{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly states \"Opposed to this policy\" and repeats \"Opposed to this policy,\" which clearly indicates rejection of the proposed regulation. No supporting reasons or qualifications are provided.","tone":"negative","tags":[]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I support inclusion regardless of sexual orientation,\" which indicates approval of the policy’s inclusive treatment of transgender students. Although the comment mentions sexual orientation rather than gender identity, the overall message is supportive of the regulation’s inclusion goals.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","inclusion","nondiscrimination"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly oppose this legislation\" and repeatedly urges rejection: \"Don't make the other children suffer\" and \"Vote what is right!\" The reasons given are objections to parental rights, pronoun use, and bathroom/changing room access for transgender students.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","pronouns","bathroom access","student privacy","LGBTQ+ inclusion"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly disagree with the VDOE model polices regarding the treatment of transgender students,\" which clearly indicates opposition to adopting the regulation. No mitigating language or request for changes is provided.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","LGBTQ+ inclusion","education policy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I am opposed to the policies in this document.\" They also argue against adoption by citing concerns about \"the safety and bodily privacy of our students\" and \"the parental rights of their parents.\"","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","student safety","privacy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.96,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Oppose\" and argues that \"the VDOE should not disregard the role of parents in public education,\" indicating they do not want the policy adopted as written. The comment raises a parental rights objection rather than supporting the regulation with changes.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","public education","state authority"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I support this document\" and argues it protects \"all children's rights to a healthy educational environment.\" They further endorse equal participation and dignity for transgender students, saying they should not be made to feel \"less worthy of participating in society.\"","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student rights","school climate","anti-discrimination"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.93,"stance_rationale":"The comment uses hostile language toward the policy and the people it concerns, calling them \"Disordered Minds\" and framing the issue as \"The epitome of Inhumanity.\" This strongly indicates rejection of the transgender student policies rather than support or neutrality.","tone":"negative","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","transgender students","discrimination"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.93,"stance_rationale":"The comment uses derogatory language toward transgender people and the policy, calling them \"Disordered Minds\" and framing the issue as \"The epitome of Inhumanity.\" This strongly indicates rejection of the proposed transgender student policies rather than support or neutrality.","tone":"negative","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","transgender students","discrimination"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"DO NOT SUPPORT\" and \"Recommend this not be adopted.\" The body repeatedly argues the policies would harm parents, privacy, safety, and religious freedom, indicating clear opposition to adoption.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","privacy","bathroom access","religious freedom","student safety"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I do not approve of their proposed guidelines\" and argues the policies are based on \"radical theories\" that would \"eradicate all distinctions between male and female.\" The title also asks to \"protect children and don't deny parental involvement,\" indicating rejection of the regulation as written.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","gender identity","LGBTQ+ inclusion","school policy"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"Full, 100% support the guidance!\" which directly endorses adoption of the regulation. They also state it is \"absolutely necessary to protect our trans and non-binary youth,\" reinforcing clear support for the policy's purpose.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","transgender students","non-binary youth"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says the proposal \"contains significant danger\" and \"has no business here,\" indicating rejection of the regulation. They also frame it as an \"extreme view\" that will \"cause extreme damage,\" and argue schools should \"NEVER come in between the parents and their children.\"","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","transgender students","school policy","family values"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"Fully support!\" and endorses the draft guidance from VDOE. They also explain why, stating that \"All LGBTQ+ children should feel safe and supported especially in school,\" which clearly favors adoption of the regulation.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","school climate"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I support the guidelines\" and adds support for \"schools supporting transgender students.\" This is a clear endorsement of adopting the regulation as proposed.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student support","school policy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I oppose\" the policy and rejects transgender inclusion as \"not how we were created.\" They also object to it being \"pushed on innocent children,\" indicating opposition to adoption of the regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":["religious freedom","parental rights","LGBTQ+ inclusion","student welfare"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly rejects the policy, calling it \"indoctrination of falsehoods\" and \"unscientific, unhealthy, damaging.\" They argue against the underlying transgender framework and say the proposed teaching is \"garbage,\" indicating clear opposition to adoption.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","LGBTQ+ inclusion","science","student welfare"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says they are \"completely against this indoctrination\" and argues the state has \"no right\" to require these transgender guidelines. They also urge schools to \"stick to teaching true history, reading, writing and mathematics,\" indicating rejection of the regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender policies","parental rights","curriculum","indoctrination","religious/moral objections"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly rejects the policy, calling it \"absolutely ridiculous\" and saying \"You shouldn't legislate something different\" or \"force it to be taught in our schools.\" They also object to consequences for noncompliance, indicating opposition to adoption of the regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender policy","parental rights","school curriculum","pronoun use","LGBTQ+ inclusion"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly states, \"I support the model policy,\" which directly endorses adoption of the regulation. The title also says \"Support,\" reinforcing the same position.","tone":"positive","tags":["transgender students","school policy","nondiscrimination"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly states, \"I support the guidance,\" which directly endorses adoption of the regulation. The title also says \"Support.\" reinforcing the same position.","tone":"positive","tags":["support for guidance"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I do not approve of this proposal\" and repeatedly calls it \"reprehensible\" and says it \"should be trashed.\" The body argues against multiple provisions, including parental notification, bathroom/changing room access, dress codes, and religious accommodations, all in opposition to adoption.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","bathroom access","privacy","religious freedom","LGBTQ+ inclusion"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly labels the comment \"SUPPORT\" and urges the policy direction by saying \"Believing and supporting all kids, especially, trans kids is vital\" and that a healthy school environment helps them learn and thrive. The statement advocates for respect and inclusion for transgender students, which aligns with adopting the regulation.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student mental health","school climate","transgender students","respect and dignity"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I fully support the guidance\" and emphasizes that it is \"so important to provide an inclusive educational environment.\" The rest of the comment reinforces approval by describing transgender and non-binary students as deserving \"a positive school experience.\"","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","inclusive education","student safety"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I do not agree with this at all,\" and rejects key parts of the policy, especially allowing transgender students to use bathrooms/locker rooms aligned with their gender identity: \"their born gender should be what rest room or locker room they use.\" Although they say students should not be harassed, the overall position is to oppose the regulation's core protections and accommodations.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","bathroom access","locker room access","pronouns","gender identity"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"DO NOT SUPPORT\" and calls the policies \"totally unworkable.\" They argue the proposal would \"force all students, faculty, and administrators to comply\" with a view they reject, indicating clear opposition to adoption.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","parental rights","religious freedom","sex and gender"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly calls the proposed policies \"ridiculous,\" \"discriminatory and unenforceable,\" and says the scenario \"would totally be supported by these policies,\" indicating clear rejection. The comment argues the policies would allow abuse of gender identity claims and harm girls' access to showers and complaints.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","bathroom access","privacy","student safety","school sports"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly rejects the policy, calling it an \"insanely damaging 'policy'\" and saying \"Stop doing this with our tax dollars!\" They argue it is \"destructive\" and should not be supported, which clearly indicates opposition to adoption.