parental concerns"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Oppose\" in the title and repeatedly rejects the policy, calling it \"wrong on so many levels\" and saying \"there would be no need for these policies.\" The final line, \"Treat boys like boys and girls like girls!\" clearly indicates opposition to the transgender student policies.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","gender identity","parental rights","school policy"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly support\" and endorses \"guidance for inclusive learning environments that enable everyone.\" This clearly indicates approval of the proposed regulation.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","inclusive learning environments","student safety"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly labels the proposal \"OPPOSE\" and calls it \"Tyrannical trans guidance document.\" They argue the policies \"tramples on truth, common sense, and the rights of families\" and say the \"whole thing is an affront,\" indicating clear rejection of adoption.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","parental rights","school policy","student rights"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly support this!\" and argues that transgender students \"deserve respect\" and should be allowed bathroom access consistent with their gender identity. The comment endorses the policy’s protections and rejects claims that such access causes harm.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","bathroom access","student privacy","nondiscrimination","student safety"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly support\" and frames the regulation as \"protecting and expanding rights of members in the LGBTQ+ community.\" This clearly endorses adoption of the policy.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","civil rights","student rights"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"This policy should be overturned and abolished,\" and repeatedly frames the regulation as harmful. They argue it \"supersede[s] parents,\" \"punishes parents,\" and would \"destroy teachers and students who protest against this,\" all of which indicate clear opposition to adoption.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","religious freedom","LGBTQ+ inclusion","free speech","privacy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The comment explicitly says \"Strongly oppose,\" which clearly indicates rejection of the proposed regulation. No supporting or qualifying language is provided.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender policy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly oppose the Model Policies\" and repeatedly argues the policies are \"complete over reach\" and should not be adopted. They object to bathroom access, parental notification, and what they describe as \"indoctrination,\" all indicating rejection of the regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","bathroom access","privacy","school overreach","transgender students"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I am strongly opposed to these proposed policy changes,\" which directly states opposition to adoption. They also argue the policies \"deny the rights of parents,\" violate \"students' privacy rights,\" and threaten \"the privacy and safety of our girls,\" reinforcing a clear anti-policy position.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","privacy","student safety","girls' safety","First Amendment"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly titles the submission \"Strongly Support\" and says transgender, non-binary, and LGBTQ+ students \"should be supported and protected.\" This clearly endorses adoption of the regulation’s protections for transgender students.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","anti-discrimination","supportive schools"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"STRONGLY OPPOSE!!!\" and argues, \"Do not introduce confusion to kids,\" indicating rejection of the proposed transgender student policies. They also oppose related elements like \"Neutral pronouns\" and want issues handled \"case by case\" by parents rather than school guidance.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","parental rights","pronouns","mental health","school policy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly labels the policy and related school practices as \"STRONGLY Opposed\" and says the school is \"taking it over\" from parents. They repeatedly argue that \"Parents should be the source of guidance not the school\" and that FCPS should \"stick to educating not undermining the family and parents,\" indicating clear opposition to the regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","school authority","family values","transparency","curriculum"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I am strongly opposed to this policy\" and argues it is \"harmful to our children.\" They also say it would \"further foster a dysphoric environment\" and promote a \"culturally popular agenda\" they reject, indicating clear opposition to adoption of the regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","gender identity","student mental health","parental concerns","school policy"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I support protections for trans and non-binary students in schools\" and asks to \"Make Virginia a safer Commonwealth for TGNC youth.\" The comment argues the guidance is needed to prevent bullying, improve mental health, and protect students, which clearly supports adoption of the regulation.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","bullying prevention","mental health","privacy"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"STRONGLY SUPPORT\" and argues that \"Transgender kid's rights are human rights and should be protected.\" They also state that transgender children should be \"safe and accepted,\" which clearly endorses the regulation's purpose.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","human rights","acceptance"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I am in full support of this!\" and repeatedly urges, \"Please support this!\" They argue the policy protects transgender students' rights and would \"do no harm to cisgender students\" while helping trans students.