{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly oppose any of these policy proposals,\" which directly rejects the regulation. The quoted scripture is used to justify that opposition rather than to ask a question or offer neutral input.","tone":"negative","tags":["religious freedom","LGBTQ+ inclusion","student policy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"DO NOT PASS THIS\" and calls the proposal \"an abomination if passed,\" which clearly rejects adoption of the regulation. The religious framing (“God does not make mistakes!!!”) reinforces opposition rather than offering neutral input or support with changes.","tone":"negative","tags":["religious freedom","LGBTQ+ inclusion","transgender students"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I do not agree with this guidance\" and argues it is \"not in the best interest of ALL of the students.\" They object to the policy on privacy and family-rights grounds, citing \"bathroom/locker room issue\" and \"a family’s right to not introduce their children to these topics at young ages.\"","tone":"negative","tags":["privacy","bathroom access","locker rooms","parental rights","LGBTQ+ inclusion"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"100% against\" the policy and ends with \"a great big no on this policy.\" They object to transgender recognition in schools, oppose \"multi-sex public restrooms,\" and reject allowing transgender students in classes or facilities.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","bathroom access","school sports","privacy","religious freedom"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"STRONGLY OPPOSED\" and repeatedly rejects the policy, calling it \"short-sighted\" and \"ultimately self-defeating.\" They object to it on parental rights and ideological grounds, saying it \"usurps parental knowledge\" and \"forces ideologies upon others.\"","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","transgender students","school policy","student safety","ideology"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I not approve of the proposed guidelines\" and titles the comment \"Strongly disagree with these policies.\" They argue the policies would \"create chaos\" and object to bathroom access and family rights, indicating clear opposition to adoption.","tone":"negative","tags":["bathroom access","parental rights","gender identity","school policy","student privacy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"No way I will support this,\" which directly rejects the regulation. They also object to \"forcing everyone to conform,\" indicating opposition to the policy approach rather than a request for minor changes.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","parental rights","school policy","student inclusion"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says they are \"Completely opposed\" and threatens to \"remove my children and my tax money from the district if this passes,\" indicating they want the regulation rejected. The phrase \"basic biology\" and objection to \"distort\" their children's understanding further show opposition to adoption.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","parental rights","education policy","biology","school funding"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly oppose the proposed gender policies,\" which directly states opposition to adoption. They further argue the policies \"fall completely outside the mission and purview of public education\" and that schools have \"no business engaging in this level of social engineering,\" indicating rejection of the regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","public education mission","school policy"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Educator in full support!\" and adds that \"Schools should be a safe and inclusive place for all students,\" which clearly endorses the proposed policies. There is no language opposing or questioning the regulation.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","school climate"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I fully support the draft guidance provided by the VDOE\" and repeatedly endorses the policy as beneficial. They argue it will \"provide a safe and inclusive educational experience for EVERY student,\" especially \"LGBTQ+ students,\" indicating clear approval of adoption.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","school policy","nondiscrimination","inclusive education"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter says, \"I strongly disapprove of these guidelines,\" which directly rejects the proposed regulation. They also argue it \"put[s] an unfair burden on other students and staff,\" indicating opposition rather than a request for modification in support of adoption.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","school policy","staff burden","student rights"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I do not approve of their proposed guidelines,\" which directly rejects the regulation. The rest of the comment criticizes the policy as \"radical theories\" and claims it would \"eradicate all distinctions between male and female,\" reinforcing opposition.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","gender identity","school policy","indoctrination"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I support a safe and inclusive environment for all of our children,\" which aligns with adopting the proposed policies. There is no language opposing or questioning the regulation.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","inclusion"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly support the proposed guidance\" and explains that inclusive school support helped their transgender student thrive and graduate with honors. They argue the policy is needed because some students lack supportive home environments and benefit from \"supportive counselors, administration, and teachers/mentors.\"","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student support","mental health","school climate","transgender students"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"Strongly oppose\" and states it would be \"doubly wrong to put into place these proposed guidelines.\" They argue the guidelines would cause \"tremendous confusion and chaos,\" indicating clear rejection of the regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","counseling","parental rights","indoctrination","school policy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"These new proposed policies should be opposed to protect children,\" and argues the policy lacks needed safeguards. They frame the guidance as harmful, warning it could \"harm vulnerable children\" and lead to \"lawsuits like this one.\"","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","child welfare","medical transition","legal liability","parental rights"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I support the draft guidance provided from VDOE\" and calls it \"a step in the right direction.\" They also state that it will create \"a safe environment for LGBTQ+ students\" and prevent discrimination, indicating clear approval of adoption.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","nondiscrimination","bullying prevention"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Vehemently Oppose\" and argues the policy is \"to the detriment of the vast majority of students\". They also say it \"completely eliminates parents\" and \"DOES NOT protect all students,\" indicating clear rejection of the regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","bathroom access","locker rooms","student safety","discrimination"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.96,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"Oppose this very much!\" and argues that schools should focus on \"education only,\" implying the policy is a distraction from the primary mission of schools. The statement that we are \"not to address one group of people as more important\" suggests rejection of the transgender student policies as written.","tone":"negative","tags":["education priorities","transgender students","school policy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I do not approve of the proposed guidelines\" and the title reads \"Strongly Oppose.\" They argue the policies are based on \"radical theories,\" oppose \"gender-based policies,\" and claim the guidelines would risk parents being reported for child abuse, all of which indicate rejection of the regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":["gender identity","parental rights","religious freedom","privacy","school policy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"STRONGLY STRONGLY OPPOSE\" and argues the policy is \"pathetic\" and an \"overstepping\" of the department's role. They object to \"compelled speech\" and say the guidance should not be adopted because schools should \"stick to a basic rule\" instead.","tone":"negative","tags":["compelled speech","parental rights","LGBTQ+ inclusion","school policy","teacher speech"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly Support!\" and urges the policy to be adopted: \"Do it up!\" They also praise it as \"Comprehensive, kind, data-supported measures\" with \"positive outcomes for LGBTQ kids.\"","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","bullying prevention","student safety","mental health"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly support the draft guidance provided by the VDOE\" and repeats support for \"this guidance.\" They also endorse the goal of making sure every student has a \"safe education\" in a \"nurturing, safe and welcoming\" environment.","tone":"positive","tags":["transgender students","student safety","school climate","LGBTQ+ inclusion"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I fully support a safe and inclusive environment for all of our students\" and thanks the authors for the document and guidance. This is a clear endorsement of the proposed regulation as written.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","inclusion"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I write to oppose these policies\" and repeatedly argues they should not be adopted. They claim the policies violate \"parental rights,\" threaten privacy and safety, and conflict with religious beliefs, all of which indicate strong opposition rather than a request for modification.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","privacy","student safety","religious freedom","dress code"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly support\" and \"I fully support this,\" indicating clear approval of the proposed policies. They also argue that schools should be \"a safe and welcoming space,\" which aligns with adoption of the regulation.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","safe learning environment"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"DO NOT SUPPORT PROPOSED TRANSGENDER POLICIES IN VIRGINIA PUBLIC SCHOOLS,\" which directly rejects the regulation. They also argue for \"Separate bathrooms, separate showers\" and frame the policies as a \"travesty,\" indicating opposition to adoption.