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","LGBTQ+ inclusion","science","tax dollars","student welfare"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly condemns the policy as \"outrageous and harmful,\" calling it \"a travesty\" and saying \"all common sense and ethical standards have been thrown out the window.\" They argue for more parental involvement and against the policy’s approach, indicating they want it rejected or substantially changed.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","transgender students","school policy","student welfare","LGBTQ+ inclusion"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly support this document and the guidance it contains\" and praises the policies as creating \"inclusive and equitable environments for transgender youth.\" They also urge additional implementation, including athletics participation aligned with gender and broader curriculum inclusion, which indicates support rather than opposition.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student mental health","school sports","curriculum","transgender students"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I fully support the implementation of this guidance\" and adds that it will be \"extremely beneficial to our educators and our students.\" This is a clear endorsement of adopting the regulation.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student support","education policy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly states \"Do not support,\" which clearly indicates opposition to adopting the regulation. No additional context suggests any nuance or conditional support.","tone":"negative","tags":[]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly states, \"I do not support this policy,\" which directly indicates opposition to adoption. The title \"DO NOT SUPPORT.\" reinforces the same position without offering any qualifying support or requested changes.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","school policy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"i am against this\" and repeatedly states they would be \"dead set against this.\" Their objections focus on parental notification, parental rights, and rejecting the policy as \"not science\" and \"politics and emotion.\"","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","parental notification","science","gender identity","child services"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I do not support this at all!\" and \"i do not agree with this at all!\" They also call the proposal \"shameful and a disgrace,\" indicating clear opposition to adoption of the regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","school policy","parental concerns"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly rejects the policy, calling it \"the ultimate child abuse\" and accusing schools of \"indoctrinating confusion\" and \"grooming\" children. They also object to the policy on religious and parental-rights grounds, saying it would \"take away God given parental custody.\"","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender policies","parental rights","religious freedom","child abuse","indoctrination"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly urges adoption: \"Pass the Model Policies for the Treatment of Transgender Students in Virginia’s Public Schools.\" They repeatedly argue the policy would improve safety, privacy, and mental health for transgender and nonbinary students and say it would have helped them personally.","tone":"positive","tags":["transgender students","nonbinary students","student safety","mental health","privacy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I am appalled at the Transgender Guidance Document\" and frames it as harmful, stating it \"will definitely create an unsafe school environment\". They also criticize the policy as \"ridiculous\" and argue that school staff should not replace parents, indicating clear opposition to adoption.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","student safety","parental rights","school staff reporting","privacy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly states \"Opposed\" and argues that \"The State should not usurp the rights of parents,\" indicating rejection of the proposed policies. The comment does not suggest modifications or support for adoption.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","state authority"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"We do not support this,\" which directly rejects the regulation. They also argue it \"has no basis in science\" and is \"putting every kid at risk,\" indicating opposition rather than a request for changes.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","student safety","science","public schools"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly oppose this document,\" which directly states opposition to adoption. The follow-up about leaving \"the social engineering out of the classroom\" reinforces that they want the policy rejected.","tone":"negative","tags":["education policy","social engineering","transgender students"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"Strongly oppose gender discussions and accommodations\" and rejects the policy as a \"liberal transgender agenda.\" They also state, \"No other discussion needs to be held,\" indicating opposition to adoption of the regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","gender identity","parental rights","taxpayer concerns"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I do not approve of the proposed transgender guidelines,\" which directly rejects the regulation. They also object that \"the parents of the student not being actively engaged nor included,\" indicating opposition based on parental involvement concerns.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","transgender students","school policy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly rejects the policy, calling it \"DISGRACEFUL\" and saying \"these policies are discriminatory and is child abuse.\" They repeatedly argue against state involvement in gender identity support at school and conclude with \"LET PARENTS RAISE their kids,\" indicating clear opposition to adoption.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","religious freedom","gender identity","student privacy","LGBTQ+ inclusion"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly rejects the regulation’s subject matter, saying schools should \"only be taught academics, not social issues\" and that schools have \"no business indoctrinating\" children. They ask to \"bring the focus back on academics,\" which indicates opposition to adopting this transgender guidance.","tone":"negative","tags":["curriculum","parental rights","LGBTQ+ inclusion","indoctrination"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter is \"emphatically and unequivocally opposed to the proposed policies\" and urges officials to \"cease and desist\" from imposing them. They argue the policies are \"indoctrination\" and an overreach that usurps parental rights, which clearly indicates rejection of adoption.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","religious freedom","LGBTQ+ inclusion","student privacy","indoctrination"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly states, \"I support the Model Policies for the Treatment of Transgender Students in Virginia’s Public Schools.\" This is a direct endorsement of the regulation with no qualifications or objections.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","transgender students","public schools"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly oppose all of the proposed guidelines\" and rejects any \"discussion, 'exploration', or accommodation\" for transgender students in schools. They also object to preferred pronouns and any instruction beyond \"male/female biology,\" indicating opposition to the regulation as a whole.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","preferred pronouns","sex education","school accommodations","parental rights"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says adopting the guidelines is \"astonishingly dangerous\" and warns they would bring \"confusion, conflict, self-destruction, and chaos.\" The focus on harms to \"school-aged girls\" in sports and restrooms indicates opposition to the regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":["student safety","bathroom access","school sports","girls' rights","LGBTQ+ inclusion"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly oppose this new VDOE guidance\" and repeats that the policy should not go into effect. They also argue it is \"very one sided,\" threatens their family’s beliefs, and could put children at \"undo risk,\" all of which indicate rejection rather than support or neutrality.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","privacy","litigation"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I do not support this\" and ends with \"Do not pass this,\" which clearly opposes adoption of the regulation. The comment also argues it harms \"the other 98%\" and raises objections about parents, bathrooms, and locker rooms, reinforcing opposition.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","bathroom access","locker rooms","privacy","LGBTQ+ inclusion"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I support the Model Policies for the Treatment of Transgender Students in Virginia’s Public Schools\" and adds \"Keep transgender students safe in VA schools,\" which clearly endorses adoption of the regulation. There is no language indicating opposition or neutrality.","tone":"positive","tags":["transgender students","student safety","LGBTQ+ inclusion","school policy"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"fully support\" and urges adoption: \"Support like this has been shown to reduce trans students suicide rates.\" They also frame the policy as necessary, saying \"change like this is more than needed.\"","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","mental health","transgender students"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I do not support!\" and characterizes the policy as \"an attack on families,\" which clearly indicates opposition to adoption. There is no request for modification or neutral information, only rejection.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","family values","transgender students"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.93,"stance_rationale":"The commenter says, \"nothing should happen without parental consent,\" which rejects the policy framework unless parents approve each action. Although they begin with \"I am all for inclusive,\" the operative position is a condition that would substantially limit implementation of the transgender student policies.","tone":"mixed","tags":["parental rights","transgender students","school policy","consent"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter calls the policies \"TOTALLY ridiculous\" and says they are \"so difficult to enforce,\" indicating rejection of the regulation. They also argue against specific provisions, including locker room access, sports participation, and privacy from parents, while questioning whether the guidelines are valid at all.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","bathroom access","school sports","privacy","religious freedom"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I oppose the model policies being presented for the treatment of transgender students.