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student rights","mental health","nondiscrimination","school safety"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly endorses the guidance, calling it \"Comprehensive, ESSENTIAL, and well supported\" and saying it will be \"paramount to protecting transgender students and ensuring equal access to education.\" They also state, \"I look forward to seeing this guidance in implementation,\" which clearly supports adoption.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","equal access","nondiscrimination"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Whole Heartedly Support These Policies\" and closes with \"I support these policies.\" They argue the policies \"protect the student\" and \"go a long way to protect\" trans and non-binary students, indicating clear approval of adoption.","tone":"positive","tags":["transgender students","student privacy","name and pronouns","restroom access","LGBTQ+ inclusion"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.97,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly labels the submission \"Oppose\" and says the policies \"run the risk\" of mockery and are \"dangerous.\" They argue the document \"puts up barriers\" and criticize it for reducing communication with parents, indicating opposition to the regulation as written.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","school communication","transgender students","privacy","student support"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.96,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly titles the submission \"Oppose\" and states, \"Kids will be confused by these policies,\" which indicates disapproval of adopting the regulation. No supportive or neutral language appears.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","student confusion","school policy"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly titles the comment \"Strongly Support\" and says \"school age children need to have at least a bill that defends them,\" indicating clear approval of the regulation. The body argues the policies are needed to protect trans students' rights and respect in school.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","student rights","school safety","discrimination","LGBTQ+ inclusion"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says they are \"Never been more opposed to anything in my life\" and uses all-caps \"DO NOT\" to reject the policy. They also argue against accommodating transgender students, saying \"make a 3rd bathroom option\" instead and claiming the policy would \"endanger normal children in school.\"","tone":"negative","tags":["bathroom access","transgender students","student safety","privacy","school facilities"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Totally Support,\" which clearly endorses adoption of the proposed policies. There is no qualifying language suggesting opposition or neutrality.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","transgender students","equal treatment"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I think guidance to support students in the LGBT community is necessary\" and expresses a desire for schools where \"all students are treated equally and feel safe.\" They also state, \"we can and we should do better,\" which clearly endorses the proposed guidance.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","bullying prevention","equal treatment"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly Support\" and states that \"Trans lives, especially trans children's lives, are always incredibly valuable and need to be protected,\" which clearly endorses the regulation's protective purpose. There is no opposing language or request to weaken the policy.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","transgender students","child welfare"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"No, I do not support\" the policies and ends with \"Please reject.\" They also argue the policies \"undermine the rights of the parents and families,\" indicating clear opposition to adoption.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","religious freedom","LGBTQ+ inclusion","gender identity"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly oppose\" and repeatedly argues the policy \"has gone too far.\" They object to schools affirming a child's gender identity and keeping it from parents, indicating they do not want the regulation adopted.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","religious freedom","gender identity","school authority","privacy"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly წერს \"Strongly Support!!!!\" and endorses the policy with \"LGBTQ rights are human rights!\" This is a clear approval of the regulation as written.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","civil rights"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly urges approval of the policy, saying \"we should\" support all children and that \"Trans kids should be treated with respect, dignity\" in public schools. The title \"SUPPORT OUR TRANS YOUTH\" and repeated calls to \"treat them as such\" clearly endorse the regulation's goals.","tone":"negative","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student dignity","anti-discrimination","transgender students"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly titles the comment \"Strongly Support\" and argues that students \"MUST be provided a SAFE learning environment.\" They also criticize opposition to \"the creation of a safe and positive learning environment for ALL students,\" indicating clear approval of the regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":["student safety","LGBTQ+ inclusion","anti-discrimination","religious freedom"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"We object to the adoption of the new transgender policies in Virginia public schools\" and titles the comment \"Strongly oppose this risky and premature policy change.\" The body argues against the policies on parental rights and concerns about transgender interventions, indicating clear opposition to adoption.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","transgender students","privacy","medical transition","school policy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"STRONGLY OPPOSE!!!\" and argues the policy is \"very wrong\". They object to \"remove a parent(s) from any decisions involving their children\" and to \"encourage children to go against their parents,\" indicating rejection of the regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","transgender policies","family autonomy","political ideology"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I believe the best path forward for Virginia is to support the transgender students we have\" and urges that students be allowed to be \"their authentic selves.