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender policies","bathroom access","privacy","parental rights","school facilities"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter argues schools should \"discuss and offer\" Pimozide as a \"first-line treatment\" and says children \"should never move to Hormone replacements until they are over the age of Eighteen.\" This directly rejects the regulation’s transgender-supportive approach and seeks to substantially weaken it by replacing it with a pathologizing treatment model.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","medical treatment","parental rights","school policy","bathroom access"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I Strongly OPPOSE\" and argues the policy \"forces educators and students to accept an ideology\" that conflicts with \"religious beliefs.\" They also predict it \"will not be upheld by the courts,\" indicating rejection of the regulation rather than support or neutrality.","tone":"negative","tags":["religious freedom","parental rights","LGBTQ+ inclusion","school policy"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly states \"strong support\" for the model policies and says \"I support this guidance\". They also endorse the policies as creating a \"safe and welcoming\" environment for all children.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","school climate","anti-discrimination"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly support the draft guidance\" and urges officials to \"support the VDOE guidance.\" They also describe the policy as granting \"equal rights and protections\" and improving the school environment, which clearly indicates approval of adoption.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student rights","school climate","anti-discrimination","transgender students"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"STRONGLY OPPOSED\" and \"Please opposed this dangerous policies,\" which clearly rejects adoption of the model policies. The phrase \"dangerous policies\" and reference to \"degeneration of children\" indicate a desire to block or weaken the regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","student safety","parental rights","LGBTQ+ inclusion"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says they are \"in support of implementing the policies outlined in this guidance document\" and calls the policies \"a step in the right direction.\" They also ask to \"protect the rights of students\" and create \"safe and supportive educational settings\" for TGNC youth, indicating clear approval of adoption.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","anti-discrimination","bullying prevention","mental health"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"Please do not have guidance on this topic\" and asks to \"please remove this topic from needing a guidance document.\" They also criticize the document as \"offensive\" and argue against accepting transgender topics in public schools, indicating clear opposition to adoption of the guidance.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","public schools","parental rights","professionalism","privacy"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly support this\" and gives a reason for adoption: \"to create a safer and more equitable environment for ALL of our students.\" This is a clear endorsement of the regulation as proposed.","tone":"positive","tags":["student safety","equity","LGBTQ+ inclusion","supportive learning environment"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter clearly rejects the policy, asking why schools are \"pushing an ideology that is wrong\" and stating they are \"opposed to the direction this type of policy is headed.\" The reference to biology and Romans 1:18-32 indicates opposition to the regulation's transgender protections.","tone":"negative","tags":["religious freedom","LGBTQ+ inclusion","transgender students","biology","free speech"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Absolutely Opposed!\" and argues the policy reflects a \"quack notion\" that should be shut down. They call for removing transgender people from society and eliminating the organization promoting the policy, which clearly rejects adoption of the regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","LGBTQ+ inclusion","school policy","discrimination"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I Strongly support\" and \"I 100% support this issue!\" This is a clear endorsement of the proposed regulation.","tone":"positive","tags":["support","transgender students"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I support having schools that ensure a positive, safe, and nurturing learning environment for all students\" and thanks the agency for its \"excellent work on this guidance document.\" The comment clearly endorses the regulation and its protections for transgender students' rights and dignity.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","nondiscrimination","privacy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says it \"urges the Department of Education to reject the proposed model regulations\" and concludes, \"the Conference, therefore, opposes the proposed 'Model Policies.'\" The body repeatedly argues against the policies on parental rights, privacy, and religious grounds, showing clear opposition rather than a neutral or mixed view.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","privacy","religious freedom","gender identity","student safety"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly rejects the policy as \"Unnecessary\" and says government and NGOs \"have no business\" to impose it. They argue it should not be \"taught or promoted\" and object to pronoun use, bathroom access, and any infringement on \"parent's rights,\" all of which indicate opposition to adoption of the regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","pronouns","bathroom access","privacy","transgender students"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly states, \"I fully support this guidance document,\" which is a clear endorsement of adoption. The title \"Full Support\" reinforces that the commenter wants the regulation approved.","tone":"positive","tags":["transgender students","nondiscrimination","student privacy"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"Absolutely support\" and states they \"wholeheartedly support\" their non-binary grandchild. The comment expresses approval of the underlying transgender-student policies through affirming language about love, kindness, and respect.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","family support","religious freedom"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly labels the submission \"OPPOSE\" and says \"schools should stay out of it,\" indicating rejection of the proposed policies. They also call the policies \"insane\" and say there is \"no way to follow the rules proposed,\" which shows strong opposition to adoption.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","parental rights","school policy","child welfare"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly support this protection in our schools,\" which directly endorses the regulation. They also justify it by saying no child or adult should be \"harassed\" or made to feel \"inferior,\" indicating approval of the protections for transgender students.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","anti-harassment","nondiscrimination"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly rejects the proposal, calling the policies \"outrageous\" and saying, \"I hope these policies are not accepted by our school district nor any school district in our state.\" This is a clear request to reject the regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","school policy","opposition","science"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly support,\" and frames the policy as important for being \"welcoming to ALL students.\" As an educator, they are endorsing adoption of the regulation rather than questioning or opposing it.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student support","nondiscrimination","school climate"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"OF COURSE I support this policy\" and the title reads \"Strongly Support.\" They also criticize opposition to the policy, indicating clear approval of adoption.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender rights","student equality","nondiscrimination","respect"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly support these policies to be put in place\" and repeatedly argues that the policies should protect children and prevent discrimination. They also conclude that \"putting the policies in place will help aid the success of the public schools,\" which clearly endorses adoption.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","anti-discrimination","privacy","parental rights"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I am fully in support of this motion\" and urges officials to \"do what is right and just for these individuals.\" The reference to needing \"protection for our trans students\" indicates clear approval of the proposed policies.","tone":"positive","tags":["transgender students","student protection","nondiscrimination","LGBTQ+ inclusion"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says they are \"in FULL SUPPORT of this policy\" and states it will \"protect transgender students.\" They also argue that students deserve \"a safe accepting school\" and that protections are needed to prevent harassment and bullying.","tone":"positive","tags":["transgender students","student safety","bullying prevention","LGBTQ+ inclusion","nondiscrimination"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I fully support this policy\" and endorses the document as protecting equal rights and safety. They also argue that students should \"feel safe and respected,\" indicating approval of adoption.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","nondiscrimination","human rights"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"FULLY Support\" and \"I totally support any measures to ensure fairness and equality to ALL students!!!!\" This clearly endorses the proposed policies rather than opposing or questioning them.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","equality","student rights"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I fully support this!\" and frames the regulation as aligned with treating \"ALL children and ALL people\" with kindness and respect. The rest of the comment criticizes opponents, reinforcing approval of the proposed policies.","tone":"negative","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student dignity","anti-bullying","school climate"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I am totally opposed to these 'model policies'\" and repeatedly argues against adoption of the guidance. They list multiple reasons for opposition, including \"infringement on parental rights,\" \"keeping information from parents,\" and \"violation of the privacy rights of the majority of students.\"","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","privacy","religious freedom","LGBTQ+ inclusion","school facilities"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Fully Support!