\" They argue the policies would \"restrict my student's First Amendment\" rights and invoke the \"Equal Protection Clause,\" concluding, \"Do not force others to believes as you.\"","tone":"negative","tags":["First Amendment","equal protection","parental rights","transgender students"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter opens with \"Strongly disagree\" and argues that the policy gives children inappropriate decision-making power, comparing it to \"giving a fifth grader the right to vote or to join the army.\" They also object that it surrenders \"parental experience and responsibility\" to schools or the state, indicating clear opposition to the regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","child development","school authority","transgender policies"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"These guidance policies are unnecessary\" and calls them \"in error.\" They argue the policies \"promot[e] further discrimination\" and \"promote a denial of human dignity,\" indicating opposition to adoption.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","human dignity","discrimination","religious freedom"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly asks to \"make school and these formative years as enjoyable and inclusive for these students\" and says \"They need our support and love,\" which clearly endorses the policy’s goal of supporting transgender/LGBTQ+ students. The comment is affirmative and does not express any opposition or reservations.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student support","school climate","transgender students"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I do not approve the guidelines\" and calls the policies \"totally unworkable.\" They also object that the rules would \"force all students, faculty and administrators to comply with an empirically false view of sex and gender,\" indicating rejection of the regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender policies","sex and gender","religious freedom","parental rights"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I support the policies to protect trans students in VA!\" This is a clear endorsement of adopting the regulation, and the statement that transgender kids \"deserve to feel safe at school\" reinforces support for the policy goals.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","bullying prevention"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly oppose these draft model policies\" and states they \"do not approve\" of the proposed guidelines. The rest of the comment gives reasons for opposition, criticizing them as \"radical theories\" and claiming they \"indoctrinate our school children.\"","tone":"negative","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","transgender students","parental rights","education policy"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly support the adoption of these model policies\" and repeats that they \"would love to have these policies adopted.\" They also endorse specific provisions like using students' preferred names/pronouns and protecting them from bullying.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","bullying prevention","student support","preferred name/pronouns"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly rejects the policy direction, saying they \"fail to see how these policies protect transgender students\" and arguing the changes will \"destroy parent’s rights\" and create \"many bad situations.\" They conclude that \"Much more thought, research, and fair and balanced discussions are needed before POLICY changes are made,\" which indicates opposition to adopting the regulation as written.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","transgender students","teacher rights","school policy","privacy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I do not support this policy\" and asks to \"refocus on academics,\" indicating rejection of the regulation. They argue it promotes \"secularism as a religion\" and infringes on \"freedom of and from religion\" and \"free speech,\" which are objections to adoption.","tone":"negative","tags":["religious freedom","free speech","public schools","transgender policy","academics"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter states plainly, \"I support the guidance,\" which directly endorses adoption of the proposed regulation. There is no qualifying language or criticism suggesting opposition or neutrality.","tone":"positive","tags":["transgender students","school policy","nondiscrimination"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly rejects the policy as \"insane measures\" and says the schools are \"trying to tell our children something different,\" framing it as an agenda that should not be adopted. They argue the rules \"remove viable guidelines and safety measures\" and invoke religious objections to transgender recognition.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","student safety","religious freedom","parental rights","school policy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Oppose\" in the title and repeatedly rejects the policy as a \"twisted government policy\" that would \"subvert parental authority.\" They ask schools to \"leave the rest to the parents,\" indicating opposition to the regulation's adoption.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","transgender students","school policy","government overreach"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says they are \"Vehemently opposed\" and repeatedly argues the policies are \"completely baseless, absurd, unnecessary, and unenforceable.\" They also call for the policies to be rejected by describing them as harmful to parents, children, teachers, and girls' facilities and sports.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","bathroom access","school sports","religious freedom","privacy"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"Fully support! Policy like this is well overdue\" and frames the regulation as \"an anti-bullying and harassment policy for children.\" The rest of the comment attacks opponents, but the clear position is in favor of adopting the policy.","tone":"negative","tags":["bullying prevention","student safety","LGBTQ+ inclusion","anti-discrimination"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Absolutely oppose\" and \"I am totally against every part of this.\" They also reject specific provisions such as restroom/locker room access and parental involvement, indicating opposition to adopting the regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","bathroom access","privacy","school facilities","LGBTQ+ inclusion"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"we strongly oppose,\" which clearly indicates rejection of the proposed policies. The opening reference to being a parent of \"3 children in elementary school\" provides context but does not change the stated position.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","transgender students","public schools"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I do not approve of the proposed guidelines,\" which clearly rejects the regulation. The rest of the comment criticizes the policies as \"radical theories\" and \"indoctrination,\" reinforcing opposition rather than support for adoption.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","LGBTQ+ inclusion","school policy","indoctrination"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly opposed\" and calls the policy \"dangerous indoctrination,\" indicating rejection of the regulation. The mention of \"undermining of parental rights and responsibilities\" further shows opposition to adoption.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","transgender students","indoctrination","science"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Disapprove of VDOE transgender policy\" and argues against adoption throughout, calling the policy \"non-scientific\" and warning it will \"reap irreparable harm.\" They also reject the underlying premise of the policy, stating \"There are only two genders\" and that affected students need \"counseling, not affirmation.\"","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender policy","gender identity","student mental health","nondiscrimination","privacy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly OPPOSE VDOE transgender draft policy guidelines,\" which directly rejects the regulation. The statement \"These proposed policies are a detriment to all involved\" further indicates opposition rather than support or neutrality.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","school policy","nondiscrimination"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I do not approve of the proposed guidelines\" and calls them \"wrong and absolutely horrifying,\" indicating clear rejection of the regulation. The statement that \"Boys are boys and girls are girls\" further shows opposition to the transgender student policies.","tone":"negative","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","gender identity","parental rights","school policy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says they are \"strongly opposed\" to the policy and calls it a \"massive infringement\" and \"reckless and dangerous.\" They argue it should not be used in schools to \"push\" these policies, indicating rejection of adoption.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","student mental health","school policy","transgender students","student safety"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly support the draft guidance provided by the VDOE.\" They also endorse the policy goals, stating it will help ensure students \"can learn in a safe and supportive environment.\"","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","dignity and respect","supportive environment"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says they \"take great issue with the guidelines being proposed\" and argues against multiple provisions, including bathroom/locker room access and athletic participation. They frame the policy as violating religion, parental rights, and safety, indicating they want the guidance rejected rather than adopted.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","religious freedom","bathroom access","school sports","student safety"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"No support from this parent of 4\" and states they \"do not agree with the sweeping changes.\" They also say they \"could not in good faith send my children to school in Virginia,\" indicating rejection of the regulation as written.","tone":"negative","tags":["bathroom access","privacy","parental rights","student safety","school facilities"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Absolutely AGAINST\" and warns that if VDOE \"passes and supports this ludicrous document\" teachers should resign. The remarks reject the policy on the grounds that \"Rules are meant to be followed\" and invoke \"Majority rules!\" as a reason against it.