\" This is a clear endorsement of the proposed policies' goal of supporting transgender students.","tone":"positive","tags":["transgender students","LGBTQ+ inclusion","student support","equality","respect"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly oppose this measure\" and argues it is \"an enormous distraction from the core function and mission of our Board of Education.\" They also say matters of sexuality should be \"reserved for the privacy of one's home,\" indicating rejection of the proposed transgender student policies.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","LGBTQ+ inclusion","school mission","privacy","bullying prevention"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"Vote NO to this nonsense,\" which clearly rejects the proposed policies. The statement about not wanting \"transgender\" people in a bathroom with them or their children indicates opposition to the regulation's transgender student protections, especially around facility access.","tone":"negative","tags":["bathroom access","parental rights","transgender students","school facilities"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"Strongly oppose these policies,\" which directly states opposition to the proposed regulation. No qualifying language suggests support or neutrality.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender policies"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I very strongly oppose this plan,\" which directly states opposition to the regulation. The follow-up language, \"I can not believe that this is even being discussed. Unbelievable!\" reinforces a strongly negative rejection rather than a request for changes.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","LGBTQ+ inclusion","school policy"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"STRONGLY SUPPORT\" and \"I strongly support the rights of trans youth.\" They also argue schools should provide \"the same rights and protections\" and \"support and protect their students,\" which clearly endorses the regulation's purpose.","tone":"positive","tags":["transgender students","student safety","nondiscrimination","LGBTQ+ inclusion"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly argues against the policy, asking \"where is the science\" and stating that \"The current legislation will create instead a hostile environment.\" They frame the regulation as encouraging children to question their gender and birth sex and say it should not be adopted as written.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","student safety","gender dysphoria","bullying prevention","parental rights"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"support this guidance!!!\" and repeatedly argues that schools should provide \"an environment where trans students get treated with dignity and respect.\" They also state that the guidance would help kids \"learn and grow\" and end with \"Let our kids be who they are,\" clearly endorsing adoption of the policy.","tone":"positive","tags":["transgender students","LGBTQ+ inclusion","student dignity","school climate","privacy"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"strongly support,\" which directly endorses adoption of the regulation. No contrary language or qualifications are included.","tone":"positive","tags":[]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly oppose this,\" indicating clear rejection of the regulation. They also object to the policy's treatment of transgender identity, arguing it is \"very dangerous\" and that it could \"take a child from their parents.\"","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","transgender students","student safety","school policy"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly Support\" and repeatedly endorses the policy as a matter of \"love, respect, and support.\" They argue that \"Transgender rights are human rights\" and urge officials to \"listen to those who know what they need to thrive and do our very best to provide,\" which clearly supports adoption.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","transgender rights","student support","nondiscrimination"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The comment explicitly says \"Strongly oppose,\" which clearly indicates rejection of the proposed regulation. No supporting or qualifying language is provided.","tone":"negative","tags":[]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly support these guidelines\" and argues they are needed to \"foster a safe and respectful educational environment for all students.\" The comment also endorses the policy’s purpose of protecting and affirming transgender students from discrimination and harassment.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","anti-discrimination","bullying prevention"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.97,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Oppose!\" and argues the policy \"will allow others to take advantage of privacy.\" They propose an alternative—\"make private bathrooms for everyone and don’t make it about gender at all\"—which indicates rejection of the regulation as written rather than support.","tone":"negative","tags":["privacy","bathroom access","gender identity","student facilities"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter rejects the policy’s implications for sex-specific facilities, saying it is \"not in any way, shape, or form OK\" to allow \"people of the opposite sex into gender specific locker rooms.\" They frame the issue as a violation of others’ privacy and say it is \"WRONG,\" indicating opposition to the regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":["privacy","bathroom access","locker rooms","sex-specific facilities"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly calls the proposal \"extremely concerned\" and a \"disturbing\" \"mandate,\" then argues against it on multiple grounds, including grammar, teacher burden, privacy/safety, faith, and legal risk. The overall thrust is that the regulation should not be adopted in its current form.","tone":"negative","tags":["pronouns","teacher burden","privacy","student safety","religious freedom"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"Do not pass this\" and states that \"The school system is not the place for this,\" which clearly rejects adoption of the regulation. The reference to \"push any agenda\" indicates opposition to the policy itself rather than a request for changes.