\" and explains that \"every student deserves a safe and supportive environment\" and should \"be treated with respect,\" which aligns with adopting the regulation. There is no language opposing or questioning the policy.","tone":"positive","tags":["student safety","supportive environment","respect","LGBTQ+ inclusion"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly oppose,\" which directly states opposition to the regulation. They also argue that the policies leave \"no room in these ideas for the rights of those who disagree,\" indicating they want the guidance rejected or substantially changed.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","religious freedom","LGBTQ+ inclusion","student rights"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I fully support this policy,\" which directly endorses adoption. The follow-up, \"All students should be treated equally,\" reinforces approval of the regulation's nondiscrimination goals.","tone":"positive","tags":["nondiscrimination","student equality","transgender students"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.96,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I oppose this measure,\" which directly states opposition to the regulation. They also ask for \"adequate provisions for the consciences of religious people\" to be added, indicating they want the policy changed substantially before adoption.","tone":"neutral","tags":["religious freedom","conscience protections","transgender students"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly oppose the VDOE Draft Policies for the Treatment of Transgender Students.\" They also argue the policy would be \"detrimental to the student,\" indicating they want it rejected rather than adopted.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","student welfare","policy opposition"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"100 % oppose\" and argues the policy \"violates the very created order of God.\" The biblical quotation about \"MALE and FEMALE created He them\" is used to reject the regulation rather than support or modify it.","tone":"negative","tags":["religious freedom","gender identity","transgender students","school policy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter rejects the policy’s implications, stating that \"No child should be forced to share showers, locker rooms, hotel rooms, or other intimate settings with a member of the opposite biological sex.\" They call the policy \"a gross violation\" of privacy, indicating opposition to adoption as written.","tone":"negative","tags":["privacy","bathroom access","locker rooms","student safety","parental rights"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly oppose\" and argues the policy is \"a ploy\" and \"bent on blowing a small situation into a totally outsized problem,\" indicating they want it rejected. They also object to the policy's underlying treatment of gender and claim it would take \"parental control\" away.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","LGBTQ+ inclusion","gender identity","school policy"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"Fully Support this,\" \"should be fully supported,\" and \"I fully support this as policies that should be implemented and approved.\" The comment argues the policy will \"bring equity to all students\" and make schools \"more inclusive,\" indicating clear approval of adoption.","tone":"positive","tags":["equity","LGBTQ+ inclusion","student support","inclusivity","anti-discrimination"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"Strongly opposed to the proposed transgender equality plan,\" which clearly rejects the regulation. No supporting or neutral language is present.","tone":"negative","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","transgender students","school policy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter asks the DOE to \"respect the rights of parents\" and says, \"Let them make the decision to accept or reject the state's goals,\" which indicates opposition to the proposed transgender student policies. The request to \"Do not compromise the modesty of children\" and the reference to \"religious beliefs\" not coinciding with \"your secular values\" further show they want the regulation rejected or substantially weakened.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","religious freedom","LGBTQ+ inclusion","sex education","student privacy"]}


{"stance":"neutral","stance_confidence":0.86,"stance_rationale":"The comment does not explicitly support or oppose the regulation; it simply states that \"Education is a partnership\" and that \"The role of parents should be heard and respected.\" This reads as a general value statement about parental involvement rather than a clear position on adopting the transgender student policies.","tone":"neutral","tags":["parental rights","parental involvement"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly states, \"I support this policy.\" There is no qualifying language or criticism, so the position is clearly in favor of adoption.","tone":"positive","tags":["transgender students","policy support"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I completely oppose these policies,\" which directly rejects adoption of the regulation. They also object that the policies \"rob parents of their God-given and legitimate rights,\" reinforcing opposition on parental-rights grounds.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","religious freedom","transgender policies"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly oppose this legislation,\" which directly states their position. They argue the policy conflicts with what they call the \"biological reality\" that humans are \"binary\" and say schools should not \"teach otherwise.\"","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","sex binary","school curriculum","opposition"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"We vehemently oppose teaching any such content to children\" and asks officials to \"Please do not force your beliefs into our school system.\" The comment rejects the proposed transgender guidance as \"not always age-appropriate\" and \"contrary to both their faith\" and \"scientific study.\"","tone":"negative","tags":["religious freedom","parental rights","LGBTQ+ inclusion","curriculum content","student privacy"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly support these policies\" and thanks the agency for \"looking out for ALL students,\" which clearly endorses adoption of the regulation. There is no indication of opposition or neutrality.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","nondiscrimination"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I'm in full support of this proposal\" and closes with \"Please pass and implement this guidance.\" They also endorse the policy’s purpose by arguing that trans youth deserve \"dignified treatment\" and that it \"is proven to save lives.\"","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","transgender rights","self-determination","respect"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says the draft policies would \"undercut parents’ involvement,\" \"endanger the bodily privacy and safety of all students,\" and \"infringe the First Amendment rights of parents.\" They repeatedly argue schools \"should not\" adopt accommodations for transgender students and frame the policies as harmful, indicating clear opposition to adoption.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","privacy","student safety","bathroom access","LGBTQ+ inclusion"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The comment explicitly says \"Strongly oppose!!\" and provides no qualifying language suggesting support or neutrality. It is a direct rejection of the proposed regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":[]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.93,"stance_rationale":"The title explicitly says \"Strongly oppose draft model policies for the treatment of transgender students,\" which clearly rejects the regulation. The body’s reference to \"Brave New World\" becoming reality reinforces a negative view of the policy, even though it is brief and somewhat cryptic.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","policy opposition","school policy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.93,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly begins with \"Oppose,\" indicating they do not want the regulation adopted. The reference to \"Aldous Huxley's 'Brave New World'\" suggests a negative judgment about the policy as dystopian or socially harmful.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","privacy","school policy"]}


{"stance":"neutral","stance_confidence":0.86,"stance_rationale":"The commenter does not directly endorse or reject the transgender-student policy. Instead, they urge \"laser focused attention to classical world class education\" and argue that school systems should spend no time on \"anything unrelated to the core function\" of education, which is an indirect but not explicit position on the regulation.","tone":"neutral","tags":["curriculum","teacher qualifications","school priorities","education policy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I do not approve\" and concludes, \"This is bad policy and must be rejected.\" They argue the proposal is an overreach and object to schools supporting gender transition without parental consent.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","transgender policies","school authority","gender transition","student privacy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly rejects the policy, calling it \"absurdity,\" \"evil,\" and \"criminal,\" and urges educators to \"focus on what schools are created for\" instead of \"body parts\" and \"sexual orientation.\" They also argue for handling such issues \"in private,\" which indicates opposition to the regulation as written.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","LGBTQ+ inclusion","privacy","school priorities"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly urges approval: \"You should support this\" and \"Give them the support they so desperately need.\" They also defend the policy as beneficial for trans kids in \"supportive environments.\"","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student support","transgender students","school climate"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I oppose and do not approve\" of the proposed guidelines. They further criticize the policies as \"radical theories\" that \"confuse, not clarify sexuality,\" indicating rejection of the regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","LGBTQ+ inclusion","sex education"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly rejects the policy changes, saying we should be helping children instead of \"changing our policies on bathrooms, athletic participation, etc.\" to accommodate them. The phrase \"Enough already!