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","school policy","teacher concerns","parental rights","LGBTQ+ inclusion"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I absolutely do not now, nor will I ever support such an abomination\" and urges legislators to \"stop\" considering it. The final line, \"This must stop,\" clearly indicates opposition to adopting the regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","transgender students","school policy","religious/moral objection"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I do not support it\" and \"Please do not adopt these guidelines,\" which clearly rejects the proposed regulation. They also argue it would \"take[] the responsibility of raising children away from parents\" and cause harm to children and families, reinforcing opposition.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","religious freedom","bathroom access","privacy","student safety"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says society should \"simply accept\" transgender identity and urges that \"our kids express themselves without fear of retribution.\" They also praise the policy direction as freeing students from \"antiquated norms,\" which indicates clear support for adoption.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student expression","anti-discrimination","student safety"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly states, \"We oppose these policies\" and repeatedly urges Virginia to \"reverse course immediately.\" The body argues the policies would erase traditional family roles and threaten constitutional freedom, showing clear opposition to adoption of the regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","religious freedom","family values","free speech","LGBTQ+ inclusion"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly SUPPORT these policies\" and repeatedly endorses implementation of the proposed document. They praise the policies for \"protecting trans and non-binary youth\" and say, \"I support trans youth\" and \"I applaud\" those who developed them.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","transgender students","bullying prevention","student safety","non-discrimination"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter repeatedly says they \"do not support\" the document and objects to multiple core provisions, including parental notification, gender identity procedures, LGBTQ-inclusive education, and staff training. They argue the policy \"infring[es] parent rights\" and should require more evidence and parental involvement, indicating opposition to adoption as written.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","LGBTQ+ inclusion","privacy","curriculum","staff training"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I do not approve of many of the guidelines proposed\" and argues the draft policies should not reduce parental communication or allow gender-identity accommodations. They repeatedly criticize specific provisions, including restroom access, pronoun/name changes, confidentiality from parents, and CPS reporting guidance.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","privacy","transgender students","bathroom access","school communication"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly Support\" and asks, \"Please enact these policies to protect our transgender youth.\" They also argue the policies would help ensure \"ALL students feel safe and protected at school\" and prevent discrimination.","tone":"positive","tags":["transgender students","student safety","nondiscrimination","bullying prevention","school climate"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I support the guidelines\" and asks to \"stand firm in protecting transgender students.\" They argue the policies are necessary for inclusion, safety, and preventing harm, including references to suicide, homelessness, and emotional harm.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","privacy","mental health","parental notification"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I am 100% in support of your draft guidance\" and praises it as \"best practices for creating inclusive school environments for trans and non-binary students.\" The comment clearly endorses adoption of the regulation and offers a reason for support.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student mental health","inclusive schools","suicide prevention"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly titles the submission \"Strongly Support\" and states that \"Treat trans students with respect and dignity.\" They also endorse the policy goal by saying \"creating healthy environments in the school leads to more positive outcomes.\"","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","school climate","respect and dignity"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I do not support this insanity\" and frames the policy as \"radical and harmful\". They object to pronoun use and claim it takes \"parents rightful authority\" away, indicating clear opposition to adoption of the regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","pronouns","transgender students","science","school policy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly DISAGREE this absurdity\" and argues the policy will harm children, stating \"The safety and innocence of the kids will be stripped off.\" They also reject the pronoun-related aspects of the policy as \"absurd,\" indicating opposition to adoption.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","student privacy","LGBTQ+ inclusion","pronouns","student safety"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I vehemently disagree with and oppose the proposed Model Policies\" and ends with \"Stop now,\" which clearly rejects adoption of the regulation. The language also calls it an \"unconstitutional, leftist intrusion,\" reinforcing strong opposition rather than a request for modification.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","LGBTQ+ inclusion","parental rights","privacy","school policy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly oppose any agenda\" and objects to \"remov[ing] the right of parents and giv[ing] it to the state.\" The comment rejects the regulation as a \"radical and damaging agenda\" and argues against state involvement in children’s gender-related decisions.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","state control","transgender policy","school counseling","student privacy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly rejects the policy, saying \"There is no part of this that is acceptable\" and calling it \"completely absurd\" and \"an unacceptable violation of the rights of the majority.\" They also ask to \"Please reconsider\" the policy, indicating opposition to adoption as written.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","religious freedom","student privacy","teacher burden","LGBTQ+ inclusion"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"Please do not pass this,\" which is a direct request to reject the proposed regulation. No supporting reasons or qualifications are provided, but the intent is clear.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","policy opposition"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I fully support this new policy!!!\" and adds that \"Schools should be a safe and inclusive place for everyone!\" This clearly endorses adoption of the regulation.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","school climate"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter argues that schools should not conceal a child's gender-related statements from parents and says the district is \"opening itself up to so many lawsuits.\" The overall framing is strongly against the policy, describing it as a \"legal minefield\" and warning it will lead to damages and litigation.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","privacy","legal liability","student mental health","transgender students"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I WHOLEHEARTEDLY support\" the model policies. There is no qualifying language or criticism, indicating clear approval of adoption.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","nondiscrimination"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I support this\" and adds that \"Schools must be inclusive, allowing and supporting all children.\" They further describe it as \"good policy\" to ensure inclusion for a \"marginalized group,\" indicating clear approval of the regulation.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","school inclusion","nondiscrimination","student support"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"Strongly support!\" and repeatedly urges action: \"Please enact this policy.\" They frame the policy as protective and beneficial, saying it will \"protect these kids\" and promote acceptance.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","bullying prevention","supportive school environment"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"We strongly support protecting these fundamental human rights,\" which clearly endorses the regulation. They also argue that protecting transgender students is necessary to prevent \"persecution, discrimination, or bullying,\" indicating approval of the policy's purpose and protections.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","anti-discrimination","bullying prevention","human rights"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"Absolutely support these important guidelines\" and praises them as \"extremely important.\" They also endorse the underlying purpose by saying children should be able to express themselves \"without fearing retribution or being ostracized.\"","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","bullying prevention","privacy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"This bill should be rejected\" and \"STRONGLY OPPOSE,\" making their position clear. They repeatedly argue the policy is \"unacceptable\" and should be opposed even by \"families supporting transgender kids.\"","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","privacy","religious freedom","bathroom access","student safety"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly labels the submission \"Oppose\" and states that the model regulations \"infringe upon the First Amendment rights of parents.\" This is a clear objection to adoption of the regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","First Amendment","transgender students"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I do not approve of the proposed guidelines\" and titles the comment \"Strongly Oppose.\" They argue the policies would \"usurp parental rights\" and could discriminate against teachers with \"deeply held beliefs,\" indicating rejection of the regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","religious freedom","teacher rights","transgender students"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly states, \"I strongly oppose this,\" which directly indicates rejection of the proposed regulation. No qualifying language suggests support or neutrality.","tone":"negative","tags":[]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly oppose\" and urges, \"Do not trample on the role of the parent,\" indicating rejection of the proposed transgender student policies. The phrase \"Keep our children safe\" is used as a reason for opposing the regulation rather than supporting it.