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","parental rights","school policy","LGBTQ+ inclusion"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly titles the submission \"Oppose new proposed Model Policies\" and repeatedly argues the policies \"harms parental rights\" and \"negatively impact student emotional and physical safety.\" They object to allowing students to use different names/bathrooms without parental notification and say the state should not adopt these guidelines.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","privacy","bathroom access","student safety","LGBTQ+ inclusion"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The comment explicitly states \"OPPOSE\" in the title, which directly indicates the commenter does not want the regulation adopted. There is no body text to suggest any nuance or conditional support.","tone":"negative","tags":[]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly states, \"I OPPOSE the proposed transgender guidelines!\" twice, leaving no ambiguity about their position. No supporting reasons or qualifications are provided, but the stance against adoption is clear.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender policies","LGBTQ+ inclusion"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The comment is an emphatic rejection of the regulation, using repeated \"NO!!!\" and the title \"NO!!!!!!\". It provides no supporting details, but the intent to oppose adoption is unmistakable.","tone":"negative","tags":[]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly oppose\" and \"Strongly opposed to this. Vote no,\" which clearly indicates rejection of the regulation. There is no qualifying language suggesting support or neutrality.","tone":"negative","tags":["opposition","transgender students","school policy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"Opposed to this. Vote no,\" which clearly indicates rejection of the proposed regulation. There is no qualifying language suggesting support or a request for modification.","tone":"negative","tags":[]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.97,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Vote no,\" which directly rejects the proposed regulation. The follow-up, \"Keep academics focused on academics,\" suggests they believe the policy is a distraction from schooling priorities.","tone":"negative","tags":["education priorities","transgender students","school policy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.97,"stance_rationale":"The commenter clearly rejects the regulation, writing \"Absolutely not the place for this.\" The title \"No!!!!\" reinforces a strong opposition to adopting the policy.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","school policy","opposition"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly oppose this legislation\" and argues it is \"a disservice to the students of Virginia.\" They object to pronoun use, school involvement, and say the policy \"supersede[s] the right of the parent,\" all indicating rejection of the regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","pronouns","LGBTQ+ inclusion","school policy","student privacy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly rejects the policy as \"the radical, anti-science agenda of the transgender movement\" and says such content should \"NEVER be a part of\" school. The statement that \"Children do not belong to the State\" further indicates opposition to the regulation and its implementation in schools.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender policy","school curriculum","parental rights","religious freedom","LGBTQ+ inclusion"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I support this wholeheartedly\" and calls the model policies \"a good thing\". They also endorse an \"inclusive and equitable\" standard for how schools interact with students, which clearly favors adoption.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student support","equity","school policy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I oppose these proposed policies\" and argues they would \"allow parents to be deceived\" and \"deprive girls of necessary privacy.\" This is a clear rejection of the regulation as written.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","privacy","transgender students","school policies"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Oppose draft transgender mandates\" and argues the policy is \"stupid and dangerous\" and will \"do nothing but harm our society.\" They also state that the Department of Education has \"too much power\" and that the guidance should not be promoted in schools.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","parental rights","religious freedom","school curriculum","state authority"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly oppose the proposed guidelines,\" which directly states opposition to adoption. The added phrase \"which would affect all public schools within the Commonwealth of Virginia\" reinforces that they are objecting to the regulation’s statewide application.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender policies","public schools","statewide policy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Vote No!\" and frames the policy as \"an infringement on our religious freedom,\" which indicates opposition to adoption. The phrase \"Keep your politics out of the classroom!\" further rejects the regulation's presence in schools.","tone":"negative","tags":["religious freedom","politics in schools","transgender students","public schools"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"Vote No to protect our children!\" which clearly rejects the proposed policies. The phrase \"God makes no mistakes\" signals opposition to transgender-related guidance on religious grounds.","tone":"negative","tags":["religious freedom","parental rights","LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly rejects the policy with \"Please do not do this\" and frames it as an unwanted \"agenda\" being pushed. The rhetorical questions \"Why must this type of agenda be pushed? What purpose does it serve?\" indicate opposition rather than a request for clarification or neutral input.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","LGBTQ+ inclusion","parental rights","school policy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"I STRONGLY OPPOSE THIS!!!!!!!\" and the title \"ABSOLUTELY NOT!!!!