\" and reference to \"the detriment of the overwhelming majority\" indicate opposition to the proposed transgender student policies.","tone":"negative","tags":["bathroom access","school sports","transgender students","parental concerns"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I do not approve of the proposed guidelines\" and argues they are based on \"radical theories\" that would \"eradicate all distinctions between male and female.\" This is a clear rejection of the regulation as proposed.","tone":"negative","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","gender identity","school policy","parental rights"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says the policy is \"unacceptable\" and asks why schools are \"putting so much pressure on children\" in this way. They also warn that if it is approved it \"WILL BE damaging to all children,\" indicating clear opposition to adoption.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","school policy","child welfare","parental rights","school choice"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly labels the proposal \"Strongly Opposed\" and repeatedly argues against it, saying it is \"taking the rights of parents away\" and \"harming children.\" They also warn it would expose children to \"predators and unsafe situations,\" indicating clear rejection of the regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","student safety","privacy","transgender students","school safety"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly calls the policy \"a dangerous policy\" and says it \"threatens to undermine chains of authority,\" indicating rejection of the proposed transgender student guidance. They also argue it harms \"the rights and morals of the majority\" and propose an alternative to avoid the policy's effects, which shows opposition rather than support.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","school uniforms","teacher authority","transgender policies","student privacy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter says, \"I strongly disapprove of proposed guidelines,\" which is a direct rejection of the regulation. The rest of the comment criticizes the policies as \"radical theories\" that \"eradicate all distinctions between male and female\" and \"indoctrinate our school children,\" reinforcing opposition.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","gender identity","school policy","indoctrination","sex distinctions"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly rejects the proposal, saying \"Please don't\" and arguing the VDOE has \"gone far beyond the path the General Assembly prescribed.\" They also say schools should not accommodate \"irreversible 'gender transitions,'\" indicating opposition to the regulation's transgender-student protections.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","privacy","bathroom access","locker rooms","gender identity"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter repeatedly argues the policies are \"Not workable\" and lists objections to pronoun requirements, parent notification limits, bathroom access, and gender-neutral dress codes. The comment frames the regulation as harmful and unacceptable, saying it would create \"harassment,\" \"privacy and safety\" problems, and conflict with \"religious faith\" and biology.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","privacy","bathroom access","religious freedom","LGBTQ+ inclusion"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"I strongly disagree\" and \"strongly oppose,\" indicating rejection of the proposed policies. They argue against \"affirmation\" and say schools should \"do not infringe upon the rights of parents,\" which shows opposition to the regulation's transgender-supportive approach.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","LGBTQ+ inclusion","student counseling","medical transition"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I urge you to implement this guidance document\" and asks to \"Please implement these measures.\" They also praise it as an \"important document\" that will support \"the dignity and well-being of young people\" and protect them from harm.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","bullying prevention","school climate","privacy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I am opposed to Transgender education being a part of educational standards\" and argues that \"the school system should not be involved.\" This is a clear rejection of the proposed policies rather than support or a neutral inquiry.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender education","parental rights","school involvement","education standards"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly opens with \"Absolute OPPOSITION!\" and repeatedly rejects the policy as \"deceptive and degrading,\" \"totally against our Constitutional right,\" and \"absolute force thru policy.\" They also argue it takes away \"parental input\" and want schools to \"Go back to education's real purpose,\" indicating clear opposition to adoption.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","privacy","LGBTQ+ inclusion","student identity","school policy"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly urges adoption of the protections, saying \"Do not make mistakes that will harm further generations of LGBTQ youth\" and \"Provide equal protection in our schools!\" They describe past bullying and lack of protections as harmful, which supports the regulation.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","bullying prevention","student safety","equal protection"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.96,"stance_rationale":"The commenter argues that the policies \"would pit children against their parents,\" which is a clear criticism of the proposed guidance. By framing the policies as creating conflict over \"important questions about sex and gender identity,\" the comment signals opposition rather than support or a neutral inquiry.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","gender identity","school policy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter repeatedly argues the draft is “scientifically, ethically, and operationally” flawed and says it “threaten[s] the dignity, safety, and well being” of students and parents. They also object to specific provisions, including claims that the guidance “may – or should - lie to parents/guardians” and that it is “ethically unsound,” indicating they want it rejected or substantially revised downward.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","privacy","student safety","transgender policies","consent"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly rejects the proposal with repeated emphatic language: \"No, No, No, NO!!!\" and argues the VDOE has \"gone far beyond\" what the General Assembly intended. They call for protecting privacy and say the policies \"infringe the First Amendment rights of parents,\" indicating clear opposition to adoption.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","privacy","bathroom access","student safety","religious freedom"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter rejects the premise of the policy by asserting that sex is fixed by chromosomes and that \"Preferences do not change science,\" which directly conflicts with transgender-inclusive guidance. Although they do not explicitly say \"reject this regulation,\" the comment clearly argues against adopting policies based on gender identity or pronoun choice.","tone":"negative","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","gender identity","pronouns","science-based policy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly rejects the policy’s core premise, saying they should not be “forced to pretend that a boy is a girl” and asking that their daughter not be required to share “restrooms/showers with your son.” They argue for “immutable biological differences” and against a teenager’s “sexual preference” overriding policy, which indicates opposition to adoption of the regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":["bathroom access","privacy","parental rights","sex-based facilities","transgender students"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly oppose on countless levels,\" and argues to \"stop forcing this conversation on children.\" They frame the policy as \"an ideological move\" and urge the state to spend time and tax dollars on other priorities instead of adopting these transgender student policies.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","gender identity","curriculum priorities","child development","tax dollars"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I do not approve of proposed guidelines\" and urges, \"Stop these policies in their tracks!\" They argue the policies \"eradicate all distinctions between male and female\" and \"force\" compliance, indicating clear opposition to adoption.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","sex and gender","religious freedom","school policy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The comment explicitly says \"Strongly Oppose,\" which clearly indicates rejection of the proposed transgender student policies. No additional qualifying language suggests support or neutrality.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender policies","opposition"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly states \"Strongly Oppose,\" which directly indicates rejection of the proposed regulation. No supporting reasons or qualifications are provided, but the stance is unambiguous.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender policies"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly rejects the policy as a mandate, saying it \"SHOULD NOT be the norm\" and that these \"radical measures\" should not be \"mandated legalities.\" They argue it would \"confuse and divide\" children and should be handled only as \"special cases\" rather than through the regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","biology","parental concerns","school policy","privacy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly rejects the proposal, calling it \"an affront to the American family\" and saying \"This entire proposal\" is harmful. They argue it should not expose children to these ideas and frame it as state overreach, indicating opposition to adoption of the regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","family values","transgender students","state overreach","religious freedom"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I fully support the initiative to protect our transgender students,\" which directly endorses the regulation. They also frame the policy as promoting safety and support for all students, indicating approval rather than criticism or neutrality.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","anti-discrimination","bullying prevention"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.97,"stance_rationale":"The commenter says the draft \"fails scientifically, ethically, and operationally\" and repeatedly characterizes it as \"ideological\" and \"indoctrinat[ing],\" indicating rejection of the proposal. Although they acknowledge that examining treatment of transgender students is \"a worthwhile endeavor,\" the overall thrust is that the model guidance is unsound and should not be adopted in its current form.