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","student safety","transgender students"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.96,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I support this\" and adds that \"People deserve fair and equal treatment,\" which indicates approval of the regulation. The note that \"Judgement should be left to the parents regarding transgender matters\" suggests a preference for parental involvement, but it does not negate the overall supportive stance.","tone":"positive","tags":["equal treatment","parental rights","transgender students"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly Oppose\" and argues the policy will \"undermine the role of a parent for their child.\" They also object to related transgender care by warning that surgery should not be performed on young children, indicating rejection of the regulation's approach.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","gender identity","youth medical care","transgender students"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly states \"Opposed\" and says the policy \"undermines and bypasses Parents,\" indicating they do not want it adopted as proposed. The phrase \"this is wrong\" reinforces rejection rather than support or neutrality.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","transgender students","school policy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"We oppose this,\" indicating rejection of the proposed policies. They further specify a preferred alternative—\"bathroom and locker room settings are accessible based on the person's sex assigned at birth\"—which conflicts with the regulation's transgender-inclusive approach.","tone":"negative","tags":["bathroom access","locker rooms","sex assigned at birth","transgender students","privacy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly labels the submission \"Oppose\" and argues that schools should not adopt these policies, calling them \"based on nothing more than philosophical differences\" and saying \"The school has no place imposing\" them. They also state that existing bullying rules are sufficient and emphasize maintaining \"separate spaces for biological boys and girls,\" which rejects the regulation's approach.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","parental rights","school facilities","bullying prevention","sex-based separation"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I support the guidance document,\" which directly endorses adoption. They further justify this by saying transgender students should not encounter \"deadnaming, fear, discrimination\" and that school should be \"a place of safety and learning.\"","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","anti-discrimination","bullying prevention"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly support!\" and urges the policy to \"Keep our children safe\" while asking to \"respect their choice for gender identity.\" The reference to avoiding suicide indicates support for protections for transgender students rather than opposition to the regulation.","tone":"positive","tags":["student safety","LGBTQ+ inclusion","mental health","bullying prevention"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"STRONGLY OPPOSED\" and \"Oppose LGBT ideology,\" which clearly indicates rejection of the proposed transgender student policies. There is no request for modification or support for adoption.","tone":"negative","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","transgender students","parental rights"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I am not for document,\" indicating opposition to the proposed policies. The statement \"We keep the right of parents to act in the behalf of their children\" suggests a parental-rights objection to the regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","transgender students","school policy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly rejects the policy: \"No way no how\" and calls it \"a shameful and disgusting bill\" that should not be supported. They argue it violates parental rights, religious freedom, and school resources, and object to changing records and names for transgender students.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","religious freedom","privacy","school records","funding mandate"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"STRONGLY OPPOSE These Policies,\" which directly rejects adoption of the regulation. They also argue the policies \"infringe on the First Amendment Rights of Parents,\" indicating substantive opposition rather than a neutral question or suggestion.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","privacy","First Amendment","student dignity"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says the draft policies \"would undercut parents’ involvement\" and \"endanger the bodily privacy and safety of all students,\" which is a clear objection to adoption. The language is directly critical of the regulation and argues against it on parental rights and safety grounds.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","privacy","student safety","bodily privacy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly oppose!\" and frames the regulation as infringing \"the First Amendment rights of parents to raise and care for their children.\" This is a clear rejection of the proposed policies rather than a request for modification.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","First Amendment","transgender students"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly states \"Strongly oppose,\" which clearly indicates rejection of the proposed regulation. No additional explanation or qualifications are provided.","tone":"negative","tags":[]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.96,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly oppose\" and argues the guidelines \"will generate chaotic situations\" and \"significantly detract from a healthy school learning environment.\" Although they suggest \"more moderate adjustments,\" the overall position is against adopting the regulation as written.","tone":"negative","tags":["school climate","student safety","transgender policies","parental concerns","regulatory opposition"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I oppose this infringement of parents' rights,\" which directly rejects the proposed policy. The phrase frames the regulation as an infringement, indicating opposition rather than a request for modification.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","transgender students","school policy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter says, \"I am strongly opposed to these transgender policies,\" which directly rejects the regulation. The added statement, \"I will not support any lawmaker who supports them,\" reinforces opposition rather than asking for changes.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender policies","LGBTQ+ inclusion","parental rights"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly oppose\" the proposed policy and frames the issue as \"ignoring parental rights,\" indicating rejection of the regulation. No supportive or neutral language appears.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","transgender students","school policy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter argues that the policies are based on “recent ideas” that are “without sound scientific basis” and says they would create a system that is “easily exploited and impossible to administer fairly.” This is a clear rejection of the draft policies rather than support or a neutral inquiry.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender policies","scientific basis","administration fairness","student identity"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The comment explicitly says \"OPPOSE\" and urges \"LET PARENTS’ DECIDE,\" indicating rejection of the proposed transgender student policies in favor of parental control. It does not offer support or neutral feedback.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","transgender students","school policy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says the VDOE has \"gone far beyond the path the General Assembly prescribed\" and argues schools should not adopt these policies. They call the regulations \"harmful\" and say the model regulations \"infringe the First Amendment rights of parents,\" indicating clear opposition to adoption.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","privacy","bathroom access","school facilities","transgender policies"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly labels the submission \"OPPOSE\" and says \"This cannot stand,\" indicating rejection of the regulation. They also object that it is \"Taking the rights away from parents\" and call it \"very dangerous,\" which shows clear opposition rather than a request for modification.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","religious freedom","public education","transgender students"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Fully support this\" and argues the policy helps children feel safe and provides \"a safe space.\" They frame the regulation as needed support for students and parents rather than \"over reach.\"","tone":"positive","tags":["student safety","LGBTQ+ inclusion","parental support","safe schools"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Oppose\" and argues that public schools should not be \"a vehicle for encouraging transgender.\" They also object to the policy’s implications for facilities use, stating that \"boys and girls using the same locker rooms is unsafe and disrespectful.\"","tone":"negative","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","school facilities","privacy","student safety","bathroom access"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly labels the submission \"Oppose\" and says to \"Throw out this transgender agenda.\" They argue the policy is \"only harmful\" and reject the idea that \"sex doesn’t matter,\" indicating they want the regulation rejected rather than adopted.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender policy","bathroom access","locker rooms","sex-based facilities","student safety"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The comment is an emphatic rejection of the regulation, repeating \"NO!! NO!! NO!! NO,\" with no qualifying language or request for changes. It clearly signals the commenter does not want the policy adopted.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","policy opposition"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I oppose the transgender policies proposed,\" which directly rejects adoption of the regulation. The opening line, \"Parents should be promoted and not demoted,\" suggests a concern that the policy diminishes parental authority, reinforcing opposition.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","transgender policies","school policy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly Opposed\" and urges, \"Stop all of this liberal insanity,\" which clearly rejects the proposed policies. The language indicates opposition to adoption rather than a request for modification.","tone":"negative","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","transgender students","school policy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly oppose\" and argues the VDOE has \"gone far beyond the path the General Assembly prescribed.\" They also state the policies \"infringe the First Amendment rights of parents\" and should not accommodate gender transitions, indicating clear rejection of the regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","privacy","bathroom access","LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety"]}