\" leaves no ambiguity about rejecting the regulation. No supporting or neutral language appears.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","school policy","opposition"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter says, \"I am strongly against the proposed policy\" and concludes that \"this policy should not be supported.\" They argue it would undermine \"Parental Rights,\" \"Privacy, Safety, Religious Freedom and Freedom of Speech,\" and object to bathroom access and school involvement in gender identity issues.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","privacy","religious freedom","bathroom access","LGBTQ+ inclusion"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly states, \"I STRONGLY OPPOSE THIS!!!\" which directly indicates rejection of the proposed regulation. No supporting or qualifying language is provided.","tone":"negative","tags":[]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I am firmly opposed to this document\" and \"do NOT support this,\" indicating clear opposition to adoption. They argue the policy would \"not help children\" and object to what they call \"gender confusion\" and \"the lie that a child has been 'born in the wrong body.'\"","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","gender identity","student safety","parental rights","school policy"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I am in support of the proposed guidance\" and specifies support for \"trans and non binary students.\" This is a clear endorsement of adopting the regulation.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","transgender students","non-binary students"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I STRONGLY OPPOSE TO THIS!!!!\" and threatens to leave the state if it is adopted: \"I WILL MOVE MY FAMILY & BUSINESS OUT OF VIRGINIA.\" This is a clear rejection of the proposed regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","opposition","threat to leave","public schools"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly oppose this!\" which directly rejects the proposed regulation. The statement that \"The PARENT knows more about their child than the school\" indicates a parental-rights objection to the policy.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","transgender students","school policy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter says the document is \"over-reaching,\" that schools should \"abstain from involvement\" in gender identity discussions, and that the initiative \"robs energy and resources from more important initiatives.\" They also argue parental roles \"should never be breached,\" indicating clear opposition to adopting the policy.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","gender identity","school policy","privacy","resource allocation"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Oppose\" and labels the policy \"against American values\" and \"plain wrong and STUPID,\" which clearly indicates rejection of the regulation. There is no request for modification or neutral feedback.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","school policy","LGBTQ+ inclusion"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"I strongly oppose this idea\" and argues against the policy on the grounds that it creates \"gender confusion\" and allows access to restrooms/locker rooms by \"the opposite sex.\" The comment asks that the policy not be adopted because of perceived safety risks.","tone":"negative","tags":["bathroom access","locker rooms","student safety","privacy","gender identity"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly oppose this!\" which directly states opposition to the proposed policies. The title \"No No No\" reinforces a negative position toward adoption.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","taxpayer concerns","transgender students"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly asks, \"Please don’t implement this policy at school\" and \"Please don’t promote this kind of policies at schools,\" which clearly rejects the regulation. Although they say they are \"not against LGBQ community,\" they still oppose the policy on religious grounds, stating it is \"against God’s will.\"","tone":"negative","tags":["religious freedom","LGBTQ+ inclusion","parental rights","school policy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly states, \"I strongly oppose to this,\" which clearly indicates rejection of the proposed regulation. The title also says \"Oppose,\" reinforcing the same position.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","policy opposition"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly oppose\" and states that \"children should not be exposed to these beliefs at school,\" which clearly rejects the proposed policies. There is no indication of support or neutrality.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","parental rights","school curriculum"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly asks to \"protect our trans youth\" and to \"give them equal rights and respect,\" which clearly supports adopting the proposed policies. The title \"Support our Trans Youth\" reinforces that the comment favors the regulation.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student rights","equal treatment","transgender students"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly rejects the policy, saying the government has \"NO RIGHT to undermine parents\" and that \"This policy will be harmful to ALL children.\" The statement that it will \"do both\" indicates opposition to adoption of the model policies.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","privacy","transgender students","school policy"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly endorses support for transgender youth, stating that \"Trans youth deserve the support of all\" and that \"we owe our children more.\" The final sentence, \"When people tell you who they are, the right response is to listen,\" clearly aligns with adopting the proposed policies.","tone":"positive","tags":["transgender students","LGBTQ+ inclusion","student support","school policy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter repeatedly condemns the proposal as an \"attack on our children\" and says school is \"not the place\" for these policies. They explicitly reject the rationale behind the draft, calling it \"nothing more than a weapon\" and comparing supporters to authoritarian regimes, which clearly indicates opposition to adoption.