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","school policy","privacy","parental rights","ethics"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly Support This Proposal\" and repeatedly endorses the policy, calling it \"one step in the right direction\" and saying \"a lot needs to change on a policy level.\" They also praise specific provisions such as displaying a student's \"chosen name\" and \"true gender\" and supporting transgender students in school.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student privacy","parental rights","school records","equitable education"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter repeatedly questions why a separate transgender policy is needed and argues that existing bullying/harassment policies already cover everyone. They also warn that VDOE is \"opening a door\" to lawsuits and ask, \"Why does VDOE spend time on things that are universally covered under two words: bullying and harassment,\" indicating opposition to the regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":["bullying prevention","LGBTQ+ inclusion","school sports","dress code","lawsuits"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"Do not let this pass!!\" and calls it \"a horrible policy,\" which clearly rejects adoption of the regulation. The statement that it \"will add to the demise of our children\" shows strong opposition rather than a request for changes.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender policy","student welfare","school policy"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly endorses the policy by saying they \"support\" it and repeating that \"all children have a right to learn, free from discrimination and harassment.\" The closing \"Thank you!\" reinforces approval rather than criticism or neutrality.","tone":"positive","tags":["anti-discrimination","student rights","safe learning environment","bullying prevention"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly Support\" and argues that \"Everyone should feel safe in school\" and that \"Discrimination is wrong.\" They also endorse \"nurturing environments\" for students to be themselves, which aligns with adopting the policy.","tone":"positive","tags":["student safety","anti-discrimination","LGBTQ+ inclusion","school climate"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says the document \"should be dismissed and rejected\" and repeats \"Reject it, reject it, reject it.\" They argue the policy is \"not science\" and harmful, indicating clear opposition to adoption.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","biology","school sports","mental health","parental rights"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly labels the submission \"STRONGLY SUPPORT\" and repeatedly argues that the policies are necessary to \"protect our youth\" from bullying, harassment, and discrimination. They also defend the proposed guidance as \"evidence-based\" and criticize opponents, indicating clear approval of adoption.","tone":"positive","tags":["transgender students","student privacy","bullying prevention","anti-discrimination","inclusive policy"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says they \"strongly support the adoption of this guidance\" and describes it as \"a meaningful step\" toward a safe and supportive educational space. This is a clear endorsement of the regulation as proposed.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","supportive school environment"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"STRONGLY SUPPORT\" and urges the policy to be adopted: \"Please set an example, today, that you stand with marginalized people.\" They argue the regulation would help trans children and reduce harm, including abuse and suicide risk.","tone":"positive","tags":["transgender students","student safety","anti-discrimination","LGBTQ+ inclusion","mental health"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"Support\" and states that the policies \"will provide a safe and inclusive educational experience for all students.\" They also endorse the measure for \"our LGBT youth,\" indicating clear approval of the regulation.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","inclusive education"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"Strongly support!\" and \"I strongly support providing support to all LGBT+ children in our state!\" This is a clear endorsement of the proposed policies.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student support","nondiscrimination"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly support!\" and describes the policies as \"a good starting point\" for making students feel \"comfortable and safe.\" They also argue it is \"absolutely essential\" to ensure transgender students feel accepted and understood, indicating clear approval of the regulation.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","school climate","anti-discrimination"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly support this guidance\" and repeatedly endorses the policy as \"critical\" and \"evidence based.\" They also argue that students should be able to use the bathroom corresponding to their gender identity and that educators need these guidelines.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student privacy","bathroom access","teacher guidance","student support"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says the comments opposing the guidance are hateful and concludes, \"This only makes it more clear that students need school to be a refuge\" where they can be supported. That language clearly endorses the proposed policy and its protections for transgender and gender-nonconforming students.","tone":"negative","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","bullying prevention","supportive school environment"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"strongly support!\" twice, which clearly indicates approval of the proposed regulation. There is no qualifying language or criticism suggesting any opposition or neutrality.","tone":"positive","tags":[]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"Strongly support\" and states, \"We need to support LGBTQ+ students in the school systems.\" This is a clear endorsement of the proposed policies.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student support","nondiscrimination"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Absolutely support\" and argues there is \"no reason not to want to make our students... feel safe, supported and loved.\" They also criticize opposition to the policy and say we should \"embrace differences,\" indicating clear approval of the regulation.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","anti-discrimination","supportive schools"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly states \"Strongly support,\" which directly indicates approval of the proposed regulation. No contrary language or qualifications are included.","tone":"positive","tags":[]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I 100% support this!!!!\" and the title \"Pass This!\" clearly indicates approval of the proposed regulation. There is no qualifying language or criticism.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","transgender students","nondiscrimination"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly support this evidence-based policy\" and \"strongly encourage the VDOE\" to adopt it. They also argue the policy \"makes schools safer for our children,\" indicating clear approval of adoption.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","evidence-based policy","nondiscrimination"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.86,"stance_rationale":"The title explicitly says \"Strongly Support,\" which is a clear endorsement of the regulation. The body \"Stop playing around\" reads as a forceful push to proceed rather than reject the policy.","tone":"negative","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","transgender students","school policy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"strong opposition\" to the proposed policies and repeatedly urges Virginia to \"abandon\" them and \"return to the basics.\" They argue the policy is \"social engineering,\" undermines \"parental rights,\" and should not be adopted.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","free speech","transgender students","school policy","LGBTQ+ inclusion"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly support this guidance document\" and argues that it will help provide \"equal, respectful, and non-discriminatory treatment\" and a \"safe environment for ALL children.\" This is a clear endorsement of adoption.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","non-discrimination","transgender students","school climate"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly Support\" and argues that \"Transgender youth are deserving of the same support and respect\". They also endorse the schools becoming \"a supportive atmosphere\" for these students, indicating clear approval of the regulation.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student support","school climate","transgender students"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"STRONGLY SUPPORT\" and \"I strongly support these policies.\" They also argue that \"All youth MUST be protected,\" indicating approval of the regulation as a protective measure.","tone":"positive","tags":["transgender students","student safety","nondiscrimination","bullying prevention"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly titles the comment \"FULL SUPPORT\" and urges, \"Do not let hate win. Let the kids be who they are,\" which clearly endorses adopting the policy. The language is affirmative and supportive of transgender students.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student rights","anti-discrimination"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"STRONGLY SUPPORT\" and argues that \"Students need a space to feel safe to be themselves in school.\" The phrase \"These are BASIC HUMAN RIGHTS\" clearly endorses adoption of the policy.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","human rights"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly states, \"I support this,\" and the title says \"Strongly Support.\" There is no indication of any reservations or requested changes.","tone":"positive","tags":[]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The comment explicitly says \"STRONGLY SUPPORT,\" which clearly indicates approval of the proposed regulation. No contrary language or qualifications are present.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I cannot condone the policies\" and asks, \"Please avoid enacting the proposed policies,\" which clearly rejects adoption. They also argue the policies would create \"more safety violations\" and cause \"harassment and discomfort,\" reinforcing opposition.","tone":"negative","tags":["religious freedom","parental rights","student safety","privacy","LGBTQ+ inclusion"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly states \"Full Support\" and asks to \"please protect our trans youth.