{"stance":"neutral","stance_confidence":0.86,"stance_rationale":"The commenter does not clearly endorse or reject the regulation; they say they \"stopped reading\" after objecting that the \"definition of gender ... is not correct\" and ask to \"Please revise doc and then I will reread and evaluate.\" This indicates a request for revision and deferral of judgment rather than a firm position on adoption.","tone":"negative","tags":["gender definition","request for revision","transgender policies"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.93,"stance_rationale":"The comment is hostile toward the regulation’s apparent support for transgender students, asking, \"Why you people are so threatened by actual natural facts,\" which signals rejection rather than support. It does not offer a policy suggestion or neutral question; instead it attacks the premise of the guidance.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","LGBTQ+ inclusion","school policy"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly titles the comment \"Support\" and states that the policy \"will help schools provide support and guidance to all students.\" They further say it will ensure students can attend school \"feeling safe and included,\" which clearly endorses adoption of the policy.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","school support","nondiscrimination"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I fully support the proposals\" and urges the DOE to \"take a strong stance in favor of trans Virginian students and their families.\" This is a clear endorsement of adopting the regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","transgender students","student rights","nondiscrimination"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly oppose this transgender policy\" and calls it \"an over-reach by the schools.\" They object specifically to \"children share restrooms and locker rooms with members of the opposite biological sex,\" indicating rejection of the policy's core provisions.","tone":"negative","tags":["bathroom access","locker rooms","transgender policy","school facilities","parental rights"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly oppose\" and argues that \"Allowing children to decide for themselves what gender they are is child abuse.\" They reject the policy’s premise, insisting \"If a child is created a boy, he is a boy! If a child is created a girl, she is a girl,\" which clearly opposes adoption of the regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","gender identity","transgender students","child abuse","science and biology"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I can't support any part of this,\" and argues the policies are harmful because they expose young children to \"transgenderism.\" They also call the idea of child transgenderism illegitimate and describe the policies as \"child abuse,\" indicating clear opposition to adoption of the regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender policies","child welfare","gender identity","school age children"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Vehemently Oppose\" and \"None of this should be discussed at any level in public schools,\" which clearly rejects the regulation. The language also calls the policy \"nonsense\" and \"Disgusting,\" indicating strong opposition rather than a request for modification.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","parental rights","LGBTQ+ inclusion","school policy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says to \"Just stop the lunacy\" and argues the school system has \"no right\" to ask about students' \"sexual preference\" or address these issues, indicating rejection of the proposed transgender student policies. They also say the school should \"dedicate school efforts towards education\" instead of addressing these matters, which supports opposition to the regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":["privacy","parental rights","LGBTQ+ inclusion","student records","school authority"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter says, \"I strongly oppose reductions in parental rights,\" which indicates opposition to the proposed policies insofar as they are seen as limiting parental authority. No language suggests support or neutrality.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","transgender students","school policy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter says the proposed model \"infringes on the First Amendment rights of parents\" and argues that the VDOE should not \"usurp\" parental authority. This is a clear objection to the regulation as written and a call to reject its interference with parental rights.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","First Amendment","transgender policy","education governance"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says the proposed policy is \"in direct opposition to the beliefs of most parents\" and that schools \"should not express ideas\" conflicting with family beliefs. They also argue transgender topics \"should not be\" in schools, which indicates rejection of the regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","transgender education","school curriculum","family beliefs"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I support the guidelines\" and explains that they are meant \"to keep trans students safe at school.\" They further affirm that trans students have \"the right to be safe in all public spaces including schools,\" indicating clear approval of the regulation.","tone":"positive","tags":["transgender students","student safety","school inclusion","nondiscrimination"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly support\" and argues the guidance will \"save children's lives.\" They endorse the policy as a way to let children explore gender identity safely and praise its affirming approach.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","mental health","gender identity"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly labels the comment \"Support\" and states that \"All children ... require a safe environment\" and that adults have a responsibility to \"advocate for and protect children.\" The language endorses protecting transgender students' rights and safety, which aligns with adopting the regulation.","tone":"positive","tags":["student safety","LGBTQ+ inclusion","anti-discrimination","privacy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly disagree with the proposed guidelines,\" which clearly indicates opposition to adoption. The title \"Strongly disapprove\" reinforces that the commenter wants the regulation rejected.","tone":"negative","tags":[]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I fully support this measure,\" which directly endorses adoption of the regulation. The phrase \"to help keep Virginia's children safe\" provides a positive reason for support rather than any objection or request to weaken it.","tone":"positive","tags":["student safety","support for regulation","transgender students"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"Strongly disapprove\" and argues the policy is a \"liberal agenda\" that should not be pushed into schools. They also object to bathroom/locker room access and say the policy \"completely cuts parents out of the decision making,\" indicating clear opposition to adoption.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","bathroom access","privacy","LGBTQ+ inclusion","school facilities"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly oppose the transgender policies proposed by the VDOE\" and argues the policies \"are certainly not needed.\" They also frame the policies as taking away \"the rights of parents,\" indicating clear opposition to adoption.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","transgender policies","public schools","education policy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I do not support these transgender bills\" and concludes, \"This bill makes all children less safe and should not pass.\" The body argues against the policy on safety and medical grounds, indicating clear opposition to adoption.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","student safety","medical concerns","school policy"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"Strongly urge support of trans and non gender binary students\" and refers to \"These guides\" as beneficial. They argue the policies are \"vital for the mental health of these students\" and state they will not negatively affect other students' rights.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student mental health","equity","student rights"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.96,"stance_rationale":"The commenter argues for a new requirement that schools must communicate with parents and criticizes the policy for \"hiding very important, life-changing information\" from guardians. This indicates opposition to the proposed transgender student policies as written, at least insofar as they protect student privacy without mandatory parental notification.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","student privacy","school communication","transgender students"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I am opposed to the policies in this document\" and repeatedly argues the VDOE \"has gone far beyond\" what was prescribed. The comment urges rejection based on concerns about privacy, parental rights, and opposition to \"gender transitions.\"","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","student privacy","bathroom access","locker rooms","transgender policies"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly states, \"I SUPPORT the guidance,\" which directly endorses adoption of the regulation. The title also says \"SUPPORT,\" reinforcing the position.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","transgender students","school policy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I oppose this bill for the way it is written.\" They also argue against recognizing transgender identities, stating \"We are born male or female\" and that children should be taught \"who they really are,\" while only allowing separate spaces rather than the policy's protections.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","bathroom access","student privacy","LGBTQ+ inclusion","school facilities"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly oppose\" and argues that schools should not be \"accommodating\" policies that encourage \"irreversible 'gender transitions'.\" This is a clear rejection of the proposed transgender student policies.