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","parental rights","indoctrination","free speech","school policy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says they \"strongly oppose\" the model policies and asks that \"all training that is contrary to biological gender be held out of our school system.\" They repeatedly reject the regulation as \"false training\" and oppose \"ANY and ALL training\" that goes against it.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","gender identity","K-12 education","parental rights","school policy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"Oppose new gender identity in schools,\" which directly rejects the proposed transgender student policies. The comment provides no qualifying support or request for modification, only opposition.","tone":"negative","tags":["gender identity","transgender students","schools"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"STRONGLY OPPOSED!!\" and repeatedly rejects the policy's premise, arguing that \"Your gender is determined at birth\" and that lawmakers should not recognize individual gender identity. The appeal to scripture and statements like \"Stand up for what is right\" indicate opposition to adopting the regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":["religious freedom","gender identity","transgender students","LGBTQ+ inclusion"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The comment explicitly says \"SUPPORT\" and the body adds \"Respect every human,\" which aligns with approving the transgender student policies. There is no language opposing or questioning the regulation.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","nondiscrimination","student dignity"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly Oppose!!!\" and repeatedly rejects the policy, stating \"absolutely not!!\" and \"Please don’t confuse these children.\" They argue the regulation would undermine parental authority and create safety problems, indicating clear opposition to adoption.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","bathroom access","student privacy","religious freedom","LGBTQ+ inclusion"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The comment explicitly says \"OPPOSE\" in both the title and body, indicating clear rejection of the proposed regulation. No supporting or qualifying language is provided.","tone":"negative","tags":[]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says they are \"strongly opposed to anything that confuses gender confusion\" and argues the policy would present \"gender confusion\" to children. They also state \"We are Christians and God makes it very clear this is not right,\" indicating rejection of the regulation rather than support or neutrality.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","religious freedom","bathroom access","locker rooms","LGBTQ+ inclusion"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I STRONGLY DISAGREE!!!!\" and calls the policy \"a HUGE mistake,\" which clearly indicates opposition to adopting the regulation. No supporting reasons or requests for modification are provided, only rejection.","tone":"negative","tags":[]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly endorses protecting transgender students and argues that schools should respect a child's identity for safety: \"the school system should respect that for that child’s safety\" and \"We shouldn’t draw lines, we should just respect each other.\" The comment also defends using preferred names and pronouns and frames the policy as life-saving, saying it \"can literally save a child’s life.\"","tone":"positive","tags":["transgender students","student privacy","parental rights","pronouns","LGBTQ+ inclusion"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.86,"stance_rationale":"The comment is explicitly labeled \"OPPOSE,\" indicating rejection of the proposed regulation. The body, \"you didn’t find better to help our kids.....,\" is dismissive and suggests the commenter believes the policy is not a good way to help children.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","school policy","student welfare"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.86,"stance_rationale":"The commenter rejects the policy outright with \"NO, please!\" and frames it as harmful, calling it \"this type of experiment.\" The reference to \"teen death\" and urging officials to \"review your data\" indicates opposition based on perceived danger rather than support or a neutral question.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","student safety","mental health","policy opposition"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly support this bill\" and endorses \"any attempts to add protections for transgender students.\" This is a clear affirmative position in favor of adopting the regulation.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student protections","nondiscrimination"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I AM ABSOLUTELY OPPOSED TO THIS\" and repeats, \"THIS IS NOT WHAT’S BEST FOR OUR CHILDREN.\" This is a clear rejection of the proposed transgender student policies.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","parental rights","student welfare"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Vote 'NO'\" and \"I do not endorse,\" making clear they do not want the regulation adopted. They also object to \"altering restrooms\" and say \"this is not a good move,\" indicating opposition to the policy itself rather than a request for minor changes.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","bathroom access","parental rights","religious freedom","school facilities"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I fully support the Model Policies for the Treatment of Transgender Students in Virginia’s Public Schools\" and repeats support for \"a safe and supportive learning environment free from discrimination and harassment for all students.\" The comment is clearly in favor of adopting the regulation, with no opposing language.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","anti-discrimination","bullying prevention"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly rejects the regulation with \"HECK TO THE NO!\" and calls it \"ABSURD!\" This is a clear expression of opposition to adopting the proposed policies.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","school policy","LGBTQ+ inclusion"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Vote no\" and argues the policy \"goes against everything our country was founded upon.