\" They also endorse \"the advancement of inclusion and ethical pedagogy,\" indicating approval of the proposed policies.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","transgender students","inclusion"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.96,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly endorses inclusive treatment by saying, \"I vow to be a teacher that teaches all\" and criticizes discrimination: \"Why are we still discriminating others?\" This indicates support for the regulation’s nondiscrimination and inclusion goals.","tone":"positive","tags":["nondiscrimination","LGBTQ+ inclusion","teacher support","student inclusion"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I fully support\" the proposed policies. The statement \"Basic human rights and protections are not a debate\" further indicates approval of the regulation's protections for transgender students.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","civil rights","student protections"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Fully Support\" and adds \"This should not even be up for debate, change is needed,\" which clearly endorses adoption of the regulation. There is no indication of opposition or neutrality.","tone":"positive","tags":["transgender students","policy support","school inclusion"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says the guidelines are \"highly concerning\" and that \"it must be rejected.\" Although they acknowledge the importance of safe spaces for students with gender dysphoria, their overall position is opposition because they object to excluding parents and to the proposed policy generally.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","gender identity","student privacy","transgender students","school policy"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Fully Support\" and adds that \"This is a good and right thing for our schools to do.\" They also thank the policy makers for \"protecting our students,\" indicating clear approval of the regulation.","tone":"positive","tags":["transgender students","student safety","nondiscrimination","school policy"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly support\" and praises the policy with \"About time!\". The phrase \"Inclusion and safety for all\" indicates approval of the regulation's goals and implementation.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","nondiscrimination"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"FULLY SUPPORT\" and adds that \"All youth must be protected and feel safe in schools regardless of how they identify!\" This clearly endorses the proposed transgender student policies.","tone":"positive","tags":["student safety","LGBTQ+ inclusion","nondiscrimination","bullying prevention"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly support this!\" which directly endorses the proposed regulation. The title, \"Strongly Support!,\" reinforces the same position.","tone":"positive","tags":["support","transgender students","school policy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I STRONGLY OPPOSE the Model Policies\" and argues the policies \"exclude parents,\" \"imposes behavior on teachers,\" and force conduct on children they and their families may oppose. These statements clearly reject adoption of the regulation and call it an unnecessary \"extreme.\"","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","religious freedom","teacher compliance","gender dysphoria","family autonomy"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Fully endorse,\" calls the guidance \"great\" and \"stellar,\" and thanks the authors for putting it together. They also ask for an expansion of protections for transgender student athletes, which indicates support for the regulation with a requested improvement rather than opposition.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","privacy","student safety","school sports","gender identity"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I do not agree with this, and strongly oppose\" and states they do not want the policy involved in schools. They also object to the regulation as \"radical\" and say it would \"confuse\" children, indicating rejection of adoption.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","school policy","parental rights","LGBTQ+ inclusion"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly Support\" and states that the policy is \"vital in protecting the most vulnerable student populations.\" They also argue that transgender students \"must be respected and protected by the school,\" which clearly endorses adoption of the regulation.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","nondiscrimination","bullying prevention"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly oppose\" and urges, \"Leave our children alone to learn,\" indicating rejection of the proposed transgender student policies. The phrase \"This social engineering is harming them\" further shows opposition and a negative view of the regulation's effects.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","parental rights","school policy","student welfare"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"Strongly oppose transgender policies\" and urges VDOE to \"drop the proposed transgender policies.\" They argue the policies violate parents' rights and create stress in locker rooms, indicating clear rejection rather than support or neutrality.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","religious freedom","privacy","school facilities","LGBTQ+ inclusion"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I absolutely support this!\" and frames the policy as needed support for transgender students. They also express personal approval based on their own experience: \"it means a LOT to me to see other kids like me get the support that they need.\"","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student support","transgender students","school climate"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I support!\" and \"I fully support the transgender community,\" which clearly endorses the regulation’s purpose. The statement that \"We shouldn't hate or shame these people\" further indicates approval of protections for transgender students.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","transgender students","anti-discrimination"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I support this guidance\" and adds that it \"helps provide direction\" in a way that is \"safe and supportive for all.\" This is a clear endorsement of adopting the regulation.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","supportive learning environment"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I support the guidance\" and adds that it \"helps provide direction\" in a way that is \"safe and supportive for all.\" This is a clear endorsement of adopting the regulation.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","supportive environment"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.86,"stance_rationale":"The commenter does not explicitly reject the regulation, but asks to \"recognize and respect the role of parents\" in school policies affecting children, which signals concern that the proposed transgender policies may not sufficiently include parental authority. This is best read as opposition to the regulation as written or a request to weaken it in favor of parental control.","tone":"neutral","tags":["parental rights","school policy","transgender students"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly oppose this type of dangerous legislation,\" which is a clear rejection of the proposed policies. They also describe it as intended to \"legislate immoral cultural movements,\" indicating substantive opposition rather than a request for changes.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","LGBTQ+ inclusion","school policy","moral opposition"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly oppose the draft model policies,\" which directly states opposition to adoption. They also argue the document does not \"sufficiently respect or protect the privacy rights of children,\" indicating a substantive objection rather than a request for minor changes.","tone":"negative","tags":["privacy","transgender students","student rights","school policy"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly support\" and adds that \"any and all should have equality, no exceptions,\" which clearly endorses the regulation. There is no language opposing or questioning the policy.","tone":"positive","tags":["equality","LGBTQ+ inclusion","nondiscrimination"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.84,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I am 'for' equal treatment and non-discrimination\" and \"I agree that guidelines are needed,\" which supports adopting the regulation. They do raise concerns about classroom order, pronoun enforcement, and withholding information from parents, but these are framed as requests to improve the policy rather than reject it.","tone":"mixed","tags":["equal treatment","non-discrimination","parental rights","teacher concerns","privacy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly rejects the policy, calling it \"ludicrous,\" \"insane,\" and saying schools should not \"address\" transgender identities. They also criticize schools for allegedly forcing \"correct & rational pronouns,\" indicating opposition to the regulation's transgender student protections and related guidance.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","pronouns","school policy","LGBTQ+ inclusion","parental rights"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly endorses the policy, asking rhetorically, \"Why would you not support this?\" and describing it as \"Evidence based\" and grounded in \"love and acceptance of others.\" This is a clear affirmative position on adoption.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","nondiscrimination","student privacy","supportive school environment"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Do NOT approve this\" and \"PLEASE DO NOT APPROVE THESE UNFAIR POLICIES!\" They describe the policy as \"inhumane, destructive and counterproductive\" and argue it violates parents' rights and harms students, indicating clear opposition to adoption.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","transgender students","privacy","school authority","student wellbeing"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter clearly rejects the proposal, calling it \"so insane\" and saying \"Thank God for private schools,\" which signals disapproval of adoption. The claim that it would cause \"uncontrolled voyeurism\" and violate \"an expected right to privacy\" indicates opposition based on privacy concerns.","tone":"negative","tags":["privacy","transgender students","school facilities","student safety"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly OPPOSE this measure,\" which directly indicates rejection of the regulation. They also argue it is \"harmful to society\" and \"DISCRIMINATORY,\" reinforcing opposition rather than support or neutrality.","tone":"negative","tags":["religious freedom","parental rights","LGBTQ+ inclusion","discrimination"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly oppose this as a parent and an educator,\" which directly states opposition to the regulation. They also object to school involvement in transgender-related issues and express concern about same-sex bathroom and locker room access, indicating they want the policy rejected rather than adopted.