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","gender transition","school policy","student health"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"OPPOSE\" and argues the policy is \"arrogant and irresponsible\". They object to schools \"encourag[ing] children who are confused about their gender\" and claim it causes harm, indicating clear opposition to adoption of the regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":["gender identity","student mental health","parental rights","LGBTQ+ inclusion"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I refuse the proposal\" and frames the regulation as harmful to children, warning it will cause \"irrevocable damage.\" This is a clear rejection of the proposed transgender policies rather than a request for modification.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","student welfare","psychological harm","school policy"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I applaud the Department for going forward with the proposed Bill and guidance policies\" and says they \"should produce a more equal educational opportunity.\" This is clear approval of the regulation and its goals of protecting transgender students.","tone":"positive","tags":["transgender students","equal treatment","student rights","nondiscrimination"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly labels the proposal \"opposed\" and says it \"should be revised to do what the law requires and no more.\" They object to specific provisions, arguing that requiring staff to use pronouns they view as inconsistent with sex assigned at birth is \"to force them to lie\" and would transgress on the rights of others.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","pronouns","religious freedom","transgender students","school staff"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Support the transgender student policies\" and repeatedly states that \"These policies are necessary\" and \"will help transgender students feel safe and respected at school.\" The comment argues the policies should be adopted to prevent harassment and ensure equal access to education.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","bullying prevention","nondiscrimination","privacy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I do not approve of this!\" which clearly rejects the regulation. The follow-up, \"Parents need to be advised and involved,\" indicates a concern that the policy gives insufficient parental involvement, reinforcing opposition rather than support for adoption.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","parental involvement","transgender students","school policy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.86,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly appose\" and argues that \"when adults they can decide,\" indicating opposition to the transgender student policies for children. The brief statement suggests they do not want the regulation adopted as written.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","parental rights","student safety"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly titles the submission \"oppose Model Policies for the Treatment of Transgender Students in Virginia's Public Schools\" and says the VDOE \"has gone far beyond the path the General Assembly prescribed.\" They object to the policies' substantive views, including the quoted statement about gender identity, indicating they do not want the regulation adopted as written.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","parental rights","policy overreach","gender identity"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"Strongly oppose adoption of these policies,\" which directly states opposition to the regulation. No supporting or neutral language is present.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender policies","school policy","LGBTQ+ inclusion"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I oppose the alleged need for new VDOE policies\" and titles the comment \"OPPOSE strongly.\" They argue against recognizing transgender identities in children, indicating they want the proposed policies rejected rather than adopted.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","parental rights","school policy","sex/gender identity"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly asks the legislature to \"oppose the proposed\" VDOE model policies and repeatedly argues they are \"not fair\" and \"not one\" of the ways to help youth. They also say the proposal \"challenges Women's Rights\" and \"violates Title IX,\" indicating clear rejection of the regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","parental rights","student privacy","Title IX","school sports"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly rejects the proposed policies, saying the VDOE has \"gone far beyond the path the General Assembly prescribed\" and that the model regulations \"infringe the First Amendment rights of parents.\" The comment argues schools should not adopt policies that allow transgender accommodations in intimate spaces and calls the guidance harmful.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","privacy","bathroom access","locker rooms","religious freedom"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly labels the submission \"Oppose\" and states, \"These policies are deeply harmful to children,\" which clearly rejects the regulation. No mitigating or supportive language is present.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","student welfare","policy opposition"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"Oppose As Being Clearly Unconstitutional on Several Fronts\" and argues the proposal is \"beyond misguided\" and would \"violate and interfere with\" multiple rights. The body repeatedly frames the regulation as harmful and urges against adopting it.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","privacy","religious freedom","student privacy","LGBTQ+ inclusion"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"STRONGLY OPPOSED\" and \"Opposed completely,\" which clearly rejects the regulation. They also argue it goes \"against parental rights\" and \"children well being,\" indicating opposition to adoption.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","child welfare","LGBTQ+ inclusion"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly titles the submission \"Support\" and states that \"Transgender students deserve to be safe and supported in school.\" They further thank the agency for considering policies \"aimed at ensuring the safety and support of these students,\" which clearly endorses adoption of the regulation.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","supportive school environment"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I oppose the 'Model Policies for the Treatment of Transgender Students in Virginia’s Public Schools.'\" They argue the policies violate privacy, are unenforceable, and should not allow transgender students access to sex-segregated facilities, indicating clear rejection of the regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":["privacy","bathroom access","locker rooms","parental rights","transgender students"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"I STRONGLY OPPOSE!!\" and repeatedly argues the policy is \"ridiculous,\" \"unconstitutional,\" and an \"atrocity.\" They also object to schools \"forcing a new code\" and say the school has \"no right\" to involve itself, indicating clear rejection of the regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","school authority","privacy","transgender students","constitutional concerns"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The comment explicitly says \"Strongly oppose,\" which directly states opposition to the proposed regulation. No supporting or neutral language is present.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender policy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.95,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly begins with \"Oppose\" and argues against placing \"this conversation on five year olds,\" indicating they do not want the policy adopted as written. They also say \"there has to be a better way,\" which suggests they want a different approach rather than support for the proposed guidance.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","child welfare","medical transition","student safety"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter says, \"I strongly oppose any effort... to implement 'teaching' or establishing any guidance policies regarding the transgender ideology,\" which clearly rejects the regulation. They also argue, \"Stop taking the primary role of teaching away from parents and grandparents,\" indicating opposition to government guidance on this topic.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","transgender policy","education policy","morality","government overreach"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly rejects the policy, saying \"This is a violation\" and that it \"only damages children\". They also argue it violates \"the rights of parents\" and suggest \"There are other ways\" to address gender dysphoria, indicating opposition to the regulation as written.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","gender dysphoria","student wellbeing","transgender policies"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly Opposed\" and argues that \"Parents raise and educate their children, not the state,\" which rejects the regulation’s role in school policy. This is a clear opposition to adoption of the proposed transgender student policies.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","state authority","transgender students"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly rejects the policy, calling it \"absurd\" and \"Totally against this transgender education.\" They argue that \"You are either male or female\" and conclude, \"So quit messing with kids,\" which clearly opposes adoption of the regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","LGBTQ+ inclusion","student privacy","parental rights"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly Oppose,\" \"I do not approve,\" and \"Please do not approve.\" They argue the guidelines would \"do damage\" and object to allowing \"male and female locker rooms\" to be used by the \"opposite biological sex.\"","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","bathroom access","locker rooms","school policy","parental rights"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter says the regulations \"infringe the First Amendment rights of parents to raise and care for their children,\" which clearly اعتراضs to the policy and argues against its adoption. The comment offers no support or suggested improvements, only a constitutional objection.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","First Amendment","transgender students","school policy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.97,"stance_rationale":"The commenter says they are \"Saddened and outraged by this proposal,\" which clearly expresses disapproval of the regulation. No language suggests support or a neutral request for information.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","public schools","policy opposition"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter says, \"I strongly disagree with this policy,\" which directly rejects the regulation. They also argue for strict sex-based restroom and locker room use: \"If you have a penis you use the boys restroom... If you have vagina you use the girls restroom,\" indicating opposition to the transgender accommodations in the policy.","tone":"negative","tags":["bathroom access","locker rooms","gender identity","parental rights","LGBTQ+ inclusion"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"strongly oppose\" and repeatedly urges rejection, ending with \"Stop it now.