\" They frame it as violating \"the parents responsibility and right\" and claim it is \"against\" the Constitution, indicating clear opposition to adoption.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","constitutional concerns","government overreach"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly labels the comment \"Opposed\" and argues that \"Children should not be encouraged\" to identify as a different sex, indicating rejection of the policy’s transgender-student protections. The statement that \"Adults can make that decision but not children\" further shows opposition to the regulation as applied to students.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","parental rights","child development","gender identity"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly labels the submission \"Support\" and says the policies are \"essential for the safety and security of transgender students.\" This clearly endorses adoption of the regulation.","tone":"positive","tags":["transgender students","student safety","supportive environment"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"OPPOSE\" and asks, \"Please do not put these awful guidelines on our students.\" They argue the policies are harmful, saying children should not be considering sex or sexuality and that this is \"NOT good for the mental Health of anyone involved.\"","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","student mental health","age appropriateness","school policy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly oppose this,\" which directly states opposition to the regulation. The added claim that implementation \"would be harmful to our children\" reinforces that they want it rejected.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","student safety","parental concerns"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I'm strongly opposed to this measure\" and titles the comment \"Opposed / No.\" They argue the guidance \"reinforces and creates more confusion\" and object to \"remove clear gender/sex categories,\" indicating rejection of the regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender policies","bullying prevention","gender identity","student support","school guidance"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I oppose this measure\" and repeatedly argues against adoption, claiming it will \"train children... to disrespect their parents\" and \"force a type of religion on all students.\" Although one sentence mentions concern for transgender students, the overall thrust is rejection of the proposed policies.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","religious freedom","transgender students","school facilities","privacy"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"we do not support the proposed guidance\" if it is not adopted, and the title \"Support Trans Youth\" reinforces approval. They argue that \"Children deserve a safe environment\" and that adults should \"support the proposed guidance,\" which clearly favors adoption.","tone":"positive","tags":["student safety","LGBTQ+ inclusion","transgender students","supportive learning environment"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"This is something that should be kept out of schools,\" which rejects the regulation. They also argue it would cause \"even more confusion\" for a child and make teachers uncomfortable, indicating opposition rather than a request for modification.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","parental rights","teacher concerns","student confusion"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly states, \"I am opposed to this,\" which directly indicates rejection of the proposed regulation. The title also says \"Opposed,\" reinforcing the same position.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","school policy","opposition"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly urges readers to \"reassess your thinking on this proposed policy\" and frames the draft as a dangerous \"pandora's box\" that should not be adopted. The body lists numerous alleged harms and repeatedly attacks those \"in SUPPORT\" of the policy, indicating clear opposition to the regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","parental rights","privacy","school safety","government overreach"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly argues that \"Every child [has] the right to be safe and learn in school\" and condemns harassment and bullying of transgender youth. By saying they post this \"because of a child I love, and want safety for him,\" they clearly support protections for transgender students in school.","tone":"positive","tags":["transgender students","student safety","bullying prevention","harassment","LGBTQ+ inclusion"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly titles the comment \"Support\" and says, \"I salute the school system's courage and forward thinking approach\" and \"Forward with compassion and courage.\" These phrases clearly endorse the proposed policies rather than oppose them.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student support","nondiscrimination","privacy"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"PASS THIS !!\" and argues that students should receive \"the same rights and protections\" and that it is \"our job to protect our children--ALL our children.\" The body consistently endorses transgender rights and the policy's underlying protections rather than opposing them.","tone":"positive","tags":["transgender rights","student protections","nondiscrimination","LGBTQ+ inclusion","privacy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.96,"stance_rationale":"The commenter objects to the policy’s privacy/confidentiality approach, stating that \"Parents have a right to know critical information\" and that schools should not be the \"proprietary owner\" of the process. The title \"NO!\" and emphasis on parental involvement in \"significant life altering decisions\" indicate opposition to the regulation as written.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","student privacy","transgender students","school-parent communication"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I support this proposal\" and urges, \"Let's get this passed!!\" They also frame the policy as helping kids feel \"safe and respected,\" indicating clear approval of adoption.","tone":"positive","tags":["transgender students","student safety","LGBTQ+ inclusion","school climate","nondiscrimination"]}