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","educator concerns","bathroom access","locker room access","transgender students"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says they are \"strongly AGAINST the VDOE transgender policies\" and asks, \"Please do not let this move forward!\" This is a clear call to reject the regulation, framed as a warning that it is \"extremely dangerous\" and will cause harm.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","student safety","girls' safety","school policy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I am opposed to the Treatment of Transgender policies\" and asks, \"Please don’t pass these policies!\" This is a clear rejection of the regulation as proposed. The phrase \"more hurtful than helpful\" further indicates opposition rather than a request for modification.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","school policy","student welfare"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly oppose this policy\" and repeatedly urges that it should not be taught or adopted, calling it \"propaganda\" and saying any attempt to bypass parents \"should be immediately dismissed.\" The comment argues the policy is harmful to parental rights, religion, and science, which clearly indicates opposition to the regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","religious freedom","LGBTQ+ inclusion","student privacy","school curriculum"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I fully support any and all efforts to improve transgender student rights, services and support.\" They also urge the state to \"make Virginia a safer and welcoming place for transgender youth,\" which clearly endorses the regulation's purpose.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","transgender rights","support services"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly Oppose!\" and asks officials to reconsider the policy because it is \"not good for our students, staff or community.\" They also frame it as benefiting \"one small group,\" indicating rejection of the regulation rather than support or neutrality.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","school policy","community impact","student welfare"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"Completely Against this policy!\" which directly rejects adoption of the regulation. The phrase \"This is an outrage!\" reinforces a strongly negative opposition to the proposed policies.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","policy opposition"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly oppose any and all Virginia Department of Education policy initiatives\" and rejects \"recognition and special treatment of self identified transgender students.\" They also argue the policy should be replaced with \"mental health services,\" indicating opposition to the regulation as written.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","public schools","mental health services","political opposition","student rights"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"IN FULL SUPPORT\" and \"I whole hardly support this initiative.\" They also endorse the policy’s premise by stating their child deserves a \"supportive and caring environment\" and that their child’s identified gender should not affect others' freedoms.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student support","school climate","nondiscrimination"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly argues against the policies, saying they are \"likely causing future harm,\" create \"more problems than providing solutions,\" and that they \"don't see how current policies fail to protect them.\" The comment repeatedly criticizes the guidance on bathrooms, pronouns, and discrimination protections rather than supporting adoption.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","parental rights","bathroom access","privacy","bullying prevention"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I do support the guidance\" and gives a reason favoring adoption: \"all people should be treated with respect, dignity and kindness.\" This is a clear endorsement of the proposed policies.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student dignity","nondiscrimination"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"Strongly oppose this guidance,\" which directly states opposition to adoption. They also argue it is \"morally wrong\" and will have harmful societal effects, reinforcing that they want the policy rejected.","tone":"negative","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","family values","morality","social concerns"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I fully oppose this guidance,\" which directly states their position. They also criticize the policy’s pronoun provisions and gender-identity definitions, calling it \"madness\" to consider discipline under it.","tone":"negative","tags":["pronouns","discipline","gender identity","LGBTQ+ inclusion","school policy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly oppose these transgender policies,\" which directly rejects adoption of the regulation. They also argue it will \"endanger all students,\" create a hostile environment, and is \"too difficult\" and \"not practical,\" reinforcing opposition.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender policies","student safety","religious freedom","teacher burden","curriculum concerns"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly rejects the policy, calling it \"UNCONSTITUTIONAL\" and \"OUT OF SCOPE for VDOE.\" They argue it should not be instituted and say \"No policy should be instituted\" that forces these changes, which is clear opposition to adoption.","tone":"negative","tags":["constitutional objections","religious freedom","parental rights","school sports","gender identity"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I do not support this!\" and adds \"Oppose transgender student policies,\" which directly rejects the proposed regulation. There is no indication of support or neutrality.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","school policy","LGBTQ+ inclusion"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly oppose these documents\" and argues against \"self declaration of transgender and treatment of transgender students.\" They also claim the policy will \"endanger all students\" and has \"far reaching adverse consequences,\" indicating clear rejection of the regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","student safety","transgender policy","school guidance"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says the proposals are a \"clear violation of parental rights\" and concludes that \"these proposals should be abandoned in their entirety.\" They repeatedly argue the policies are harmful, calling them \"ludicrous,\" \"devastatingly destructive,\" and a threat to student safety and family relationships.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","privacy","student safety","pronoun policy","bathroom access"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly rejects the policy, saying \"don't confuse helpless children\" and \"do not demand that school employees lie about the sex of anyone.\" They argue for separate facilities and sports by sex and call the guidance harmful, \"child abuse,\" indicating opposition to adoption of the transgender student policies.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","bathroom access","school sports","privacy","First Amendment"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I support protections for trans students in Virginia!\" This directly endorses the proposed policies and their protections for transgender students.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","nondiscrimination"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I support the proposed protections\" and adds, \"I am glad to see these proposals to protect our students in the LGBTQ+ community.\" This clearly endorses adoption of the regulation. The remark about \"science community's views on gender\" is supportive of the policy rather than opposing it.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student protections","nondiscrimination"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly rejects the policy, saying \"STOP THE INDOCTRINATION NOW!\" and \"LEAVE OUR CHILDREN ALONE!\" They argue the guidance is \"child abuse,\" violates privacy and First Amendment rights, and should not be adopted because it would promote gender dysphoria and allow shared facilities/sports participation.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","LGBTQ+ inclusion","privacy","school sports","bathroom access"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly Oppose VDOE's Transgender Guidelines\" and asks officials to \"oppose this and do not let anything resembling it move forward at all.\" The body argues the policy is \"extremely dangerous\" and would cause harm, indicating clear rejection of the regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","parental rights","student safety","religious freedom","LGBTQ+ inclusion"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I fully support this guidance,\" which directly endorses adoption. They also praise the policy goals, saying schools should \"accept\" children and be \"safe for them\" and should \"respect diversity and value equity.\"","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","diversity","equity"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"Please reject these transgender guidelines 100%,\" which is a direct call to not adopt the regulation. The title, \"Reject these transgender guidelines,\" reinforces the same position.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender policies","school guidance","LGBTQ+ inclusion"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I support this guidance\" and gives a reason favoring adoption: \"every student deserves a school environment that is safe and welcoming for everyone.\" This is a clear endorsement of the regulation as proposed.","tone":"positive","tags":["student safety","LGBTQ+ inclusion","school climate"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly oppose\" and asks the agency to \"vote NO on this,\" which clearly rejects the proposed policies. The language about \"eradicate all distinctions between male and female\" and \"indoctrinate our school children\" indicates opposition to adoption.","tone":"negative","tags":["gender identity","transgender students","school policy","parental concerns","indoctrination"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Totally opposed to all\" and \"Stop this insanity,\" which clearly rejects the proposed policies. The rest of the comment is abusive language directed at transgender people and the regulation's supporters, reinforcing opposition rather than support or neutrality.","tone":"negative","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","transgender students","school policy","discrimination"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly oppose the proposed gender policies!