\" The body argues the policy is harmful, calling it \"insane\" and \"cruel and torturous,\" and raises objections about bathrooms, sports, and parental notification.","tone":"negative","tags":["bathroom access","parental rights","school sports","Title IX","student safety"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Oppose transgender policies proposed by the Virginia Department of Education\" and repeatedly argues the policies are \"nothing but propagandas\" that should not be imposed on children. They object to children learning about transgender topics and frame the guidance as harmful and inappropriate for age.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender policies","age-appropriate content","parental rights","student curriculum","LGBTQ+ inclusion"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"Fully support policies to support LGBT+ students\" and adds that \"All students deserve to learn in an inclusive, safe environment.\" This clearly endorses adoption of the proposed policies.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","inclusive schools"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I absolutely do not approve of these proposed guidelines!\" and repeatedly argues they should not be adopted. They describe the policies as a \"state overreach,\" claim they \"endanger girls,\" and say they undermine \"parental authority,\" all of which indicate clear opposition.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","bathroom access","school sports","student safety","transgender policies"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says they are \"Strongly in favor of policies that protect the rights of transgender children\" and urges action to make school \"a safe and positive one.\" This clearly supports adopting the regulation.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","transgender rights","school climate"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.74,"stance_rationale":"The commenter says transgender people \"should be given the same rights as anyone else\" and argues for accommodations such as a third restroom labeled \"Family\" and similar facilities for sports. Although they criticize the policy as \"not... properly thought out,\" the overall thrust is to support transgender access with separate accommodations rather than reject the regulation outright.","tone":"mixed","tags":["bathroom access","locker rooms","school sports","privacy","transgender rights"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly oppose this!\" which directly indicates rejection of the regulation. The phrase \"absolute blatant infringement of our rights\" further shows opposition to adoption.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","civil rights","transgender students"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I urge you not only to ratify and release this Guidance Document\" and \"Strongly Support!!!\". They argue the policies are needed so children feel \"safe\" and \"belong at school\" and to protect all students from discrimination.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","anti-discrimination","equity","bullying prevention"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly oppose several key provisions\" and describes the guidance as \"an outrageous intrusion\" and \"very destructive\". Although they support eliminating hostility toward transgender students and allowing participation in non-gender-specific activities, they reject the privacy and identity-affirmation provisions and want the work done \"in dialogue with the parents\" instead.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","privacy","bathroom access","student records","LGBTQ+ inclusion"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I oppose in the Strongest terms possible\" and calls the policy \"horrible policy.\" They also argue that it is \"NOT up to our schools to enforce the politically correct agenda of the moment,\" indicating clear rejection of the regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","school policy","parental rights","LGBTQ+ inclusion"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I do not approve of their proposed guidelines\" and the title reads \"Oppose these dangerous policy changes.\" The body repeatedly argues the policies are harmful and should not be adopted, citing concerns about pronouns, parental notification, bathrooms, dress codes, and religious objections.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","privacy","bathroom access","religious freedom","gender identity"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly rejects the proposal in the title, writing \"No to transgender regulations proposed by Va. Dept. of Education!!!\" and repeatedly urges \"Don't do it!\" They argue the policy is \"highly dangerous\" and would lead to assaults and lawsuits, indicating clear opposition to adoption.","tone":"negative","tags":["bathroom access","locker rooms","student safety","privacy","transgender students"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly oppose\" and repeatedly urges, \"Do not make schools support this aberrant behavior.\" The body argues the policy is \"anti-family, anti-religious\" and calls transgender/gay identity \"radical\" and \"destructive,\" indicating clear rejection of the regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","religious freedom","parental rights","school policy","LGBTQ+ inclusion"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter rejects the policy, saying \"None of this is in the best interest of children\" and calling it \"ridiculous.\" They argue that schools should not handle gender-related matters without parental knowledge, indicating opposition to the transgender student policies as written.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","student privacy","transgender students","school notification"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly states, \"I do not support this policy,\" which directly rejects the proposed regulation. There is no qualifying language suggesting support with changes or a neutral inquiry.","tone":"negative","tags":[]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I do not approve of this,\" which directly rejects the proposed regulation. The added phrase \"anti parent, anti teacher\" reinforces opposition rather than support or neutrality.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","teacher authority","transgender students"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly support the draft guidance provided by the VDOE.\" This is a clear endorsement of adopting the regulation/guidance as proposed.","tone":"positive","tags":["transgender students","school policy","LGBTQ+ inclusion"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly oppose the guidelines proposed by the Virginia Department of Education\" and repeatedly argues against adopting them. They describe the policies as \"ultra-progressive dogma,\" a \"severe trampling of freedom,\" and say they would not send their children to a school with these rules.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","transgender policies","public education","school administration","student privacy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I oppose the proposed rules\" and gives a reason for that opposition: it \"removes parents from being involved in the decision process.\" This is a clear rejection of the regulation as written.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","transgender students","school policy"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Long overdue, 100% support\" and \"Support 100%\". They also frame the policy as necessary protection, calling it \"suicide prevention\" and saying it is \"the least school systems can do\" for transgender youth.","tone":"positive","tags":["suicide prevention","transgender youth","student safety","LGBTQ+ inclusion"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"Do Not Support this policy!\" which clearly indicates opposition to adoption. There is no qualifying language suggesting support with changes or a neutral question.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","school policy"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"Fully support\" and repeats, \"I fully support this!!\" This is a clear endorsement of the proposed regulation with no reservations or objections.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","transgender students","nondiscrimination"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"We Do NOT support these policies\" and asks that the guidelines not be adopted. They describe the proposal as \"an attack on our Rights\" and object to it as \"radical theories,\" indicating clear opposition rather than a request for changes.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","religious freedom","LGBTQ+ inclusion","school policy"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The comment explicitly says, \"Protect transgender students!\" which aligns with the regulation’s purpose of providing protections and supportive policies for transgender students in public schools. It offers clear affirmative support and no criticism or request to weaken the policy.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","anti-discrimination"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly oppose this policy\" and urges, \"do not continue with these policies.\" They argue it \"prevents parents from being parents\" and takes away students' ability to object to shared bathrooms/dressing rooms, indicating rejection of the regulation rather than support with changes.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","privacy","bathroom access","student voice","transgender students"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly rejects the policy, calling it an \"ill-conceived setup\" and arguing that it \"usurp[s] parental authority\" and \"compels speech and belief.\" The comment frames the guidelines as harmful to parents, students, and schools rather than supporting adoption.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","compelled speech","privacy","transgender students","school policy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly disagree with this policy\" and \"I do not agree with this policy,\" indicating clear opposition to adoption. They also argue it \"goes against a lot of people's religious values and beliefs\" and should not be \"forced on them,\" which reinforces rejection of the regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":["religious freedom","parental rights","LGBTQ+ inclusion","school policy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly disagree with this policy\" and \"I don't agree with this policy at all,\" indicating clear opposition. They also argue it \"goes against a lot of people's religious beliefs\" and should not be \"forced on anyone,\" which shows they want the policy rejected.","tone":"negative","tags":["religious freedom","parental rights","LGBTQ+ inclusion","nondiscrimination"]}