\" This is a clear rejection of the regulation with no qualifying support or suggested revisions.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","gender policy","opposition"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Reject\" and \"Strongly oppose!\", which clearly indicates they do not want the regulation adopted. There is no qualifying language suggesting support or neutrality.","tone":"negative","tags":[]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"Please vote NO!\" and repeatedly argues the policy creates problems, including discomfort in \"intimate spaces,\" objections to accommodations, and claims it is \"not equitable.\" They also object to transgender-related assemblies and curriculum, saying it \"should not be part of regular social studies curriculum.\"","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","bathroom access","privacy","religious freedom","curriculum"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I am strongly opposed to this whole set of regulations,\" which clearly rejects the proposed policies. The phrase \"re: transgender in our schools\" indicates opposition to the regulation as a whole rather than a request for changes.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","public schools","regulatory opposition"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly disagree with schools adopting gender-neutral policies\" and repeatedly argues schools should not adopt these policies. They call the proposal \"outrageous\" and say it should be handled by families rather than schools or government.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","religious freedom","teacher rights","student safety","LGBTQ+ inclusion"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I am in full support of these polices\" and endorses them as helping transgender students feel \"safe and included at school.\" They also frame the policies as consistent with their professional ethics and equal treatment for all students.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","equal rights","school climate"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter says they are \"in full support of the Virginia Depart of Education’s guidelines\" and explicitly endorses the guidance as helpful and protective. They also praise the effort, saying it will \"provide consistent guidelines across the state\" and \"protect the future.\"","tone":"positive","tags":["student safety","LGBTQ+ inclusion","nondiscrimination","school policy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"oppose\" and argues the policy \"could be easily abused\" and lead to unfair disciplinary action over pronouns. They also suggest schools should focus on existing bullying problems instead of adopting this guidance, indicating rejection of the regulation.","tone":"negative","tags":["pronouns","bullying prevention","student privacy","disciplinary action","transgender students"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I fully support this as it is a step in the right direction,\" and frames the policy as protecting children and creating a \"supportive environment.\" There is no indication of opposition; the comment endorses adoption of the regulation as written.","tone":"positive","tags":["transgender students","student safety","supportive environment","bullying prevention","LGBTQ+ inclusion"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"We ABSOLUTELY need to support this policy\" and urges adoption to \"protect our young trans folx from bullying and harassment.\" The rest of the comment reinforces approval of the policy's inclusivity goals.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","bullying prevention","student safety","inclusivity"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly support our trans youth\" and asks to \"Please vote to support this legislation.\" They frame the policy as necessary to make students \"feel safe & accepted at school,\" indicating clear approval of adoption.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","bullying prevention","mental health"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly states \"FULLY SUPPORT,\" which clearly endorses adoption of the guidance document. No objections, qualifications, or requests for changes are included.","tone":"positive","tags":[]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly states \"FULLY SUPPORT\" and repeats \"Fully Support,\" leaving no ambiguity about their position on the regulation. There are no qualifying concerns or requests for changes.","tone":"positive","tags":[]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"Our Transgender community needs to be supported\" and urges schools to be \"supportive of them\" and \"doing everything in their power\" to help. This clearly endorses the regulation’s goal of supporting transgender students rather than opposing it.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","mental health","supportive schools"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I fully support these common sense guidelines,\" which directly endorses adoption of the regulation. The phrase \"making sure ALL students are safe and welcome at school\" reinforces approval of the policy's goals.","tone":"positive","tags":["student safety","LGBTQ+ inclusion","nondiscrimination","school climate"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I strongly urge Virginia to adopt the guidance document change\" and repeatedly endorses \"non-discriminatory, inclusive\" guidance. The comment argues the policy is needed to protect students from \"bigotry, discrimination, bullying, and transphobia,\" indicating clear support for adoption.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","nondiscrimination","student safety","bullying prevention","privacy"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I am in full support of the proposed guidance\" and closes with \"Please pass the proposed guidance.\" They also frame the policy as protecting transgender students from discrimination and supporting their right to education.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student rights","anti-discrimination","education access"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I fully support this evidence-based, common sense guidance\" and calls the policies \"a necessary step in ensuring equity for all students across Virginia.\" The comment advocates adoption of the model policies to protect LGBTQ+ students and create a safer school environment.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","equity","bullying prevention","school climate"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Oppose proposed Transgender Policies\" and repeatedly argues the policy \"would open up a Pandora's box of problems\" and \"is not in the best interests of our children.\" They also object that it \"completely take[s] the parents out of the picture,\" indicating rejection of the regulation as written.","tone":"negative","tags":["parental rights","transgender students","student mental health","privacy","school policy"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"Strongly oppose!\" and argues to \"keep the distinctions between genders for our children,\" which indicates rejection of the proposed transgender student policies. The comment does not request modifications; it opposes the regulation's underlying approach.","tone":"negative","tags":["gender distinctions","transgender students","school policy"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"100% support\" and urges the standards be \"completely support[ed].\" They frame the policy as providing \"basic decency to transgender students\" and say it is \"long overdue,\" which clearly endorses adoption.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","transgender students","bullying prevention"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I fully support this common sense guidance\" and gives a reason favoring adoption: \"all students are entitled to a safe and non-discriminatory learning environment.\" This is a clear endorsement of the proposed policies.","tone":"positive","tags":["student safety","nondiscrimination","LGBTQ+ inclusion","supportive learning environment"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly states \"100% support\" and adds \"This is necessary guidance,\" which clearly endorses adoption of the regulation. There is no indication of reservations or alternative requests.","tone":"positive","tags":["transgender students","school policy","nondiscrimination"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly rejects the policy, calling it \"Orwellian BS\" and saying \"Stop indoctrinating the next generation.\" They also state that \"This proposed change is designed to drive a wedge between Americans,\" which clearly indicates opposition to adoption.","tone":"negative","tags":["transgender students","gender identity","school policy","parental rights","indoctrination"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly states \"Support, 100%\" and argues that acceptance reduces harm, citing that \"suicides decrease with acceptance.\" This clearly indicates approval of the proposed transgender student policies.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","mental health","anti-discrimination"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.98,"stance_rationale":"The commenter rejects the policy outright, opening with \"No way\" and arguing to \"fight to support our Christian values\" against the regulation. They frame it as government overreach that would \"stop government telling a parent how to parent\" and claim the state is trying to \"erase everything that we stand for,\" indicating opposition to adoption.","tone":"negative","tags":["religious freedom","parental rights","government overreach","transgender students"]}


{"stance":"oppose","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I oppose this current proposal of Transgender policies for VA school systems!!\" This is a clear rejection of the regulation, and the statement that it \"totally goes against our creator GOD\" reinforces opposition on religious grounds.","tone":"negative","tags":["religious freedom","transgender policies","public schools"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says \"SUPPORT\" and states that the legislation is \"very helpful.\" They also express approval of protections for transgender individuals, saying they \"deserve the basic respect of everyone.\"","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student rights","nondiscrimination"]}


{"stance":"support","stance_confidence":0.99,"stance_rationale":"The commenter explicitly says, \"I wholeheartedly support the guidance document\" and argues that inclusive policies are appropriate for schools. They also state that schools should \"be part of the solution, not part of the problem,\" which clearly endorses adoption.","tone":"positive","tags":["LGBTQ+ inclusion","student safety","bullying prevention","mental health","school policy"]}